Volume 9 -
MEJDS (2019) 9: 1 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nayebaghayee A, Aleyasin S A, Heidari H, Davoodi H. Exposure and Response Prevention therapy on Inflated Sense of Responsibility, and Intolerance of Uncertainty, in Patients with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. MEJDS 2019; 9 :1-1
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1396-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1396-en.html
1- Department of General Psychology, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of clinical Psychology, Ashtian Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Counseling and Psychology, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of clinical Psychology, Ashtian Branch, Islamic Azad University
3- Department of Counseling and Psychology, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract: (4211 Views)
Background & Objective: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is a heterogeneous disorder and has different therapeutic approaches. Over the past few decades, we have witnessed tremendous advances in the role of cognitive systems in the formation, continuity, and treatment of the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Certain beliefs have been identified as a significant contributor to the creation and continuation of this disorder, Cognitive models of OCD also indicating that responsibility assessment is involved in the etiology and preservation of OCD symptoms. According to Salkovskis (1985), the Inflated Sense of responsibility in OCD has a central role. Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), which means the tendency to avoid ambiguous situations and the inability to deal with uncertainty, is considered significant damage to OCD. ERP as a standard golden treatment, including the gradual inclusion of anxiety due to obsessive-compulsive disorder, and the prevention or limitation of obsessive-compulsive procedures and reduction of anxiety. Aim of this study was the efficacy of Exposure and Response Prevention Therapy (ERP) in Inflated Sensory Responsibility and Intolerance of Uncertainty in Patients with OCD.
Methods: The research design was a semi-experimental study with pretest, post-test, and follow-up. The statistical population consisted of all the people of Mahallat city, which is located in Markazi province in Iran in 2018. Sixteen patients with OCD were selected through the available sampling method and randomly within two groups: ERP and control group. (8 patients in each group). Each person in the treatment group received 12 treatment sessions by the Salkovskis exposure and Response prevention therapy method for OCD. Subjects were measured both before and at the end of interventions as well as three months later in the follow-up phase by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Yale-BOCS; Goodman, 1989), the Salkovskis Responsibility Attitude Scale; (RAS; Salkovskis, Wroe, Morrison, Richards, Reynolds & Thorpe, 2000) and The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale; (IUS; Freeston et al, 1994) . The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale is a reliable instrument; with internal stability of 0.89 by Goodman and in Iran with internal stability for the sign index (SC) and severity scale (SS) were 0.97 and 0. 95 for the Persian version by Rajazi Esfahani et al. Responsibility Attitude Scale is a 26-item scale, consistency (α=0.91), excellent test-retest reliability over a five-week period (r=0.78), and Intolerance of Uncertainty Scalexcellent internal consistency (α=0.89), and satisfactory test-retest reliability (r=0.74). Post-extraction research data analyzed by repeated measurements analysis using SPSS-23 software.
Results: To test the hypothesis of the research, about the existence of the pre-test variables and the possibility of the primary difference between the two intervention and control groups, as well as reducing the initial difference and comparing the groups, the multivariate analysis of variance, and used repeated measure design. In the semi-experimental design, before analyzing the hypothesis of the research, Levin's findings showed that the homogeneous assumption of covariance of data and regression slope established. The results of Mocheli's test also showed that there is no spheroidal assumption (p<0.050). The findings showed that there is a significant difference between the mean variables of the inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance in the experimental group with the control group. Therefore, the effectiveness of treatment on the reduction of the inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance can be verified (p<0.001), and this effect was lasting after three months (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study have shown the effectiveness of exposure and Response prevention therapy in improving an inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance in patients with OCD.
Methods: The research design was a semi-experimental study with pretest, post-test, and follow-up. The statistical population consisted of all the people of Mahallat city, which is located in Markazi province in Iran in 2018. Sixteen patients with OCD were selected through the available sampling method and randomly within two groups: ERP and control group. (8 patients in each group). Each person in the treatment group received 12 treatment sessions by the Salkovskis exposure and Response prevention therapy method for OCD. Subjects were measured both before and at the end of interventions as well as three months later in the follow-up phase by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Yale-BOCS; Goodman, 1989), the Salkovskis Responsibility Attitude Scale; (RAS; Salkovskis, Wroe, Morrison, Richards, Reynolds & Thorpe, 2000) and The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale; (IUS; Freeston et al, 1994) . The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale is a reliable instrument; with internal stability of 0.89 by Goodman and in Iran with internal stability for the sign index (SC) and severity scale (SS) were 0.97 and 0. 95 for the Persian version by Rajazi Esfahani et al. Responsibility Attitude Scale is a 26-item scale, consistency (α=0.91), excellent test-retest reliability over a five-week period (r=0.78), and Intolerance of Uncertainty Scalexcellent internal consistency (α=0.89), and satisfactory test-retest reliability (r=0.74). Post-extraction research data analyzed by repeated measurements analysis using SPSS-23 software.
Results: To test the hypothesis of the research, about the existence of the pre-test variables and the possibility of the primary difference between the two intervention and control groups, as well as reducing the initial difference and comparing the groups, the multivariate analysis of variance, and used repeated measure design. In the semi-experimental design, before analyzing the hypothesis of the research, Levin's findings showed that the homogeneous assumption of covariance of data and regression slope established. The results of Mocheli's test also showed that there is no spheroidal assumption (p<0.050). The findings showed that there is a significant difference between the mean variables of the inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance in the experimental group with the control group. Therefore, the effectiveness of treatment on the reduction of the inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance can be verified (p<0.001), and this effect was lasting after three months (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study have shown the effectiveness of exposure and Response prevention therapy in improving an inflated sense of responsibility and uncertainty of intolerance in patients with OCD.
Keywords: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Inflated Sense of Responsibility, Intolerance of Uncertainty, Exposure and Response Prevention therapy (ERP).
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; Washington, DC; 2013.
2. Lam DC, Salkovskis PM, Warwick HM. An experimental investigation of the impact of biological versus psychological explanations of the cause of “mental illness”. Journal of Mental Health. 2005; 14 (5):453-64. [DOI]
3. Conley SL, Wu KD. Experimental modification of dysfunctional interpretations in individuals with contamination concerns. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2018; 59:56-64. [DOI]
4. Wolters LH, Prins PJ, Garst GJ, Hogendoorn SM, Boer F, Vervoort L, Et al. Mediating Mechanisms in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood OCD: The Role of Dysfunctional Beliefs. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 2018; 21:1-3. [DOI]
5. Hansmeier J, Exner C, Rief W, Glombiewski JA. A test of the metacognitive model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2016; 10:42-8. [DOI]
6. Kim SK, McKay D, Taylor S, Tolin D, Olatunji B, Timpano K, Et al. The structure of obsessive compulsive symptoms and beliefs: A correspondence and biplot analysis. Journal of anxiety disorders. 2016; 38:79-87. [DOI]
7. Cheie L, Miu AC. Functional and dysfunctional beliefs in relation to adolescent health-related quality of life. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; 97:173-7. [DOI]
8. Mantz SC, Abbott MJ. The relationship between responsibility beliefs and symptoms and processes in obsessive compulsive disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2017; 14:13-26. [DOI]
9. Salkovskis PM, Wroe AL, Gledhill A, Morrison N, Forrester E, Richards C, Et al. Responsibility attitudes and interpretations are characteristic of obsessive compulsive disorder. Behaviour research and therapy. 2000; 38 (4):347-72. [DOI]
10. Arntz A, Voncken M, Goosen AC. Responsibility and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An experimental test. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2007; 45 (3) :425-35. [DOI]
11. Luppino OI, Tenore K, Mancini F, Basile B. A Theoretical Integration of Schema Therapy and Cognitive Therapy in OCD Treatment: Goals and Beliefs of the Obsessive Mind (Part I) . Psychology. 2018; 9 (09) :2261. [DOI]
12. Pugh K, Luzon O, Ellett L. Responsibility beliefs and persecutory delusions. Psychiatry research. 2018; 259:340-4. [DOI]
13. Salmani B, Hasani J. The role of intolerance of uncertainty and positive metacognitive beliefs in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and depression. RJMS. 2016; 23 (142) :64-72. [Persian]
14. Faleer HE, Fergus TA, Bailey BE, Wu KD. Examination of an experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty on obsessive-compulsive outcomes. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2017; 15:64-73. [DOI]
15. Samuels J, Bienvenu OJ, Krasnow J, Wang Y, Grados MA, Cullen B, Et al. An investigation of doubt in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2017; 75:117-124. [DOI]
16. Gillett CB, Bilek EL, Hanna GL, Fitzgerald KD. Intolerance of uncertainty in youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: A transdiagnostic construct with implications for phenomenology and treatment. Clinical psychology review. 2018; 60:100-8. [DOI]
17. Counsell A, Furtado M, Iorio C, Anand L, Canzonieri A, Fine A, Et al. Intolerance of uncertainty, social anxiety, and generalized anxiety: Differences by diagnosis and symptoms. Psychiatry research. 2017; 252:63-9. [DOI]
18. Almardani Some’eh S, Narimani M, Mikaeeli N, Basharpoor S. The Comparison of Intolerance of Uncertainty, Emotion Regulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients and Normal Individuals. Psychological Studies. 2017; 13 (2):77-94. [Persian]
19. Ong CW, Clyde JW, Bluett EJ, Levin ME, Twohig MP. Dropout rates in exposure with response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: What do the data really say? Journal of Anxiety. 2016; 40:8-17. [DOI]
20. Olatunji BO, Rosenfield D, Tart CD, Cottraux J, Powers MB, Smits JA. Behavioral versus cognitive treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: An examination of outcome and mediators of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2013; 81 (3) :415. [DOI]
21. Hawton KE, Salkovskis PM, Kirk JE, Clark DM. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems: A practical guide. Ghassemzadeh H. (Persian translator). First edition. Tehran: Arjmand; 2013, Vol (1), pp: 176-223. [Persian]
22. Hawton KE, Salkovskis PM, Kirk JE, Clark DM. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems: A practical guide. Oxford University. New York, NY; 1989.
23. Motivala SJ, Arellano M, Greco RL, Aitken D, Hutcheson N, Tadayonnejad R, et al. Relationships between obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression and functioning before and after exposure and response prevention therapy. International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice. 2018; 22 (1):40-6. [DOI]
24. Wheaton MG, Galfalvy H, Steinman SA, Wall MM, Foa EB, Simpson HB. Patient adherence and treatment outcome with exposure and response prevention for OCD: Which components of adherence matter and who becomes well? Behaviour research and therapy. 2016; 85:6-12. [DOI]
25. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann RL, Hill CL, Et al. The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of general psychiatry. 1989;46 (11) :1006-11. [DOI]
26. Esfahani S, Motaghipour Y, Kamkari K, Zahiredin A, Janbozorgi M. Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2012; 17 (4):297-12. [Persian]
27. Kabirnezhad S, Alilou MM, Sharifi MA. Validity and Reliability of the Responsibility Attitude Scale (RAS). Psychological Research. 2010; 13 (1):109-23. [Persian]
28. Buhr K, Dugas MJ. The intolerance of uncertainty scale: psychometric properties of the English version. Behaviour research and therapy. 2002; 40 (8):931-45. [DOI]
29. Akbari M. The Comparison of the Efficacy of Intolerance Uncertainty Therapy, Buspirone and Combined Treatment in Improvement Symptom of Patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Quarterly of Clinical Psychology Studies, Allameh Tabataba’i University. 2017; 7 (27):89-115. [Persian]
30. Salkovskis PM, Warwick HMC. Cognitive Therapy of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. In: Cognitive Psychotherapy [Internet]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 1988 [cited 2019 May 24]. p. 376–95.
31. Salkovskis PM. Understanding and treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1999; 37:S29-52. [DOI]
32. Shahjoee T, Aliloo MM, Roodsari AB, Fakhari A. Intolerance of uncertainty and worry among patients with generalized anxiety disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2012; 17 (4):304-12. [Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
