Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 233 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rostami S, Asadzade H, Entesar Foumani G, Hejazi M. The Effects of Coping Cat Program on Test Anxiety and Academic Performance in Sixth-Grade Elementary Students. MEJDS 2020; 10 :233-233
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2302-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2302-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University, Zanjan Branch
2- Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University
2- Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract: (1454 Views)
Background & Objectives: Test anxiety is among the most common anxieties that children face during their education; it is also one of the main reasons for academic failure and inability to progress in elementary students. There is a treatment for test anxiety that can be used in various individual and group–based interventions. There exist several types of cognitive–behavioral programs for children, i.e., used in situations, like school. This is because this anxiety, as a deterrent to students' academic achievement and performance, imposes significant costs on communities. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the effects of the Coping Cat Program (CCP) on test anxiety and academic performance in sixth–grade students.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The statistical population of the study included all sixth–grade female elementary students in Zanjan City, Iran, in the academic year of 2019–2020. Of whom, 40 qualified volunteers with the lowest average score (15.00) in the first semester 0 and highest scores (37.50) in the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI; Abolghasemi et al., 1996) were selected as the study samples. The study participants were randomly divided into the experimental and control groups. The inclusion criteria of the study included being sixth–grade female students, interested in cooperating with the present research, and having no biopsychological illnesses (based on the information in their academic records). Exclusion criteria also included the lack of interest in cooperating with the research and absence from >1 training sessions. The required data were collected in pretest, posttest, and follow–up phases by the TAI. Furthermore, to recognize the academic performance of the study subjects, the average scores obtained in the first semester of the academic year 2019–2020 were considered. Moreover, the experimental group received CCP (Kendall & Hedtke, 2006) in sixteen 60–minute sessions. In this period, the control group received no training. To evaluate the stability of the results, one month after the posttest, the experimental group was followed up. In this study, mean and standard deviation values were used to analyze descriptive statistics. Moreover, repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the obtained data; Benfroni posthoc test was applied to examine pairwise comparisons. All statistical operations were performed in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The repeated–measures ANOVA data revealed that for the test anxiety, group effect (p˂0.001; Eta=0.292), time effect (p˂0.001; Eta=0.345), and group×time interaction (p˂0.001; Eta=0.278) were significant. Concerning academic performance, the effect of group (p˂0.001; Eta=0.242), the effect of time (p˂0.001; Eta=0.429), and the interaction of group×time (p=0.010; Eta=0.162) were significant. Moreover, Benfroni posthoc test results indicated a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group respecting the pretest and posttest (p˂0.001) as well as pretest and follow–up (p=0.142) for test anxiety and academic performance. The obtained results suggested the positive effect of CCP on reducing test anxiety (p=0.142) and increasing academic performance (p˂0.001) in primary school children at the follow–up phase.
Conclusion: CCP can diagnose undesired anxiety symptoms in children and use these symptoms as a guide to anxiety management to reduce educational disabilities and improve students' academic performance.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The statistical population of the study included all sixth–grade female elementary students in Zanjan City, Iran, in the academic year of 2019–2020. Of whom, 40 qualified volunteers with the lowest average score (15.00) in the first semester 0 and highest scores (37.50) in the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI; Abolghasemi et al., 1996) were selected as the study samples. The study participants were randomly divided into the experimental and control groups. The inclusion criteria of the study included being sixth–grade female students, interested in cooperating with the present research, and having no biopsychological illnesses (based on the information in their academic records). Exclusion criteria also included the lack of interest in cooperating with the research and absence from >1 training sessions. The required data were collected in pretest, posttest, and follow–up phases by the TAI. Furthermore, to recognize the academic performance of the study subjects, the average scores obtained in the first semester of the academic year 2019–2020 were considered. Moreover, the experimental group received CCP (Kendall & Hedtke, 2006) in sixteen 60–minute sessions. In this period, the control group received no training. To evaluate the stability of the results, one month after the posttest, the experimental group was followed up. In this study, mean and standard deviation values were used to analyze descriptive statistics. Moreover, repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the obtained data; Benfroni posthoc test was applied to examine pairwise comparisons. All statistical operations were performed in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The repeated–measures ANOVA data revealed that for the test anxiety, group effect (p˂0.001; Eta=0.292), time effect (p˂0.001; Eta=0.345), and group×time interaction (p˂0.001; Eta=0.278) were significant. Concerning academic performance, the effect of group (p˂0.001; Eta=0.242), the effect of time (p˂0.001; Eta=0.429), and the interaction of group×time (p=0.010; Eta=0.162) were significant. Moreover, Benfroni posthoc test results indicated a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental group respecting the pretest and posttest (p˂0.001) as well as pretest and follow–up (p=0.142) for test anxiety and academic performance. The obtained results suggested the positive effect of CCP on reducing test anxiety (p=0.142) and increasing academic performance (p˂0.001) in primary school children at the follow–up phase.
Conclusion: CCP can diagnose undesired anxiety symptoms in children and use these symptoms as a guide to anxiety management to reduce educational disabilities and improve students' academic performance.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Pettus KR. The relationship of parental monitoring to community college student adjustment and achievement: differences by gender, ethnicity, parental education level, and student residence [Ph.D. Thesis]. [Columbia]: University of South Carolina; 2006.
2. Sommer M, Martin E. Does trait test anxiety compromise the measurement fairness of high-stakes scholastic achievement tests? Learning and Individual Differences. 2016;50:1-10. [DOI]
3. Lowe PA, Mowbray T, Jacobs K, Boyle C. Should test anxiety be measured differently for males and females? Examination of measurement bias across gender on measures of test anxiety for middle and high school, and college students. JPsychoeduc Assess. 2015;33(3):238–46. [DOI]
4. Ringeisen T, Raufelder D. The interplay of parental support, parental pressure and test anxiety e Gender differences in adolescents. J Adoles. 2015;45:67-79. [DOI]
5. Soysa C, Weiss A. Mediating perceived parenting styles- test anxiety relationships: academic procrastination and maladaptive perfectionism. Learning and Individual Differences. 2014;34:77- 85. [DOI]
6. Heiser P, Simidian G, Albert D, Garruto J, Catucci D, Faustino P, et al. Anxious for success: high anxiety in New York´ s schools. New York: New York State School Boards Association; 2015. [Article]
7. Abolghasemi A, Beigi P, Narimani M. Comparison the efficacy of trainings of cognitive-behavior and emotion regulation skills on self-efficacy and academic adjustment of students with test anxiety. Educational Psychology. 2011;7(22):21-42. [Persian] [DOI]
8. Bong M, Skaalvik EM. Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Education Psychology Review. 2003;15(1):1-40.
9. Warnecke I, Haffinger L-M, Konradi H, Reiss N, Luka-Krausgrill U, Rohrmann S. Design of a guided internet-delivered counseling intervention for test anxiety. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology. 2020;8(1):163–76. [DOI]
10. Bicer A, Perihan C, Lee Y. A Meta-Analysis: The effects of CBT as a clinic- & school-based treatment on students’ mathematics anxiety. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2020;15(2):em0576. [DOI]
11. Asbrand J, Heinrichs N, Schmidtendorf S, Nitschke K, Tuschen-Caffier B. Experience versus report: where are changes seen after exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy? a randomized controlled group treatment of childhood social anxiety disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2020;51(3):427–41. [DOI]
12. Creswell C, Violato M, Cruddace S, Gerry S, Murray L, Shafran R, et al. A randomised controlled trial of treatments of childhood anxiety disorder in the context of maternal anxiety disorder: clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61(1):62–76. [DOI]
13. Mohammadyfar MA, Yasamani L, Najafi M. The effectiveness of cognitive - behavioral training on reducing of test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2018;15(32):203–22. [Persian] [DOI]
14. Bernhardt S. Anxiety and behavior: brief cognitive behavioral therapy in school with a ten-year-old boy using the coping cat program [Thesis for M.Sc. in School Psychology]. [Minnesota, USA]: Minnesota State University Moorhead; 2019.
15. Poorabolghasem Hosseini S, Hosseinkhanzadeh A, Mousavi SV. The effectiveness of attention reinforcement training on test anxiety of girl students. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2017;3(4):49–55. [Persian] [DOI]
16. Silk JS, Pramana G, Sequeira SL, Lindhiem O, Kendall PC, Rosen D, et al. Using a smartphone app and clinician portal to enhance brief cognitive behavioral therapy for childhood anxiety disorders. Behav Ther. 2020;51(1):69–84. [DOI]
17. Urao Y, Yoshida M, Koshiba T, Sato Y, Ishikawa S-I, Shimizu E. Effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural therapy-based anxiety prevention programme at an elementary school in Japan: a quasi-experimental study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018;12:33. [DOI]
18. Khan A, Malik TA, Ahmed S, Riaz A. Translation, adaptation and implementation of coping cat program with pakistani children. Child Youth Care Forum. 2020;49(1):23–41. [DOI]
19. Jaradat AKM. A comparison of two methods for reducing test-anxiety and improving academic performance. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;5(2):408–18. [DOI]
20. Anastopoulos AD, King KA, Besecker LH, O’Rourke SR, Bray AC, Supple AJ. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for college students with adhd: temporal stability of improvements in functioning following active treatment. J Atten Disord. 2020;24(6):863–74. [DOI]
21. Swan AJ, Kendall PC, Olino T, Ginsburg G, Keeton C, Compton S, et al. Results from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Longitudinal Study (CAMELS): functional outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(9):738–50. [DOI]
22. Abolghasemi A, Asadi Moghadam A, Najariyan B, Shokrkon H. Build and validate a scale to measure test anxiety in third grade students of Ahvaz middle school. Science Quarterly Educational and Psychology of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. 1996;3(3 & 4):61-74. [Persian]
23. Delavar A. Research methods in psychology and educational sciences. Virayesh Pub; 2019. [Persian]
24. Kendall PC, Hedtke KA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious children: therapist manual ; coping cat. 3rd ed. Ardmore, PA: Workbook Publ; 2006.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
