Volume 5 -                   MEJDS (2015) 5: 1 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nemati S, Asadi M M. Prevalence of Cousin Marriage among Parents of Intellectually Disabled and Normal Children and Its Association with Intellectual Disability. MEJDS 2015; 5 :1-5
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-348-en.html
1- onal Children, Assistant Professor in Department of Educat
2- Student of Clinical Psychology
Abstract:   (19698 Views)
Abstract 
Objective: Cousin Marriages provide a good opportunity to latent and recessive genes to express themselves and cause various disabilities, such as intellectual disability. Hence, avoiding them may prevent such disabilities. The purpose of this research was to study the prevalence of cousin marriages among the parents of intellectually disabled and normal children and to identify its association with intellectual disability.
Materials & Methods: A correlational retrospective study was conducted. 467 couples with normal children were selected by cluster sampling from primary, secondary and high schools in Ardebil. Moreover, 433 couples with exceptional children were identified. Among the latter’s children, 238 intellectually disabled were randomly selected. Chi-square was used to determine the frequency of cousin marriages through descriptive statistics and to establish the association between cousin marriages and the birth of normal and intellectually disabled children.
Results: According to the descriptive data 107 of 238 (96.44%) parents of intellectually disabled children and 88 of 467 (84.18%) parents of normal children were cousins. Data analysis with chi-square showed a significant association between cousin marriages and the birth of intellectually disabled children (χ2=54.31, p<0.01, df=1).
Conclusion: Cousin Marriage plays an important role in the incidence of intellectual disability through recessive genes. Therefore, couples need to be aware of the consequences of cousin marriage and should receive genetic counseling.
Full-Text [PDF 254 kb]   (6213 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Zlotogora J. Molecular basis of autosomal recessive diseases among the Palestinian Arabs. American journal of medical genetics. 2002;109(3):176-82. [DOI:10.1002/ajmg.10328]
2. Mokhtar MM, Abdel-Fattah MM. Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. European journal of epidemiology. 2001;17(6):559-65. [DOI:10.1023/A:1014567800950]
3. El-Hazmi MA, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari AA. Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genet. 1995;32(8):623-6. [DOI:10.1136/jmg.32.8.623]
4. Sueyoshi S, Ohtsuka R. Effects of polygyny and consanguinity on high fertility in the rural Arab population in South Jordan. J Biosoc Sci. 2003;35(04):513-26. [DOI:10.1017/S0021932003005911]
5. Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Al-Gazali LI, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T. Consanguinity and associated socio-demographic factors in the United Arab Emirates. Hum Hered. 1996;46(5):256-64. [DOI:10.1159/000154362]
6. Ahmed Gunaid A, Ali Hummad N, Abdallah Tamim K. Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. J Biosoc Sci. 2004;36(01):111-21. [DOI:10.1017/S0021932003006138]
7. Al-Awadi SA, Naguib KK, Moussa MA, Farag TI, Teebi AS, El-Khalifa MY. The effect of consanguineous marriages on reproductive wastage. Clin Genet. 1986;29(5):384-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb00509.x]
8. Rajab A, Patton MA. Short Report: A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Hum Biol. 2000;27(3):321-6. [DOI:10.1080/030144600282208]
9. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. Modernization or cultural maintenance: the practice of consanguineous marriage in Iran. J Biosoc Sci. 2008;40(06):911-33. [DOI:10.1017/S0021932008002782]
10. Givens BP, Hirschman C. Modernization and consanguineous marriage in Iran. J Marriage Fam. 1994;820-34. [DOI:10.2307/353595]
11. Sharkia R, Zaid M, Athamna A, Cohen D, Azem A, Zalan A. The changing pattern of consanguinity in a selected region of the Israeli Arab community. Am J Hum Biol. 2008;20(1):72-7. [DOI:10.1002/ajhb.20678]
12. McLaren J, Bryson SE. Review of recent epidemiological studies of mental retardation: Prevalence, associated disorders, and etiology. Am J Ment Retard. 1987.
13. Hussain R, Bittles AH, Sullivan S. Consanguinity and early mortality in the Muslim populations of India and Pakistan. Am J Hum Biol. 2001;13(6):777-87. [DOI:10.1002/ajhb.1124]
14. Ropers H-H, Hamel BC. X-linked mental retardation. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2005;6(1):46-57. [DOI:10.1038/nrg1501]
15. Uyguner O, Kayserili H, Li Y, Karaman B, Nürnberg G, Hennies HC, et al. A new locus for autosomal recessive non-syndromic mental retardation maps to 1p21. 1-p13. 3. Clin Genet. 2007;71(3):212-9. [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00762.x]
16. Santos C, Rodriguez Revenga L, Madrigal I, Badenas C, Pineda M, Mila M. A novel mutation in JARID1C gene associated with mental retardation. European journal of human genetics. 2006;14(5):583-6. [DOI:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201608]
17. Tamim H, Khogali M, Beydoun H, Melki I, Yunis K, et al. Consanguinity and apnea of prematurity. American journal of epidemiology. 2003;158(10):942-6. [DOI:10.1093/aje/kwg226]
18. Nemati S, Afrooz GA, Asgari A, Bonab BG. Prevalence of consanguineous marriage among parents of deaf and normal children in Ardabil, North Western Iran. Audiology. 2012;21(2):66-70.
19. Nosrati F. Comparison the bio-psycho-social and cognitive characteristics of parents with Down syndrome children and normal children in Tehran.2006.
20. Afrooz GA. strategies for Prevention of disability. Tehran:Tehran university publication, 2005.
21. Raiesvand E. Comparison between prevalence of consanguineous marriage among normal parents and parents who have exceptional children in Lorestan province. Thesis for Master of Science. Tehran, Tehran University; 1992. [Persian]
22. Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2001;60(2):89-98. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600201.x]
23. Saggar AK, Bittles AH. Consanguinity and child health. Paediatr Child Health. 2008;18(5):244-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.paed.2008.02.008]
24. Devi CA, Sudarsanam D. Role of Consanguinity in Mental retardation. Asian J Exp Biol Sci. 2011;2(1):162-4.
25. Akrami SM. Consanguineous marriage; genetic counseling, culture and religious aspects. Iran J Pediatr. 2006;16(3):359-65.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb