Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies
مجله مطالعات ناتوانی
MEJDS
Medical Sciences
http://jdisabilstud.org
1
admin
2322-2840
2322-2840
10.29252/mejds
14
8888
13
fa
jalali
1398
12
1
gregorian
2020
3
1
0
In Press
online
1
fulltext
fa
بررسی نقش تعدیل کننده دو سوگرایی هیجانی در پیش بینی رفتار خوردن آشفته براساس ناگویی خلقی
Investigating the role of a moderator of two emotional biases in predicting turbulent eating behavior based on Alexithymia
روانشناسی
Psychology
مقاله پژوهشی اصیل
Original Research Article
<strong>زمینه و هدف:</strong> خوردن و تمام عوامل وابسته به آن از جمله عوامل مورد توجه در تأمین سلامت جسمی و روانی فرد می باشد، باید گفت که یکی از اساسی ترین راه های پیشگیری از بیماری های مزمن، تعادل در رژیم غذایی است. پژوهش حاضر به منظوربررسی نقش تعدیل کننده دوسوگرایی هیجانی در رابطه بین ناگویی خلقی و رفتار خوردن آشفته انجام شد<span dir="LTR">.</span><br>
<strong>روش بررسی:</strong> این پژوهش از نوع مطالعه همبستگی بود؛ جامعه آماری پژوهش تمامی دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شیراز در نیم سال دوم تحصیلی 97-1396 بودند. نمونه پژوهش حاضر 90 نفر ازدانشجویان بودند که به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای انتخاب شدند.برای جمع آوری داده ها از مقیاس ناگویی خلقی تورنتو، پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی هیجانی و پرسشنامه نگرش خوردن استفاده شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از روش رگرسیون چندمتغیره گام به گام با استفاده از نرم افزار <span dir="LTR">spss23</span> در سطح معناداری 05/0 صورت گرفت.<br>
<strong>یافته ها:</strong> یافته های حاصل از برازش مدل رگرسیون نشان داد که متغیر ناگویی خلقی پیش بینی کننده رفتار خوردن آشفته می باشد (<span dir="LTR">β</span><span dir="LTR"> = 0/463, p < 0/001</span>). بعلاوه با تعدیل اثر دوسوگرایی هیجانی مقدار براورد ضریب مذکور به <span dir="LTR">β</span><span dir="LTR"> = 0/359</span>(<span dir="LTR">p < 0/001</span>) تغییر یافت. افزایش 06/0 (<span dir="LTR"> p = 0/006</span>) در مقدار ضریب تعیین حاکی از تأثیر معنی دار متغیر دوسوگرایی هیجانی در بررسی ارتباط بین ناگویی خلقی و رفتار خوردن آشفته بود.<br>
<strong>نتیجه گیری:</strong> از نتایج این پژوهش میتوان نتیجه گرفت که رابطه بین ناگویی خلقی و رفتار خوردن آشفته تحت تاثیر نقش تعدیل کننده دوسوگرایی هیجانی قرار دارد.<br>
<strong>Background and aim:</strong> Eating and all its related factors are among the factors that are important in providing physical and mental health. One of the most important ways of preventing chronic diseases is to balance diet. It seems that mood formation is a determinant factor in predicting eating disorder, and in the meantime, an agent such as emotional bias as a moderating factor can affect the relationship between mood nudity and disturbed eating habits. To this end, the present study was conducted to investigate the role of emotional bias in the relationship between mood and emotional disturbance.<br>
<br>
<strong>Methodology</strong>: This research was correlational. The statistical population of the study consisted of 90 students of Islamic Azad University of Shiraz who were studying in the second six months of 1397. The sample size was determined based on the number of predictive variables based on cluster sampling method. For this study, Toronto snorkeling tool, Eating Attitude Questionnaire (EAT-26) and Expression (EAE) were used. The Toronto Noodle Scale was made by Taylor, Rhine, and Bagby and redefined by Bagby, Taylor, and Parker. The scale of 20 questions used to assess mood is an autoregressive scale with three difficulty subscales in identifying emotions (7 items), difficulty in describing emotions (5 items), and external thinking (8 items). Eating Attitudes Questionnaires (EAT-26) were developed by Garner et al. The questionnaire is widely used as a self-assessment screening tool for attitudes and behaviors of eating. The scale has 26 items and has three components of eating habits (13 items), eating (6 items) and oral control (7 questions) (17). The question of the Emotional Conjunctness Letter (AEQ) is designed to examine the importance of the bias role of emotional expression in health. This scale has 28 items, from 1 to 16 of which is related to bias in expressing positive emotions and 17-28 of them is related to doubling in favor. The range of response to each material is 5 degrees and it never varies from time to time, the method of scoring it is Likert. Will never respond to a score of 1, and will always receive a score of 5. There is no reciprocal material, so the scoring method is the same for the whole scale and the total score varies from 28 to 140.<br>
<br>
<strong>Findings</strong>: The results of the fitting of the regression model showed that the mood variance predicts disordered eating behavior (β = 0.463, p <0.001). In addition, by adjusting the effect of emotional ambivalence, the coefficient of estimation was changed to β = 0.359 (p <0.001). An increase of 0.06 (p = 0/006) in the coefficient of determination indicated a significant effect of emotional ambivalence on the relationship between mood swings and disturbed eating behaviors.<br>
<br>
<strong>Conclusion</strong>: People with emotional bias experience a higher level of negative emotions and psychological distress, and they can turn into disturbed eating behavior to escape faster than negative emotions. People with emotional biases are in conflict with their emotions. Especially, emotional ambivalence is associated with stress, and on the other hand, as bipartite individuals use conflicting coping methods, it is more likely that experiencing disturbed eating. Emotional bias is less related to self-esteem, which in turn may lead to the development of maladaptive behaviors. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the relationship between mood nougat and turbulent eating behaviors is influenced by the role of emotional bias moderator.<strong><span dir="RTL"></span></strong><br>
ناگویی خلقی,دوسوگرایی هیجانی,رفتار خوردن آشفته
: Alexithymia, emotional bias, turbulent eating behavior
0
0
http://jdisabilstud.org/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1392-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=1
amir
javadpour
امیر
جوادپور
amir.javadpour2000@gmail.com
100319475328460028960
100319475328460028960
No
نجمه
فتح
najmehfath@yahoo.com
100319475328460028961
100319475328460028961
Yes