Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 99 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, University of Tehran
2- Department of Educational Administration and Planning, University of Tehran
3- Department of Psychology, University of Kharazmi
Abstract:   (2383 Views)
Background & Objectives: It is hypothesized that there are deficiencies in the Executive Functions (EF) as well as specific–domains of mathematics learning, as the substructure of mathematical learning disabilities. Furthermore, there is a lack of process–based interventional programs, i.e., specially designed to use numerical and arithmetic materials for students with mathematical learning disabilities. Therefore, the present study aimed to design and validate a process–based program for enhancing EF in students with learning disabilities in mathematics, i.e., called "Farayesh."
Methods: The intervention program was designed after studying EF theoretical models and task paradigms. The Farayesh program was generated based on Diamond's EF theoretical model (2013) in three components of working memory, inhibition, and switching. The program training approach was process–based, and tasks’ content implements numerical materials and arithmetic processes. The Farayesh was presented in the form of 12 tasks with parallel forms. Four complex span tasks contain categorization span, subtraction span, computation span, and numerical dot–matrix used for working memory component. Four tasks comprise number–word Stroop, number–digit Stroop, size–magnitude Stroop, and stop–signal designed for inhibition component; four tasks are used for switching contain addition–subtraction switching, larger–than–smaller switching (with two rules), number–digit switching, and ones–tens switching. The face and content validity of the program was estimated using the views of 8 experts by the Content Validity Ratio (CVR). For assessing the effects of the program, a quasi–experimental research with a pretest–posttest and an active control group design was used. The research population comprised all third– and fourth–grade students with mathematical learning disabilities in governmental centers for individuals with learning disabilities in Ahvaz City, Iran. In total, 30 students were selected using a purposive sampling method and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received 17 sessions of the Farayesh program; however, the control group received their routine schedules. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC–IV) and IRAN KEY–MATH Test of Mathematics was used for recruiting eligible students. Scores, completion time, and the number of errors of the 12 tasks were considered as the pretest and posttest values to assess working memory, inhibition, and switching. The obtained data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in SPSS at the significance level of α=0.05.
Results: The obtained data indicated the high reliability and validity of the process–based program of executive function (Farayesh) for students with mathematical learning disabilities. The CVR for all tasks was higher than those of the Lawshe table (CVR>0.75). Thus, the content validity of the program was established. The Farayesh program improved the frequency of correct responses of working memory (p<0.001) and reduced completion time and error in switching (p<0.001) and inhibition tasks (p<0.001) in the experimental group, compared with the controls.
Conclusion: The "Farayesh" program with a process–based approach to teaching core EFs (i.e., working memory, inhibition, & switching) and with a math–specific domain content could be used to stimulate and optimize the pre–existing cognitive capacity of students with mathematical learning disabilities. Implementing this program could improve dysexecutive functions in this group. Additionally, the present study result was consistent with the brain plasticity theory. In other words, it approved that with a sufficient amount of time and effort of cognitive exercises, the inherent capacity of biological, cognitive systems could be eliminated. The Farayesh program could be used as a preventive and therapeutic cost–effective intervention, i.e., especially for children with learning disabilities. The process–based program, "Farayesh," used for improving EFs, is recommended for educational, clinical, and therapeutic use in schools and rehabilitation centers due to its high reliability and validity.
 
Full-Text [PDF 534 kb]   (573 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. de Lima RF, Azoni CAS, Ciasca SM. Attentional performance and executive functions in children with learning difficulties. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2011;24(4):685–91.
2. Faulkenberry T, Geye T. The Cognitive Origins of Mathematics Learning Disability: A Review. The Rehabilitation Professional. 2014;22:9–16.
3. Hassinger-Das B, Jordan NC, Glutting J, Irwin C, Dyson N. Domain-general mediators of the relation between kindergarten number sense and first-grade mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014;118:78–92. [DOI]
4. Toll SWM, Van der Ven SHG, Kroesbergen EH, Van Luit JEH. Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2011;44(6):521–32. [DOI]
5. Dias NM, Seabra AG. Intervention for executive functions development in early elementary school children: effects on learning and behaviour, and follow-up maintenance. Educational Psychology. 2017;37(4):468–86. [DOI]
6. Geary DC. Mathematics and Learning Disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 2004;37(1):4–15. [DOI]
7. Cattell RB. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1963;54(1):1–22. [DOI]
8. Noack H, Lövdén M, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. Cognitive plasticity in adulthood and old age: gauging the generality of cognitive intervention effects. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;27(5):435–53. [DOI]
9. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2005;28:377–401. [DOI]
10. Kray J, Ferdinand NK. How to improve cognitive control in development during childhood: Potentials and limits of cognitive interventions. Child Dev Perspect. 2013;7(2):121–5. [DOI]
11. Karbach J. Plasticity of executive functions in childhood and adolescence: Effects of cognitive training interventions. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento. 2015;7(1):64–70.
12. Nazari S, Hassanzadeh S, Shokoohi-Yekta M, Kharrazi SK, Farzad V. Conditions of effectiveness and near and far transfer effects of executive function’s interventions: systematic review. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:12. [Persian] [Article]
13. Kroesbergen EH, van ’t Noordende JE, Kolkman ME. Training working memory in kindergarten children: effects on working memory and early numeracy. Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(1):23–37. [DOI]
14. Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2015;13(12):1153–70. [Persian] [Article]
15. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135–68. [DOI]
16. Exceptional Education Organization. Wechsler Children's Intelligence Scale. 4th ed. Tehran: Exceptional Education Organization; 2018. [Persian]
17. Mohammad Esmaeil E. Azmoon Riaziat Iran KeyMath [Iranian Mathematical Test of Keymath]. Tehran: Exceptional Education Organization; 2002. [Persian]
18. Delavar A. Educational and psychological Research. Tehran: Virayesh Publication; 2006, pp: 99. [Persian]
19. Shipstead Z, Redick TS, Engle RW. Is working memory training effective? Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):628–54. [DOI]
20. Chein JM, Morrison AB. Expanding the mind’s workspace: training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010;17(2):193–9. [DOI]
21. Karbach J, Unger K. Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence. Front Psychol. 2014;5:390. [DOI]
22. Liu Q, Zhu X, Ziegler A, Shi J. The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):14200. [DOI]
23. Bull R, Lee K. Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Dev Perspect. 2014;8(1):36–41. [DOI]
24. Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(2):270–91. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.