Volume 7 -                   MEJDS (2017) 7: 86 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Chehri P, Sadeghi M, Veiskarami H. Investigating the Effects of Hope training on cognitive engagement and Academic Achievement of Exceptional Girl Students (mental retardation) of Khoramaabad Second Level of Middle School. MEJDS 2017; 7 :86-86
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-808-en.html
1- Lorestan University
Abstract:   (4165 Views)
Abstract
Background & objective: Factors such as frustration toward continuing education, lack of self-confidence, lack of making efforts to compensate for failures, and lack of insistence on achieving success are thought to affect academic achievement. Therefore, this study aims at investigating the impact of teaching hope, as a construct in positive psychology upon the cognitive engagement and academic achievement among high school exceptional female students (with intellectual disability) in Khorramabad, Iran.
Methods: This is a two group pretest-post quasi-experimental study. The study population consisted of all exceptional high school female students in Khorramabad in the school year of 2014-2015. The research sample consisted of 30 Exceptional high school female students.  The participants were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups in equal numbers. The research instrument was Smart Cognitive engagement Questionnaire (2012). The questionnaire, adopted from the theoretical model of Linen Brink and Pintrich (2003), measures aspects of cognitive engagement through 19 statements. The reliability of the tool was 0.88 in this study. To measure the academic achievement of the students, the students’ final GP of the second semester was used. After selecting the test group as well as the control group, in the same conditions and simultaneously and before any intervention, each questionnaire of cognitive learning questionnaires was read out for the students of the groups to complete the questionnaire as a pre-test. The experiment groups received 9 sessions 60 minute hope training in accordance with Snyder's Hope Theory and Magyar Moe’s positive psychology. The instruction was carried out in an operational and illustrative manner in forms of presentation, stories and of PowerPoint files. The control group did not receive any training. Afterwards, post-tests were administered to the students of both groups.. Descriptive statistics indices (mean and standard deviation) were used for describing the data. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) were used to test the research hypotheses.
Results: The results of multivariate and single-variable covariance analysis showed that, by controlling the pre-test scores, there was a significant difference between the average scores of the cognitive engagement and academic achievement variables in the experimental and control groups in the post-test phase( (p <0.001 and F=10.71). Therefore, teaching hope influences the exceptional female students’ cognitive engagement and academic achievement in Khorramabad.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the positive and significant effects of teaching was thoroughly vivid. Hence educational affairs authorities should seek to apply and promote educational practices that increase the ability to progress and awaken hope among the students with intellectual disabilities and prepare them to face classroom challenges. This practice gradually resulted in improving the students’ academic skills, cognitive engagement and ultimately academic achievement.
Full-Text [PDF 615 kb]   (1762 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Afrooz GH. Exceptional Children Who? What is exceptional education? Peivand. 2001; 268;1: 292-280. [Persian]
2. Rastegar A, Hejazi E, Gholamali Lavassani M. & Ghorban Jahromy, R. Intelligence beliefs and academic achievement: the role of achievement goals and academic engagement. Psychological Research. 2009; 12 (1 and 2): 25-11.
3. Saif AA. Measurement, assessment and training evaluation. [Tehran]: Doran; 2011. [Persian]
4. Abedini Y, Hejazi E, Sajadi H, Qazi Tabatabaei M. The mediating role of academic engagement in the relationship between goals, avoidance-performance and achievement in female students majoring in the humanities, and psychology Educational Research. New Educational Approaches. 2008; 4(9): 41-85.
5. Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris A. School engagement: potential of the concept: state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 2004; 74: 59-119. [DOI:10.3102/00346543074001059]
6. Linnenbrink EA, Pintrich P. The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly. 2003; 19: 119-137. [DOI:10.1080/10573560308223]
7. Ravindran B, Greene BA, Debacker TK. Predicting preservice teachers' cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research. 2005;98(4):222-33. [DOI:10.3200/JOER.98.4.222-233]
8. Fredricks JA, McColskey W. The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. InHandbook of research on student engagement 2012 (pp. 763-782). Springer, Boston, MA. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37]
9. Schunk DH, Meece JR, Pintrich PR. Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson Higher Ed; 2012.
10. Hejazi E, Abedini Y. Structural-functional relationship model approach goals, academic engagement and achievement. Journal of Psychology. 2008; 12 (3(47)):332-348. [Persian]
11. Ebrahimi N, Sabaghyan Z, Abolqasemi M. The relationship between hope and academic achievement. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2011; 17(2(60)): 1-16. [Persian]
12. Davoodi M. Hope and the role of education in human life. Knowledge Journal. 2004; 81: 51-45.
13. Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
14. Karr A. Positive Psychology. Najafi J, Sharifi H.[Persian Translators]. Kalameh Publishing; 2006.
15. Snyder CR. Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological inquiry. 2002;13(4):249-75. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01]
16. Mohammadi A. Effect of Luthanz Psychological Capital Intervention Model on Internal Motivation, Academic Exhaustion and Academic Achievement of Secondary Students in Sanandaj. [MA thesis].Lorestan University; 2014.
17. Zerang R. The relationship between learning styles and academic engagement and academic performance. [Master Thesis]. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2012.
18. Mohsenpour M. The role of self-efficacy, achievement goals, learning strategies and sustainable development in third grade math student's math. [Master's thesis]. [Tehran]: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences; Tehran University, 2005.
19. Snyder CR. The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. Simon and Schuster; 1994.
20. Snyder CR, editor. Handbook of hope: Theory, measures, and applications. Academic press; 2000.
21. Curry LA, Shyder CR. Hope takes the field: Mind matters in athletic performances. In Handbook of hope; 2000,pp. 243-259. [DOI:10.1016/B978-012654050-5/50015-4]
22. Reeder MC. The Role of Trait Achievement Motivation and Ability in Predicting Academic Performance Trajectories. Michigan State University. Psychology; 2010.
23. Ayers SC. Achievement motivation and stress inoculation training: Coping through college. Saint Louis University; 2010.
24. McClelland DC. Human motivation. CUP Archive; 1987. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139878289]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb