Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 20 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahmadi Z, Bazzazian S, Tajeri B, Rajab A. Laughter Therapy on Self-Compassion and Hyperglycemia in the Elderly with Type 2 Diabetes. MEJDS 2020; 10 :20-20
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1805-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1805-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University
4- Head of Iranian Diabetes Association
2- Department of Psychology, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University
4- Head of Iranian Diabetes Association
Abstract: (2237 Views)
Background & Objectives: The elderly population is increasing due to important reasons, like decreased mortality rate resulting from advances in medical sciences, health, and education, and subsequently increased life expectancy globally. Aging is associated with various biopsychosocial aspects. The prevalence of no communicable diseases, like diabetes, increases with age and reaches its maximum in the elderly. Diabetes is among the most prevalent metabolic disorders, especially in the elderly. Diabetes has debilitating and dangerous effects on the vital organs of the body. Moreover, due to deficiency in insulin secretion, blood glucose levels of the patient is significantly increased; the most frequent symptom of diabetes is glucose intolerance or hyperglycemia. Accordingly, the patient encounters short– and long–term complications of diabetes. One of such problems in the elderly is the odds of the occurrence of another concomitant disease that complicates blood glucose level control. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of laughter therapy on self–compassion and hypoglycemia in the elderly with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental research with a pretest–posttest, follow–up, and a control group design. The statistical population of the study consisted of 60– to 75–year–old patients with type 2 diabetes, referring to the Iranian Diabetes Association treatment centers in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. The study participants were voluntarily selected, 36 of whom were randomly divided into two groups (laughter therapy=18; control group=18). The criterion for the selection of sample size was an effect size of 0.25, alpha of 0.05, and power of 0.80 in both study groups. The minimum sample size was 18 per group. The study participants were selected from three treatment centers, and 15 were chosen from each center. The required data were obtained by the Self–Compassion Scale (SCS, Neff, 2003) and glycated hemoglobin test (HbA1c). The experimental group received 8 sessions of laughter therapy, and no intervention was provided to the control group. The follow–up test was performed two months after the end of the training period. The inclusion criteria were ≥1 year of type 2 diabetes according to a physician’s approval, hemoglobin A1c level of ≥6%, minimum high–school diploma education, moderate socioeconomic status, receiving no concurrent psychological treatment, no acute or chronic medical illnesses, such as epilepsy, skeletal diseases, cardiovascular failure, etc. which could cause problems in blood sampling and attending meetings, no severe mental illnesses, such as psychotic disorders and sensory impairment, no current use of psychotropic drugs or substance abuse, as well as no severe diabetes complications (e.g., nausea, & undergoing kidney dialysis, etc.) that could lead to hospitalization. Absence from >2 therapeutic sessions and the occurrence of major stress due to unpredicted events were also considered as the exclusion criteria. The acquired data were analyzed by repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of p<0.05 in SPSS.
Results: The obtained results revealed that laughter therapy increased self–compassion (p<0.001) and reduced blood glucose level (p<0.001) in the posttest phase; the treatment effects retained after two months (p<0.001). The posttest scores of the self–compassion components in the experimental group were relatively higher than those of the pretest stage. In other words, the intervention significantly improved compassion variables in the experimental group. The relevant findings also indicated that the self–compassion scores of the follow–up phase significantly increased in the experimental group, and blood glucose levels significantly decreased in the experimental group.
Conclusion: The present study evaluated the effectiveness of laughter therapy on self–compassion and hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The collected results demonstrated that laughter therapy could improve the study subjects’ compassion and blood glucose level. Thus, laughter therapy is effective on self–compassion and hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and could be used by clinicians to improve the health status of patients with diabetes.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental research with a pretest–posttest, follow–up, and a control group design. The statistical population of the study consisted of 60– to 75–year–old patients with type 2 diabetes, referring to the Iranian Diabetes Association treatment centers in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. The study participants were voluntarily selected, 36 of whom were randomly divided into two groups (laughter therapy=18; control group=18). The criterion for the selection of sample size was an effect size of 0.25, alpha of 0.05, and power of 0.80 in both study groups. The minimum sample size was 18 per group. The study participants were selected from three treatment centers, and 15 were chosen from each center. The required data were obtained by the Self–Compassion Scale (SCS, Neff, 2003) and glycated hemoglobin test (HbA1c). The experimental group received 8 sessions of laughter therapy, and no intervention was provided to the control group. The follow–up test was performed two months after the end of the training period. The inclusion criteria were ≥1 year of type 2 diabetes according to a physician’s approval, hemoglobin A1c level of ≥6%, minimum high–school diploma education, moderate socioeconomic status, receiving no concurrent psychological treatment, no acute or chronic medical illnesses, such as epilepsy, skeletal diseases, cardiovascular failure, etc. which could cause problems in blood sampling and attending meetings, no severe mental illnesses, such as psychotic disorders and sensory impairment, no current use of psychotropic drugs or substance abuse, as well as no severe diabetes complications (e.g., nausea, & undergoing kidney dialysis, etc.) that could lead to hospitalization. Absence from >2 therapeutic sessions and the occurrence of major stress due to unpredicted events were also considered as the exclusion criteria. The acquired data were analyzed by repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at the significance level of p<0.05 in SPSS.
Results: The obtained results revealed that laughter therapy increased self–compassion (p<0.001) and reduced blood glucose level (p<0.001) in the posttest phase; the treatment effects retained after two months (p<0.001). The posttest scores of the self–compassion components in the experimental group were relatively higher than those of the pretest stage. In other words, the intervention significantly improved compassion variables in the experimental group. The relevant findings also indicated that the self–compassion scores of the follow–up phase significantly increased in the experimental group, and blood glucose levels significantly decreased in the experimental group.
Conclusion: The present study evaluated the effectiveness of laughter therapy on self–compassion and hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The collected results demonstrated that laughter therapy could improve the study subjects’ compassion and blood glucose level. Thus, laughter therapy is effective on self–compassion and hypoglycemia in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and could be used by clinicians to improve the health status of patients with diabetes.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Stirban AO, Andjelkovic M, Heise T, Nosek L, Fischer A, Gastaldelli A, et al. Aleglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐α/γ agonist, improves insulin sensitivity, glucose control and lipid levels in people with type 2 diabetes: findings from a randomized, double‐blind trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(7):711-15. [DOI]
2. Kropff J, Del Favero S, Place J, Toffanin C, Visentin R, Monaro M, et al. 2 month evening and night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: a randomised crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(12):939-47. [DOI]
3. Bell KJ, Smart CE, Steil GM, Brand-Miller JC, King B, Wolpert HA. Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1008-15. [DOI]
4. Renard E, Farret A, Kropff J, Bruttomesso D, Messori M, Place J, et al. Day-and-night closed-loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes under free-living conditions: results of a single-arm 1-month experience compared with a previously reported feasibility study of evening and night at home. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1151-60. [DOI]
5. Sinclair S, Torres M-B, Raffin-Bouchal S, Hack TF, McClement S, Hagen NA, et al. Compassion training in healthcare: what are patients’ perspectives on training healthcare providers? BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:169. [DOI]
6. Tanco K, Azhar A, Rhondali W, Rodriguez‐Nunez A, Liu D, Wu J, et al. The effect of message content and clinical outcome on patients' perception of physician compassion: a randomized controlled trial. The Oncologist. 2017;23(3):375-82. [DOI]
7. Falconer CJ, Rovira A, King JA, Gilbert P, Antley A, Fearon P, et al. Embodying self-compassion within virtual reality and its effects on patients with depression. BJPsych open. 2016;2(1):74-80. [DOI]
8. Sheppard K. Compassion fatigue among registered nurses: Connecting theory and research. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28(1):57-9. [DOI]
9. Griffith ER. Spirituality and self-compassion among college students. The West Virginia Academy of Science. 2019;91(1).
10. Neff KD, McGehee P. Self-compassion and psychological resilience among adolescents and young adults. Self and Identity. 2010;9(3):225-40. [DOI]
11. Neff K. Self-compassion and psychological well-being. Constructivism in the Human Sciences. 2004;9(2):27-38.
12. Voci A, Veneziani CA, Fuochi G. Relating mindfulness, heartfulness, and psychological well-being: the role of self-compassion and gratitude. Mindfulness. 2019;10:339-51. [DOI]
13. Raja A, Sundari FKJ. Comparison of the efficacy of laughter therapy and breathing exercises on pulmonary function among smokers. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2014;4(1):105-12.
14. Shahidi M, Mojtahed A, Modabbernia A, Mojtahed M, Shafiabady A, Delavar A, et al. Laughter yoga versus group exercise program in elderly depressed women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(3):322-7. [DOI]
15. Moshtagh Eshgh Z, Naghavi B, Rashvand F, Alavi Majd H, Bana Derakhshan H. Effects of humor therapy on fatigue and depression of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery. 2011;20(70):7-11. [Persian] [DOI]
16. Rad M, Borzoee F, Shahidsales S, Tabarraie Y, Varshoee-Tabrizi F. The effects of humor therapy on the fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing external radiotherapy. J Babol Univ Med Sci. 2015;17(1):45-52. [Persian] [Article]
17. Rad M, Borzoee F, Mohebbi M. The effect of humor therapy on fatigue severity and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing external radiation therapy. Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research. 2016;24(103):102-14. [Persian] [Article]
18. Low L-F, Goodenough B, Fletcher J, Xu K, Casey A-N, Chenoweth L, et al. The effects of humor therapy on nursing home residents measured using observational methods: The SMILE cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(8):564-9. [DOI]
19. Memarian A, Sanatkaran A, Bahari SM. The effect of laughter yoga exercises on anxiety and sleep quality in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2017;4(7):1463-79. [DOI]
20. Hatzipapas I, Visser MJ, van Rensburg EJ. Laughter therapy as an intervention to promote psychological well-being of volunteer community care workers working with HIV-affected families. SAHARA J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance. 2017;14(1).
21. Shahidi M, Mojtahed A, Modabbernia A, Mojtahed M, Shafiabady A, Delavar A, et al. Laughter yoga versus group exercise program in elderly depressed women: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(3):322-7. [Persian] [DOI]
22. Kim SH, Kook JR, Kwon M, Son MH, Ahn SD, Kim YH. The effects of laughter therapy on mood state and self-esteem in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2015;21(4):217-22. [DOI]
23. Elmali H, Akpinar RB. The effect of watching funny and unfunny videos on post-surgical pain levels. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017;26:36-41. [DOI]
24. Chang C, Tsai G, Hsieh C-J. Psychological, immunological and physiological effects of a Laughing Qigong Program (LQP) on adolescents. Complement Ther Med. 2013;21(6):660-8. [DOI]
25. Falkenberg I, Buchkremer G, Bartels M, Wild B. Implementation of a manual-based training of humor abilities in patients with depression: A pilot study. Psychiatry Research. 2011;186(2-3):454-7. [DOI]
26. Wicksell RK, Melin L, Lekander M, Olsson GL. Evaluating the effectiveness of exposure and acceptance strategies to improve functioning and quality of life in longstanding pediatric pain–a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2009;141(3):248-57. [DOI]
27. Dunbar RIM, Baron R, Frangou A, Pearce E, Van Leeuwen EJC, Stow J, et al. Social laughter is correlated with an elevated pain threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;279(1731):1161-7. [DOI]
28. Hassed C. Mind-body therapies: Use in chronic pain management. Pain. 2013;42(3):112-17.
29. Rosen T, Stern ME, Elman A, Mulcare MR. Identifying and initiating intervention for elder abuse and neglect in the emergency department. Clinics in geriatric medicine. 2018 Aug 1;34(3):435-51. [DOI]
30. Williams MJ, Dalgleish T, Karl A, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychol Assess. 2014;26(2):407-18. [DOI]
31. Neff KD, Pisitsungkagarn K, Hsieh Y-P. Self-compassion and self-construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2008;39(3):267-85. [DOI]
32. Azizi A, Mohammadkhani P, Foroughi AA, Lotfi S, Bahramkhani M. The Validity and Reliability of the Iranian Version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2013;1(3):149-55. [Persian] [Article]
33. Kataria M, Regner T. A note on the relationship between television viewing and individual happiness. J Socio Econ. 2011;40(1):53-8. [DOI]
34. Shrestha N, Lohani SP, Angdembe MR, Bhattarai K, Bhattarai J. Cost of diabetes mellitus care among patients attending selected outpatient clinics. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2013;52(190):343-8.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
