Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy Approaches and Communication Imagery (Imago Therapy) on the Emotional Expression of Women Seeking Divorce

Rafee, Farzaneh; Asadi, Javanshir; Khajvand Khoshli, Afsaneh

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 202 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: 173483838354052162260735

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Rafee F, Asadi J, Khajvand Khoshli A. Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy Approaches and Communication Imagery (Imago Therapy) on the Emotional Expression of Women Seeking Divorce. MEJDS 2022; 12 :202-202
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2515-en.html

Comparing the Effectiveness of Reality Therapy Approaches and Communication Imagery (Imago Therapy) on the Emotional Expression of Women Seeking Divorce

Farzaneh Rafee¹

, Javanshir Asadi ^*²

, Afsaneh Khajvand Khoshli²

1- PhD Student in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

Abstract: (954 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: In today's world, the inability to recognize emotions and lack of emotional expression in marital relationships can be called one of the causes of marital disputes. The effect of psychological approaches on emotional expression can reduce couples’ differences and overshadow the health of the individual, family, and society. Reality therapy is one of the approaches that relies on concepts such as choice, control, and responsibility, and is effective in people's control and coping strategies. Another effective approach to couple communication is imagotherapy or communication imagery. In communication imagery, the unconscious is guided to improve one's wholeness by rekindling the communication, both individual and interpersonal, that was broken by failure in childhood. The present study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of two approaches to reality, therapy and communication imaging on the emotional expression of women seeking a divorce in Hamadan City, Iran.
Methods: The present study was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest design and a 3–month follow–up with a control group. The statistical population included all women seeking divorce in Hamadan in 2019. In this study, among the eligible volunteers, based on the inclusion criteria, 30 people entered the study in an accessible manner and were randomly organized into three groups of 10 experimental (reality therapy, and imago therapy) and control. The inclusion criteria were aged 20 to 50 years of volunteers and not using any counseling and psychological services. In this study, the exclusion criterion was having more than two absences for the participants in the study. Reality therapy sessions were performed in 8 sessions for 90 minutes and in the imago therapy approach 10 sessions were performed for 60 minutes.. The sessions were performed twice a week. The Emotional Expressiveness Questionnaire (EEQ) (King and Emmons, 1990) as a pretest was administered at the beginning of the first session and after the full implementation of the treatment intervention as a posttest and after three months for follow–up for all three groups.
Data description was done through central and dispersion indicators such as mean and standard deviation. The data were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance and one–way analysis of variance and Bonferroni's post hoc test by SPSS version 20 software and probability values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: The results showed that the findings showed a significant difference between reality therapy and the control group for the variables of emotional expression (p<0.001), expression of positive emotion (p<0.001), expression of intimacy (p<0.001), and expression of negative emotion (p= 0.023). The results also showed a significant difference in communication imagery with the control group for the variables of positive emotion expression (p= 0.041), and intimacy expression (p= 0.005). In the experimental groups, there was no significant difference in the results of the posttest and follow–up stages in the variables of emotional expression, positive emotion expression and intimacy, which indicated the persistence of the effect of interventions in the follow–up stage (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in the variable of expressing intimacy (p = 0.039).
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, reality therapy is effective on emotional expression and its components (intimacy, positive emotional expression and negative emotional expression). While communication imagery only affects two variables of positive emotionl expression and intimacy; Therefore, reality therapy is more effective in increasing emotional expression than communication imagery.

Keywords: Reality therapy, Communication imagery (Imagotherapy), Emotion expression, Positive emotion, Negative emotion, Intimacy

Full-Text [PDF 630 kb] (468 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Hammett JF, Castañeda DM, Ulloa EC. The association between affective and problem-solving communication and intimate partner violence among caucasian and mexican american couples: a dyadic approach. J Fam Viol. 2016;31(2):167–78. [DOI]

2. Salmani K, Rasoli F, Eskandari F, Sanei F, Jafarnejad Z. The effectiveness of imago training on marital intimacy and marital confilics between wife of addicted people in Karaj health center in (2018). Alborz University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2020;9(3):259–68. [Persian] [DOI]

3. Farhadi A, Salehin S, Aghayan S, Keramat A, Talebi S. The effectiveness of reality therapy based on choice theory on marital intimacy and sexual satisfaction of newly married women. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2020;28(2):83–92. [Persian] [DOI]

4. Bornstein PH, Bornstein MT. Zanashooei darmani (az didgahe raftari-ertebati) [Marital therapy (a behavioral-communications approach)]. Toozandeh Jani H, Kamalpoor N. (Persian translator). Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services; 2004.

5. Arabpour E, Hashemiyan K. The effectiveness of couple therapy via reality therapy method on the improvment of intimacy relations of couples. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011;2(4):1–13. [Persian]

6. Cheraey L, Goudarzi M, Akbary M. Comparison of the effectiveness of couple therapy with Imagotherapy and Negarfeldman integrated approach on marital intimacy of conflicting couples. Journal of Woman and Society. 2019;10(3):239–54. [Persian] [Article]

7. Kennedy S, Ruggles S. Breaking up is hard to count: the rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography. 2014;51(2):587–98. [DOI]

8. Hatami Varzaneh A, Esmaeili M, Farahbakhsh K, Borjali A. Barrasiye moghayes’ei ezdevaj haye paydar rezayatmand va ezdevajhaye dar hale jodaei (motaleye keyfi) [Comparative study of happy, stable marriages and dissolving marriages (a qualitative study)]. Journal of Women and Families Cultural-Educational. 2016;11(35):7–39. [Persian] [Article]

9. Mohannaee S, Poladei Rayshahri A, Golestaneh S, Keykhosrovani M. Effectiveness of couple therapy by Hendrix imago therapy method on improving communication patterns and reducing emotional divorce. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2019;7(1):58–65. [Persian] [Article]

10. Rafienia P, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaei SK, Azad Fallah P. Rabeteye sabk haye ebraz hayajan ba salamat omoomi dar daneshjooyan [Relationship between emotional expression styles and general health in college students]. Journal of Psychology. 2006;10(1):84–105. [Persian]

11. Alghamdi M, Hunt N, Thomas S. The effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy with traumatised firefighters in Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled study. Behav Res Ther. 2015;66:64–71. [DOI]

12. Perry RM, Hayaki J. Gender differences in the role of alexithymia and emotional expressivity in disordered eating. Pers Individ Dif. 2014;71:60–5. [DOI]

13. Mousavi E, Alizadeh T, Yavari Kermani M, Pourhossein R. The role of alexithymia and emotional expressivity in predicting somatization symptoms among vetrans. Journal of Military Psychology. 2014;5(19):19–28. [Persian] [Article]

14. Parkins R. Gender and emotional expressiveness: an analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Griffith work Papers Pragmat Intercult Commun. 2012;5(1):46–54.

15. Capuzzi M, Stauffer MD. Foundations of couples, marriage, and family counseling. First edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.

16. Abbasi H, Ahmadi SA, Fatehizadeh M, Bahrami F. Effect of couple therapy based on the choice theory on social commitment of couples. J Edu Commun Health. 2017;4(2):3–10. [Persian] [DOI]

17. Amani A. The efficacy of reality therapy on marital commitment and self esteem of couples. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2015;5(2):1–23. [Persian] [Article]

18. Halford WK, Snyder DK. Universal processes and common factors in couple therapy and relationship education. Behav Ther. 2012;43(1):1–12. [DOI]

19. Hendrix H, LaKelly Hunt H. Rahnamayenzanashooei asan (mobtani bar nazariye imago therapy) [The easy marriage handbook (based on the imagotherapy theory)]. Rahmani Shams H, Nazari SM. (Persian translator). Tehran: Nasle Khorshid Pub; 2016. [Persian]

20. Sheidanfar N, Navabinejad Sh, Farzad V. Comparison of the effectiveness of treatment of focused emotional couples and imago couples therapy on individual adjustment in couples (in the first years). Journal of Psychological Science. 2020;19(89):593–606. [Persian] [Article]

21. Hasanzadeh R. Ravesh tahghigh karbordi [Applied research method]. Tehran: Ravan Pub; 2018. [Persian]

22. King LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: psychological and physical correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(5):864–77. [DOI]

23. Amini Khoei N, Shafiabadi A, Delavar A, Nooranipour R. The effectiveness of two approaches : life skills training and imago therapy on improving couples' communication patterns. Journal of Counseling Research. 2014;13(50):54–79. [Persian] [Article]