Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 65 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1402.041
Ethics code: IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1402.041
Clinical trials code: IR.IAU.ILAM.REC.1402.041

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abbasi M, Ahmadi V, Mami S, Soleimannejad H, Mihandoost Z. Comparing the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Anxiety and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Pain. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :65-65
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3630-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran
Abstract:   (361 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Pain is classified based on its duration into two types: acute and chronic. Persistence of pain beyond three months is defined as chronic pain. Chronic pain is a debilitating condition in which the individual not only suffers from the distress caused by the pain itself but also faces numerous other stressors that affect various aspects of life. Anxiety and reduced quality of life are common problems among patients with chronic pain. Acceptance and commitment therapy is known to be one of the effective methods in reducing psychological problems of patients with chronic pain. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a process–oriented approach that considers psychological damage to be caused by reduced psychological flexibility. Among the effective treatments in reducing psychological problems in patients with chronic pain is cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT), which has a significant impact on managing these problems. Psychological interventions such as ACT and CBT may be effective in improving patients with chronic pain. So, the present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ACT and CBT in reducing anxiety and improving quality of life in patients with chronic pain.
Methods: The present quasi–experimental study employed a pretest–posttest and a follow–up design with three groups (two experimental groups and one control group). The statistical population consisted of all patients with chronic pain who visited healthcare centers affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, as well as the offices of pain specialists and subspecialists in Kermanshah City, Iran, between March 2023 and March 2024. From this population, 69 eligible and willing participants (23 per group) were recruited using convenience sampling. The inclusion criteria were as follows: confirmed diagnosis of chronic pain, an age range of 25 to 55 years, ability to attend therapy sessions, and provision of informed consent, absence of acute or chronic psychiatric disorders, not receiving concurrent psychological treatment, and no use of psychiatric medication within the past three months. The exclusion criteria included lack of cooperation, failure to complete assigned homework during sessions, and absence from more than two sessions. Participants were randomly assigned to the two experimental groups and one control group, after which the pretest questionnaires were administered. The study instruments were the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (McCracken & Dhingra, 2002) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL, 1996). The first experimental group received ACT, as outlined in the protocol by Hayes et al. (2012), while the second experimental group received CBT, as outlined in the protocol by Rudd (2012), both delivered in eight 90–minute sessions. Data analysis included analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi–square test to assess group homogeneity, and repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests for outcome comparisons. Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 26 at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The results indicated that the effect of time (p<0.001, η²=0.969), group (p<0.001, η²=0.931), and the interaction effect of time and group (p<0.001, η²=0.940) on pain anxiety were statistically significant. Similarly, the effect of time (p<0.001, η²=0.974), group (p<0.001, η²=0.923), and the interaction effect of time and group (p<0.001, η²=0.949) on quality of life were statistically significant. In the pretest stage, there were no significant differences among the three groups in the mean scores of pain, anxiety, and quality of life (p>0.05). However, in the posttest and follow–up stages, significant differences were observed in the mean scores of pain, anxiety, and quality of life between the ACT group and the CBT group compared to the control group (p<0.001). Nonetheless, there were no significant differences between the two therapy groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that both therapeutic approaches of ACT and CBT are significantly effective in reducing anxiety and improving the quality of life in patients with chronic pain, with neither method demonstrating statistically significant superiority over the other.

Full-Text [PDF 383 kb]   (91 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Sommer C, Rittner H. Pain research in 2023: towards understanding chronic pain. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(1):27–8. [DOI]
2. Shaghaghi F, Smkhani Akbarinejhad H. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on intensity pain and pain catastrophizing in women with chronic pain. Medical Sciences. 2025;35(1):56–64. [Persian] [DOI]
3. Langford DJ, Baron R, Edwards RR, Gewandter JS, Gilron I, Griffin R, et al. What should be the entry pain intensity criteria for chronic pain clinical trials? an IMMPACT update. Pain. 2023;164(9):1927–30. [DOI]
4. Franqueiro A, Yoon J, Crago M, Curiel M, Wilson J. The interconnection between social support and emotional distress among individuals with chronic pain: a narrative review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:4389–99. [DOI]
5. Rogers AH, Farris SG. A meta‐analysis of the associations of elements of the fear‐avoidance model of chronic pain with negative affect, depression, anxiety, pain‐related disability and pain intensity. Eur J Pain. 2022;26(8):1611–35. [DOI]
6. Pandelani FF, Nyalunga SLN, Pandelani T. Chronic pain: the prevalence of chronic pain in patients attending Soshanguve Community Health Centre. Can J Pain. 2024;8(1):2284152. [DOI]
7. Woelk J, Goerlitz D, Wachholtz A. I’m tired and it hurts! sleep quality and acute pain response in a chronic pain population. Sleep Med. 2020;67:28–32. [DOI]
8. Schreier AM, Johnson LA, Vohra NA, Muzaffar M, Kyle B. Post-treatment symptoms of pain, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Pain Manag Nurs. 2019;20(2):146–51. [DOI]
9. Jamshidi A, Manavipour D, Besharat MA, Mojtabaei M. The effectiveness of paradox therapy on pain anxiety and self-empathy in women with breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2024;16(4):31–49. [Persian] [Article]
10. Kerckhove N, Boudieu L, Ourties G, Bourdier J, Daulhac L, Eschalier A, et al. Ethosuximide improves chronic pain-induced anxiety- and depression-like behaviors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29(12):1419–32. [DOI]
11. Oliveira DS, Vélia Ferreira Mendonça L, Sofia Monteiro Sampaio R, Manuel Pereira Dias De Castro-Lopes J, Ribeiro De Azevedo LF. The impact of anxiety and depression on the outcomes of chronic low back pain multidisciplinary pain management—a multicenter prospective cohort study in pain clinics with one-year follow-up. Pain Medicine. 2019;20(4):736–46. [DOI]
12. Ashori A, Ebrahimi MI, Ghasemipour Y. Comparison the level of cognitive distortion and life quality in the people with chronic pain, people with non-chronic pain and the habitual. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2020;62(5.1):1723–32. [Persian] [Article]
13. Veenhoven R. Quality of Life (QOL), an overview. In: Maggino F; editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Cham: Springer Pub; 2023. [DOI]
14. Boelhouwer J, Noll HH. Objective quality of life. In: Maggino F; editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer Pub; 2023. [DOI]
15. Jones P, Drummond P. Construction and evaluation of a mindfulness-based quality of life and well-being program (MQW) in a randomized trial. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(17):14782–803. [DOI]
16. Khalilnejad N, Asgari P, Ahmadian H, Shahrbabaki HE. The effectiveness of quality of life therapy on psychological well-being and social adjustment in breast cancer patients. The Journal of Tolooebehdasht. 2024;23(5):34–49. [Persian] [DOI]
17. Bagheri Sheykhangafshe F, Fathi-Ashtiani A, Savabi Niri V, Rezaei Golezani H, Baryaji S. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on anxiety sensitivity and alexithymia of nurses with chronic low back pain. The Journal of Tolooebehdasht. 2023;21(5):49–63. [Persian] [Article]
18. Madhi A, Farshbaf Manisefat F, Etemadi-Nia M. Comparing the effects of paradoxical treatment and acceptance and commitment therapy on distress tolerance in women with health anxiety. Journal of Community Health. 2025;18(4):62–75. [Persian] [Article]
19. Walser RD, O’Connell M. Alliance rupture and repair in acceptance and commitment therapy. In: Eubanks CF, Samstag LW, Muran JC; editors. Rupture and repair in psychotherapy: a critical process for change. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2023. [DOI]
20. Glassman LH, Forman EM, Herbert JD, Bradley LE, Foster EE, Izzetoglu M, et al. The effects of a brief acceptance-based behavioral treatment versus traditional cognitive-behavioral treatment for public speaking anxiety: an exploratory trial examining differential effects on performance and neurophysiology. Behavior Modification. 2016;40(5):748–76. [DOI]
21. Mohammadi SY, Soufi A. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment treatment on quality of life and perceived stress in cancer patients. Health Psychology. 2020;8(32):57–72. [Persian] [Article]
22. Mohammadzadeh A, Esmikhani Akbarinejad H. A comparison of the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on anxiety, pain, and quality of life in women with chronic headache. Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain. 2025;16(1):52–64. [Persian] [Article]
23. Abow FH, Razak TA, Abulkassim R, Adnan M, Rahi AFA, Fadhil AM. Comparing the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and hope therapy on pain anxiety and self-acceptance in patients with leukemia: effectiveness of ACT and hope therapy in patients with leukemia. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture. 2023;10(1):99–108. [DOI]
24. Abdolpour B, Nejati M, Dastar Z, Smkhani Akbarinejhad H. Effectiveness of acceptance & commitment therapy on pain anxiety and quality of life in women with breast surgery experience. Journal of Anesthesiology and Pain. 2025;16(1):12–23. [Persian]
25. Ahmad Othman A, Wan Jaafar WM, Zainudin ZN, Mohamad Yusop Y. The influence of acceptance and commitment therapy on depression and quality of life among emerging adults in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2024;14(3):1277–303. [DOI]
26. Mohseni M, Kalantari M, Namdari K, Abedi A. Comparing effectiveness of combined transdiagnostic, mindfulness, and DBT with CBT on psychological inflexibility of pain in people with chronic pain. Applied Psychology. 2023;17(4):169–93. [Persian] [Article]
27. Zhang SY, Pan MR, Zhang LQ, Li HM, Zhao MJ, Dong M, et al. Efficacy of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for medicated adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry Res. 2025;344:116352. [DOI]
28. Clara MI, Van Straten A, Savard J, Canavarro MC, Allen Gomes A. Web-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in cancer survivors: the OncoSleep randomized trial. Sleep Med. 2025;129:67–74. [DOI]
29. Jafarpour E, Bahadori A, Esm Zamani Aghmioni S, Barzegari Soltan Ahmadi M. Comparison of the effectiveness of self-compassion-focused therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy on reducing anxiety, depression, and self-criticism in women with generalized anxiety disorder Quarterly of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. 2025;2(1):150–68. [Persian] [Article]
30. Wang S, Gao L, Wang C, Bai J, Shen M, Zhao X, et al. Effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depressive symptoms among patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2025;15:1433558. [DOI]
31. Narimisaei J, Naeim M, Nasiri Z, Imannezhad S, Mohammadi Y. Effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy on quality of life and psychological wellbeing of patients with Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2025;213(3):78–81. [DOI]
32. Kang Q, Xiong L, Shi Z, Li Y, Xing T, Yang L. Comparing the multi-disciplinary approach utilizing cognitive behavioral therapy and sound therapy to standard audiological treatment in chronic tinnitus patients: impact on severity reduction and quality of life improvement. Am J Otolaryngol. 2025;46(5):104700. [DOI]
33. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2016. [Persian]
34. McCracken LM, Dhingra L. A short version of The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS‐20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag. 2002;7(1):45–50. [DOI]
35. Paknejad M, Asghari A, Rahiminezhad A, Rostami R, Taheri A. Factorial structure and psychometric properties of The Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20). Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2014;5(3):71–94. [Persian] [Article]
36. World Health Organization. WHOQOL-Bref: introduction. administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: field trial version; 1996. [Article]
37. Nejat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh SR. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire: translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2006;4(4):1–12. [Persian] [Article]
38. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
39. Rudd MD. Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (BCBT) for suicidality in military populations. Mil Psychol. 2012;24(6):592–603. [DOI]
40. Hayatloo S, Farshbaf Manisefat F, Etemadi-Nia M. Comparing the effects of acceptance and commitment therapy and brief cognitive-behavioral therapy on sleep quality of adolescents with gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of Community Health. 2025;18(4):39–51. [Persian] [Article]
41. Ma TW, Yuen ASK, Yang Z. The efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2023;39(3):147–57. [DOI]
42. Pardos-Gascón EM, Narambuena L, Leal-Costa C, Van-Der Hofstadt-Román CJ. Differential efficacy between cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies for chronic pain: systematic review. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021;21(1):100197. [DOI]
43. Kiani S, Sabahi P, Makvand Hosaini S, Rafienia P, Alebouyeh M. Comparison of the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based therapy and positive cognitive-behavioral therapy on the pain self-efficacy of patients with chronic pain. Journal of Psychological Science. 2020;19(89):567–78. [Persian] [Article]
44. El Rafihi-Ferreira R, Hasan R, Toscanini AC, Linares IMP, Suzuki Borges D, Brasil IP, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024;92(6):330–43. [DOI]
45. Shahroyi M, Bahrainian AM, Mehrabizade Honarmand M, Ahi G. Comparing the effect of acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion therapy, and cognitive-behavioral therapy on the cognitive flexibility of students with social anxiety. Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal. 2025;24(2):207–21. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb