logo
Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 131 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.UI.REC.1402.012

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Jahanbazi R, Kalantari M, Sarafraz M. Developing a Structural Model of Attachment Styles and Psychological Distress With the Mediation of Self-compassion in Self-harming Adolescents aged 13 to 18. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :131-131
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3371-en.html
1- MSc Student in Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2- Full Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract:   (1797 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Adolescence is a critical period of development characterized by unique challenges and vulnerabilities. One of the most significant behaviors adolescents exhibit in response to challenges is self–harm, which carries both personal and social consequences. One of the most significant factors influencing the occurrence of self–harming behaviors is the presence of psychological distress in adolescents. Psychological distress refers to a group of negative emotional states such as anxiety, depression, and stress, which can have a considerable impact on an individual’s mental health and well–being. Another predictive variable in the occurrence of psychological distress is attachment styles. According to John Bowlby, attachment is an enduring emotional bond between a developing child and a caregiver that affects social development and psychological functioning throughout a lifetime. Some studies have examined mechanisms that increase the impact of attachment styles on psychological distress. One of these mechanisms is a protective variable, self–compassion, which moderates negative emotions. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the relationships among attachment styles, psychological distress, and self–compassion in self–harming adolescents.
Methods: The current descriptive–analytical research employed structural equation modeling as its research approach. The statistical population of the research included all self–harming adolescents aged 13 to 18 living in Shiraz City, Iran, in the spring of 2023. Of whom, 275 were selected by a convenience sampling method. Participants were required to meet specific criteria, including a willingness to participate in the study and a demonstration of self–harm. Incomplete responses to questionnaire items served as the exclusion criterion. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects orally to participate in the study, and to maintain confidentiality, no identifying information was collected. After selecting the statistical sample, the research questionnaires were distributed in paper form by the first researcher to adolescent clients at 4 psychology clinics in Shiraz. Data were collected through the Attachment Style Questionnaire (Collins & Read, 1990), the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002), the Self–compassion Scale (Neff, 2003), and the Inventory of Statements About Self–Injury (Klonsky & Glenn, 2009). For data analysis, in the descriptive statistics section, central and dispersion indices, such as the mean and standard deviation, were used. In the inferential statistics section, the structural equation modeling method was used in SPSS version 22 and AMOS version 22.
Results: Results showed that the direct effects of secure attachment style on psychological distress (β= –0.257, p<0.001) and self–compassion (β=0.338, p<0.001), the direct effects of avoidant attachment style on psychological distress (β=0.157, p=0.031) and self–compassion (β= –0.162, p=0.037), as well as the direct effect of self–compassion on psychological distress (β= –0.362, p<0.001) were significant. The indirect effects of secure attachment style (β = –0.122, p = 0.002) and avoidant attachment style (β = 0.059, p = 0.032) on psychological distress, mediated by self–compassion, were significant. The indirect effect of anxious attachment style (β=0.028, p=0.315) mediated by self–compassion on psychological distress was not significant. In addition, according to the indicators of the proposed research model, the collected data had an acceptable fit (χ2/df=1.925, CFI=0.939, GFI=0.897, RMSEA=0.077, IFI=0.941).
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, attachment styles, mediated by self–compassion, play a significant role in the psychological distress of self–harming adolescents. The present study indicates the importance of psychological factors, such as attachment styles and self–compassion, in the psychological distress of this group of adolescents.

Full-Text [PDF 431 kb]   (28 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Alami K, Ghasemi E, Semnanian S, Azizi H. Adolescent morphine exposure changes the endogenous vlPAG opioid response to inflammatory pain in rats. Dev Psychobiol. 2024;66(1):e22447. [DOI]
2. Jiang Y, You J, Zheng X, Lin MP. The qualities of attachment with significant others and self-compassion protect adolescents from non-suicidal self-injury. Sch Psychol Q. 2017;32(2):143–55. [DOI]
3. Trafford AM, Carr MJ, Ashcroft DM, Chew-Graham CA, Cockcroft E, Cybulski L, et al. Temporal trends in eating disorder and self-harm incidence rates among adolescents and young adults in the UK in the 2 years since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023;7(8):544–54. [DOI]
4. Soyez V, Hove LV, Azadfar Z, Heel MV, Soyez V. The effectivity of a school-based early intervention targeting psychological complaints and non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024;13(7):1852. [DOI]
5. Sadath A, Troya MI, Nicholson S, Cully G, Leahy D, Ramos Costa AP, et al. Physical and mental illness comorbidity among individuals with frequent self-harm episodes: A mixed-methods study. Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1121313. [DOI]
6. Nock MK. Why do people hurt themselves? new insights into the nature and functions of self-injury. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(2):78–83. [DOI]
7. Rogier G, Petrocchi C, D’aguanno M, Velotti P. Self-harm and attachment in adolescents: what is the role of emotion dysregulation? Eur Psychiatry. 2017;41(S1):S222. [DOI]
8. Ahmadi Marvili N, Mirzahoseini H, Monirpoor N. The role of personality organization and attachment styles in tendency of adolescence toward self–harm behaviors and suicide. Iran J Rehabil Res Nurs. 2019;5(3):14–22. [Persian] [Article]
9. Simionescu G, Doroftei B, Maftei R, Obreja BE, Anton E, Grab D, et al. The complex relationship between infertility and psychological distress (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(4):306. [DOI]
10. Ciocca G, Rossi R, Collazzoni A, Gorea F, Vallaj B, Stratta P, et al. The impact of attachment styles and defense mechanisms on psychological distress in a non-clinical young adult sample: a path analysis. J Affect Disord. 2020;273:384–90. [DOI]
11. Bowlby J. Disruption of affectional bonds and its effects on behavior. Can Ment Health Suppl. 1969;59:12–12. [Article]
12. Allen JP, Tan J. The multiple facets of attachment in adolescence. Cassidy J, Shaver P. editors. Handbook of attachment. New York NY: Guilford. 2016. pp. 399-415.
13. Saeeda S, Bastami M, Mootabi F, Safarpour F. Prediction cognitive emotion regulation strategies based on attachment styles with the mediating role of self-compassion. Rooyesh. 2022;11(5):147–60. [Persian] [Article]
14. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity. 2003;2(3):223-50. [DOI]
15. Bluth K, Campo RA, Futch WS, Gaylord SA. Age and gender differences in the associations of self-compassion and emotional well-being in a large adolescent sample. J Youth Adolescence. 2017;46(4):840–53. [DOI]
16. Srinivasan R, Flouri E, Lewis G, Solmi F, Stringaris A, Lewis G. Changes in early childhood irritability and its association with depressive symptoms and self-harm during adolescence in a nationally representative United Kingdom birth cohort. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024;63(1):39–51. [DOI]
17. Garner DM, Olmsted MP, Bohr Y, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychol Med. 1982;12(4):871–8. [DOI]
18. Klonsky ED, Glenn CR. Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2009;31(3):215–9. [DOI]
19. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(4):644–63. [DOI]
20. Pakdaman Sh. Investigating the relationship between attachment and socialization in adolescence. [Dissertation for PhD]: [Tehran, Iran]. Tehran University; 2001.
21. Mohebbi L. Investigating the mediating role of sensitivity to justice in the relationship between attachment styles and academic dishonesty. [Thesis for MSc]: [Shiraz, Iran]. Shiraz University; 2021. [Persian]
22. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76. [DOI]
23. Yaghoubi H. Psychometric properties of the 10 questions Version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10). Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 2016; 6(4): 45-57. [Article]
24. Momeni F, Shahidi S, Mootabi F, Heydari M. Psychometric properties of a Farsi version of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Contemp Psychol. 2014;8(2(16)):27–40. [Persian]
25. Lotfi S, Paivastegar M, Khosravi Z, Khodabakhsh Pirlkani R, Mehrinejad A. Psychometric properties of the persian version of the scale of statements related to self-injury in students. J Psychol Sci. 2022;21(110):321–36. [Persian] [DOI]
26. Wulandari D, Sutrisno S, Nirwana MB. Mardia’s Skewness and Kurtosis for Assessing Normality Assumption in Multivariate Regression. Enthusiastic Int J Appl Stat Data Sci. 2021;1–6. [DOI]
27. Gökdağ C. How does interpersonal emotion regulation explain psychological distress? The roles of attachment style and social support. Personal Individ Differ. 2021;176:110763. [DOI]
28. Akhavan-Abiri F, Shairi MR, Gholami Fesharaki M. The relationship between attachment and psychological distress with regard to the mediating role of mindfulness. Feyz Med Sci J. 2019;23(1):89–101. [Persian] [Article]
29. Poostchi M, Sharifi -Daramadi P, Asgari M, Kazemi F. Effectiveness of mother-child interaction instructional program based on secure attachment style on social adjustment of elementary school students with anxiety disorders. Middle East J Disabil Stud. 2022;12(0):66–66. [Persian] [Article]
30. Husain W, Inam A, Wasif S, Zaman S. Emotional intelligence: emotional expression and emotional regulation for intrinsic and extrinsic emotional satisfaction. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:3901–13. [DOI]
31. Imani M, Taghva A, Shiralinia K, Kazemi M. The role of personal and occupational factors on suicide and self-harm behavior of military personnel. EBNESINA. 2015;17(2):43–51. [Persian] [Article]
32. Lathren CR, Rao SS, Park J, Bluth K. Self-compassion and current close interpersonal relationships: a scoping literature review. Mindfulness. 2021;12(5):1078–93. [DOI]
33. Murray CV, Jacobs JIL, Rock AJ, Clark GI. Attachment style, thought suppression, self-compassion and depression: Testing a serial mediation model. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(1):e0245056. [DOI]
34. Viriyaphongsagul P. Attachment style, self-compassion, emotional empathy, and depression among undergraduate students in a selected international university. Sch Hum Sci. 2021;13(1):1-4.
35. Mackintosh K, Power K, Schwannauer M, Chan SWY. The relationships between self-compassion, attachment and interpersonal problems in clinical patients with mixed anxiety and depression and emotional distress. Mindfulness. 2018;9(3):961–71. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.