Volume 15 - Articles-1404
MEJDS (2025) 15: 57 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mosadegh Y, Parvinpour S, Bahram A, Shafizadeh M. Investigating the Psychometric Properties and Responsiveness of Children's Perceived Motor Competence Assessment Tools Based on the COSMIN Criterion: A Systematic Review. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :57-57
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3357-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3357-en.html
1- PhD Student of Motor Development, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Department of Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Abstract: (1173 Views)
Abstract
Background & Objectives: Motor competence plays an important role in children's development and growth, providing opportunities for an active lifestyle in the future. Therefore, childhood is a critical period for the development of motor competence that enables children to participate in different physical activities successfully. Motor competence consists of two dimensions: actual motor competence and perceived motor competence. At the outset of elementary school, children exhibit varying perceptions of their physical competence, with some confident in their abilities while others feel inadequate. As physical education teachers play a crucial role in developing children's motor skills, it is essential to have reliable and valid assessment protocols for body literacy. Given that motor skills significantly impact children's development and growth, childhood is a critical period for developing motor competence that enables children and adolescents to participate in various physical activities successfully. The present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties and responsiveness of tools used to evaluate children's perceived motor competence based on the COSMIN criterion.
Methods: This study was a systematic review and the research method was based on summarizing the results based on COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) guideline. An advanced search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in the field of motor competence assessment tools for children aged 4 to 8, up to October 8, 2023. The keywords considered for this purpose were "perceived competence," "measure," "children," and all related terms. The search was conducted in English with the above keyword. The inclusion criteria for this study consist of a detailed introduction of measurement tools and evaluation items, assessment of perceived motor competence, use of valid and reliable tools, examination of at least one psychometric property of the tool based on the COSMIN criteria, publication of articles in English, and articles published in reputable journals. The study population includes healthy children aged between 4 and 8 years, and the statistical population is limited to this age range. The exclusion criteria include articles published in conferences, review articles, letters to the editor, lack of clear expression of the measurement method, short reports, articles where the participants are not children, articles that do not provide information on the characteristics of the measure proposed by COSMIN, and articles assessing perceived motor competence in individuals older than 8 years. The study selection and data extraction process were conducted independently by two authors, with any disputes resolved through discussion and, if necessary, consultation with a third author.
Results: In general, in this systematic review study, 1149 articles from three databases have been identified, of which 633 articles have been included in the review stage after repetitive removal, and 47 articles have been examined in terms of the main features of tools for evaluating perceived motor performance. These nine psychometric properties of instruments are content validity (face validity), construct validity (structural validity, hypothesis testing, and cross-cultural validity), criterion validity, reliability (internal consistency, reliability, and measurement error), and responsiveness. The obtained results showed content validity (form) of 11 articles (23%), construct validity of 13 articles (27%), hypothesis testing of 2 articles (0.04%), cross-cultural validity of 16 articles (34%), and criterion validity of 2 articles (0.04%) of 47 articles. In the internal consistency section, 36 articles (76%), and the reliability, 25 articles (53%) were recognized out of 47 articles. However, in the measurement error and responsiveness section, no reports were found among the evaluation articles.
Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, none of the tools used to assess children's perceived motor competence have reported all nine psychometric characteristics specified by the COSMIN method. Additionally, no study has yet reported the responsiveness rate and measurement error of the evaluation tool for children's perceived motor competence.
Type of Study: Systematic Review Article |
Subject:
Rehabilitation
References
1. Lander N, Mergen J, Morgan PJ, Salmon J, Barnett LM. Can a teacher–led RCT improve adolescent girls' physical self–perception and perceived motor competence? J Sports Sci. 2019;37(4):357–63. [DOI]
2. Shen B, Centeio E, Garn A, Martin J, Kulik N, Somers C, et al. Parental social support, perceived competence and enjoyment in school physical activity. J Sport Health Sci. 2018;7(3):346–52. [DOI]
3. Barnett LM, Lai SK, Veldman SLC, Hardy LL, Cliff DP, Morgan PJ, et al. Correlates of Gross motor competence in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(11):1663–88. [DOI]
4. Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273–84. [DOI]
5. Gao Z, Zeng N, Pope ZC, Wang R, Yu F. Effects of exergaming on motor skill competence, perceived competence, and physical activity in preschool children. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(2):106–13. [DOI]
6. Goodway JD, Rudisill ME. Perceived physical competence and actual motor skill competence of African American preschool children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 1997;14(4):314–26. [DOI]
7. Wang CKJ, Liu WC, Lochbaum MR, Stevenson SJ. Sport ability beliefs, 2 x 2 achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation: the moderating role of perceived competence in sport and exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(2):303–12. [DOI]
8. Qaderi H, Ghadiri F, Bahram A. Effects of teacher centered and child centered approaches on actual and perceived motor competence of the elementary school girls. Motor Behavior. 2018;10(31):39–52. [Persian] [DOI]
9. Bardid F, De Meester A, Tallir I, Cardon G, Lenoir M, Haerens L. Configurations of actual and perceived motor competence among children: associations with motivation for sports and global self–worth. Hum Mov Sci. 2016;50:1–9. [DOI]
10. Rodrigues LP, Luz C, Cordovil R, Bezerra P, Silva B, Camões M, et al. Normative values of the motor competence assessment (MCA) from 3 to 23 years of age. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22(9):1038–43. [DOI]
11. Khodaverdi Z, Bahram A, Stodden D, Kazemnejad A. The relationship between actual motor competence and physical activity in children: mediating roles of perceived motor competence and health-related physical fitness. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(16):1523–9. [DOI]
12. Feitoza AHP, Henrique R dos S, Barnett LM, Ré AHN, Lopes VP, Webster EK, et al. Perceived motor competence in childhood: Comparative study among countries. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S337–50. [DOI]
13. Hands B, Larkin D, Parker H, Straker L, Perry M. The relationship among physical activity, motor competence and health–related fitness in 14–year–old adolescents. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(5):655–63. [DOI]
14. Sabzevari H, Bahram A, Shahrzad N. The best predictor of boys' physical activity in childhood: motor competence, perceived competence and health–related fitness. Journal of Motor and Behavioral Sciences. 2019;2(1):85–96. [Persian] [Article]
15. Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306. [DOI]
16. Raudsepp L, Liblik R. Relationship of perceived and actual motor competence in children. Percept Mot Skills. 2002;94(3 Pt 2):1059–70. [DOI]
17. Wang J, Liu W, Bian W. Relationship between perceived and actual motor competence among college students. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;116(1):272–9. [DOI]
18. Essiet IA, Lander NJ, Salmon J, Duncan MJ, Eyre ELJ, Ma J, et al. A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy–report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):131. [DOI]
19. Robertson SJ, Burnett AF, Cochrane J. Tests examining skill outcomes in sport: a systematic review of measurement properties and feasibility. Sports Med. 2014;44(4):501–18. [DOI]
20. Jalali R. Review of articles related to responsiveness as a characteristic of quality of life instruments. Journal of Knowledge and Health in Basic Medical Sciences. 2015;10(1):64–72. [Persian] [DOI]
21. Nazari S, Foroughan M, Mohammadi Shahbolaghi F, Rassouli M, Sadegh Moghadam L, Farhadi A, et al. Analysis of the psychometric properties of the perceived social support scales in older adults. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2016;10(4):210–8. [Persian] [Article]
22. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, Vet HCW de, Terwee CB. The Consensus–based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105–13. [DOI]
23. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2017;16(3):343–57. [Persian] [Article]
24. Sattler MC, Jaunig J, Tösch C, Watson ED, Mokkink LB, Dietz P, et al. Current evidence of measurement properties of physical activity questionnaires for older adults: an updated systematic review. Sports Med. 2020;50(7):1271–315. [DOI]
25. Barnett LM, Webster EK, Hulteen RM, De Meester A, Valentini NC, Lenoir M, et al. Through the looking glass: a systematic review of longitudinal evidence, providing new insight for motor competence and health. Sports Med. 2022;52(4):875–920. [DOI]
26. Alcaraz–Ibáñez M, Paterna A, Griffiths MD, Sicilia Á. Psychometric properties of problematic exercise measures: a systematic review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2024;17(2):1013–49. [DOI]
27. Grgic J, Lazinica B, Pedisic Z. Test-retest reliability of the 30–15 Intermittent Fitness Test: a systematic review. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(4):413–8. [DOI]
28. Robertson S, Kremer P, Aisbett B, Tran J, Cerin E. Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study. Sports Med Open. 2017;3:2. [DOI]
29. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health–related patient–reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45. [DOI]
30. Niemistö D, Barnett LM, Laukkanen A, Tolvanen A, Sääkslahti A. Perceived motor competence in early childhood predicts perceived and actual motor competence in middle childhood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023;33(10):2025–38. [DOI]
31. Estevan I, Bowe SJ, Menescardi C, Barnett LM. Self and proxy (parents and teachers') reports of child motor competence: a three–year longitudinal study. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023;64:102331. [DOI]
32. Laukkanen A, Niemistö D, Aunola K, Barnett LM, Sääkslahti A. Child perceived motor competence as a moderator between physical activity parenting and child objectively measured physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023;67:102444. [DOI]
33. Maïano C, Morin AJS, April J, Coutu S, Dugas C, Hue O. relationship between actual and perceived locomotor and ball skills competence among children: a person–centered approach. J Sports Sci. 2022;40(3):271–80. [DOI]
34. Arman M, Barnett LM, Bowe SJ, Bahram A, Kazemnejad A. The validity and reliability of scales to measure perceived movement skill competence in Iranian young children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2021;9(1):58–79. [DOI]
35. Tietjens M, Barnett LM, Dreiskämper D, Holfelder B, Utesch TO, Lander N, et al. Conceptualising and testing the relationship between actual and perceived motor performance: a cross–cultural comparison in children from Australia and Germany. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(17):1984–96. [DOI]
36. Estevan I, Molina-García J, Queralt A, Bowe SJ, Abbott G, Barnett LM. The new version of the pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence in spanish children: evidence of validity and reliability. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte. 2018;15(55):35–54. [DOI]
37. Lopes VP, Saraiva L, Gonçalves C, Rodrigues LP. Association between perceived and actual motor competence in Portuguese children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S366–77. [DOI]
38. Famelia R, Tsuda E, Bakhtiar S, Goodway JD. Relationships among perceived and actual motor skill competence and physical activity in Indonesian preschoolers. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S403–23. [DOI]
39. Duncan MJ, Jones V, O'Brien W, Barnett LM, Eyre ELJ. Self–perceived and actual motor competence in young British children. Percept Mot Skills. 2018;125(2):251–64. [DOI]
40. Venetsanou F, Kossyva I, Valentini N, Afthentopoulou AE, Barnett L. Validity and reliability of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence for Young Greek children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S239–51. [DOI]
41. Valentini NC, Barnett LM, Bandeira PFR, Nobre GC, Zanella LW, Sartori RF. The pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence: determining content and construct validity for Brazilian children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S189–204. [DOI]
42. Diao Y, Dong C, Barnett LM, Estevan I, Li J, Ji L. Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in Chinese children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(s2):S223–38. [DOI]
43. Pesce C, Masci I, Marchetti R, Vannozzi G, Schmidt M. When children's perceived and actual motor competence mismatch: sport participation and gender differences. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S440–60. [DOI]
44. Barnett LM, Vazou S, Abbott G, Bowe SJ, Robinson LE, Ridgers ND, et al. Construct validity of the pictorial scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;22:294–302. [DOI]
45. Barnett LM, Robinson LE, Webster EK, Ridgers ND. Reliability of the pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence in 2 diverse samples of young children. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(8):1045–51. [DOI]
46. Crane JR, Foley JT, Temple VA. The influence of perceptions of competence on motor skills and physical activity in middle childhood: a test of mediation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(9):5648. [DOI]
47. Marshall RL, DiLalla LF, Harbke CR, Pali EC. Genetic and familial influences on self–perception in early childhood and self–esteem in adulthood: a cross–sectional analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2023;26(6):339–52. [DOI]
48. Jambunathan S, Burts DC. Comparison of perception of self–competence among five ethnic groups of preschoolers in the US. Early Child Development and Care. 2003;173(6):651–60. [DOI]
49. Xiong S, Zhang P, Gao Z. Effects of exergaming on preschoolers' executive functions and perceived competence: a pilot randomized trial. J Clin Med. 2019;8(4):469. [DOI]
50. Heritage B, Mancini V, Rigoli D, Piek J. Measure reliability of the perceived competence and social acceptance for children scale via rasch analysis. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020;90(1):130–51. [DOI]
51. den Uil AR, Janssen M, Busch V, Kat IT, Scholte RHJ. The relationships between children's motor competence, physical activity, perceived motor competence, physical fitness and weight status in relation to age. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0278438. [DOI]
52. Önder A, Ogelman HG, Göktaş İ. Examining the predictive effect of teacher–child relationship on young children's self–perception. Early Child Development and Care. 2022;192(3):362–9. [DOI]
53. True L, Brian A, Goodway J, Stodden D. Relationships between product–and process–oriented measures of motor competence and perceived competence. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2017;5(2):319–35. [DOI]
54. Xiong S, Li X, Tao K. Effects of structured physical activity program on Chinese young children's executive functions and perceived physical competence in a day care center. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5635070. [DOI]
55. Gullo DF, Ambrose RP. Perceived competence and social acceptance in kindergarten: its relationship to academic performance. The Journal of Educational Research. 1987;81(1):28–32. [DOI]
56. DiBiase R, Miller PM. Self–perceived peer acceptance in preschoolers of differing economic and cultural backgrounds. J Genet Psychol. 2015;176(3–4):139–55. [DOI]
57. True L, Stodden D. Examining the dynamic relationship between motor competence, perceived motor competence, and physical fitness in children: Relationships among product –and process– oriented measures of motor skill competence and perceived competence in young children. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2012;34:S12–3.
58. Valentini NC, Rudisill ME. Motivational climate, motor–skill development, and perceived competence: two studies of developmentally delayed kindergarten children. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2004;23(3):216–34. [DOI]
59. Harter S, Pike R. The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Dev. 1984;55(6):1969–82.
60. Nobre GC, Valentini NC, Nobre FSS. Motor and school performance, self–perception of competence and nutritional status of children across ages: the role of social vulnerability on child development. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2018;18(3):1478–87. [DOI]
61. Nobre GC, Valentini NC, Nobre FSS. Fundamental motor skills, nutritional status, perceived competence, and school performance of Brazilian children in social vulnerability: gender comparison. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;80:335–45. [DOI]
62. Almeida G, Luz C, Rodrigues LP, Lopes V, Cordovil R. Profiles of motor competence and its perception accuracy among children: association with physical fitness and body fat. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023;68:102458. [DOI]
63. Menescardi C, De Meester A, Álvarez O, Castillo I, Haerens L, Estevan I. The mediational role of motivation in the model of motor development in childhood: a longitudinal study. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2023;66:102398. [DOI]
64. George–Komi L, Palmer KK, Palmer SA, Nunu MA, Robinson LE. Sex differences in perceived motor competence after the children's health activity motor program intervention. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2023;45(5):249–56. [DOI]
65. Barnett LM, Abbott G, Lander N, Jidovtseff B, Ridgers ND. Validity evidence for the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Water Competence short form (PSPWC–4). J Sports Sci. 2022;40(22):2491–8. [DOI]
66. Moreno–Murcia JA, Huéscar Hernández E, Polo R, López E, Carbonell B, Meseguer S. The effect of stories on real and perceived aquatic competence in preschoolers. Revista Internacional Medicina Ciencias Actividad Fisica Deporte. 2016;16(61):127–38. [DOI]
67. De Pasquale C, De Sousa Morgado L, Jidovtseff B, De Martelaer K, Barnett LM. Utility of a scale to assess Australian children's perceptions of their swimming competence and factors associated with child and parent perception. Health Promot J Austr. 2021;32 Suppl 2:106–15. [DOI]
68. Barnett LM, Makin O. An app to assess young children's perceptions of movement competence. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(s2):S252–63. [DOI]
69. Noordstar JJ, van der Net J, Jak S, Helders PJM, Jongmans MJ. The change in perceived motor competence and motor task values during elementary school: a longitudinal cohort study. Br J Dev Psychol. 2016;34(3):427–46. [DOI]
70. Estevan I, Molina-García J, Abbott G, Bowe SJ, Castillo I, Barnett LM. Evidence of reliability and validity for the pictorial scale of perceived movement skill competence in Spanish children. Journal of Motor Learning and Development. 2018;6(Suppl 2):S205–22. [DOI]
71. Robinson LE, Palmer KK. Development of a digital–based instrument to assess perceived motor competence in children: face validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency. Sports (Basel). 2017;5(3):48. [DOI]
72. Vazou S, Mantis C, Luze G, Krogh JS. Self–perceptions and social–emotional classroom engagement following structured physical activity among preschoolers: A feasibility study. J Sport Health Sci. 2017;6(2):241–7. [DOI]
73. Liong GHE, Ridgers ND, Barnett LM. Associations between skill perceptions and young children's actual fundamental movement skills. Percept Mot Skills. 2015;120(2):591–603. [DOI]
74. Barnett LM, Ridgers ND, Zask A, Salmon J. Face validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in young children. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(1):98–102. [DOI]
75. Pérez LMR, Sanz JLG. New measure o f perceived motorcompetence for children ages 4 to 6 years. Percept Mot Skills. 2005;101(1):131–48. [DOI]
76. Downs SJ, Boddy LM, McGrane B, Rudd JR, Melville CA, Foweather L. Motor competence assessments for children with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6(1):e000902. [DOI]
77. Hulteen RM, Barnett LM, True L, Lander NJ, Del Pozo Cruz B, Lonsdale C. Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(15):1717–98. [DOI]
78. Asunta P, Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Rintala P. Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties – a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):322. [DOI]
79. Nobakht Z, Sourtigi H, Rassafiani M. Translation, cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of a test: factors influencing researcher decisions. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;4(4):173–83. [Persian] [DOI]
80. Shirinabadi Farahani A, Rassouli M, Yaghmaei F, Alavi Majd H. Index for selecting an appropriate instrument to conduct research in health sciences: Introducing the COSMIN checklist. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2015;4(4):1–13. [Persian] [Article]
81. Corner EJ, Hichens LV, Attrill KM, Vizcaychipi MP, Brett SJ, Handy JM. The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study. Burns. 2015;41(2):241–7. [DOI]
82. Ebadi A, Taghizadeh Z, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Translation, development and psychometric properties of health related measures–Part 2: construct validity, reliability and responsiveness. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2017;16(4):445–55. [Persian] [Article]
83. Gerber CN, Labruyère R, van Hedel HJA. Reliability and responsiveness of upper limb motor assessments for children with central neuromotor disorders: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(1):19–39. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
