Psychometric Properties of the Yamaguchi Emotional Vulnerability Scale in the Iranian Population

Ghaemi , Ali; Kheiri , Yousef; Yazdani, Shaghayegh; Shalchi , Behzad

تعطیلات نوروز ۱۴۰۴-ضمن آرزوی قبولی طاعات و عبادات و همچنین تبریک فرارسیدن بهار و شروع سال جدید، به اطلاع می‌رساند این نشریه از تاریخ ۲۸ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۳ لغایت ۱۵ فروردین ۱۴۰۴ تعطیل می باشد.

Volume 14 - Articles-1403 MEJDS (2024) 14: 69 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Ghaemi A, Kheiri Y, Yazdani S, Shalchi B. Psychometric Properties of the Yamaguchi Emotional Vulnerability Scale in the Iranian Population. MEJDS 2024; 14 :69-69
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3439-en.html

Psychometric Properties of the Yamaguchi Emotional Vulnerability Scale in the Iranian Population

Ali Ghaemi¹

, Yousef Kheiri²

, Shaghayegh Yazdani³

, Behzad Shalchi ^*⁴

1- M.A. in General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Center for the Development of Interdisciplinary Research in Islamic Studies and Health Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3- MA Student in Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Iran
4- Associate Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center and Working Group of Psychiatry and Psychology Culture-based Knowledge Development, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract: (615 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Emotional vulnerability is a multifaceted and intricate experience that involves both psychological and physiological factors. It is described as a type of distress that arises from emotional difficulties such as interpersonal conflicts or deep emotional wounds. This concept includes feelings of hurt, sadness, or suffering that may stem from various sources, such as sensitivity to criticism, fear of rejection, avoidance of emotional situations, and difficulty in managing interpersonal conflicts. Emotional vulnerability refers to the psychological distress caused by negative emotions such as sadness, grief, anger, or anxiety. This concept plays a significant role in affecting mental health and psychological well-being. Despite the significant impact of emotional vulnerability on psychological problems and disorders, there is no appropriate tool to measure it in the Iranian population. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale (Yamaguchi et al., 2022) in the Iranian population.
Methods: This study was of a tool development and methodological research design. The statistical population consisted of 10,414 students from Zanjan University in the academic year 2022-2023. To assess content validity, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used. The reliability of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale (Yamaguchi et al., 2022) was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest reliability. Since the minimum recommended sample size for test-retest is 30, 50 participants were randomly selected for this assessment. Additionally, the face validity of the tool was qualitatively evaluated by consulting 15 students. The study’s statistical sample for confirmatory factor analysis consisted of 400 participants selected through random cluster sampling. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to assess the factor structure (construct validity) and convergent validity (Pearson correlation with the Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons & Gaher, 2005) and the Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002)). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 and AMOS version 24, with all tests computed at a 5% significance level.
Results: The CVR values for all items ranged from 0.80 to 1.0, indicating that the importance and necessity of each item in the tool were confirmed with a CVR greater than 0.63. Moreover, the CVI for the entire tool was calculated to be greater than 0.63, demonstrating that the items had appropriate simplicity, specificity, and clarity. The Cronbach’s alpha values for the entire scale were 0.83, with subscale values of 0.81 for vulnerability to criticism or rejection, 0.78 for vulnerability to weakened relationships, 0.75 for vulnerability to interpersonal conflicts, and 0.80 for vulnerability to procrastination and emotional avoidance. The test-retest reliability for the entire scale was 0.80, with subscale values of 0.73 for vulnerability to criticism or rejection, 0.76 for vulnerability to weakened relationships, 0.74 for vulnerability to interpersonal conflicts, and 0.79 for vulnerability to procrastination and emotional avoidance. The factor structure of the Emotional Vulnerability Scale was confirmed in the Iranian sample, and all model fit indices were acceptable (χ2/df=1.55, GFI=0.95, AGFI=0.93, IFI=0.91, CFI=0.90, RMSEA=0.037). Additionally, the correlation coefficients between the four subscales—Vulnerability to criticism or denial, Vulnerability toward worsening relationships, Vulnerability toward interpersonal discord, and Vulnerability toward procrastination and emotional avoidance—and the Distress Tolerance Scale (Simons & Gaher, 2005) were 0.21, 0.41, 0.24, and 0.35, respectively, and with the Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler et al., 2002) were 0.33, 0.42, 0.37, and 0.46, respectively.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that this scale is a suitable tool for assessing emotional vulnerability among Iranian students. The results of this study can be applied in the fields of clinical psychology, health psychology, and family counseling.

Keywords: Emotional vulnerability, psychometric properties, reliability, validity

Full-Text [PDF 447 kb] (510 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull. 1995;117(3):497–529. [DOI]

2. Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. The growing problem of loneliness. The Lancet. 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):426. [DOI]

3. Hawkley LC, Thisted RA, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness predicts reduced physical activity: Cross-sectional & longitudinal analyses. Health Psychol. 2009;28(3):354–63. [DOI]

4. Leary MR. The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2000;32:1–62.

5. Alden LE, Trew JL. If it makes you happy: Engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion. 2013;13(1):64–75. [DOI]

6. Abdolpour G, Shalchi B, Hamzezadeh S, Salehi A. The mediating role of self-esteem on the relationship between emotional dysregulation and compassion with Internet addiction. Shenakht J Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 10;6(3):129–43. [DOI]

7. Zhang Y, Sun Q. How Interpersonal Sensitivity Affects Depression Under the COVID-19 Lockdown Among College Students in South China: A Moderated Mediation Model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 31;16:1271–82. [DOI]

8. Chou KL, Liang K, Sareen J. The Association Between Social Isolation and DSM-IV Mood, Anxiety, and Substance Use Disorders: Wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Jan 11;72(11):1515. [DOI]

9. Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Emotional sensitivity before and after coping with rejection: A longitudinal study. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2015 Nov 1;41:28–37. [DOI]

10. Schilling K. Examining the Role of Self-esteem in the Association between Emotional Vulnerability and Psychological Well-being. Honors Theses [Internet]. 2015 Apr 1; Available from: [Article]

11. Khrystenko O. Implicit displays of emotional vulnerability: A cross-cultural analysis of “unacceptable” embarrassment-related emotions in the communication within male groups. Open Linguist. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):209–31. [DOI]

12. Zil-E-Ali A, Tariq R, Aadil M, Zil-E-Ali F, Ali A, Ahmed A, et al. What is Emotional Pain? A Review of Pathophysiology and Treatment Options. Intern Med Med Investig J. 2018;3(4):1–6. [DOI]

13. Amaro-Díaz L, Montoro CI, Fischer-Jbali LR, Galvez-Sánchez CM. Chronic Pain and Emotional Stroop: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022 Jan;11(12):3259. [DOI]

14. Yamaguchi S, Kawata Y, Murofushi Y, Ota T. The development and validation of an emotional vulnerability scale for university students. Front Psychol. 2022;13. [DOI]

15. Sachdeva V, Tayal N, Yadav DVP. Role of emotional labour in mental health. Int J Res Hum Resour Manage. 2022;4(1):07–12. [DOI]

16. Kuo JR, Linehan MM. Disentangling emotion processes in borderline personality disorder: Physiological and self-reported assessment of biological vulnerability, baseline intensity, and reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2009;118(3):531–44. [DOI]

17. Barlow DH. Unraveling the mysteries of anxiety and its disorders from the perspective of emotion theory. American Psychologist. 2000;55(11):1247–63. [DOI]

18. Fakhari A, Shalchi B, Rahimi VA, Sadeh RN, Lak E, Najafi A, et al. Mental health literacy and COVID-19 related stress: The mediating role of healthy lifestyle in Tabriz. Heliyon. 2023;9(7). [DOI]

19. Flouri E, Mavroveli S. Adverse Life Events and Emotional and Behavioural Problems in Adolescence: The Role of Coping and Emotion Regulation. Stress and Health. 2013;29(5):360–8. [DOI]

20. 1. Thoits PA. Mechanisms Linking Social Ties and Support to Physical and Mental Health. J Health Soc Behav. 2011 Jun 1;52(2):145–61. [DOI]

21. Caspi A, Moffitt TE. Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):583–90. [DOI]

22. Amiri S, Shalchi B, Malek A, Pour Hasan S, Bakht Shokuhi Z. Developmental Family Functioning and Conduct Disorder Symptoms in Teenagers: The Function of Cognitive Emotion Regulation. International Journal of School Health. 2024 Oct 1;11(4):241–50. [DOI]

23. Plieger T, Melchers M, Montag C, Meermann R, Reuter M. Life stress as potential risk factor for depression and burnout. Burnout Research. 2015 Mar 1;2(1):19–24. [DOI]

24. Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010 Mar 1;30(2):217–37. [DOI]

25. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking Rumination. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep 1;3(5):400–24. [DOI]

26. Aldao A, Sheppes G, Gross JJ. Emotion Regulation Flexibility. Cogn Ther Res. 2015 Jun 1;39(3):263–78. [DOI]

27. Zaki J, Williams WC. Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion. 2013;13(5):803–10. [DOI]

28. Marroquín B, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Emotion regulation and depressive symptoms: Close relationships as social context and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2015;109(5):836–55. [DOI]

29. Jabarian M, Ghoreyshi Rad F, Shalchi B. The Relationship Between Internalizing Syndromes and Morbid Curiosity and Cyber Aggression in Adolescents. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Forensic Medicine. 2024;14(3):E44583. [DOI]

30. Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 10;10(1):13. [DOI]

31. Menefee DS, Ledoux T, Johnston CA. The Importance of Emotional Regulation in Mental Health. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2022 Jan 1;16(1):28–31. [DOI]

32. Graves BS, Hall ME, Dias-Karch C, Haischer MH, Apter C. Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PLOS ONE. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0255634. [DOI]

33. Deasy C, Coughlan B, Pironom J, Jourdan D, Mannix-McNamara P. Psychological Distress and Coping amongst Higher Education Students: A Mixed Method Enquiry. PLOS ONE. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e115193. [DOI]

34. Sue DW, Sue D. Counseling the culturally different: Theory and practice, 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2022. xiii, 368 p.

35. Cohen RJ, Swerdlik ME, Phillips SM. Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement, 9th ed. Mountain View, CA, US: Mayfield Publishing Co; 2018. xxviii, 798 p.

36. Sarmad V, Bazargan A, Hejazi E. Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Agah Pub; 2015. [Persian]

37. Simons JS, Gaher RM. The Distress Tolerance Scale: Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure. Motiv Emot. 2005 Jun 1;29(2):83–102. [DOI]

38. Kianfar F, Bahonar F, Sanieemanesh M. Examining the psychometric properties of the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire and Distress Tolerance Questionnaire in high school students. Applied Research in Consulting. 2023 May 22;6(1):33–53. [Persian] [Article]

39. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine. 2002 Aug;32(6):959–76. [DOI]

40. Yaghubi H. Psychometric properties of the 10 questions Version of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10). Applied Psychological Research Quarterly. 2016;6(4):45–57. [Article]

41. Machosky J, Meissner WW. The dynamics of childhood trauma. Am J Psychoanal. 2006; 66(1): 63-75. [DOI]

42. Fakhari A, Doshmangir L, Farahbakhsh M, Shalchi B, Shafiee-Kandjani AR, Alikhah F, et al. Developing inpatient suicide prevention strategies in medical settings: Integrating literature review with expert testimony. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 1;78:103266. [DOI]

43. Azarmehr R, Shalchi B, Ahmadi E. Impulsive behavior as a mediator between childhood maltreatment and emotional disorders. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 2020;14(4). [Persian] [DOI]

44. Shalchi B, Beigzadeh MN, Shafiee-Kandjani AR, Shahrokhi H, Khanmiri BH. Childhood maltreatment and vulnerability to substance use disorders: The mediating role of psychological security. Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Jul 29;14(2):193–201 [DOI]

45. Fan N, Fan H, Luo R, Wang Y, Yan Y, Yang X, et al. The impact of childhood trauma on emotional distress and the moderating role of sense of coherence among college students in China. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 29;14(1):9797. [DOI]

46. Kim J, Cicchetti D. Longitudinal pathways linking child maltreatment, emotion regulation, peer relations, and psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2010;51(6):706–16. [DOI]

47. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment & Human Development. 2002 Sep 1;4(2):133–61. [DOI]

48. Briere J, Scott C. Principles of trauma therapy: A guide to symptoms, evaluation, and treatment. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2014.

49. Ghaemi A, Vaghef L, Shalchi B. Validity and reliability of persian version of morbid curiosity scale in students. Med J Tabriz Uni Med Sciences. 2024 Jan 1;45(6):485–94. [Persian] [DOI]

50. Lee K, Xu F, Fu G, Cameron CA, Chen S. Taiwan and Mainland Chinese and Canadian children’s categorization and evaluation of lie- and truth-telling: A modesty effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2001;19(4):525–42. [DOI]

51. Matsumoto D, Yoo SH, Hirayama S, Petrova G. Development and Validation of a Measure of Display Rule Knowledge: The Display Rule Assessment Inventory. Emotion. 2005;5(1):23–40. [DOI]