تعطیلات نوروزی مجله- ضمن تبریک فرارسیدن بهار و شروع سال جدید به اطلاع میرساند این نشریه از تاریخ ۲۵ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۲ لغایت ۱۳ فروردین ۱۴۰۳ تعطیل می باشد.

Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 181 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sajadifar S, Rezakhani S, Behboodi M. Explaining family performance based on early maladaptive schemas: The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in married women. MEJDS 2020; 10 :181-181
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2005-en.html
1- Department of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Counseling, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1175 Views)
Background & Objectives: Early maladaptive schemas are highly ineffective and by affecting individuals’ emotional experiences, lead to an inability to individually and socially live and affect their family functioning. Family functioning is the effort and ability of family members to balance the family system. Satisfying the child's emotional and physical needs in the family and through the manifestations of the child's sufficient attachment forms adaptive schemas about self and others. Such a process generates the feeling of being valued, independent, worthy, and loved as well as providing care to the individual and determine how individuals respond to the social fabric. The existence of inconsistent schemas with fundamental emotional themes adversely impacts the process of identifying, understanding, and regulating emotions. The current study aimed to explain family functioning based on early maladaptive schemas by the mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation in married women.
Methods: The present descriptive and correlational study consisted of 600 married women referring to Imam Khomeini and Qeytariyeh Cultural Centers in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. Accordingly, by the convenience sampling method, 350 individuals were selected; after dropping 26 distorted questionnaires, the final sample size reached 324. The inclusion criteria of the study included living in Tehran, having at least one year of experience of cohabitation, and over 18 years of age. Exclusion criteria included the presence of a physical disability and chronic illnesses (i.e., asked in the form of yes/no questions via the demographic data questionnaire from each study participant), using certain medications (i.e., asked in the form of yes/no questions via the demographic data questionnaire from each research participant), and hospitalization during the last year due to biopsychological conditions (i.e., asked in the form of yes/no questions via the demographic data questionnaire from each study participant). The tools applied in the present study included the Young Schema Questionnaire–Short Form (Young, 1998), the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski et al., 2001), and the McMaster Family Assessment Device (Epstein et al., 1983). The structural equation modeling method was applied in AMOS and SPSS at the significance level of 0.05 to analyze the obtained data.
Results: The present research results indicated that the total path coefficient between the early maladaptive schemas and family functioning was negative and significant (β=–0.381, p<0.001). Additionally, the path coefficient between maladaptive schemas and negative emotion regulation strategies was positive and significant (β=0.448, p<0.001) and the path coefficient between maladaptive schemas and positive emotion regulation strategies were not significant (β=–0.027, p=0.685). The path coefficient between the positive strategies of emotion regulation and family functioning was positive and significant (β=0.445, p<0.001) and the path coefficient between negative emotion regulation strategies and family functioning were negative and significant (β=–0.163, p=0.011). The indirect path coefficient between the early maladaptive schemas and family functioning was negative and significant (β=–0.085, p=0.036). Furthermore, the sum of squares of multiple correlations for the family functioning variable was equal to 0.34. This finding suggests that early maladaptive schemas and negative emotion regulation strategies explain 34% of the variance in family functioning in the explored married women.
Conclusion: The present study data revealed that negative emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and family functioning in married women. It is suggested that therapists consider the clinical interventions required to modify early maladaptive schemas and emotion regulation among married women to improve their daily, social, and family functioning.
Full-Text [PDF 465 kb]   (528 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Hasanzadeh S. Reinforcing the family in the Islamic culture. Journal of Qur’anic Knowledge. 2015;4(15):45–68. [Persian] [Article]
2. Shaker A, Heshmati R, Rahimi MP. Investigation of Marital adjustment in people with secure, preoccupied, dismissing and fearful attachment styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;5:1823–6. [DOI]
3. Alibabaei M, Vahhabi Homabadi J, Khaleghipour S. The effectiveness of eclective method of kindness and positive self-talk on resiliency, hostility and positive feeling towards spouse in betrayed women. Positive Psychology Research. 2019;5(2):47-64. [DOI]
4. Goldenberg I, Stanton M, Goldenberg H. Family therapy: an overview. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2017.
5. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1983;9(2):171–80. [DOI]
6. Khatibi A. Survey of females’ attitude toward factors affecting the family’s strength (research done among women staff of Payam Noor University; Hamadan Province). Woman and Family Studies. 2015;3(1):59–92. [Persian] [DOI]
7. Feshangchi N, Karbalaie Mohammad Meigooni A, Bahrami Hidaji M. The mediation role of narcissistic personality traits and interpersonal problems in the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and anabolic steroids use in athletes. Sport Psychology Studies. 2018;7(24):17-34. [Article]
8. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2012;11(1):11–5. [DOI]
9. Bosmans G, Braet C, Van Vlierberghe L. Attachment and symptoms of psychopathology: early maladaptive schemas as a cognitive link? Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(5):374–85. [DOI]
10. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: a practitioner’s guide. New York; London: Guilford; 2007.
11. González-Jiménez AJ, Hernández-Romera M del M. Early maladaptive schemas in adolescence: a quantitative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;132:504–8. [DOI]
12. Janovsky T, Rock AJ, Thorsteinsson EB, Clark GI, Murray CV. The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: A meta‐analytic review. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020;27(3):408–47. [DOI]
13. Keshavarz-Afshar H, Ghanbarian E, Jebeli SJ, Saadat SH. The relationship between differentiation of self and early maladaptive schemas with family performance components among the military women residing in Tehran, Iran. Journal Mil Med. 2019;20(6):635–44. [Persian] [Article]
14. Yakın D, Gençöz T, Steenbergen L, Arntz A. An integrative perspective on the interplay between early maladaptive schemas and mental health: The role of self-compassion and emotion regulation. J Clin Psychol. 2019;75(6):1098–113. [DOI]
15. Doré BP, Ochsner KN. Emotion regulation. In: Toga AW, editor. Brain mapping. Waltham: Academic Press; 2015. pp: 53–8.
16. Domaradzka E, Fajkowska M. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in anxiety and depression understood as types of personality. Front Psychol. 2018;9:856. [DOI]
17. Kraaij V, Garnefski N. The behavioral emotion regulation questionnaire: development, psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019;137:56–61. [DOI]
18. Dollar JM, Calkins SD. Emotion regulation and its development. In: Benson JB, editor. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2020. pp: 546–59.
19. Fosco GM, Grych JH. Capturing the family context of emotion regulation: a family systems model comparison approach. Journal of Family Issues. 2013;34(4):557–78. [DOI]
20. Kamali Igoli S, Abolmaali Alhoseini K. Predicting cognitive emotion regulation strategies according to family communication processes and perfectionism in high school adolescent girls. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2016;10(3):291–310. [Persian]
21. Freed RD, Rubenstein LM, Daryanani I, Olino TM, Alloy LB. The relationship between family functioning and adolescent depressive symptoms: the role of emotional clarity. J Youth Adolesc. 2016;45(3):505–19. [DOI]
22. McCarthy C, Lambert R, Seraphine A. Adaptive family functioning and emotion regulation capacities as predictors of college students’ appraisals and emotion valence following conflict with their parents. Cognition & Emotion. 2004;18(1):97–124. [DOI]
23. Bernstein DP, Rafaeli E, Young JE. Schema therapy: distinctive features. London: Routledge; 2011.
24. Kaya Tezel F, Tutarel Kişlak Ş, Boysan M. Relationships between childhood traumatic experiences, early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal styles. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015;52(3):226–32. [DOI]
25. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3th ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
26. Young JE. Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center; 1998.
27. Sadooghi Z, Aguilar-Vafaie ME, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaie K, Esfehanian N. factor analysis of the young schema questionnaire-short form in a nonclinical Iranian sample. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2008;14(2):214–9. [Persian] [Article]
28. Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30(8):1311–27. [DOI]
29. Hasani J. The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2010;2(3):73–84. [Persian] [DOI]
30. Yousefi N. An investigation of the psychometric properties of the McMaster Clinical Rating Scale (MCRS). Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2012;2(7):91–120. [Persian] [Article]
31. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2006.
32. Honardoost N. A report of several books on scheme Therapy. Clinical Psychology Studies. 2015;5(18):167–80. [Persian] [Article]
33. Cormier A, Jourda B, Laros C, Walburg V, Callahan S. Influence between early maladaptive schemas and depression. Encephale. 2011;37(4):293–8. [French] [DOI]
34. Shorey RC, Anderson S, Stuart GL. Early maladaptive schemas of substance abusers and their intimate partners. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2013;45(3):266–75. [DOI]
35. Güner O. Psychometric properties and normative values of early maladaptive Schema Questionnaires Set for children and adolescents (SQS). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24(2):534–54. [DOI]
36. Mahmoodnejad M, Karbalaie Mohammad Meigooni A, Sabet M. Prediction of suicidal ideation and interpersonal violence among labor children based on childhood trauma, emotion regulation difficulties and callous-unemotional traits. Journal of Psychological Achievements. 2018;25(1):1–22. [Persian] [DOI]
37. Dvir Y, Ford JD, Hill M, Frazier JA. Childhood maltreatment, emotional dysregulation, and psychiatric comorbidities. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22(3):149–61. [DOI]
38. Kuster F, Orth U, Meier LL. Rumination mediates the prospective effect of low self-esteem on depression: a five-wave longitudinal study. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(6):747–59. [DOI]
39. Deci EL. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In: Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Elsevier; 2017. [DOI]
40. Dadomo H, Grecucci A, Giardini I, Ugolini E, Carmelita A, Panzeri M. Schema therapy for emotional dysregulation: theoretical implication and clinical applications. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1987. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb