Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 8 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mehrparvar R, Seidi F, Shirzad Eraghi E, Sokhangooei Y. Comparison of two corrective exercises programming with approach of SEAS and Evminov on Non-structural scoliosis abnormality. MEJDS 2020; 10 :8-8
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1162-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1162-en.html
1- University of Tehran
2- Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences
3- Faculty of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences
2- Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences
3- Faculty of Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (2187 Views)
Background & Objective: Scoliosis the spinal anomalies, if not detected in advance and progressed, can create problems in the appearance of the person. In the severe cases may even cause respiratory impairment. Different methods have been developed such as surgery, brace and physical activity to correct this abnormality. Today, in scoliosis abnormalities, different approaches and styles related to physical activity have been proposed all of which are designed to correct their abilities according to the type of abnormality. Recently, an approach has been developed that claims to have a good effect on this index; hence the purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare the effectiveness of the Evminov training program with SEAS on abnormalities of nonstructural scoliosis in boys aged 10 to 14 years.
Methods: The present study was semi–experimental. The statistical population was all primary and secondary school students from the 4th to 8th grades who participated in the movement correctional centers of Karaj (Alborz province, north of Iran), including 752 people. The statistical sample of the study consisted of 45 boys 10 to 14 years old with non–structural scoliosis with curvature less than 20 degrees, which were identified by random sampling into three groups of 15 experimental subjects (2 groups of SEAS and Evminov exercises) and a control group. Inclusion criteria included 1) 10 to 14 years old boys with non–structural scoliosis with lateral curvature of less than 20 degrees; 2) non–use of other therapies for treatment; 3) lack of employment for specific work or regular exercise. Exclusion criteria included 1) had any pathological symptoms, history of fractures, surgery or joint diseases in the spine, shoulder and shoulder belt; 2) regular weekly physical activity, membership in sports teams, and lack of completion of a training program based on the goals of the research or the lack of interest of the subject; 3) structural or functional shortness of more than 2 centimeters in one of the lower limbs 4) scoliosis convulsion or structural and protic scoliosis, including spinal rotation and apparent deformities of the trunk during the Adams test in forward folded forward position 5) weight outside normal range or BMI less than 18 or more It was 25. The research tools included the standard Evminov board, the EOS700D digital camera, and the corresponding tripod, digital astronomy, digital scale for the subjects' weight, Corel Draw 110, and a small and large training platform ladder. The training program for SEAS and Evminov was for 12 weeks and three sessions per week. In the Evminov training group, each move with 3 to 5 repetitions between 10 to 12 seconds and the rest of 12 to 15 seconds and a 10 to 20 gradient degree Evminov board. In the SEAS training group, six different types of exercises ranged from 10 to 12 seconds and three to five repetitions with a rest time of 12 to 15 seconds. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test used for normality investigation, data analysis, and t–test and ANOVA test and LSD post hoc test used for data analysis. Also, the statistical significance of 95% confidence level with alpha less than or equal to 0.05 considered at all stages of the test. After data collection, using SPSS software version 24, the results were interpreted.
Results: The results of this study showed that 12 weeks of Seas and Evminov exercises had a significant effect on the malformation of nonstructural scoliosis in boys aged 10 to 14 years (p≤0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference between the results of SEAS and Evminov exercises on nonstructural scoliosis abnormalities.
Conclusion: It seems that corrective exercises, especially exercises based on the principles of SEAS and Evminov practices, can be effective in reducing the angle of lateral deviation of the spine, and it is suggested that further research be conducted to increase the external validity of the study.
Methods: The present study was semi–experimental. The statistical population was all primary and secondary school students from the 4th to 8th grades who participated in the movement correctional centers of Karaj (Alborz province, north of Iran), including 752 people. The statistical sample of the study consisted of 45 boys 10 to 14 years old with non–structural scoliosis with curvature less than 20 degrees, which were identified by random sampling into three groups of 15 experimental subjects (2 groups of SEAS and Evminov exercises) and a control group. Inclusion criteria included 1) 10 to 14 years old boys with non–structural scoliosis with lateral curvature of less than 20 degrees; 2) non–use of other therapies for treatment; 3) lack of employment for specific work or regular exercise. Exclusion criteria included 1) had any pathological symptoms, history of fractures, surgery or joint diseases in the spine, shoulder and shoulder belt; 2) regular weekly physical activity, membership in sports teams, and lack of completion of a training program based on the goals of the research or the lack of interest of the subject; 3) structural or functional shortness of more than 2 centimeters in one of the lower limbs 4) scoliosis convulsion or structural and protic scoliosis, including spinal rotation and apparent deformities of the trunk during the Adams test in forward folded forward position 5) weight outside normal range or BMI less than 18 or more It was 25. The research tools included the standard Evminov board, the EOS700D digital camera, and the corresponding tripod, digital astronomy, digital scale for the subjects' weight, Corel Draw 110, and a small and large training platform ladder. The training program for SEAS and Evminov was for 12 weeks and three sessions per week. In the Evminov training group, each move with 3 to 5 repetitions between 10 to 12 seconds and the rest of 12 to 15 seconds and a 10 to 20 gradient degree Evminov board. In the SEAS training group, six different types of exercises ranged from 10 to 12 seconds and three to five repetitions with a rest time of 12 to 15 seconds. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test used for normality investigation, data analysis, and t–test and ANOVA test and LSD post hoc test used for data analysis. Also, the statistical significance of 95% confidence level with alpha less than or equal to 0.05 considered at all stages of the test. After data collection, using SPSS software version 24, the results were interpreted.
Results: The results of this study showed that 12 weeks of Seas and Evminov exercises had a significant effect on the malformation of nonstructural scoliosis in boys aged 10 to 14 years (p≤0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference between the results of SEAS and Evminov exercises on nonstructural scoliosis abnormalities.
Conclusion: It seems that corrective exercises, especially exercises based on the principles of SEAS and Evminov practices, can be effective in reducing the angle of lateral deviation of the spine, and it is suggested that further research be conducted to increase the external validity of the study.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Rehabilitation
References
1. Ameri E, Behtash H, Mobini B, Bouzari B, Shooshtarizadeh T, Kabiri P. Pathologic study of paraspinal muscles in different types of Scoliosis. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2008;26(88):46–53. [Persian] [Article]
2. Lonstein JE. Scoliosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;443:248–59. [DOI]
3. Weinstein SL, Ponseti IV. Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(4):447–55.
4. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(4):512–21. [DOI]
5. Syczewska M, Graff K, Kalinowska M, Szczerbik E, Domaniecki J. Influence of the structural deformity of the spine on the gait pathology in scoliotic patients. Gait Posture. 2012;35(2):209–13. [DOI]
6. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stüssi E. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(5):449–56. [DOI]
7. Gum JL, Asher MA, Burton DC, Lai S-M, Lambart LM. Transverse plane pelvic rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: primary or compensatory? Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1579–86. [DOI]
8. Hawes MC. The use of exercises in the treatment of scoliosis: an evidence-based critical review of the literature. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003;6(3–4):171–82. [DOI]
9. Siqueira Rodrigues BG de, Ali Cader S, Bento Torres NVO, Oliveira EM de, Martin Dantas EH. Pilates method in personal autonomy, static balance and quality of life of elderly females. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(2):195–202. [DOI]
10. Duval-Beaupère G, Lespargot A, Grossiord A. Flexibility of scoliosis, What does it mean? Is this terminology appropriate? Spine. 1985;10(5):428–32.
11. Vyacheslav E. However to win back pain. Restoring the spine by the method by using / Kak navsegda pobedit bol v spine. Vosstanovlenie pozvonochnika po metodike avtora s ispolzovaniem. Ukrine: Azbuka; 2010. [Russian]
12. Romano M, Negrini A, Parzini S, Tavernaro M, Zaina F, Donzelli S, et al. SEAS (Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis): A modern and effective evidence based approach to physiotherapic specific scoliosis exercises. Scoliosis. 2015;10(1):3. [DOI]
13. Negrini S, Negrini A, Romano M, Verzini N, Negrini A, Parzini S. A controlled prospective study on the efficacy of SEAS.02 exercises in preparation to bracing for idiopathic scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;123:519–22.
14. MacDonald DA, Moseley GL, Hodges PW. The lumbar multifidus: does the evidence support clinical beliefs? Man Ther. 2006;11(4):254–63. [DOI]
15. Smania N, Picelli A, Romano M, Negrini S. Neurophysiological basis of rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(10):763–71. [DOI]
16. Berven S, Bradford DS. Neuromuscular scoliosis: causes of deformity and principles for evaluation and management. Semin Neurol. 2002;22(2):167–78. [DOI]
17. Ranganathan R, Newell KM. Changing up the routine: intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(1):64–70. [DOI]
18. Najafi H, Seidi F, Alizade MH. The effect of an eight week selected corrective exercises program on non-structural scoliosis deformity. J Res Sport Rehab. 2014;2(3):11–9. [Persian] [Article]
19. Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
20. Kotwicki T, Chowańska J, Kinel E, Lorkowska M, Stryła W, Szulc A. Sitting forward bending position versus standing position for studying the back shape in scoliotic children. Scoliosis. 2007;2(1):S34. [DOI]
21. Berdishevsky H, Lebel VA, Bettany-Saltikov J, Rigo M, Lebel A, Hennes A, et al. Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises - a comprehensive review of seven major schools. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;11:20. [DOI]
22. Negrini A, Negrini S, Romano M, Verzini N, Parzini S, Monticone M, et al. A Blind Radiographic Controlled Study on the Efficacy of Active Self-Correction According to SEAS. 02. In: 3rd International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities. Poland: SOSORT (Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment); 2006.
23. Daneshmandi H, Alizadeh MH, Gharakhanlou R. Corrective Exercises. Tehran: SAMT; 2011. [Persian]
24. Heary RF, Madhavan K. The history of spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(3 Suppl):5–15. [DOI]
25. Daneshmandi H, Akbar M, Ghafar Pour Y. Barrasi taghirat scoliosis pas az yek doure tamrinat eslahi [Study of scoliosis changes after a period of corrective exercises]. J Harekat. 2004;(21):33–43. [Persian] [Article]
26. Alanazi MH, Parent EC, Dennett E. Effect of stabilization exercise on back pain, disability and quality of life in adults with scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(5):647–53. [DOI]
27. Meyer D, D.C. Correction of Spondylolithesis by the Correction of Global Posture [Internet]. Circular Traction. 2001. Available from: [Article]
28. Rahnama N, Bambaeichi E, Taghian F, Nazarian AB, Abdollahi M. Effect of 8 Weeks Regular Corrective Exercise on Spinal Columns Deformities in Girl Students. J Isfahan Med School. 2010;27(101):676–86. [Persian] [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
