Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 245 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tahamtan A, Kalhornia Golkar M, Haji Alizadeh K. Designing a Causal Model of Cognitive Emotion Regulation, Mental Health, and Alexithymia in Patients with Hypertension. MEJDS 2020; 10 :245-245
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2256-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Kish International Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (1255 Views)
Background & Objectives: Physical disabilities may cause psychological problems, leading to exacerbated biological conditions. Stress, conflicts, and generalized anxiety disorder can affect most physical illnesses; some diseases are even further affected by such characteristics than others. Accordingly, hypertension is among the most essential causes of numerous internal diseases. The present study aimed to investigate the fitness of the causal model of Cognitive Emotion Regulation (CER) with mental health and emotional alexithymia in patients with hypertension. This study examined individuals with hypertension, high emotional disabilities, and the inability to control and express their emotions. Thus; they encountered physical injuries, like hypertension. Mental health is among the most crucial and effective factors in improving the condition of these patients. Therefore, identifying characteristics related to mental health and recognizing emotions in subjects with hypertension can help to make a significant contribution to improving their mental health and wellbeing. The present study aimed to model the relationship between CER, mental health, and alexithymia in patients with hypertension.
Methods: This correlational study used structural equation modeling. The statistical population included all patients with hypertension referring to healthcare centers in Shiraz City, Iran, in 2019. Among them, 480 patients were selected by the purposive sampling technique. The inclusion criteria of the study were an age range of 35 to 50 years, systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg, at least one year of presenting hypertension, and literacy. Exclusion criteria were the existence of a serious medical illness, major psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairments, or weaknesses in the patient's cognitive function. The research tools included the General Health Questionnaire–28 (GHQ–28) (Goldberg and Hillier, 1979) and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS–20) (Bagby et al., 1994). To analyze the obtained data, we used descriptive statists, such as mean and standard deviation. To fit the model, we applied inferential statistics (correlation) and structural equation modeling. Pearson correlation coefficient method and structural equation modeling were employed to analyze the obtained data in SPSS, SmartPLS, and LISREL.
Results: The present research findings supported the research model and indicated that the direct path coefficient between the cognitive regulation of negative emotions and mental health was positive and significant (p<0.001, β=0.531). Besides, there was a negative and significant relationship between the cognitive regulation of positive emotions and mental health (p<0.001, β=–0.650). The direct path coefficient between the cognitive regulation of negative emotion and emotional alexithymia was positive and significant (p<0.001, β=0.672); there was a negative and significant difference between the cognitive regulation of positive emotion and emotional alexithymia (p<0.001, β=–0.430). Furthermore, the direct path coefficient between emotional alexithymia and mental health was positive and significant (p<0.001, β=0.834). The indirect relationship between the three variables (the relationship between the cognitive regulation of emotion & mental health mediated by alexithymia) was significant; the higher limit (0.4289) and the lower limit (0.3232) did not include a zero confidence interval for them. The final model fit indicators were as follows: Goodness of Fit Index (GFI)=0.92, Comparative Fit Index (CFI)=0.93, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.079.
Conclusion: The present study results emphasized the need to use adaptive CER strategies to overcome emotional alexithymia and consequently improve mental health in patients with hypertension.
Full-Text [PDF 795 kb]   (466 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. 1. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH. Effects of endurance training on blood pressure, blood pressure-regulating mechanisms, and cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension. 2005;46(4):667–75. [DOI]
2. 2. Allen J, Balfour R, Bell R, Marmot M. Social determinants of mental health. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(4):392–407. [DOI]
3. 3. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Aldao A. Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;51(6):704–8. [DOI]
4. 4. Garnefski N, Legerstee J, Kraaij VV, Van Den Kommer T, Teerds J. Cognitive coping strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a comparison between adolescents and adults. J Adolesc. 2002;25(6):603–11. [DOI]
5. 5. Scarpazza C, di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E. Emotional modulation of touch in alexithymia. Emotion. 2014;14(3):602–10. [DOI]
6. 6. Mann S, Holdsworth L. The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2003;18(3):196–211. [DOI]
7. 7. Bajenaru O, Antochi F, Tiu C. Particular aspects in patients with coronary heart disease and vascular cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci. 2010;299(1–2):49–50. [DOI]
8. 8. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2015.
9. 9. Goldberg DP, Hillier V. A Scaled Version of General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979;9:131-45. [DOI]
10. 10. Gibbons P, de Arévalo HF, Mónico M. Assessment of the factor structure and reliability of the 28 item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in El Salvador. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2004;4(2):389–98.
11. 11. Nadi Najafabadi F, Nazari Chegeni A, Bassaknejad S. Design and test a model of the relationship between negative life events and mental health with resiliency and social support mediation in female medical sciences students at jundishapour university of Ahvaz. Jentashapir Journal of Cellular and Molecular Biology. 2014;5(1): e94184.
12. 12. Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1994;38:23-32. [DOI]
13. 13. Pandey R, Mandal MK, Taylor GJ, Parker JD. Cross-cultural alexithymia: development and validation of a Hindi translation of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. J Clin Psychol. 1996;52(2):173–6. [DOI]
14. 14. Taylor GJ, Bagby RM. An overview of the alexithymia construct. In: The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass; 2000. pp: 40–67.
15. 15. Besharat MA. Reliability and factorial validity of a Farsi version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale with a sample of Iranian students. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(1):209–20. [DOI]
16. 16. Becker J-M, Klein K, Wetzels M. Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning. 2012;45(5):359–94. [DOI]
17. 17. Barshan S, Haji Alizadeh K. The effectiveness of group training about cognitive emotion regulation on improving mental health in delinquent male adolescents of Kerman city. Health and Development Journal. 2020;6(3):247–58. [Persian] [Article]
18. 18. Dubey A, Pandey R. Mental health problems in alexithymia: Role of positive and negative emotional experiences. Journal of Projective Psychology & Mental Health. 2013;20(2):128–36.
19. 19. Grynberg D, Luminet O, Corneille O, Grèzes J, Berthoz S. Alexithymia in the interpersonal domain: A general deficit of empathy? Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;49(8):845–50. [DOI]
20. 20. Hu T, Zhang D, Wang J, Mistry R, Ran G, Wang X. Relation between emotion regulation and mental health: a meta-analysis review. Psychol Rep. 2014;114(2):341–62. [DOI]
21. 21. Dehghani Y, Moradi N, Tabnak F, Afshin SA. Investigating the relationship between humor and difficulty in regulation of emotions and alexithymia in students. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2018;20(2):113–20. [Persian] [DOI]
22. 22. Rezaeinezhad N, Moradi O, Hasani R, Sajadi P. Predicting alexithymia based on parental health, self differentiation and emotional cognitive regulation among high school students. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018;19(61):32–42. [Persian] [Article]
23. 23. Irani Barghi Z, Bakhti M, Baghyan MJ, Karami S. The relationship between the five factors of personality and alexithymia with mental health in MS patients. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology. 2014;3(10):64-79. [Persian] [Article]
24. 24. Mazaheri M. On the relationship between alexithymia and depression and anxiety in psychiatric patients. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2010;12(46):9–470. [Persian] [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb