Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 9 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saeidi M, Khalatbari J, Ghorbanshiroudi S, Abolghasemi S. Cognitive behavioral therapy and compassion focused therapy on loneliness of women on the verge of divorce. MEJDS 2020; 10 :9-9
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1220-en.html
1- Tonekabon branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (2902 Views)
Background & Objectives: Loneliness among the main psychosocial concerns of women, especially those who are in the process of divorcing and family separation. The statistics suggest that one out of every 4 individuals suffers from loneliness. Loneliness affects people with a sense of emptiness, sorrow, and anxiety. Moreover, it influences various aspects of social interactions, lifestyle, and bio psychological well–being. Loneliness is generally accompanied by social, behavioral, and emotional harms. Literature suggests that loneliness is a causative factor in the health and well–being of different populations and has long–term and immediate consequences in mental health. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Compassion–Focused Therapy (CFT) are among the approaches that could help people. The main purpose of CBT is to help group members to identify and experience their feelings and to perceive how their beliefs and assumptions influence their feelings and behaviors; accordingly, they could experience alternative substitutes. CFT is among the most influential and prominent theories, rooted in evolutionary psychology and basic nerve science. It comes from tradition and the cognitive–behavioral model. In CFT, people learn to stop their critique, blame, and condemnation, and accept the responsibility of their thoughts and feelings. They are trained to be keen to self–reproach. In this regard, the present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CBT and CFT on loneliness in women on the verge of divorce.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of this study included all women referring to the social emergency department of Tonekabon City, Iran, who were on the verge of divorce. In total, 45 individuals were randomly selected and assigned into two experimental groups and one control group (n=15). The experimental groups received CBT and CFT for 8 consecutive 60–minute sessions; however, the control group received no treatment. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3) was used to collect the required data. After the end of intervention sessions, all of the study subjects completed this scale again. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS, applying one–way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). 
Results: The ANCOVA results suggested significant differences in loneliness scores between the experimental and control groups. CBT and CFT significantly affected loneliness in women on the verge of divorce in experimental groups compared to the controls (p<0.001). Accordingly, the research hypotheses were confirmed. 
Conclusion: Cognitive reconstruction is beneficial in understanding and modifying negative thinking. Cognitive reconstruction helps individuals to stay positive and to alter their thinking positively. Negative thinking, in addition to generating a feeling of discomfort, decreases the quality of a person's performance and undermines social relationships with other people. CFT could assist an induvial in improving communication with self and others, and overcome the feelings of loneliness and isolation. Therefore, by persuading their compassion, they can cope with their destructive tendencies, and emotions, and improve their interpersonal communication and calmness. Therefore, CBT and CFT could be used as effective measures to reduce the sense of loneliness in women on the verge of divorce.
Full-Text [PDF 419 kb]   (1055 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Berguno G, Leroux P, McAinsh K, Shaikh S. Children’s experience of loneliness at school and its relation to bullying and the quality of teacher interventions. The Qualitative Report. 2004;9(3):483–99.
2. Jokar B, Salimi A. Vijegihaye ravansanji form kootah meqyas ehsas tanhaie ejtemaie va atefi bozorgsalan [Psychometric properties of the short form of adult social and affective loneliness scale]. Journal of Behavioral Science .2011;5(4):311–7. [Persian]
3. Wu C, Yao G. Psychometric analysis of the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences. 2008;44(8):1762–71. [DOI]
4. Fisher B. When Your Relationship Ends: The Divorce Process Rebuilding Blocks. Family Relations Learning Center; 1978, pp:29–38.
5. Heinrich LM, Gullone E. The clinical significance of loneliness: a literature review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(6):695–718. [DOI]
6. Michela JL, Peplau LA, Weeks DG. Perceived dimensions of attributions for loneliness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982;43(5):929–36. [DOI]
7. Karnick PM. Feeling lonely: theoretical perspectives. Nurs Sci Q. 2005;18(1):7–12; discussion 6. [DOI]
8. Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Gregg A, Tissarchondou HS, Peveler R. Loneliness, social support and cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stress. Stress. 2007;10(1):37–44. [DOI]
9. Vitkus J, Horowitz LM. Poor social performance of lonely people: lacking a skill or adopting a role? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52(6):1266–73. [DOI]
10. Kleinke CL. Coping with Life Challenges. Mohamadkhani Sh. (Persian translator). Fourteen edition. Tehran: Resane Takhassosi Publication; 2016, pp:188.
11. Wright JH, Basco MR, Thase ME. Learning Cognitive-Behavior Therapy: An Illustrated Guide. Ghasemzadeh H, Hamidpour H. (Persian translator). 3rd edition. Tehran: Arjmand Publication; 2016.
12. Gilbert P, Irons C. Focused therapies and compassionate mind training for shame and self-attacking. In: Compassion: Conceptualisations, research and use in psychotherapy. New York, US: Routledge; 2005. pp:263–325.
13. Whelton WJ, Greenberg LS. Emotion in self-criticism. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;38(7):1583–95. [DOI]
14. Leary MR, Tate EB, Adams CE, Allen AB, Hancock J. Self-compassion and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events: the implications of treating oneself kindly. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(5):887–904. [DOI]
15. Bennett-Goleman T. Emotional alchemy: how the mind can heal the heart. New York: Three Rivers Press; 2001.
16. Gilbert P. Compassion Focused Therapy: Distinctive Features. Esbati M,Feizy A. (Persion translator). 1st edition. Tehran: Ebne Sina Publication; 2016.
17. Hutcherson CA, Seppala EM, Gross JJ. Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. Emotion. 2008;8(5):720–4. [DOI]
18. Rezaei M. The effect of self-compassion training on the amount of passing, sincere attitudes and quality of life of married people [Master's Thesis]. Tehran: Islamic Azad University of Tehran Center; 2015. [Persian]
19. Siegel DJ. The Mindful Therapist: A Clinician’s Guide to Mindsight and Neural Integration. Norton; 2010.
20. Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978;42(3):290–4. [DOI]
21. Bahirayi H, Delavar A, Ahadi H. Standardization of UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3) on students attending Universities in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;1(1):6–18. [Persian]
22. Free ML. Cognitive Therapy in Groups: Guidelines and Resources for Practice. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2007, pp:39–52.
23. Neff KD, McGehee P. Self-compassion and Psychological Resilience Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Self and Identity. 2010;9(3):225–40. [DOI]
24. Porges SW. The Polyvagal Perspective. Biol Psychol. 2007;74(2):116–43. [DOI]
25. Thoma NC, McKay D. Working with Emotion in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Techniques for Clinical Practice. Mohamad Khani Sh, Etemadi A, Sadat Goli Z, Bastami M, Khaleghi M, Akbari E. (Persian translator). 1st edition. Tehran: Arjmand Publication; 2015.
26. Nori H. Compassion & Mindfulness a New Approach to Life's Challenge. 1st edition. Tehran: Kianafraz Publication; 2017. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb