Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 15 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sadeghi S, Nouhi S, Aghayousefi A, Aghaei H. Determining the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Ambiguity Tolerance and Cognitive Flexibility in People with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. MEJDS 2024; 14 :15-15
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3021-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahroud, Iran
2- Assistant Professor in Psychology, Shahroud Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3- Associate Professor in Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (658 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Obsessive–compulsive disorder is diagnosed based on the presence of unwanted and disturbing thoughts and repetitive behaviors. One of the treatments whose effectiveness has been confirmed in psychological disorders is the treatment based on acceptance and commitment. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy on ambiguity tolerance and cognitive flexibility in people with obsessive–compulsive disorder.
Methods: The current research was quasi–experimental and employed a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population of this research included people with obsessive–compulsive symptoms residing in the vocational training and occupational therapy camp of Semnan City, Iran, in 2022. Since the number of subjects in groups in the quasi–experimental studies is at least 15 people, 30 qualified volunteers were randomly entered into the study and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups (each group includes 15 people). The implementation method was such that after selecting the people of the sample group and before starting the treatment program, the Ambiguity Tolerance Questionnaire (McLean, 1993) and the Psychological Flexibility Questionnaire (Dennis and Vander Wal, 2010) were distributed among both groups. After that, acceptance and commitment therapy was implemented in the experimental group (in the form of 8 sessions of 90 minutes, each session once a week), and the control group was not subjected to any treatment program. In the end, the posttest was done again from both groups. Also, after the end of the research, the treatment program was implemented for the control group to maintain the ethical standards in the research. The criteria for entering the research were as follows: 1) interview based on DSM–5 criteria and also a higher than average score on Bill Brown's Obsessive Compulsive Scale (because the statistical population of this research is people with obsessive symptoms, this measurement was carried out by a specialist in the field of clinical psychology), 2) at least a diploma level of education, 3) not participating in other psychological interventions at the same time, and 4) absence of debilitating physical and mental diseases diagnosed by the researcher using a clinical interview. The criteria for leaving the research were as follows: 1) Absence of more than three sessions, 2) non–observance of group therapy rules, and 3) suffering from a physical or mental illness that did not exist before the treatment and was identified during the implementation. Data analysis was carried out in two parts: descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. At the level of descriptive statistics, frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were used, and at the level of inferential statistics, covariance analysis was used. To check the normality of the data using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and to check the homogeneity of variances using the Levene test and also the assumption of homogeneity of the slope of the regression lines by checking the effect of the group in the pretest interactions were used in the regression model. Finally, univariate analysis of covariance was used. Also, an independent t test was used to compare the averages of age variables of two groups, and a Chi–square test was used to compare the frequency of education variables. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 24, and the significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results of covariance analysis for all variables of ambiguity tolerance and psychological flexibility showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups in the posttest after deleting the effect of pretest (p<0.001). Also, the value of eta squared for both ambiguity tolerance and psychological flexibility indicates the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy.
Conclusion: It can be said that acceptance and commitment therapy can effectively increase the tolerance of ambiguity and cognitive flexibility of people with obsessions.

Full-Text [PDF 326 kb]   (294 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
2. Dams GM, Calamari JE, Rector NA, Riemann BC. Identification of belief-based subtypes in obsessive-compulsive disorder using latent profile analysis. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2020;26:100555. [DOI]
3. Radmehr F, Karami J. The examination of the role tolerance of ambiguity and flourishing in predicting academic engagement in students. Educational Psychology. 2019;15(52):203–216. [Persian] [Article]
4. Carleton RN. Fear of the unknown: one fear to rule them all? J Anxiety Disord. 2016;41:5–21. [DOI]
5. Furnham A, Marks J. Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the recent literature. Psychology. 2013;4(9):717–28. [DOI]
6. Koerner N, Mejia T, Kusec A. What's in a name? Intolerance of uncertainty, other uncertainty-relevant constructs, and their differential relations to worry and generalized anxiety disorder. Cogn Behav Ther. 2017;46(2):141–61. [DOI]
7. Gunessee S, Subramanian N. Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2020;40(7/8):1201–23. [DOI]
8. Andrés S, Lázaro L, Salamero M, Boget T, Penadés R, Castro-Fornieles J. Changes in cognitive dysfunction in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder after treatment. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(6):507–14. [DOI]
9. Marshall EJ, Brockman RN. The relationships between psychological flexibility, self-compassion, and emotional well-being. J Cogn Psychother. 2016;30(1):60–72. [DOI]
10. Vafaei M, Roshani F, Piri R, Malek A, Michel TM. Comparison of cognitive flexibility, appropriate risk taking and reaction time in people with and without adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In: The 9th National Conference of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry [Internet]. Tehran: 2018. [Persian]
11. InZelazo PD, Müller U. Executive function in typical and atypical development. In: Goswami U; editors. The Wiley -Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Malden: Wiley Blackwell; 2011.
12. Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Fox JP, Schreurs KMG, Spinhoven P. The role of psychological flexibility in a self-help acceptance and commitment therapy intervention for psychological distress in a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2013;51(3):142–51. [DOI]
13. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies – republished article. Behav Ther. 2016;47(6):869–85. [DOI]
14. Lang AJ, Schnurr PP, Jain S, He F, Walser RD, Bolton E, et al. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for distress and impairment in OEF/OIF/OND veterans. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9(1):74–84. [DOI]
15. Poddar S, Sinha V, Urbi M. Acceptance and commitment therapy on parents of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Int J Educ Psychol Res. 2015;1(3):221. [DOI]
16. Eifert GH, Forsyth JP, Arch J, Espejo E, Keller M, Langer D. Acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders: three case studies exemplifying a unified treatment protocol. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009;16(4):368–85. [DOI]
17. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2015. [Persian]
18. Bond FW, Lloyd J, Guenole N. The work‐related acceptance and action questionnaire: Initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2013;86(3):331–47. [DOI]
19. Imani M. Examining the factor structure of psychological flexibility questionnaire in students. Journal of Education and Learning Studies. 2015;8(1):162–81. [Persian] [Article]
20. Mclain DL. The Mstat-I: a new measure of an individual's tolerance for ambiguity. Educ Psychol Meas. 1993;53(1):183–9. [DOI]
21. Feizi A, Mahbobi T, Zare H, Mostafaei A. The relationship of cognitive intelligence and ambiguity tolerance with entrepreneurship among students of West Azarbayjan Payam Noor University, Iran. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2012;10(4):276–84. [Persian]
22. Bach PA, Moran DJ. ACT in practice: case conceptualization in acceptance & commitment therapy. Kamali S, Kian Rad N. (Persian translator). Tehran: Arjmand Pub; 2016.
23. Borghei S, Roshan R, Bahrami H. Treatment based on acceptance and commitment and spirituality of religious therapy in a group method improvement of the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and obsessive beliefs and quality of life in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2020;10:6. [Persian] [Article]
24. Asli Azad M, Manshaee Gh, Ghamarani A. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive emotion regulation and intolerance of uncertainty of the students with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2020;9(36):33–53. [Persian] [Article]
25. Faleer HE, Fergus TA, Bailey BE, Wu KD. Examination of an experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty on obsessive-compulsive outcomes. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2017;15:64–73. [DOI]
26. Kroska EB, Miller ML, Roche AI, Kroska SK, O’Hara MW. Effects of traumatic experiences on obsessive-compulsive and internalizing symptoms: the role of avoidance and mindfulness. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:326–36. [DOI]
27. Eilenberg T, Hoffmann D, Jensen JS, Frostholm L. Intervening variables in group-based acceptance & commitment therapy for severe health anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 2017;92:24–31. [DOI]
28. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):639–65. [DOI]
29. Arch JJ, Craske MG. Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: different treatments, similar mechanisms? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2008;15(4):263–79. [DOI]
30. Masuda A, Hayes SC, Sackett CF, Twohig MP. Cognitive defusion and self-relevant negative thoughts: examining the impact of a ninety-year-old technique. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(4):477–85. [DOI]
31. Moghtadayi M, Khosh Akhlagh H. Effectiveness of acceptance- and commitment-based therapy on psychological flexibility of veterans' spouses. Iran J War Public Health. 2015;7(4):183–88. [Persian] [Article]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb