Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 81 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mahmoodi Booket Z, Sayyadi P S, Saeidmanesh M. Investigating the Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Anxiety in Children with High-Functioning Autism. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :81-81
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3366-en.html
1- Master's Degree in Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, University of Science and Art, Yazd, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (1254 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significant impairment of social interaction, communication impairment, and restricted/repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, and activities. In addition to the challenges caused by the main symptoms of this disorder, maladaptive behaviors such as anxiety and aggression can be associated with ASD and further impair performance and quality of life. Because most people with ASD spend the majority of their lives with ASD in adulthood, there is a compelling need for effective treatments for these incompatibilities. One of the psychological problems found in children with ASD is anxiety. This intense emotion is accompanied by an unpleasant state and internal turmoil that affects the individual, including feelings of low confidence, helplessness, and physiological arousal. Despite the various treatments that have been done for these children so far, there are few studies to investigate the effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the anxiety of children with ASD. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the effectiveness of tDCS on anxiety in children with high–functioning autism spectrum disorder.
Methods: This quasi–experimental research employed a pretest–posttest design with a control group. Among children aged 8 to 12 with autism spectrum disorder referred to the rehabilitation clinics of Yazd City, Iran, 30 qualified volunteers were included in the study using available sampling; 15 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. The inclusion criteria were as follows: having autism spectrum disorder as diagnosed by a psychiatrist, having an IQ greater than 80, being between 8 and 12 years of age, and not using other treatment methods such as medication and psychotherapy. The exclusion criteria were missing one tDCS session and failure to complete the questionnaire during the study. Each subject completed a consent form to participate in the study. In the present study, a Taiwan–made iOMED device (2011) was employed. It consisted of two electrodes (anode and cathode), each with a surface area of 35 cm². The electrodes were embedded in saline–soaked pads to facilitate electrical conductivity and ensure effective current delivery to the scalp. Anxiety variable scores were compared using Spence Children's Anxiety Scale–Child Version (SCAS–Child) (Spence, 1997) at two time points, before and after tDCS. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 17 software and covariance analysis. The significance level of the tests was 0.05.
Results: Data analysis revealed that the anxiety variable score in children with autism spectrum disorder in the intervention group and after receiving tDCS was significantly reduced compared to the control group (p<0.001). The effect size also showed that 66% of the difference between the intervention group and the control group in the anxiety variable was due to the implementation of tDCS.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that 10 sessions of 20 minutes of 1 mA tDCS of the left anodic/right cathodic region of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex led to the improvement of anxiety in children with ASD. So, tDCS can be used as a complementary treatment to improve the anxiety of children with ASD.

Full-Text [PDF 264 kb]   (70 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Im DS. Treatment of aggression in adults with autism spectrum disorder: a review. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2021;29(1):35–80. [DOI]
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). 2000.
3. Maenner MJ, Shaw KA, Baio J, EdS1, Washington A, Patrick M, et al. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years — autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020;69(4):1–12. [DOI]
4. Cassidy S, Au-Yeung S, Robertson A, Cogger-Ward H, Richards G, Allison C, et al. Autism and autistic traits in those who died by suicide in England. Br J Psychiatry. 2022;221(5):683–91. [DOI]
5. Pelton MK, Crawford H, Bul K, Robertson AE, Adams J, De Beurs D, et al. The role of anxiety and depression in suicidal thoughts for autistic and non‐autistic people: a theory‐driven network analysis. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2023;53(3):426–42. [DOI]
6. Pickard H, Hirsch C, Simonoff E, Happé F. Exploring the cognitive, emotional and sensory correlates of social anxiety in autistic and neurotypical adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61(12):1317–27. [DOI]
7. Cai RY, Richdale AL, Dissanayake C, Uljarević M. Brief report: inter-relationship between emotion regulation, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, and depression in youth with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(1):316–25. [DOI]
8. Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11(11):CD009645. [DOI]
9. Lerner O, Friedman J, Frenkel-Toledo S. The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):103. [DOI]
10. Shiozawa P, Leiva APG, Castro CDC, Da Silva ME, Cordeiro Q, Fregni F, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for generalized anxiety disorder: a case study. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;75(11):e17–8. [DOI]
11. Hosseini Ashkezary P, Mottaghi S, Saeidmanesh M, Moradi A. Comparison of the effectiveness of mindfulness therapy based on stress reduction and electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex (tDCS) in improving anxiety symptoms of students with test anxiety. Neuropsychology. 2022;7(27):79–93. [Persian] [Article]
12. Nishida K, Koshikawa Y, Morishima Y, Yoshimura M, Katsura K, Ueda S, et al. Pre-stimulus brain activity is associated with state-anxiety changes during single-session transcranial direct current stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:266. [DOI]
13. Spence SH. The structure of anxiety symptoms among children: a confirmatory factor analytic study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1997;106:280-97.
14. Spence SH, Barrett PM, Turner CM. Psychometric properties of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale with young adolescents. J Anxiety Disord. 2003;17(6):605–25. [DOI]
15. Hoseini S, Sadeghi M, Qaderi Bagajan K, Soleimani ZA, Jafari M, Zolfaghari S. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Spence children's Anxiety Scale in Iranian adolescents. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023;28(4):1565–79. [DOI]
16. DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp. 2011;(51):2744. [DOI]
17. Pedron S, Dumontoy S, González-Marín MDC, Coune F, Van Schuerbeek A, Haffen E, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces motivation to drink ethanol and reacquisition of ethanol self-administration in female mice. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):198. [DOI]
18. Saeidmanesh M, Shabanzadeh R, Shabanzadeh M, Abedini M, Demheri F, Yeganehfard E, et al. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory and depression in mothers with deaf children. Journal of Clinical Physiotherapy Research. 2024;8(1):e79. [DOI]
19. Van Dam WO, Chrysikou EG. Effects of unilateral tDCS over left prefrontal cortex on emotion regulation in depression: evidence from concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021;21(1):14–34. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb