Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 23 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- General Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch
2- Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University
3- Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch
4- Department of Psychology, Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract:   (2934 Views)
Background & Objectives: Marital conflicts are among the major problems in societies, which harm the structures of families and cause behavioral and psychological problems in children. The present study aimed to examine the mediating role of marital conflict in the relationship between attachment styles, narcissism and sensation seeking, and marital burnout. 
Methods: A correlational method based on structural equation modeling was used in this research. The sample population was the couples that were married for 5 years, referring to consulting centers in the second and third quarters of 2018 to solve their marital conflicts. In total, 100 couples were selected through convenience sampling method. They completed the following questionnaires: 1) Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI–40, Ruskin and Terry, 1988), Ruskin and Hull developed the main version of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM–III). Moreover, it consists of 40 pairs and 7 items (authority, self–sufficiency, superiority seeking, self–display, exploitation, pride, & nicknaming); the obtained points of each person implicate the presence or lack of one of the attributes. The experimental studies have supported the reliability of it (Ruskin and Terry, 1988; Ackerman et al., 2011). 2) The Marital Conflict Questionnaire (MCQ, Sanaei & Barati, 2000) that consists of 54 items and 7 subscales about decreased cooperation decreased sexual relationships, drawing more support from children, more personal relationships with kinsmen, reduced family relationships with the family of spouse and friends, less effective relation with the spouse, and the separation of financial matters from the spouse. The results of several studies have supported the validity and reliability of this scale (Zahed Babolan, Husseini Shurabeh, Piri, and Dehghan, 2015). 3) In the adult version of the Attachment Style Scale, (AAS–R, Collins & Reid,1990), Collins and Reid (1990) have emphasized the differentiation logic of Hazan and Shiver about attachment styles (secure, anxious, & avoidant children) described the discrimination of three attachment styles in the adult version; the sum of the scores of the subjects in each subscale is calculated in that subscale as their general score. Various studies have supported the technical aspects of the adult version (Collins and Reid, 1990; Pakdaman, 2011). 4) The Marital Burnout Questionnaire (MBQ, Paniz, 1996) includes 21 questions answered on a 7–point scale with three components of emotional tiredness, psychological tiredness, and physical tiredness. For explaining the obtained scores, the score of each participant is divided by the total number of questions of the tool (21 questions). The score of each dimension of burnout indicates an increased level of marital burnout. 5) Zuckerman's Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS–1979) is a multidimensional tool, i.e., composed of 4 different aspects (subscales). These dimensions are thrill and adventure seeking, disinhibition, experience–seeking, and boredom susceptibility. Each subscale contains 10 items, making a total of 40 items. Every pair of items determines if a participant is a sensation seeker or not. The experimental studies have supported this scale’s reliability (Zuckerman 1994; Zuckerman 2007).
Results: is the present study results suggested a significant relationship between secure attachment style (β=–0.17, p=0.027), avoidant attachment style (β=0.21, p=0.016), anxiety (β=0.48, p≤0.001), narcissism (β=0.30, p=0.008), sensation seeking (β=0.25, p=0.010), marital conflict (β=0.75, p≤0.001), and marital burnout. The fitness test of the structural equation model and the fitness of the final model revealed that the fitness indices were CFI=0.93, GFI=0.93, AGFI=0.90, and RMSEA=0.063, indicating a proper fit for the model and the relevant data.
Conclusion: According to the obtained data, it is necessary to provide educational workshops and interventions to reduce divorce and marital conflicts and to modify the confronting guidelines.
Full-Text [PDF 668 kb]   (1456 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Beam CR, Marcus K, Turkheimer E, Emery RE. Gender differences in the structure of marital quality. Behav Genet. 2018;48:209-23. [DOI]
2. Sheppard KE, Boon SD. Predicting appraisals of romantic revenge: The roles of honesty-humility, agreeableness and vengefulness. Pers Individ Dif. 2012;52(2):128-32. [DOI]
3. Feeney JA, Karantzas GC. Couple conflict: Insights from an attachment perspective. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:60–4. [DOI]
4. Rezapour R, Zakeri MM, Ebrahimi L. Prediction of narcissism, perception of social interactions and marital conflicts based on the use of social networks. Journal of Family Research. 2017;13(2):197-214. [Persian] [DOI]
5. Motahari Z, Behzadpour S, Sohrabi F. Describing the level of marital conflict according to sensation seeking and endurance in couples. Woman and Study of Family. 2013;20(6):105-22 [Persian]
6. Ackerman RA, Donnellan MB, Roberts BW, Fraley RC. The effect of response format on the psychometric properties of the narcissistic personality inventory: Consequences for item meaning and factor structure. Assessment. 2016;23(2): 203–20. [DOI]
7. Kochaki Amirhendeh M, Karbalayi A, Sabet M. The mediating role of anger rumination and self-criticism rumination in relationship between disaffection and marital violence. Andishe va Raftar. 2017;12(43):47-56. [Persian]
8. Pines AM, Nunes R. The relationship between career and couple burnout: Implications for career and couple counseling. J Employ Couns. 2011;40(2):50-64. [DOI]
9. Ajeli Lahiji L, Besharat MA. Prediction of family function and life quality based on the attachment styles of couples. Journal of Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment. 2018;3(2):119-38. [Persian] [Article]
10. Safipouriyan S, Ghadami A, Khakpour M, Sodani M, Mehrafarid M. The effect of group counseling using interpersonal therapy (IPT) in reducing marital boredom in female divorce applicants. Journal of Nursing Education. 2016;5(1):1-11. [Persian] [Article]
11. Pines AM, Neal MB, Hammer LB, Icekson T. Job burnout and couple burnout in dual-earner couples in the sandwiched generation. Soc Psychol Q. 2011;74(4):361-86. [DOI]
12. Shiota MN, Levenson RW. Birds of a feather don`t always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative material satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychol Aging. 2007;22(4):666-75. [DOI]
13. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. First Edition. New York, USA: Hillsdale NJ Erlbaul; 1978. [DOI]
14. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(3):511-24. [DOI]
15. Kajbaf M, Neshatdust H, Khaloei G. A study of the relationship between sensation seeking and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology and Personality. 2005;1(10):69-78. [Persian] [Article]
16. Chin WW. Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 1998;22(1):vii-xvi. [Article]
17. Sanayi B, Alaghemend S, Falahati Sh, Hooman A. Family and Marriage Scales. First edition. Tehran: Besat; 2000. [Persian]
18. Kiani Chalmari A, Asadi S, Esmaeili F, Zavar M. Prediction of marital burnout based on emotional expressivness and marital attributions in married people referring to the welfare. Journal of Counseling Research. 2016;15(59):58-75. [Persian] [Article]
19. Zuckerman M. Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality. 1979;47(2):245-87. [DOI]
20. Mahboubi M, Maleki M, Mardanihamooleh M. The relationship between sensation seeking variables and job stress in emergency medicine workers. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2012;16(2):e78827. [Persian]
21. Saffarinia M, Shaqaqi F, Maleki B. A preliminary investigation of psychometric properties of narcissistic personality inventory (NPI-4). Clinical Psychology Studies. 2012;2(8):71-92 [Persian]
22. Collins NL, Read SJ. Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. In: Bartholomew K, Perlman D. Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood. London, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 1994,pp:53–90.
23. Komijani M. Comparison of attachment styles in normal teenagers and educable teenagers with mental retardation. Science and Research in Applied Psychology. Islamic Azad University of Khorasgan. 2009;42:69-91. [Persian]
24. Mohammadalipoor Z, Rostami M, Ghaemmaghami M. Attachment styles and risky behaviors. Journal of Research on Addiction. 2010;4(15):83-90. [Persian] [Article]
25. Lavner JA, Lamkin J, Miller JD, Campbell WK, Karney BR. Narcissism and newlywed marriage: Partner characteristics and marital trajectories. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2016;7(2):169–79. [DOI]
26. Lamkin J, Lavner JA, Shaffer A. Narcissism and observed communication in couples. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;105:224–8. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.