Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 168 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghadimi Nouran M, Shafiabady A, Khodabakhshi Koolaee A, Asgari M. Psychological Factors in Women With Binge Eating Disorder: A Qualitative Study. MEJDS 2020; 10 :168-168
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1947-en.html
1- Department of Education and Counselation, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University
3- Department of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Khatam University
4- Department of Assessment and Measurement, Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University
Abstract:   (1484 Views)
Background & Objectives: Binge Eating Disorder (BED) is among the most prevalent eating conditions in individuals. BED is the periodic and uncontrolled consumption of large amounts of food in a short period, followed by guilt, depression, or self–loathing. Individuals with BED also experience various psychological issues, including depression and anxiety. Recently, this disorder has become widespread in females. Women with BED are often dissatisfied with their body weight and shape; they experience body–based social anxiety, i.e., associated with a concern about weight and eating that plays an important role in predicting eating disorders. The present study aimed to investigate the nature of BED in women and identify its associated psychological factors.
Methods: This study was conducted using the qualitative research method of grounded theory. The statistical population consisted of women with BED who referred to the Specialty Nutrition Clinic of Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. The inclusion criteria of the study included having 25 to 50 years of age; no acute physical or mental illness; no pregnancy or lactation; no weight loss diet, no type 2 diabetes, and no substance abuse. The necessary conditions and the absence of physical illness were confirmed by a general practitioner and related tests. Besides, the absence of acute mental disorders was assessed by diagnostic interviews by researchers. The study participants were selected by purposive sampling method in which the information was collected in the research field and analyzed outside; the researcher returned to the research field to collect further data. This zigzag process continued until the data categories were saturated. In total, 15 eligible volunteers were interviewed. Interviews were recorded and transcribed subsequently. The interviews were semi–structured and covered general questions, such as "in what conditions do you often overeat?", "how do you usually overeat?", and "how do you feel about your body appearance?". When necessary and for obtaining more details, exploratory questions, such as "can you explain more about this?" or "can you make your point clearer?" were probed. Each interview lasted 45–60 minutes. The collected data were analyzed using Straus and Corbin’s continuous comparative analysis (1998). The conceptualization (open coding) was first performed in the analysis and axial coding was implemented to refine and differentiate the obtained categories (closest to the same meaning); finally, selective coding or the process of integrating categories into a template was performed. The validity and reliability of the research were assessed per Guba and Lincoln criteria (2000). The acceptance of the data was established by reviewing the manuscripts by the study participants, which led to a better understanding of their experiences by the researcher and increased the participants' confidence. Verifiability was verified by reviewing the text of the interviews, as well as agreement on the codes and classes extracted by the relevant experts and authors. Furthermore, the consistency of the findings was determined using the opinion of experts and re–reading the data. Transferability also enabled the better presentation of data and factors through interviews with different research participants.
Results: The study participants included 15 women with BED with an age range of 35 to 48 years, with degrees ranging from diploma to doctorate. From the 29 codes obtained in open coding, 8 categories of axial coding were extracted, including individual negative emotional causes; interpersonal negative emotional causes; extreme avoidance–compulsive behaviors; improper eating habits; inappropriate eating time; acquiring positive emotion, and causes of the lack of individual and interpersonal emotional aspects. Next, three factors, including negative emotion causes, inappropriate behavioral habits, and the lack of emotion were selected and extracted. Each component contained a specific sub–component in individual and interpersonal domains. Accordingly, all three factors fell in the personal domain and two negative emotional factors and the lack of emotion were also classified in the interpersonal domain.
Conclusion: The present research results suggested that the psychological factors of BED in women included (the main factors of) negative emotion, the lack of emotion, and inappropriate behavioral habits, i.e., correlated with each other. These characteristics were classified in the context of individual and interpersonal aspects. In addition to the impact of individual factors, interpersonal characteristics are essential and should be considered as systemic factors. The collected data can be used in developing different approaches for the treatment of BED.
Full-Text [PDF 552 kb]   (449 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Spitzer RL, Yanovski S, Wadden T, Wing R, Marcus MD, Stunkard A, et al. Binge eating disorder: its further validation in a multisite study. Int J Eat Disord. 1993;13(2):137–53.
2. Latzer Y, Tzischinsky O. Eating attitudes in a diverse sample of Israeli adolescent females: a comparison study. J Adolesc. 2005;28(3):317–23. [DOI]
3. Edwards L. Theoretical analysis of binge eating disorder through the perspectives of self psychology and cognitive theory/cognitive behavioral therapy, and an explanation of blending these perspectives [Thesis for Master]. [Northampton, UK]: Smith College;2013.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
5. Keel PK, Haedt-Matt AA, Hildebrandt B, Bodell LP, Wolfe BE, Jimerson DC. Satiation deficits and binge eating: Probing differences between bulimia nervosa and purging disorder using an ad lib test meal. Appetite. 2018;127:119–25. [DOI]
6. McCarthy M. The thin ideal, depression and eating disorders in women. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(3):205–15. [DOI]
7. Hoek HW. Review of the worldwide epidemiology of eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;29(6):336–9. [DOI]
8. Roustaee R, Hajifaraji M, Dezhkam M, Houshiar-rad A, Mehrabi Y, Zowghi T. Prevalence of eating disorders and some of the factors related to them among high school female students in the City of Tehran, 2010. Iranian Journal of Nutrition Sciences & Food Technology. 2013;8(1):135–44. [Persian] [Article]
9. Nobakht M, Dezhkam M. An epidemiological study of eating disorders in Iran. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2000;28(3):265–71. [DOI]
10. Leehr EJ, Krohmer K, Schag K, Dresler T, Zipfel S, Giel KE. Emotion regulation model in binge eating disorder and obesity--a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;49:125–34. [DOI]
11. Starkman H. An integrative group treatment model for women with binge eating disorder: mind, body and self in connection. Clin Soc Work J. 2016;44(1):57–68. [DOI]
12. Javaras KN, Laird NM, Reichborn‐Kjennerud T, Bulik CM, Pope Jr HG, Hudson JI. Familiality and heritability of binge eating disorder: Results of a case‐control family study and a twin study. Int J Eat Disord. 2008;41(2):174-9. [DOI]
13. Khanlarzade F, Asgari K, Amini M. An investigation of the neuropsychological performance in patients with diabetes type2. Med J Mashhad Uni Med Sci. 2015;58(8):459–65. [Persian] [DOI]
14. Khodapanah M, Sohrabi F, Ahadi H, Taghiloo S. The Mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in the relationship between brain-behavioral systems with eating behavior in individuals with overweight and obesity. Journal of Research in Psychological Health. 2018;11(4) :55-73. [Article]
15. Haynos AF, Fruzzetti AE. Anorexia nervosa as a disorder of emotion dysregulation: evidence and treatment implications. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2011;18(3):183–202. [DOI]
16. Wolff GE, Crosby RD, Roberts JA, Wittrock DA. Differences in daily stress, mood, coping, and eating behavior in binge eating and nonbinge eating college women. Addict Behav. 2000;25(2):205-16. [DOI]
17. Kerr-Gaffney J, Harrison A, Tchanturia K. Social anxiety in the eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2018;48(15):2477–91. [DOI]
18. Brosof LC, Levinson CA. Social appearance anxiety and dietary restraint as mediators between perfectionism and binge eating: A six month three wave longitudinal study. Appetite. 2017;108:335–42. [DOI]
19. Becker AE. Culture and Eating Disorders. In: Bhugra D, Bhui K. Textbook of cultural psychiatry. Cambridge University Press; 2018. pp: 304–16.
20. Ghanee F, Ghasemi V. Investigating the phenomenon of obesity stigma among 15-44 year old women in Yazd. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2017;28(3):41-60. [DOI]
21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications; 1998.
22. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging Confluences. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln, YS, editors. 2nd ed. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000. pp:1065-1122.
23. Smith KE, Mason TB, Crosby RD, Cao L, Leonard RC, Wetterneck CT, et al. A comparative network analysis of eating disorder psychopathology and co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms before and after treatment. Psychol Med. 2019;49(2):314–24. [DOI]
24. Narimani M, Ghasemi Nezhad MA. The role of psychological factors in predicting binge eating disorder. Journal of School Psychology. 2014;3(3):86–105. [Persian] [Article]
25. Spettigue W, Obeid N, Santos A, Norris M, Hamati R, Hadjiyannakis S, et al. Binge eating and social anxiety in treatment-seeking adolescents with eating disorders or severe obesity. Eat Weight Disord. 2020;25(3):787–93. [DOI]
26. Stice E, Shaw H. Eating disorders: Insights from imaging and behavioral approaches to treatment. J Psychopharmacol. 2017;31(11):1485–95. [DOI]
27. Mason TB, Smith KE, Lavender JM, Lewis RJ. Independent and interactive associations of negative affect, restraint, and impulsivity in relation to binge eating among women. Appetite. 2018;121:147–53. [DOI]
28. Crockett AC, Myhre SK, Rokke PD. Boredom proneness and emotion regulation predict emotional eating. J Health Psychol. 2015;20(5):670–80. [DOI]
29. Braden A, Musher-Eizenman D, Watford T, Emley E. Eating when depressed, anxious, bored, or happy: Are emotional eating types associated with unique psychological and physical health correlates? Appetite. 2018;125:410–7. [DOI]
30. Ferrell EL, Watford TS, Braden A. Emotion regulation difficulties and impaired working memory interact to predict boredom emotional eating. Appetite. 2020;144:104450. [DOI]
31. Lee AY, Reynolds KD, Stacy A, Niu Z, Xie B. Family functioning, moods, and binge eating among urban adolescents. J Behav Med. 2019;42(3):511-21. [DOI]
32. Escrivá-Martínez T, Galiana L, Rodríguez-Arias M, Baños RM. The binge eating scale: structural equation competitive models, invariance measurement between sexes, and relationships with food addiction, impulsivity, binge drinking, and Body Mass Index. Front Psychol. 2019;10:530. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb