1. Moll K, Kunze S, Neuhoff N, Bruder J, Schulte-Körne G. Specific learning disorder: prevalence and gender differences. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e103537. [
DOI]
2. Rosário P, Núñez JC, Valle A, González-Pienda J, Lourenço A. Grade level, study time, and grade retention and their effects on motivation, self-regulated learning strategies, and mathematics achievement: a structural equation model. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2013;28(4):1311–31. [
DOI]
3. Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich PR. The role of self-efficacy beliefs instudent engagement and learning intheclassroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2003;19(2):119–37. [
DOI]
4. Montague M. Self-Regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 2008;31(1):37–44. [
DOI]
5. de Boer H, Donker AS, Kostons DDNM, van der Werf GPC. Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. 2018;24:98–115. [
DOI]
6. Cartwright KB, Coppage EA, Lane AB, Singleton T, Marshall TR, Bentivegna C. Cognitive flexibility deficits in children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2017;50:33–44. [
DOI]
7. Mesrabadi J, Erfani Abab E. Meta-Analysis of the relationship between learning strategies and academic achievement. Cognitive Strtegies in Learning. 2014;2(2):97–118. [Persian] [
Article]
8. Brouwer KL. Writing motivation of students with language impairments. Child Language Teaching and Therapy. 2012;28(2):189–210. [
DOI]
9. Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH. Motivation: An Essential Dimension of Self-Regulated Learning. In: Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. Mahwah, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2008.
10. Abedini Y, Bagherian R, Kadkhodaie MS. The relation among motivational beliefs, cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic achievement: Testing of alternative models. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2010;12(3):34–48. [Persian] [
Article]
11. Erfani N. The intermediary role of learning motivation in predicting academic achievement based on the students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2017;14(26):167–98. [Persian] [
DOI]
12. Joo Y-J, Bong M, Choi H-J. Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. ETR&D. 2000;48(2):5–17. [
DOI]
13. Harputlu L, Ceylan E. The Effects of Motivation and Metacognitive Strategy Use on EFL Listening Proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;158:124–31. [
DOI]
14. Lee J, Zentall SS. Reading motivation and later reading achievement for students with reading disabilities and comparison groups (ADHD and typical): A 3-year longitudinal study. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2017;50:60–71. [
DOI]
15. Bostrom L, Lassen LM. Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and meta-cognition. Education & Training. 2006;48:178–89.
16. Seyf AA. Modern Educational Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Instructoin. Tehran: Doran Publication; 2015, pp:202–55. [Persian]
17. Shooshtari M. Investigating standardization, of cognition and metacognition strategies questionnaire of mcinroy and dawson on junior high school students of Isfahan city. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2013;4(14):169–86. [Persian] [
Article]
18. Saghi S, Chalibanlou G, Fazel A, Mohammadi M. A study of the relationship between learning styles and academic achievement with mediating of Meta cognitive awareness among the university students. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation. 2011;4(13):79–94. [Persian] [
Article]
19. Arami Z, Manshaee GR, Abedi A, Sharifee T. The comparison of motivational beliefs, metacognitive skills and self-regulation learning between gifted & ordinary students of the city of Isfahan. New Educational Approaches. 2016;11(2):59–70. [Persian] [
DOI]
