Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 30 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Foroutan M, Nejat H, Toozandehjani H. Comparing the Effectiveness of Compassion-Focused Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy on Distress Tolerance and Pain Management in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. MEJDS 2020; 10 :30-30
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1221-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1221-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Neyshabour Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Psychology, Neyshabur Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (2924 Views)
Background & Objective: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by the demyelination of the myelin sheath of axons. MS leads to defects or limitations in the transmission of neural impulses. Prevalent comorbid conditions in MS patients include mood and emotional disturbances, with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, dysthymia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder, as the most frequent illnesses. Pain is commonly experienced in these patients. According to studies, pain significantly affects their mental health and quality of life. The present study aimed to compare the effects of Compassion–Focused Therapy (CFT) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) on distress tolerance and pain management in patients with MS.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of the study included all women with MS, who referred to the Mashhad Welfare Organization Disability Recognition Commission in the first three months of 2017 to receive the Welfare Organization's services. Participating in the study was voluntary. The study sample included 45 women with MS. Fifteen participants were randomly assigned to the control and 30 in the experimental (15 in the DBT and 15 in the CFT groups) groups. The study inclusion criteria were as follows: having at least a high–school diploma degree, being aged from 20 to 50 years, the lack of mental and personality disorders (approved by a clinical interview), not joining other therapeutic programs, no receipt of individual counseling or pharmacotherapy, and voluntarily attending treatment sessions. The study exclusion criteria were having psychological and personality disorders (approved by a clinical interview), consuming psychedelic drugs, co–participating in other therapeutic programs, receiving individual counseling or pharmacotherapy, abstaining from two intervention sessions, and the lack of cooperation in the medical sessions. The experimental groups participated in 12 group therapy sessions. DBT was developed for 12 sessions of 75 minutes (once a week), i.e., conducted on the study subjects per the manual of DBT of Linehan. CFT included 12 sessions of 75 minutes (once a week) based on Gilbert's guide. The study participants completed the Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons, Gaher, 2005), and the Pain Medication Questionnaire (Rosenstile, Keefe, 1983) before and after the interventions. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and inferential statistics; Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) in SPPSS.
Results: The ANCOVA results confirmed the effect of CFT and DBT on distress tolerance and pain management (p<0.001) in the studied subjects. The collected data suggested a significant difference between the effects of CFT and DBT on the dependent variables of distress tolerance and pain management (p<0.001). The DBT method was more effective than CFT on distress tolerance and some subscales of pain management, including attention restoration, pain catastrophizing, and increased activity. CFT was more effective than DBT on some of the pain management subscales, including pain reinterpretation, self–talk, pain ignorance, as well as prayer and hope (p<0.001).
Conclusion: DBT has a clearer structure than the CFT and simultaneously applies behavioral and accreditation techniques. DBT also includes dialectical principles and techniques (e.g., self–observation), i.e., associated with change maintenance. A feature of MS patients is the lack of well–functioning when being distracted from their emotions. Through the DBT process, by combining mindfulness exercises with behavioral exercises, MS patients experience to observe their depressed mood and physiological, behavioral, and emotional consequences without judgment. Besides, in addition to attempting to accept the existence of this state and its tolerance, they learn the mechanism of the passage of this state. Furthermore, by practicing these exercises, they shift to an automatic style of mind. Conducting these exercises will ultimately lead to a distraction from undesirable emotions, such as depressed and anxious moods.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a control group design. The statistical population of the study included all women with MS, who referred to the Mashhad Welfare Organization Disability Recognition Commission in the first three months of 2017 to receive the Welfare Organization's services. Participating in the study was voluntary. The study sample included 45 women with MS. Fifteen participants were randomly assigned to the control and 30 in the experimental (15 in the DBT and 15 in the CFT groups) groups. The study inclusion criteria were as follows: having at least a high–school diploma degree, being aged from 20 to 50 years, the lack of mental and personality disorders (approved by a clinical interview), not joining other therapeutic programs, no receipt of individual counseling or pharmacotherapy, and voluntarily attending treatment sessions. The study exclusion criteria were having psychological and personality disorders (approved by a clinical interview), consuming psychedelic drugs, co–participating in other therapeutic programs, receiving individual counseling or pharmacotherapy, abstaining from two intervention sessions, and the lack of cooperation in the medical sessions. The experimental groups participated in 12 group therapy sessions. DBT was developed for 12 sessions of 75 minutes (once a week), i.e., conducted on the study subjects per the manual of DBT of Linehan. CFT included 12 sessions of 75 minutes (once a week) based on Gilbert's guide. The study participants completed the Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons, Gaher, 2005), and the Pain Medication Questionnaire (Rosenstile, Keefe, 1983) before and after the interventions. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and inferential statistics; Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) in SPPSS.
Results: The ANCOVA results confirmed the effect of CFT and DBT on distress tolerance and pain management (p<0.001) in the studied subjects. The collected data suggested a significant difference between the effects of CFT and DBT on the dependent variables of distress tolerance and pain management (p<0.001). The DBT method was more effective than CFT on distress tolerance and some subscales of pain management, including attention restoration, pain catastrophizing, and increased activity. CFT was more effective than DBT on some of the pain management subscales, including pain reinterpretation, self–talk, pain ignorance, as well as prayer and hope (p<0.001).
Conclusion: DBT has a clearer structure than the CFT and simultaneously applies behavioral and accreditation techniques. DBT also includes dialectical principles and techniques (e.g., self–observation), i.e., associated with change maintenance. A feature of MS patients is the lack of well–functioning when being distracted from their emotions. Through the DBT process, by combining mindfulness exercises with behavioral exercises, MS patients experience to observe their depressed mood and physiological, behavioral, and emotional consequences without judgment. Besides, in addition to attempting to accept the existence of this state and its tolerance, they learn the mechanism of the passage of this state. Furthermore, by practicing these exercises, they shift to an automatic style of mind. Conducting these exercises will ultimately lead to a distraction from undesirable emotions, such as depressed and anxious moods.
Keywords: Compassion therapy, Dialectical behavior therapy, Distress tolerance, Pain management, Patients with multiple sclerosis.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Gamboa OL, Tagliazucchi E, von Wegner F, Jurcoane A, Wahl M, Laufs H, et al. Working memory performance of early MS patients correlates inversely with modularity increases in resting state functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage. 2014;94:385–95. [DOI]
2. Brown RA, Lejuez CW, Kahler CW, Strong DR. Distress tolerance and duration of past smoking cessation attempts. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(1):180–5.
3. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure. Motiv Emot. 2005;29(2):83–102. [DOI]
4. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106(3):337–45. [DOI]
5. Forbes A, While A, Mathes L, Griffiths P. Health problems and health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(1):67–78. [DOI]
6. Neff KD. The role of self-compassion in development: A healthier way to relate to oneself. Hum Dev. 2009;52(4):211–4. [DOI]
7. Gilbert P. Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2009;15(3):199–208. [DOI]
8. Morley RH, Terranova VA, Cunningham SN, Vaughn T. The role that self-compassion and self-control play in hostility provoked from a negative life event. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2016;3(2):125–41.
9. Yarnell LM, Neff KD. Self-compassion, interpersonal conflict resolutions, and well-being. Self and Identity. 2013;12(2):146–59. [DOI]
10. Manzari Tavakoli F. Barrasi asarbakhshi amoozesh groohi motemarkez bar khod shafeghat varzi bar ezterab va afsordegi daneshjooyan daneshgah Azad vahed Baft [The Effectiveness of self-compassin group training on anxiety and depression among students of Islamic Azad University Baft branch]. In: World Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences, Law and Social Sciences at the Beginning of the Third Millennium [Internet]. Shiraz, Iran: Pazhoohesh Sherkat Idea Bazar Sa’anat Sabz; 2016. [Persian] [Article]
11. Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM. Mindfulness and Acceptance: Expanding the Cognitive-Behavioral Tradition. Guilford Press; 2011.
12. Kring AM, Davison GC, Johnson SL, Neale JM. Abnormal Psychology. Wiley; 2007.
13. Conrad AM, Sankaranarayanan A, Lewin TJ, Dunbar A. Effectiveness of a 10-week group program based on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy skills among patients with personality and mood disorders: Findings from a pilot study. Australas Psychiatry. 2017;25(5):466–70. [DOI]
14. Van Dijk S, Jeffrey J, Katz MR. A randomized, controlled, pilot study of dialectical behavior therapy skills in a psychoeducational group for individuals with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2013;145(3):386–93. [DOI]
15. Kröger C, Schweiger U, Sipos V, Arnold R, Kahl KG, Schunert T, et al. Effectiveness of dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder in an inpatient setting. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(8):1211–7. [DOI]
16. Shams J, Azizi A, Mirzaei A. Correlation between distress tolerance and emotional regulation with students smoking dependence. Hakim Research Journal. 2010;13(1):11–8. [Persian] [Article]
17. Asghari MA, Golak N. The roles of pain coping strategies in adjustment to chronic pain. Scientific Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality. 2005;1(10):1–23. [Persian] [Article]
18. Asghari A, Nicholas MK. Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study. Pain. 2001;94(1):85–100. [DOI]
19. Linehan M. Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality Disorder, First Ed. New York: Guilford Publications; 1993.
20. Gilbert P. The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. Br J Clin Psychol. 2014;53(1):6–41. [DOI]
21. Schnell K, Herpertz SC. Effects of dialectic-behavioral-therapy on the neural correlates of affective hyperarousal in borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41(10):837–47. [DOI]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
