Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 142 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mendeley  
Zotero  
RefWorks

Adel Ghahraman M, Shirzad E, Minonejhad H, Akochakian M. Comparing the Effect of Core Muscle Fatigue on the Kinematic Parameters of Walking Between Men and Women. MEJDS 2024; 14 :142-142
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3185-en.html
1- PhD Student in Physical Education, Sports Pathology and Corrective Exercises, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
2- PhD in Physical Education Department, Sports Biomechanics, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
3- PhD in Physical Education Department, Sports Pathology and Corrective Exercises, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (352 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Athletes generally seek to improve their performance, and to achieve this goal, they use conditioning training programs that include core stability exercises. Fatigue is one of the causes that can lead to decreased coordination and impaired muscle function, and the muscles of the core area of ​​the body are of great importance by creating a stable surface for the execution of coordinated movements of the limbs. Changes in muscle function caused by fatigue reduce their ability to generate strength and, as a result, the occurrence of abnormalities and injuries. Fatigue affects gait parameters such as increasing stride width to improve balance and increase heel strike speed. Fatigue differs between men and women. Despite the studies that have been conducted on the relationship between central stability and performance and according to the results of such research, researchers have not yet managed to clearly understand the impact or lack of influence of central stability on the performance of athletes. This study compared the effect of central muscle fatigue on the kinematic parameters of walking between men and women.
Methods: The present research method was interventional (quasi–experimental) due to the application of fatigue. The selection of subjects was targeted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the current research, the effect of central body muscle fatigue on walking was investigated through repeated measurement design (pretest–posttest) in two groups of subjects. The statistical population of this research includes all young men and women aged 18 to 25 with 3 years of regular sports experience who participated in the exam based on a public call in the universities of Mashhad City, Iran, in the academic year of 2022–2023. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the samples of this research included 15 female and 15 male qualified volunteers who were identified from the statistical community and then purposefully selected as research subjects. The inclusion criteria comprised the body mass index between 20–25 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria also include non–participation in the posttest and non–satisfaction of the person to participate in the research. In the exclusion criteria section, people with a history of the trunk or lower limb surgery, severe spinal deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis, etc.), meniscus damage and knee ligament tears, ankle joint instability, lower limb misalignment, including genu valgum, genu varum, geno recurvatum, flat soles and hollow soles, suffering from back pain during the tests, having a history of any acute injury in the 60 days before the tests used, which had a negative effect in this research, and use of assistive devices for walking. Three attempts of walking without shoes were performed before and three attempts after the fatigue protocol. The subject was asked to walk a distance of two meters to the sides and in front of the location of the cameras. To analyze the data in SPSS software, a paired t test was used to examine intragroup comparisons, and an independent t test was used for intergroup comparisons at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: According to the paired t test results, no significant difference was observed between the male and female groups (p>0.05) in the pretest and posttest scores of core muscle fatigue on gait kinematic parameters. By examining the results of the independent t test between the male and female groups, there was a significant difference only in the pretest scores of step (p=0.012) and stride (p=0.025), and no significant difference was observed in the pretest and posttest scores of step time, stride time, cadence, and speed (p>0.05).
Conclusion: While there may be differences in the effects of fatigue on kinematic parameters between women and men, the general results show that the impact of fatigue on walking performance may not be significantly different between the two sexes. Since the parameters of step, stride, step time, stride time, cadence, and speed were constant in both the pretest and posttest stages, this result is correct only for the cases examined in the test, and different results may be obtained in other conditions.

Full-Text [PDF 259 kb]   (9 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Reed CA, Ford KR, Myer GD, Hewett TE. The effects of isolated and integrated “core stability” training on athletic performance measures: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012;42(8):697–706. [DOI]
2. Bonnar D, Bartel K, Kakoschke N, Lang C. Sleep interventions designed to improve athletic performance and recovery: a systematic review of current approaches. Sports Med. 2018;48(3):683–703. [DOI]
3. Domingos C, Alves CP, Sousa E, Rosa A, Pereira JG. Does neurofeedback training improve performance in athletes? NeuroRegulation. 2020;7(1):8–17. [DOI]
4. Kurtsev BV,Gorodiskij BV, Jorgos P, inventors. Means of imforving performance of athletes [Internet]. Russia Patent RU 2664424 C1. 2018 [cited Nov 2024]. [Russian] Available from: [Article]
5. Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–602. [DOI]
6. Mohseni M, Imani F. The emerging burden of low back pain in the Iranian population: a warning about resource limitations. Interv Pain Med Neuromod. 2023;3(1): e136055. [DOI]
7. Sharrock C, Cropper J, Mostad J, Johnson M, Malone T. A pilot study of core stability and athletic performance: is there a relationship? International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2011;6(2):63–74.
8. Cissik JM. The role of core training in athletic performance, injury prevention, and injury treatment. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2011;33(1):10–5. [DOI]
9. Borghuis J, Hof AL, Lemmink KAPM. The importance of sensory–motor control in providing core stability. Sports Med. 2008;38(11):893–916. https:// [DOI]
10. Nesser TW, Huxel KC, Tincher JL, Okada T. The relationship between core stability and performance in division I football players. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(6):1750. [DOI]
11. Okada T, Huxel KC, Nesser TW. Relationship between core stability, functional movement, and performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(1):252–61. [DOI]
12. Clayton MA, Trudo CE, Laubach LL, Linderman JK, Marco GM, Barr S. Relationships between isokinetic core strength and field based athletic performance tests in male collegiate baseball players. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online. 2011;14(5):20–30.
13. Lederman E. The myth of core stability. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(1):84–98. [DOI]
14. Abt JP, Smoliga JM, Brick MJ, Jolly JT, Lephart SM, Fu FH. Relationship between cycling mechanics and core stability. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1300–4. [DOI]
15. McMullen KL, Cosby NL, Hertel J, Ingersoll CD, Hart JM. Lower extremity neuromuscular control immediately after fatiguing hip-abduction exercise. J Athl Train. 2011;46(6):607–14. [DOI]
16. Vuillerme N, Anziani B, Rougier P. Trunk extensor muscles fatigue affects undisturbed postural control in young healthy adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007;22(5):489–94. [DOI]
17. Surenkok O, Kin–Isler A, Aytar A, Gültekin Z. Effect of trunk–muscle fatigue and lactic acid accumulation on balance in healthy subjects. J Sport Rehabil. 2008;17(4):380–6. [DOI]
18. Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189–98. [DOI]
19. Tse MA, McManus AM, Masters RSW. Development and validation of a core endurance intervention program: implications for performance in college-age rowers. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(3):547–52. [DOI]
20. Zahednejad S, Javadpour S, Motealleh A, Salehi R. A comparison of the gait harmonic ratio between faller and non–faller Iranian older adults, under single-task and dual–task conditions. Sadra Medical Journal. 2021;9(2):161–72. [Persian] [DOI]
21. Barbieri FA, dos Santos PC, Vitório R, van Dieën JH, Gobbi LT. Effect of muscle fatigue and physical activity level in motor control of the gait of young adults. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):702-7. [DOI]
22. Cortes N, Onate J, Morrison S. Differential effects of fatigue on movement variability. Gait Posture. 2014;39(3):888-93. [DOI]
23. Safaei-Pour Z, Ebrahimi E, Saeedi H, Kamali M. Invesigation of dynamic plantar pressure distribution in healthy adults during standing and walking. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2009;10(2):1-8. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.