Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 220 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shafiee Amiri M, Abbasi G, Fakhri M K. The Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Cognitive Evaluation, Death Anxiety, Experimental Avoidance, and Emotional Expression in Nurses. MEJDS 2020; 10 :220-220
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2134-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2134-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (1516 Views)
Background & Objectives: Nurses are always exposed to anxiety–induced harms. Their work environment and activities are threatening to the general population, causing anxiety. In hospitals, recruiting and retaining staff is vital. Recently, the position of nurses to increase the efficiency of hospitals has been considered by managers. However, disregarding the conditions of nurses can lead to frustration, the loss of motivation to work, and a deeper impact on the socioeconomic development of a country. It is necessary to help nurses to solve job–related problems. Recognizing factors affecting the cognitive assessment, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression can improve nurses’ conditions using different approaches. The present study aimed to determine the effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on cognitive assessment, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression in nurses.
Methods: This was an applied and quasi–experimental research with a pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The statistical population of this study included all nurses of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital in Babol City, Iran, in 2019 (N=388). The study sample included 40 nurses who were selected using the convenience sampling method. They were assigned to the experimental and control groups (n=20/group). The inclusion criteria of the study were the age range of 30 to 50 years; having ≥5 years of work experience; no history of participation in ACT workshops; no history of mental disorders, and specific and chronic physical illnesses. The exclusion criteria of the research included non–compliance with the group rules stated in the first session and absence from >2 sessions. The required data were obtained using the Cognitive Appraisal Questionnaire (Peacock & Wong, 1990), the Death Anxiety Questionnaire (Templer, 1970), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II (Bond et al., 2011), and the Emotional Expression Questionnaire (King & Emmons, 1990). The test group received eight 90–minute weekly sessions of ACT according to Hayes’s educational package (2010). To describe the obtained data, central and dispersion indices, e.g., mean and standard deviation were used; for data analysis, repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post–hoc test were used in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: Repeated–Measures ANOVA data concerning cognitive evaluation, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression were significant for intragroup (time) (p<0.001), interaction (time & group) (p<0.001), and intergroup (p<0.001) factors. Respecting cognitive evaluation, the rate of intergroup effect was equal to 0.24. Regarding death anxiety, the rate of intergroup effect equaled 0.23. Concerning experimental avoidance, the intergroup effect was measured as 0.37. Respecting emotional expression, the intergroup effect was calculated as 0.25. The posttest scores of cognitive assessment in the experimental group were lower than those of the pretest (p<0.001). The cognitive evaluation values of the follow–up stage were significantly different from the pretest stage ones (p<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the scores of posttest and follow–up steps (p=0.105). Furthermore, the posttest scores of death anxiety in the experimental group were lower than those of the pretest (p<0.001), and the follow–up values of death anxiety were significantly different from the pretest scores (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the values of posttest and follow–up (p=0.457). The experimental avoidance posttest scores were lower than those of the pretest values in the experimental group (p<0.001). Besides, the experimental avoidance scores of the follow–up stage were significantly different from those of the pretest stage (p<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the posttest and follow–up stages (p=0.721). The posttest scores of emotional expression were higher than those of the pretest in the experimental group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the emotional expression scores of the follow–up stage were significantly different from those of the pretest (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the posttest and follow–up steps (p=0.569). The obtained results highlighted that the effectiveness of ACT lasted until the follow–up phase for all studied variables.
Conclusion: The obtained data suggested the effectiveness of group ACT on cognitive assessment, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression in nurses.
Methods: This was an applied and quasi–experimental research with a pretest–posttest–follow–up and a control group design. The statistical population of this study included all nurses of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital in Babol City, Iran, in 2019 (N=388). The study sample included 40 nurses who were selected using the convenience sampling method. They were assigned to the experimental and control groups (n=20/group). The inclusion criteria of the study were the age range of 30 to 50 years; having ≥5 years of work experience; no history of participation in ACT workshops; no history of mental disorders, and specific and chronic physical illnesses. The exclusion criteria of the research included non–compliance with the group rules stated in the first session and absence from >2 sessions. The required data were obtained using the Cognitive Appraisal Questionnaire (Peacock & Wong, 1990), the Death Anxiety Questionnaire (Templer, 1970), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II (Bond et al., 2011), and the Emotional Expression Questionnaire (King & Emmons, 1990). The test group received eight 90–minute weekly sessions of ACT according to Hayes’s educational package (2010). To describe the obtained data, central and dispersion indices, e.g., mean and standard deviation were used; for data analysis, repeated–measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post–hoc test were used in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: Repeated–Measures ANOVA data concerning cognitive evaluation, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression were significant for intragroup (time) (p<0.001), interaction (time & group) (p<0.001), and intergroup (p<0.001) factors. Respecting cognitive evaluation, the rate of intergroup effect was equal to 0.24. Regarding death anxiety, the rate of intergroup effect equaled 0.23. Concerning experimental avoidance, the intergroup effect was measured as 0.37. Respecting emotional expression, the intergroup effect was calculated as 0.25. The posttest scores of cognitive assessment in the experimental group were lower than those of the pretest (p<0.001). The cognitive evaluation values of the follow–up stage were significantly different from the pretest stage ones (p<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the scores of posttest and follow–up steps (p=0.105). Furthermore, the posttest scores of death anxiety in the experimental group were lower than those of the pretest (p<0.001), and the follow–up values of death anxiety were significantly different from the pretest scores (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the values of posttest and follow–up (p=0.457). The experimental avoidance posttest scores were lower than those of the pretest values in the experimental group (p<0.001). Besides, the experimental avoidance scores of the follow–up stage were significantly different from those of the pretest stage (p<0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the posttest and follow–up stages (p=0.721). The posttest scores of emotional expression were higher than those of the pretest in the experimental group (p<0.001). Furthermore, the emotional expression scores of the follow–up stage were significantly different from those of the pretest (p<0.001); however, there was no significant difference between the posttest and follow–up steps (p=0.569). The obtained results highlighted that the effectiveness of ACT lasted until the follow–up phase for all studied variables.
Conclusion: The obtained data suggested the effectiveness of group ACT on cognitive assessment, death anxiety, experimental avoidance, and emotional expression in nurses.
Keywords: Acceptance and commitment therapy, Cognitive assessment, Death anxiety, Experimental avoidance, Emotional expression, Nurses.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Melnyk BM, Orsolini L, Tan A, Arslanian-Engoren C, Melkus GD, Dunbar-Jacob J, et al. A national study links nurses’ physical and mental health to medical errors and perceived worksite wellness. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(2):126–31. [DOI]
2. Copanitsanou P, Fotos N, Brokalaki H. Effects of work environment on patient and nurse outcomes. Br J Nurs. 2017;26(3):172-6 [DOI]
3. Seifi F, Ebrahimzadeh S. Predicting job performance of nurses based on emotional regulation and mental health practices. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2016;2(1):1620–9. [Article]
4. Matsukiyo Y, Nakao H, Kakuma T. Structuring the process of disaster relief nurses’ cognitive evaluation of stress. Health Emergency and Disaster Nursing. 2018;5(1):12-24. [DOI]
5. Fry M, Arendts G, Chenoweth L. Emergency nurses' evaluation of observational pain assessment tools for older people with cognitive impairment. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(9-10):1281-90. [DOI]
6. Mioni G, Meligrana L, Perini F, Marcon M, Stablum F. Lack of temporal impairment in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front Integr Neurosci. 2019;13(5):42-61. [DOI]
7. Kim WS, Cho HH, Kwon S. The influence of terminal care performance, death anxiety and self-esteem on terminal care stress of geriatric hospital nurses. The Korean Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care. 2016;19(2):154-62. [DOI]
8. Sharifi Nia H, Lehto RH, Ebadi A, Peyrovi H. Death anxiety among nurses and health care professionals: A review article. Int J of Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016;4(1):2-10. [Article]
9. Villatte JL, Vilardaga R, Villatte M, Plumb Vilardaga JC, Atkins DC, Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy modules: differential impact on treatment processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2016;77:52–61. [DOI]
10. Twohig MP, Levin ME. Acceptance and commitment therapy as a treatment for anxiety and depression: a review. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017;40(4):751–70. [DOI]
11. Dindo L, Van Liew JR, Arch JJ. Acceptance and commitment therapy: a transdiagnostic behavioral intervention for mental health and medical conditions. Neurotherapeutics. 2017;14(3):546–53. [DOI]
12. Peluso PR, Freund RR. Therapist and client emotional expression and psychotherapy outcomes: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy. 2018;55(4):461-72. [DOI]
13. Lang AJ, Schnurr PP, Jain S, He F, Walser RD, Bolton E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for distress and impairment in OEF/OIF/OND veterans. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9(Suppl 1):74–84. [DOI]
14. Wersebe H, Lieb R, Meyer AH, Hofer P, Gloster AT. The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy self-help intervention. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2018;18(1):60–8. [DOI]
15. Ly KH, Asplund K, Andersson G. Stress management for middle managers via an acceptance and commitment-based smartphone application: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions. 2014;1(3):95–101. [DOI]
16. Forman EM, Butryn ML. A new look at the science of weight control: how acceptance and commitment strategies can address the challenge of self-regulation. Appetite. 2015;84:171–80. [DOI]
17. Mirzaeidoostan Z, Zargar Y, Zandi Payam A. the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on death anxiety and mental health in women with HIV in Abadan city, Iran. Iranian J Psy Cli Psy. 2019;25(1):2–13. [Persian] [DOI]
18. Bayati A, Abbasi P, Ziapour A, Parvane E, Dehghan F. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on death anxiety and death obsession in the elderly. World Family Medicine Journal. 2017;(10):122–8. [DOI]
19. Peacock EJ, Wong PT. The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine. 1990;6(3):227–36. [DOI]
20. Templer DI. The construction and validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. J General Psychol; 1970.82:165-77. [DOI]
21. Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011;42(4):676–88. [DOI]
22. King LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: psychological and physical correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(5):864–77. [DOI]
23. Shokri O, Matini Yekta L. The efficacy of Attributional Retraining Program on cognitive appraisal processes, conflict resolution strategies and marital adjustment. Quarterly of Applied Psychology. 2019;13(3):409-31. [Persian] [DOI]
24. Sharif Nia H, Ebadi A, Lehto RH, Mousavi B, Peyrovi H, Chan YH. Reliability and validity of the persian version of templer death anxiety scale-extended in veterans of Iran-Iraq warfare. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014;8(4):29–37. [Article]
25. Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J, Toarmino D, et al. Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record. 2004;54(4):553-78.
26. Abbasi I, Fata L, Moloudi R, Zarabi H. Psychometric adequacy the Persian vision of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II). Psychological Methods and Models. 2013;2(10):65-80. [Article]
27. Sharifinia MA, Haroonrashidi H. The relationship between the dark traits of personality and emotional expressiveness with satisfaction of life among the military personnel in Ahvaz, Iran. Military Psychology. 2020;11(41):41–9. [Persian] [Article]
28. Hayes SA, Orsillo SM, Roemer L. Changes in proposed mechanisms of action during an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2010;48(3):238-45. [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
