Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 140 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Department of Health Psychology, Khorramshahr-Persian Gulf International Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1390 Views)
Background & Objectives: A mental health condition that causes the excessive consumption of food, leading to obesity, is food craving. According to brain imaging data, the Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) plays an important role in craving. Anxiety can also occur in overweight individuals. Anxiety and obesity affect each other and are related. Furthermore, anxiety is a negative emotion that in some individuals, causes emotional eating behavior. Besides, weight gain increases anxiety, which requires neuropsychological therapies. A therapy used in the present study was Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), i.e., a non-invasive, painless, and safe method of cerebral stimulation. The tDCS seems to be able to modulate cortical irritability and be applied as a treatment for managing psychiatric disorders. Another intervention implemented in the present study was Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Psychological factors significantly impact the development of obesity. Thus, such interventions could significantly help to reduce weight and modify the negative perception of body image, and of course, self-concept and social anxiety among overweight and obese individuals. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effects of tDCS and CBT on craving and anxiety in overweight individuals.
Methods: This was an applied and experimental study with a pretest-posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of the study included all overweight individuals who referred to Aramesh Psychology Center in Tehran City, Iran, in 2019. Using the targeted sampling method, 36 of them were selected as the study participants and placed in two experimental groups and one control group (n=12/group). The study inclusion criteria included having a diploma and higher education, the age range of 18 to 47 years, having a body mass index of <40 kg/m2, presenting an uncontrollable tendency to consume at least one of the following foods three times a week during at least the last month: sweets and nuts, too much of fatty foods, the concurrent consumption of fast food and drugs, due to no other disorder. The study exclusion criteria included a history of epilepsy; a history of concussion or brain surgery; using anticonvulsants or antipsychotics or the regular use of benzodiazepines in the past month; a major cognitive or psychiatric condition, e.g., a history of suicidal attempt; having metal objects, like electronic implants, e.g., pacemakers or cochlear implants; pregnancy; a personal or family history of seizures; a history of endocrine or autoimmune diseases; a history of brain surgery or the loss of consciousness for >15 minutes, and a history of consuming weight loss medications or attending frequent weight loss programs. The Food Craving Questionnaire (Cepeda-Benito et al., 2000) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (Steer & Beck, 1997) were used to collect the required information. The tDCS intervention sessions were performed for 3 sessions every other day and the CBT sessions were conducted in 8 weekly 90-minute sessions; however, the controls received no intervention. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS using descriptive statistics, e.g., mean and standard deviation; the employed inferential statistics consisted of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc test.
Results: The mean posttest scores of craving and anxiety, after controlling the pretest scores, were significant in both test groups; in other words, both provided interventions were effective in reducing craving (p<0.001), craving intensity (p<0.001), and anxiety (p<0.001) among the study subjects. The mean of squares for cravings (a component of craving), craving (a component of craving intensity), and anxiety were 0.74, 0.68, and 0.68, respectively. Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare the study participants’ posttest scores after controlling the pretest values. The relevant results indicated a significant difference between the tDCS and control groups in terms of craving (inclination component) (p=0.023), craving (craving intensity component) (p<0.001), and anxiety (p<0.001). The research findings also suggested a significant difference between the CBT and control groups concerning craving (inclination component) (p=0.035), and craving (craving intensity component) (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the tDCS and CBT groups for craving (inclination component) (p=0.884). Additionally, there was no significant difference between the mean scores of tDCS and CBT groups in craving (the component of craving intensity) (p=0.972). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the mean anxiety values of the tDCS and CBT groups (p=0.165).
Conclusion: The provided tDCS and CBT approaches were effective in reducing craving and anxiety in the study participants. Therefore, these interventions could be used as therapeutic or educational methods to improve these conditions in overweight individuals.
Full-Text [PDF 527 kb]   (605 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Alberts HJ, Mulkens S, Smeets M, Thewissen R. Coping with food cravings. Investigating the potential of a mindfulness-based intervention. Appetite. 2010;55:160–3. [DOI]
2. Boswell RG, Kober H. Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta‐analytic review. Obesity Reviews. 2016;17(2):159-77. [DOI]
3. Martin A, Booth JN, Laird Y, Sproule J, Reilly JJ, Saunders DH. Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;1:CD009728. [DOI]
4. Da Silva MC, Conti CL, Klauss J, Alves LG, Nascimento Cavalcante HM, Fregni F, et al. Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) induced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plasticity in alcohol dependence. J Physiol. 2013;107(6):493-502.
5. Adom T, Puoane T, Villiers AD, Kengne AP. Prevalence of obesity and overweight in African learners: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e013538. [DOI]
6. Alizadeh Goradel J, Pouresmali A, Mowlaie M, Sadeghi Movahed F. The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on obsession-compulsion, anxiety, and depression of a patient suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2016;4(2):75–80. [Persian] [DOI]
7. Alonzo A, Fong J, Ball N, Martin D, Chand N, Loo C. Pilot trial of home-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of depression. J Affect Disord. 2019;252:475–83. [DOI]
8. Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD. Effects of a common transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions. Exp Brain Res. 2016;234(9):2629–42. [DOI]
9. Beiter R, Nash R, McCrady M, Rhoades D, Linscomb M, Clarahan M, et al. The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. J Affect Disord. 2015;173:90–6. [DOI]
10. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, O’connor ME. Eating disorder examination (Edition 16.0 D). In: Fairburn CG. editor. Cognitive behavior therapy and eating disorders. New York: Guilfor; 2008. pp:265-308.
11. Blattman C, Jamison JC, Sheridan M. Reducing crime and violence: experimental evidence from cognitive behavioral therapy in Liberia. American Economic Review. 2017;107(4):1165–206. [DOI]
12. Brenninkmeijer V, Lagerveld SE, Blonk RWB, Schaufeli WB, Wijngaards-de Meij LDNV. Predicting the effectiveness of work-focused CBT for common mental disorders: the influence of baseline self-efficacy, depression and anxiety. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(1):31–41. [DOI]
13. Brunoni AR, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, Zanão TA, de Oliveira JF, Goulart A, et al. The sertraline vs. electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(4):383–91. [DOI]
14. Chaturvedi R, Kulandaivelan S, Joshi S, Malik M. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) on pain in fibromyalgia-systematic review based on Prisma guidelines. International Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Physical Education. 2018;3(2):858–62.
15. Chisholm D, Sweeny K, Sheehan P, Rasmussen B, Smit F, Cuijpers P, et al. Scaling-up treatment of depression and anxiety: a global return on investment analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(5):415–24. [DOI]
16. Brennan L. Does motivational interviewing improve retention or outcome in cognitive behaviour therapy for overweight and obese adolescents? Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016;10(4):481–6. [DOI]
17. Cepeda-Benito A, Gleaves DH, Williams TL, Erath SA. The development and validation of the state and trait food-cravings questionnaires. Behavior Therapy. 2000;31(1):151–73. [DOI]
18. Steer RA, Beck AT. Beck anxiety inventory. In: Zalaquett CP, Wood RJ. editors. Evaluating stress: A book of resources. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press; 1997. pp:23-40.
19. Mohammadi MR, Akhondzadeh S, Mostafavi S-A, Keshavarz SA, Ahmadi Motlagh T, Eshraghian MR, et al. Reliability and validity of the Persian Version of Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait-Reduced (FCQ-T-r) in overweight and obese women. Journal of Nutrition,Fasting and Health. 2018;6(3):150–7. [DOI]
20. Kaviani H, Mousavi AS. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Tehran University Medical Journal TUMS Publications. 2008;66(2):136–40. [Persian] [Article]
21. Dobson K, Beshai S. The theory-practice gap in cognitive behavioral therapy: reflections and a modest proposal to bridge the gap. Behav Ther. 2013;44(4):559–67. [DOI]
22. Soler MD, Kumru H, Pelayo R, Vidal J, Tormos JM, Fregni F, Navarro X, Pascual-Leone A. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation and visual illusion on neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. Brain. 2010;133(9):2565-77. [DOI]
23. Mehta S, McIntyre A, Guy S, Teasell RW, Loh E. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(11):780-5. [DOI]
24. Sadeghi Movahed F, Alizadeh Goradel J, Pouresmali A, Mowlaie M. Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on worry, anxiety, and depression in generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, single-blind pharmacotherapy and sham-controlled clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2018;12(2): e11071. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.