Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 241 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Samadpour Shahrak E, Sattari Sarbangholi H, Moosavi M S. Effective Factors on the Vitality of Open Spaces in Residential Complexes from an Elderly Perspective: A Qualitative Research. MEJDS 2020; 10 :241-241
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1806-en.html
1- Department of architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (2525 Views)
Background & Objectives: As the aging population continues to grow, solutions to address the needs of and care for this population become increasingly essential. Numerous studies on shifting demographics reported that the ability to meet the challenge of an aging population and responding to its needs requires a better understanding of concepts, such as aging, frailty, and disability. The needs of the elderly are often associated with the concept of “aging in place.” A major aspect of “aging in place” is the quality of houses and their open area. The built environment can respond to the elderly’s needs and influence behaviors and create a vitality place for them. This research addressed the psychosocial needs of the aging population in open spaces; social environments to propose a model for living in open spaces in residential complexes, i.e., defined as the engagement and integration of the elderly residents in the community structure to experience an enhanced quality of life. The hypothesis is that, by linking the social and psychological needs of the aging groups to architectural principles and physical manifestations, a model for living in place is achieved; accordingly, the elderly experience vitality. The current study aimed to determine the factors influencing vitality in open spaces for the elderly.
Methods: This study employed a qualitative content analysis method based on interviews. The selected elderly were interviewed for qualitative analysis purposes. Individuals who were living in the Aseman residential complex, in East Azerbaijan Province, in 2019–2020 (as the case study) were selected and interviewed. To select the study sample, the purposive sampling method was employed. Totally, 24 participants were recruited and interviewed concerning factors affecting vitality in open spaces. A semi–structured interview was conducted to identify the dimensions of vitality in the environment from the perspective of the elderly until saturation was reached. The researchers interviewed the research participants in open spaces at 10–12 AM and 6–9 PM. After coding the collected data, these approaches were investigated and presented in a diagram format.
Results: Effective factors on the vitality of open areas in residential complexes for the elderly were classified into 15 main themes and 59 sub–themes. The main themes were as follows: space configuration, physical diversity, physical identity, climate comfort, safe environment, comfort, flexibility, space maintenance, legibility, communication management, accumulation, social identity, relaxation, mental security, and mental interaction with the environment. The sub–themes related to each main theme were classified as follows: space configuration: space form, space proportions, space layout, and spatial communication; physical diversity: diversity, responsiveness to activities, dynamism and attractiveness, cohesion, and beauty; physical identity: space configuration and ecology; climate comfort: temperature, humidity, light, and shade; safe environment: space dynamics, structural elements, and non–physical elements; comfort: design quality, complementary spaces, accessibility, and human scale; flexibility: variability, adaptability, and variation; space maintenance: the quality of space, equipment, and facilities; legibility: natural elements, sensory stimuli, guide elements, structural elements, signs, complexity, and permeability; communication management: relationships as well as direct and indirect social communication; accumulation: the desire to be in a natural place, opportunities to meet others, and presence; social identity: memories, social celebrations, a sense of participation, and the possibility of being active; relaxation: air quality, noise pollution, light quality, congestion, and nature; mental security: environmental risk (human, vehicles), a sense of control, privacy, and aristocracy to the place; mental interaction with environment: openness, creating motivation through developing favorable forms, visual perception, understanding the environment, and an environment for everyone.
Conclusion: Based on the present research findings, 4 core dimensions were found to be correlated with lively open spaces in residential complexes from the elderly’s perspectives. These dimensions included physical, functional, social, and mental aspects. These dimensions were classified into 15 main themes and 59 sub–themes. Thus, vitality in open spaces is correlated with biopsychosocial issues, i.e., needed to be addressed to prevent abnormalities in the aging period.
Full-Text [PDF 630 kb]   (638 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Architecture

References
1. Karami Matin B, Rezaei S, Alinia S, Shaahmadi F, Kazemi Karyani A. Ageing in Iran in 1410, a warning to health care system. Journal of Medicine and Cultivation. 2013;22(2):9–18. [Persian] [Article]
2. Jahan F, Noghabi R. The effect of mindfulness training on moral intelligence, spiritual intelligence and wisdom in the elderly. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2019;9:17. [Persian] [Article]
3. Latifi Z, Kiani M, Yousefi Z. The structural equation modeling of the older people’s life expectancy based on the anxiety sensitivity, social support, and pain perception. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2019;14(2):188–99. [Persian] [DOI]
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Aug]; Available from: [Article]
5. Lotfi S, Maouchehri Miandoaab A. Examining objective and subjective aspects of accessibility to neighborhood facilities in quality of life (A case study of Margheh, Iran). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. 2011;3(45):75–86. [Persain] [Article]
6. Sadat SA, Taher Tolou Del MS. The factors contributing to the livability of inhabitants of residential spaces. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design. 2017;5(1):47–60. [Persian] [Article]
7. Saeid M, Makarem A, Khanjani S, Bakhtyari V. Comparison of social health and quality of life between the elderlies resident at nursing homes with non-resident counterparts in Tehran city, Iran. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2019;14(2):178–87. [Persian] [DOI]
8. Ljunggren M. Elderly abuse and depression in developed countries: Does religion/spirituality matter? [Thesis for Bachelor degree in Helth Education]. [Gävle, Sweden]: Gävle University; 2012.
9. Varaee P, Momeni K, Moradi A. Structural equation modeling: a study on the effect of religious orientation on the psychological wellbeing concerning the mediating role of death anxiety and self-compassion in the male elderly living in Kermanshah city in 2017. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2019;14(2):162–77. [Persian] [DOI]
10. Alalhesabi M, Rafiee F. Evaluation of the requirements in public space for elderly: a case study in Kholdebarin park, Shiraz, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2013;5(9):247–57. [Persian] n [Article]
11. Mohammadzadeh R. Assessment of spatial and physical factors quality of sahand new town residential communities open (outdoor) spaces. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. 2011;3(47):29–38. [Persian] [Article]
12. Carmona M, Tiesdell S, Heath T. Public places urban spaces: the dimensions of urban design. Gharaee F, Shokohi M, Ahari Z, Salehi E. (Persian translators). Tehran: Art University Pub;2009.
13. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Danaie Fard H, Kazemi H. (Persian translators). Tehran: Eshraghi Pub; 2017.
14. Tabatabaee A, Hasani P, Mortazavi H, Tabatabaeichehr M. Strategies to enhance rigor in qualitative research. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;5(3):663–70. [Persian] [DOI]
15. Mahmoudi M, Ahmad F, Abbasi B. Livable streets: The effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Cities. 2015;43:104–14. [DOI]
16. Francis M. Urban open space: designing for user needs. Washington D.C: Island Press; 2003.
17. Mehrabani E, Mansouri S-A, Javadi S. Landscape approach in creating vitality in Valiasr Avenue an emphasis on creating the sense of place. Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2017;14(55):5–16. [Persian] [Article]
18. Mansouri A, Ferzin AA. Landscape approach in city designing. Tehran: Nazar Institute Pub; 2016. [Persian]
19. Gehl J. Life between buildings: using public space. Shasti Sh. (Persian translator). Tehran: Iranian Students Book Agency; 2008.
20. Zabetian, Taqvaei ED, Aliakbar. Elderly friendly cities through people participation. Housing and Rural Environment. 2010;28(128):60–71. [Persian] [Article]
21. Kiaee M, Soltanzadeh H, Heidari A. Measure the flexibility of the spatial system using space syntax (case study: houses in Qazvin). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar. 2019;16(71):61–76. [Persian] [DOI]
22. Lotfi S, Golmakani A, Hosein Poor M, Sholeh M. Urban design framework for MollāSadrā avenue in Shiraz (Iran) with an approach to social interactions. Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management. 2014;13(36):9–24. [Persian]
23. Alipour Esfahani M, Zamani B, Shahivandi A. Compiling components affecting the quality of social vitality in streets (case study: historic street of Sepah, Isfahan). Maremat & Me’mari-e Iran. 2018;1(15):119–36. [Persian] [Article]
24. Lynch K. A theory of good city form. Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 1981, pp: 121–2.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb