تعطیلات نوروز ۱۴۰۴-ضمن آرزوی قبولی طاعات و عبادات و همچنین تبریک فرارسیدن بهار و شروع سال جدید، به اطلاع می‌رساند این نشریه از تاریخ ۲۸ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۳ لغایت ۱۵ فروردین ۱۴۰۴ تعطیل می باشد.

Search published articles


Showing 2 results for Kraskian Mujembari

Samira Zarrabi-Ajami, Hadi Zamanian, Adis Kraskian Mujembari, Sarah Pashang,
Volume 11, Issue 0 (Articles-1400 2021)
Abstract

Background & Objectives: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune, and progressive disease associated with the inflammation of the central nervous system due to demyelination. Despite the numerous biological investigations about MS patients by Iranian researchers; however, only a few studies have addressed disability in patients with MS, mainly focusing on its physical aspects, not the psychological ones. Further, some studies outlined a significant association between psychological resources and physical functions in patients with MS. The multi–process model of integrative self–regulation and sense of coherence has formulated two sets of integrative, psychological resources. The present study aimed to investigate the associations of integrative self–regulation processes, including integrative self–knowledge, self–control, self–compassion, mindfulness, and sense of coherence dimensions, including comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness, with disability in patients with MS.
Methods: The present cross–sectional, analytical, and the fundamental study was conducted in 2019 in various service centers for patients with MS in Tehran and Qom Cities, Iran. The study population included patients with MS living in Tehran and Qom. The statistical sample included 452 patients with MS living in Tehran and Qom. The study's inclusion criteria included the definitive and documented diagnosis of MS by a neurologist, aged 18 to 60 years, the ability to communicate in Persian effectively, and providing informed consent forms. Patients who underwent psychotherapy during the study, whose diagnosis of MS was not definitive, developed obvious cognitive and mental disabilities, underwent spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia surgery over the past month. Severe and chronic comorbidities (e.g., psychotic disorders & cancer illness) and for the past 6 months were involved in divorce/separation, and the loss of first–degree relatives was excluded from the study. A convenience sampling method was used for data collection. The sample was gathered via a multi–center approach to reach a representative sample. The required data were collected by Determined Disease Stages (PDDS) (Learmonth et al., 2013), Orientation to Life Questionnaire–13 (OLQ–13) (Antonovsky, 1987), Integrative Self–knowledge Scale (ISK) (Qorbani et al., 2008), Brief Self–Control Scale (BSCS) (Tangney et al., 2004), Self–Compassion Scale–Short Form (SCS–SF) (Raes et al., 2011), and Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) (Brown e& Ryan, 2003. Statistical analysis at two levels of descriptive statistics (including mean, standard deviation, frequency, & percentage) and inferential statistics (including Pearson correlation test & hierarchical multiple regression tests) was performed in SPSS.
Results: The obtained results revealed that disability with meaningfulness in life (r= 0.10, p<0.05), integrative self–knowledge (r=–0.13, p<0.01), self–control (r=–0.12, p<0.01) and self–compassion (r=–0.12, p<0.05) indicated a marginally significant relationship. In predicting disability, in addition to the contextual variables of age (β=0.35, p<0.001) and gender (β=0.24, p<0.001), only the self–compassion (β=–0.17, p=0. 007) played a predicting role.
Conclusion: The disability of MS may not be associated with a severe reduction in integrative psychological resources, as opposed to other studies. However, future studies with longitudinal and intervention designs to investigate the causal relationships and patient benefit can target integrative self–regulation processes, especially compassion for patients themselves.

Azadeh Yaraghchi , Farhad Jomehri, Mohammadreza Seyrafi, Adis Kraskian Mujembari , Gholamreza Mohammadi Farsani ,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (Articles-1403 2024)
Abstract

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Obesity, as a chronic and prevalent disorder, is directly and indirectly associated with many diseases. It is one of the most important fields of study in health psychology. In recent years, people with obesity have shown signs of maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and inefficient interpersonal behavior. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies are processes that people use to manage stress. So, thoughts and cognitions are essential in managing, regulating, and controlling emotions after experiencing a stressful event. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies are among the important aspects of obesity pathology. Therefore, it is considered one of the important diagnostic and therapeutic criteria in psychological interventions for obesity. Interpersonal psychotherapy indicates cognitive, emotional, and affective distress as a result of negative social evaluation, which makes a person suffer from eating disorder symptoms. As a result, it is recommended that thoughts and emotions and inefficiency in social situations be identified, as well as to increase self–esteem and reduce emotional responses that cause eating behavior. This study assessed the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy on weight loss and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in obese people.

Methods: The present study was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design and a control group. The statistical population of this research comprised obese people who were referred to nutrition clinics located in a specific area of Tehran City, Iran, from November 2017 to February 2018. This research selected 28 eligible volunteers with a body mass index above 29.9 kg/m2 by purposeful sampling and considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were assigned to the experimental group (interpersonal psychotherapy, n=13) and control group (n=15). The inclusion criteria in this research were as follows: living in Tehran and being able to participate in group therapy sessions, being willing to cooperate, being between 20 and 50 years old, not suffering from a chronic physical disease, lacking any psychological disorders, and being obese (BMI>29.9 kg/m2). The exclusion criteria were as follows: unwillingness to continue attending intervention sessions and failure to attend group therapy for more than two sessions. Then, after explaining the goals and conditions of the study to the participants, they were assured that while their information remains confidential, they can withdraw from the plan at any stage of the study if they wish. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Then, they completed the demographic and emotional cognitive regulation questionnaires (Garnefski & Kraaij, 2007) at the study's beginning and end. Furthermore, the participant's body mass index was measured at the first meeting and at the treatment's end. The intervention group participated in the interpersonal group therapy for ten sessions. Statistical methods included the Chi–square test and analysis of covariance.

Results: The findings showed that interpersonal psychotherapy could reduce body mass index (p<0.001), reduce negative emotional cognitive regulation strategies (p<0.001), and increase positive emotional cognitive regulation strategies (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Interpersonal psychotherapy is an effective way to lose weight and improve cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Therefore, this treatment method is recommended to promote the physical and mental health of obese individuals. 



Page 1 from 1     

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb