Volume 8 -
MEJDS (2018) 8: 73 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farahani A, Yarmohammadian A, Malekpour M, Abedi A. Relationship between Self-Handicapping and Social Supports with Quality of Life in Blind Individuals. MEJDS 2018; 8 :73-73
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-885-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-885-en.html
Relationship between Self-Handicapping and Social Supports with Quality of Life in Blind Individuals
1- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Isfahan
Abstract: (2437 Views)
Background & Objective : one of the most common groups with impairment is visually impaired individuals whose disability and visual impairment severely affected their quality of life. Life quality of visually impaired individuals has been considered and emphasized as one of the rehabilitation goals by experts with special needs. Of the most important objectives of research conducted on quality life is attention to and identification of variables that affecting prediction and explanation of their quality of life. Variables considered in this research include social support and self-handicapping. Based on some references self-handicapping has a negative correlation with the quality of life of visually impaired individuals and social support has positive correlation with their quality of life. Self-handicapping means creating or claiming an obstacle for successful performance, which in the case of a failure, these obstacles are considered as causes of the failure. Social support is a source of assistance and support from individuals, social groups and society, which is defined as a strategy to deal with stressful lives by recalling assistance from social networks. The aim of the present study was to explain the relationship of self-handicapping and social support with quality of life of visually impaired individuals.
Methods: The study design was a correlational research. Population of the present study consisted of visually impaired individuals aged from 15 to 35 years in cities of Isfahan and Shiraz (center and south of Iran). A number consisting 135 individuals were selected as participants via the convenience sampling technique. Then, they completed questionnaires. Inclusion criteria was confirmed visual impairment, no alertness or mental disorder, not suffering from other chronic diseases, tendency to participate in the study. In addition, exclusion criterion was incomplete questionnaires. Finally, by removing incomplete questionnaires, a number of 128 copies of questionnaires were statistically analyzed. To collect data, the quality of life in visually impaired people questionnaire, self-handicapping scale, and social support questionnaire were employed. To analyze the data, regression coefficient and multiple regression were used.
Results: Findings of the study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between social support and life quality of visually impaired individuals and more support increased the quality of life more (p<0.01). In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between behavioral self-management and life quality of visually impaired individuals (p<0.01). Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between self-actualization and the life quality of these individuals (p<0.05). Results of multiple regression analysis indicated that social support plays a significant role in predicting the life quality of visually impaired individuals. Claimed and behavioral self-handicapping which had no significant roles therefore excluded from the model.
Conclusion: It seems that visually impaired individuals’ expectations in the support dimension focus more on emotional needs and positive relationships than on pessimistic behaviors that instill disability. In addition, these individuals avoid entering to chances and opportunities of life through self-handicapping mechanisms. Therefore, become more passive and ultimately experiences lower quality of life over time. According to results, development of rehabilitation services for increasing social support and application of interventions for reducing self-handicapping in visually impaired individuals is highly recommended. In addition, need to intervention programs based on the increase in self-esteem of visually impaired individuals should be considered. Furthermore, with the aim of reinforcing the social support network among those individuals, developed programs should be designed. Additionally, relative particularly family members of visually impaired individuals should have more awareness and sensitivity to social support.
Methods: The study design was a correlational research. Population of the present study consisted of visually impaired individuals aged from 15 to 35 years in cities of Isfahan and Shiraz (center and south of Iran). A number consisting 135 individuals were selected as participants via the convenience sampling technique. Then, they completed questionnaires. Inclusion criteria was confirmed visual impairment, no alertness or mental disorder, not suffering from other chronic diseases, tendency to participate in the study. In addition, exclusion criterion was incomplete questionnaires. Finally, by removing incomplete questionnaires, a number of 128 copies of questionnaires were statistically analyzed. To collect data, the quality of life in visually impaired people questionnaire, self-handicapping scale, and social support questionnaire were employed. To analyze the data, regression coefficient and multiple regression were used.
Results: Findings of the study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between social support and life quality of visually impaired individuals and more support increased the quality of life more (p<0.01). In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between behavioral self-management and life quality of visually impaired individuals (p<0.01). Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between self-actualization and the life quality of these individuals (p<0.05). Results of multiple regression analysis indicated that social support plays a significant role in predicting the life quality of visually impaired individuals. Claimed and behavioral self-handicapping which had no significant roles therefore excluded from the model.
Conclusion: It seems that visually impaired individuals’ expectations in the support dimension focus more on emotional needs and positive relationships than on pessimistic behaviors that instill disability. In addition, these individuals avoid entering to chances and opportunities of life through self-handicapping mechanisms. Therefore, become more passive and ultimately experiences lower quality of life over time. According to results, development of rehabilitation services for increasing social support and application of interventions for reducing self-handicapping in visually impaired individuals is highly recommended. In addition, need to intervention programs based on the increase in self-esteem of visually impaired individuals should be considered. Furthermore, with the aim of reinforcing the social support network among those individuals, developed programs should be designed. Additionally, relative particularly family members of visually impaired individuals should have more awareness and sensitivity to social support.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Meneses R, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Martins da Silva A, Giovagnoli A. Neuropsychological predictors of quality of life in focal epilepsy. Seizure. 2009;18:313-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2008.11.010]
2. Bullinger M. Hasford J. Testing and evaluation quality of life measures for German clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trial. 1991;12:91S-105S. [DOI:10.1016/S0197-2456(05)80015-7]
3. Atadokht A, Sheikholeslami A, Hosseini Kiasari T, Jokar Kamal Abadi N. The role of meta-cognitive beliefs and emotional intelligence of the blind in predicting social adjustment and comparing it with ordinary individuals. Quarterly of Exceptional Persons. 2015;17:149-66. [Persian] [DOI:10.22054/jpe.2015.1467]
4. Witt WP, Riley AW, Coiro MJ. Child hood functional status, family stressors and psychosocial adjustment among school-aged children with disabilities in the United States. Arch PediatrAdolesc Med. 2003;157(7):687-95. [DOI:10.1001/archpedi.157.7.687]
5. Raasch TW, Leat SJ, Kleinstein RN. Evaluating the value of low-vision services. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1997;68(5):287-95.
6. Scott IU, Smiddy WE, Schiffman J, Feuer WJ, Pappas CJ. Quality of life of patients with low vision and the impact of low vision services. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 1999;128:54-62. [DOI:10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00108-7]
7. Stelmack J, Szlyk J, Joslin C, Swetland B, Myers L. Pilot study: use of the NEI VFQ-25 to measure outcomes of low vision rehabilitation services in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Stuen C Arditi A Horowitz Aet al eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. 2000;774-776. Swets & Zeitlinger Lisse, The Netherlands.
8. Sarabandi A, Mobaraki H, Kamali M, Chabok A. Soltani Sh. Investigating the effect of using rehabilitation services on the quality of life of the blind. Novin Journal of Rehabilitation. 2013;7(4):48-56. [Persian] [http://mrj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5060-fa.html]
9. Klein BEK, Klein R, Lee KE, Cruickshanks KJ. Performance-based and self assessed measures of visual function as related to history of falls, hip fractures and measured gait time. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:160-4. [DOI:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91911-X]
10. West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Zeger S, Fried L. Function and visual impairment in a populationbased study of older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:72-82.
11. Stelmack J. Quality of life of low-vision patients and outcomes of low-vision rehabilitation. Optometry & Vision Science. 2001;78(5):335-42. [DOI:10.1097/00006324-200105000-00017]
12. Kuyk T, Liu L, Elliott JL, Grubbs HE, Owsley C, Griffin RL, et al. Health-related quality of life following blind rehabilitation. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17(4):497-507. [DOI:10.1007/s11136-008-9336-3]
13. Eftekhar H, Nojoomi M, Koohpayeh-Zadeh J. A comparison of the quality of life among blind students and their sighted counterparts. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2002;7(4):49-55. [Persian] [http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-256-en.html]
14. Ellwein B, Selvaraj S, Pokharel G. Visual function and quality of life outcomes among cataract operated and unoperated in Nepal. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1998;82:606-10. [DOI:10.1136/bjo.82.6.606]
15. Tavakol Kh, Dehi M, Naji H, Nasiri M. Parental anxiety and quality of life in children with blindness in Ababasire institution. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2008;13(4):141-4. [Persian]
16. Berglas S, Jones EE. Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978;36:405-17. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.36.4.405]
17. Heidari M, Khodapanahi K. Dehghani M. Investigating the self-contingency status in the structural model of students' academic achievement prediction [PhD Thesis].Tehran:Shahid Beheshti University; 2010. [Persian]
18. Mirzaee M, Farahani A, Heidari M. Amrai K. Comparing self-handicapping among blind and deaf students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15:777-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.183]
19. Liewellyn G, Gething L, Kendig H, Cant R. Adult sons and daughters with a disability. In: Liewellyn G, Gething L, Kendig H, Cant R. Invisible Carers: Facing an Uncertain Future. Sydney: University of Sydney; 2003. [http://www.afdsrc.org/care/completed/sons_daughters.php]
20. Heard E, Whitfield KE, Edwards CL, Bruce MA, Beech BM. Mediating effects of social support on the relationship among perceived stress, depression, and hypertension in African Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2011;103(2):116-22. [DOI:10.1177/1043659614543476]
21. Bahri L. Dehghan Menshadi M. Dehghan Menshadi Z. Investigating the role of resiliency prediction and social support in mental health of parents with blind and deaf children. Exceptional Education. 2014;1:5-12. [Persian] [http://exceptionaleducation.ir/article-1-128-fa.html]
22. Bovier PA, Chamot E, Perneger TV. Perceived stress, internal resources, and social support as determinants of mental health among young adults. Quality of Life Research. 2004;13:161-70. [DOI:10.1023/B:QURE.0000015288.43768.e4]
23. Ahmadi R. Sharifi Daramadi P. Comparison of self-efficiency effects of between visually impaired and normal male adolescents. Quarterly of Exceptional Persons. 2014; 13, 1-14. [Persian]
24. Kathleen AM, Lawrence RB. Is the self-handicapping scale reliable in non-academic achievement domains? Personality and Individual Differences. 1999;27:901-11. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00039-2]
25. Dolatian M, Maziar P, Alavi Majd H. Investigation of the relationship between delivery type and postpartum depression in women referring to selected health care centers of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2006;3(28):260-9. [Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
