جلد 13 - شماره سال ۱۴۰۲
جلد (13): 88 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rafiee F, Sodani M, Gholamzadeh Jofreh M. Evolution of Love in the Coronavirus Crisis: Lived Experience of Couples with Stable Marriage. MEJDS 2023; 13 :88-88
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3172-fa.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3172-fa.html
رفیعی فرح ناز، سودانی منصور، غلامزاده جفره مریم. تحول عشق در بحران کرونا: تجربۀ زیستۀ زوجین دارای ازدواج‌های پایدار. مجله مطالعات ناتوانی. 1402; 13 () :88-88
1- دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، گروه مشاوره، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران
2- استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3- استادیار، گروه مشاوره، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران
2- استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3- استادیار، گروه مشاوره، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران
چکیده: (976 مشاهده)
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: در شرایط همه‌گیری کووید-۱۹، عشق زوجی قادر است در سیر تحولی خود به‌عنوان پدیده‌ای زمانمند و پویا، پاسخ‌گوی نیازهای موقعیتی همسران به تکیه‌گاهی ایمن برای حفاظت از خود و روابط زوجی در مقابله با بحران باشد؛ براین‌اساس، مطالعۀ حاضر با هدف کشف تحول عشق در دوران کرونا براساس تجربۀ زیستۀ زوجین دارای ازدواج‌های پایدار طراحی شد.
روش‌بررسی: این پژوهش در سال ۱۴۰۲ در قالب مطالعۀ کیفی پدیدارشناسانه انجام شد. به‌منظور تحلیل داده‌ها، روش پدیدارشناختی تفسیری (IPA) به‌کار رفت. جامعۀ آماری را زوجین دارای ازدواج پایدار تشکیل دادند که تجاربی از عشق را در زندگی زوجی خود داشتند. نمونه‌گیری ازطریق روش گلوله‌برفی صورت گرفت و پس از انجام مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافتۀ عمیق و کدگذاری اولیه، با مصاحبۀ پانزده زوج، اشباع نظری حاصل شد. روش جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافتۀ عمیق و انعطاف‌پذیر و باز، در بازه‌ای زمانی بین ۶۰تا۹۰ دقیقه بود. پس از پایان هر مصاحبه و بعد از گوش‌دادن مکرر به صوت ضبط‌شدۀ جلسات، متن مصاحبه ترانویسی شد. روایی این پژوهش، براساس معیار قابلیت اعتماد لینکلن و گوبا (۱۹۸۵) و با پنج مؤلفۀ راستی‌آزمایی شامل اعتبارپذیری، انتقال‌پذیری، باورپذیری، تأییدپذیری و کفایت استنباطی بررسی شد.
یافته‌ها: با تحلیل چندمرحله‌ای مصاحبه‌ها، ۲۸۰ شناسۀ باز مشخص شد و ذیل ۸۱ مفهوم اولیه طبقه‌بندی گردید. با ادامۀ کدگذاری، استخراج یازده زیرمضمون صورت گرفت و پس از یافتن الگوهای بین زیرمضامین، سه مضمون با عنوان‌های گسترش صمیمیت، تحول راهبردهای تعاملی، انطباق و مقابلۀ زوجی، پدیدار شد. در هر طبقه، تجارب زوجین در دو دستۀ تجارب درونی و تجارب رابطه‌ای قرار گرفت.
نتیجه‌گیری: براساس نتایج این پژوهش، در طول دوران همه‌گیری کرونا، همسرانی که دارای تجارب عاشقانه در زندگی زوجی خود بودند، تجارب درونی غنی‌تری از عواطف مثبت عاشقانه داشتند و در مواجهه با بحران کووید-۱۹، از منابع عاطفی خود برای رشد فردی و ارتقای کیفیت و سازگاری و ثبات رابطه، استفاده کردند.
نوع مطالعه: مقاله پژوهشی اصیل |
موضوع مقاله:
مشاوره
فهرست منابع
1. Pietromonaco PR, Overall NC. Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID–19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships. Am Psychol. 2021;76(3):438–50. [DOI]
2. Eder SJ, Nicholson AA, Stefanczyk MM, Pieniak M, Martínez–Molina J, Pešout O, et al. Securing your relationship: quality of intimate relationships during the COVID–19 pandemic can be predicted by attachment style. Front Psychol. 2021;12:647956. [DOI]
3. Williamson HC. Early effects of the COVID–19 pandemic on relationship satisfaction and attributions. Psychol Sci. 2020;31(12):1479–87. [DOI]
4. Balzarini RN, Muise A, Zoppolat G, Gesselman AN, Lehmiller JJ, Garcia JR, et al. Sexual desire in the time of COVID–19: How COVID–related stressors are associated with sexual desire in romantic relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(8):3823–38. [DOI]
5. Stanley SM, Markman HJ. Helping couples in the shadow of COVID–19. Fam Process. 2020;59(3):937–55. [DOI]
6. Günther–Bel C, Vilaregut A, Carratala E, Torras–Garat S, Pérez–Testor C. A mixed–method study of individual, couple, and parental functioning during the state–regulated COVID–19 lockdown in Spain. Fam Process. 2020;59(3):1060–79. [DOI]
7. Pietromonaco PR, Overall NC. Implications of social isolation, separation, and loss during the COVID–19 pandemic for couples' relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;43:189–94. [DOI]
8. Tobore TO. Towards a comprehensive theory of love: the quadruple theory. Front Psychol. 2020;11:862. [DOI]
9. Gómez–López M, Viejo C, Ortega–Ruiz R. Well–being and romantic relationships: a systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(13):2415. [DOI]
10. Davila J, Mattanah J, Bhatia V, Latack JA, Feinstein BA, Eaton NR, et al. Romantic competence, healthy relationship functioning, and well–being in emerging adults. Personal Relationships. 2017;24(1):162–84. [DOI]
11. Donato S, Parise M, Pagani AF, Lanz M, Regalia C, Rosnati R, et al. Together against COVID–19 concerns: the role of the dyadic coping process for partners' psychological well–being during the pandemic. Front Psychol. 2020;11:578395. [DOI]
12. Yang H, Ma J. How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: factors that worsen (vs. protect) emotional well–being during the coronavirus pandemic. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113045. [DOI]
13. Özad BE, Jamo MS, Uygarer G. COVID–19 restrictions, lifestyles, and marital conflicts: an empirical analysis of marital sustainability. Sustainability. 2022;14(18):11249. [DOI]
14. Bradbury–Jones C, Isham L. The pandemic paradox: the consequences of COVID–19 on domestic violence. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(13–14):2047–9. [DOI]
15. Osur J, Ireri EM, Esho T. The effect of COVID–19 and its control measures on sexual satisfaction among married couples in Kenya. Sex Med. 2021;9(3):100354. [DOI]
16. Schmid L, Wörn J, Hank K, Sawatzki B, Walper S. Changes in employment and relationship satisfaction in times of the COVID–19 pandemic: evidence from the German family panel. European Societies. 2021;23(sup1):S743–58. [DOI]
17. Alase A. The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): a guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies. 2017;5(2):9–19. [DOI]
18. Parvari P. The transition from philosophy to methodology,a new reading of the phenomenology method:the foundation of philosophical approaches and implementation steps. Sociological studies. 2019;12(44):87–106. [Persian] [DOI]
19. McMullin C. Transcription and qualitative methods: implications for third sector research. Voluntas. 2023;34(1):140–53. [DOI]
20. Lincoln Y, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1985.
21. Sagone E, Commodari E, Indiana ML, La Rosa VL. Exploring the association between attachment style, psychological well–being, and relationship status in young adults and adults–a cross–sectional study. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023;13(3):525–39. [DOI]
22. Balzarini RN, Muise A, Zoppolat G, Di Bartolomeo A, Rodrigues DL, Alonso–Ferres M, et al. Love in the time of COVID: perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with COVID related stressors. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2023;14(3):342–55. [DOI]
23. Feeney BC, Lemay EP. Surviving relationship threats: the role of emotional capital. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012;38(8):1004–17. [DOI]
24. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;52(3):511–24. [DOI]
25. Collins NL, Ford MB. Responding to the needs of others: the caregiving behavioral system in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2010;27(2):235–44. [DOI]
26. Kamali Z, Allahyar N, Ostovar S, Alhabshi SMS bin SM, Griffiths MD. Factors that influence marital intimacy: a qualitative analysis of iranian married couples. Cogent Psychology. 2020;7(1):1771118. [DOI]
27. Vowels LM, Francois–Walcott RRR, Perks RE, Carnelley KB. "Be free together rather than confined together": a qualitative exploration of how relationships changed in the early COVID–19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2021;38(10):2921–43. [DOI]
28. Berli C, Schwaninger P, Scholz U. "We feel good": daily support provision, health behavior, and well–being in romantic couples. Front Psychol. 2021;11:622492. [DOI]
29. Cassidy J, Stern JA, Mikulincer M, Martin DR, Shaver PR. Influences on care for others: attachment security, personal suffering, and similarity between helper and care recipient. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(4):574–88. [DOI]
30. Mellat Khah S, Haghani Zemydani M, Khazaei S, Ilanloo H. Investigation of adaptability components of couples in corona pandemic crisis: a qualitative study. Rooyesh–e–Ravanshenasi Journal. 2021;10(8):1–12. [Persian] [Article]
31. Rusbult CE, Agnew CR, Arriaga XB. The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology: volume 2. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. pp: 218–31. [DOI]
32. Khojasteh Mehr R, Mohammadi R, Sudani M, Abbaspur Z. The lived experience of sacrifice in enduring marriages: a descriptive phenomenological psychological study. Journal of Counseling Research. 2018;17(65):150–86. [Persian] [Article]
33. Lin L, Guo H, Duan L, He L, Wu C, Lin Z, et al. Research on the relationship between marital commitment, sacrifice behavior and marital quality of military couples. Front Psychol. 2022;13:964167. [DOI]
34. Gupta S, Bhattacharya S, Banerjee R, Chakraborty A, Das D, De A. The differential impact of COVID–19 pandemic on sexual behavior of eligible couples in urban and rural India. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2023;5(1):48–53. [DOI]
35. Carvalho J, Pascoal PM. Challenges in the practice of sexual medicine in the time of COVID–19 in Portugal. J Sex Med. 2020;17(7):1212–5. [DOI]
36. Löfgren C, Elmerstig E, Schröder J, Chollier M, Mehulić J, de Graaf H, et al. Changes in intimacy and sexuality during the COVID–19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of data from a survey on partnered individuals in eight european countries. Sex Cult. 2023;27(2):693–714. [DOI]
37. Karney BR, Bradbury TN. The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: a review of theory, method, and research. Psychol Bull. 1995;118(1):3–34. [DOI]
38. Karantzas GC, Feeney JA, Agnew CR, Christensen A, Cutrona CE, Doss BD, et al. Dealing with loss in the face of disasters and crises: integrating interpersonal theories of couple adaptation and functioning. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022;43:129–38. [DOI]
39. Frost DM, LeBlanc AJ. The complicated connection between closeness and the quality of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2022;39(5):1237–55. [DOI]
40. Brock RL, Ramsdell EL, Franz MR, Stasik–O'Brien SM, Gervais SJ, Calkins FC. Free to be me with you: development of the individuality in couples questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2023;35(7):602–17. [DOI]
41. Tan K, Agnew CR, Hadden BW. Seeking and ensuring interdependence: desiring commitment and the strategic initiation and maintenance of close relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020;46(1):36–50. [DOI]
42. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: exploring the attachment–related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships. 2005;12(2):149–68. [DOI]
43. Doho SS, Setiawan J. Role of communication and marital acceptance in marital adjustment for dual earners married under 10 years. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia. 2022;26(1):44–52. [DOI]
44. Jiang Q. Changes in couples' relationships and their differences in type during the COVID–19 pandemic in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12516. [DOI]
45. Randall AK, Post JH, Reed RG, Butler EA. Cooperating with your romantic partner: Associations with interpersonal emotion coordination. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2013;30(8):1072–95. [DOI]
46. Rosta–Filep O, Sallay V, Carbonneau N, Martos T. Cooperation and conflict in romantic partners' personal projects: the role of life domains. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(20):16854–67. [DOI]
47. Randall AK, Bodenmann G. The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(2):105–15. [DOI]
48. Bodenmann G, Pihet S, Shantinath SD, Cina A, Widmer K. Improving dyadic coping in couples with a stress–oriented approach: a 2–year longitudinal study. Behav Modif. 2006;30(5):571–97. [DOI]
49. Falconier MK, Kuhn R. Dyadic coping in couples: a conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Front Psychol. 2019;10:571. [DOI]
50. Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM. Why we need interdependence theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2008;2(5):2049–70. [DOI]
51. Christensen A, Doss BD. Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:111–4. [DOI]
52. Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ, vanDellen MR. Transactive goal dynamics. Psychol Rev. 2015;122(4):648–73. [DOI]
53. Daks JS, Rogge RD. Examining the correlates of psychological flexibility in romantic relationship and family dynamics: a meta–analysis. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020;18:214–38. [DOI]
54. Twiselton K, Stanton SCE, Gillanders D, Bottomley E. Exploring the links between psychological flexibility, individual well–being, and relationship quality. Personal Relationships. 2020;27(4):880–906. [DOI]
55. Tavaloli T, Kimiaee SA, Agha Mohammadian H. The effectiveness of marriage enrichment training of TIME plan on improving marital intimacy and women's psychological security. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2022;10(3):259–74. [DOI]
56. Lucchetti G, Góes LG, Amaral SG, Ganadjian GT, Andrade I, Almeida PO de A, et al. Spirituality, religiosity and the mental health consequences of social isolation during COVID–19 pandemic. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021;67(6):672–9. [DOI]
57. Chirico F. Spirituality to cope with COVID–19 pandemic, climate change and future global challenges. Journal of Health and Social Sciences. 2021;6:151–8.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
