Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 151 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mokhtari Far A, Taher M, Nouhi S, Rafiei Nia P. Determining the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Cognitive and Experiential Avoidance in People with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. MEJDS 2024; 14 :151-151
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3231-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Abstract:   (628 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Obsessive–compulsive disorder is a common psychological disorder that causes severe problems in an individual's life. In general, obsessive–compulsive disorder is characterized by symptoms such as repetitive and recurrent thoughts, images, or urges that cause the person to feel disturbed or anxious. Cognitive avoidance is a common feature of people with obsessive–compulsive disorder. It refers to the tendency of people with obsessions to try to suppress or avoid thoughts related to their obsessions. Experiential avoidance is another common feature of obsessive–compulsive disorder. Experiential avoidance refers to the tendency of people with obsessions to avoid or escape unpleasant feelings or situations that trigger their obsessions or compulsions. Acceptance and commitment therapy is an effective treatment for people with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Acceptance and commitment therapy focuses on helping people accept their thoughts and feelings without judgment while committing to actions that align with their values. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive and experiential avoidance in people with obsessive–compulsive disorder.
Methods: The current research was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design using a control group and an experimental group. The statistical population of this research included people with obsessions who were referred to counseling and psychology clinics in Mashhad City, Iran, in 2022. From the statistical population, 30 qualified volunteers were included in the study and were randomly assigned to two treatment–schema and control groups (each group included 15 people). The inclusion criteria were as follows: obtaining a score higher than 16 on the Yale–Brown obsession scale, bearing at least a diploma level of education, and not participating in other therapeutic interventions simultaneously. The exclusion criteria were as follows: absence of more than three sessions and disobeying the rules was group therapy. This research observed ethical standards including obtaining informed consent and ensuring privacy and confidentiality. Also, when participating in the research, the participants were free to withdraw from the research at any time and provide individual information. The implementation method was such that after selecting the people of the sample group and before starting the treatment program, the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaires (Sexton & Daga, 2008) and the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (Gámez et al., 2011) were distributed between both groups. After that, acceptance and commitment therapy was implemented in the experimental group (in the form of 8 sessions of 90 minutes, each session once a week), and the control group was not subjected to any treatment program. In the end, the posttest was done again from both groups. Also, after the end of the research, the treatment program was also implemented on the control group to maintain the ethical standards in the research. Data analysis was carried out in two parts: descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Univariate covariance analysis was used at the level of descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation and at the inferential statistics level. Data analysis was done using SPSS software version 24, and the significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive avoidance subscales, including repression, thought substitution, attention redirection, situational avoidance, and image change, as well as experiential avoidance variable subscales, including behavioral avoidance, aversion to disturbance, procrastination, distraction/stopping, and disturbance tolerance, was significant in the experimental group of people with obsessive–compulsive disorder (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Based on research findings, acceptance, and commitment therapy is an effective therapeutic approach for reducing cognitive avoidance and experiential avoidance in people with obsessive–compulsive disorder.

Full-Text [PDF 263 kb]   (232 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
2. Blair J. The role of guilt in obsessive compulsive disorder [PhD dissertation]. [Chicago, USA]: Adler University; 2016.
3. Melli G, Chiorri C, Carraresi C, Stopani E, Bulli F. The role of disgust propensity and trait guilt in OCD symptoms: a multiple regression model in a clinical sample. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2015;5:43–8. [DOI]
4. Soondrum T, Wang X, Gao F, Liu Q, Fan J, Zhu X. The applicability of acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sci. 2022;12(5):656. [DOI]
5. Gloster AT, Walder N, Levin ME, Twohig MP, Karekla M. The empirical status of acceptance and commitment therapy: a review of meta-analyses. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020;18:181–92. [DOI]
6. Vakili Y, Gharraee B. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in treating a case of obsessive compulsive disorder. Iran J Psychiatry. 2014;9(2):115–7.
7. Lillis J, Schumacher L, Thomas JG, Levin ME, Dunsiger S, Unick JL, et al. Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing two low-intensity weight loss maintenance interventions based on acceptance and commitment therapy or self-regulation. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021;103:106327. [DOI]
8. Roemer L, Orsillo SM, Salters-Pedneault K. Efficacy of an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008;76(6):1083–9. [DOI]
9. Orsillo SM, Roemer L, Barlow DH. Integrating acceptance and mindfulness into existing cognitive-behavioral treatment for GAD: a case study. Cogn Behav Pract. 2003;10(3):222–30. [DOI]
10. Wynne B, McHugh L, Gao W, Keegan D, Byrne K, Rowan C, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy reduces psychological stress in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):935-945.e1. [DOI]
11. Iturbe I, Pereda-Pereda E, Echeburúa E, Maiz E. The effectiveness of an acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness group intervention for enhancing the psychological and physical well-being of adults with overweight or obesity seeking treatment: the mind & life randomized control trial study protocol. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9):4396. [DOI]
12. Hayes SC, Levin ME, Plumb-Vilardaga J, Villatte JL, Pistorello J. Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav Ther. 2013;44(2):180–98. [DOI]
13. Levin ME, Haeger JA, Pierce BG, Twohig MP. Web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for mental health problems in college students: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Modif. 2017;41(1):141–62. [DOI]
14. Goodman WK, Price LH, Rasmussen SA, Mazure C, Fleischmann R, Hill CL, et al. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale I: development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46:1006–11. [DOI]
15. Sexton KA, Dugas MJ. The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: validation of the English translation. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(3):355–70. [DOI]
16. Gámez W, Chmielewski M, Kotov R, Ruggero C, Watson D. Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: The Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2011;23(3):692–713. [DOI]
17. Bassak Nejad S, Moini N, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. The relationship between post event processing and cognitive avoidance with social anxiety among students. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2011;4(4):335–40. [Persian] [Article]
18. Moradi A, Barghi Irani Z, Bagiyan Koulemarz MJ, Kariminejad K, Zabet M. Factor determination and psychometric features of the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (MEAQ). Social Cognition. 2018;6(2):57–82. [Persian] [Article]
19. Hayes SA, Orsillo SM, Roemer L. Changes in proposed mechanisms of action during an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2010;48(3):238–45. [DOI]
20. Rezaei L, Bigdeli H. The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on cognitive flexibility and marital satisfaction in married women with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2021;11:206. [Persian] [Article]
21. Rajabi F, Hasani F, Keshavarzi Arshadi F, Emamipour S. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder and guilt feeling in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Iranian Journal of Rehabilitation Research in Nursing. 2019;6(2):140–7. [Persian] [Article]
22. McCracken LM, Gutiérrez-Martínez O. Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(4):267–74. [DOI]
23. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD. A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Springer; 2004.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb