Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 37 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zivari Rahman M. Development and Standardization of the Suicide with Death Intent Questionnaire Among Adolescents. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :37-37
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3557-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Counseling, Sayyed Jamaleddin Asadabadi University, Asadabad, Iran
Abstract:   (466 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Suicide attempts are a major challenge in the field of mental health, and in many countries, especially among individuals aged 15 to 19 years, they are the second or third leading cause of death. In Iran, despite the lack of precise statistics due to cultural and social considerations, evidence suggests that this phenomenon has been increasing in recent years, particularly among adolescents and young adults. One of the most important concepts in studying suicidal behaviors is "death intent," which determines the individual's severity and seriousness in wanting to end his or her life. This indicator can predict the likelihood of repeated suicide attempts and the methods used. Tools like the Beck Suicide Ideation Scale have been designed to assess death intent; however, these tools face cultural and linguistic challenges in non–Western societies. In Iran, there are no indigenous tools for measuring death intent, and research has mainly focused on the prevalence and risk factors. Therefore, the development and standardization of precise tools to assess death intent in Iran is essential. So, the present study was conducted to develop and standardize a suicide with death intent questionnaire among adolescents.
Methods: This research employed a sequential exploratory mixed–methods approach and a tool development framework. The first phase of the study was qualitative and utilized a descriptive phenomenological method to identify the components of suicide attempts with death intent. Participants in this phase included 16 high school students from Hamadan City, Iran, who had attempted suicide in 2023 and were selected through purposive sampling. The inclusion criteria were as follows: being enrolled in one of the second secondary schools in Hamadan, being referred to the Hamadan Province Counseling Center, visiting the counseling center, and being ready and providing informed consent to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: not being mentally healthy enough to participate in the research and not cooperating with the researcher in the interview. Semi–structured interviews were conducted with these participants. In the quantitative phase of the study, a descriptive–correlational method was used. The statistical population consisted of 408 high school students in Hamadan Province who had been referred to counseling centers for assistance. Among them, 374 students (201 girls and 173 boys) were selected as the sample using convenience sampling. To collect data, the Suicide with Death Intent Questionnaire (SDIQ) was used, which consisted of 32 items based on a 5–point Likert scale. After performing exploratory factor analysis, the final questionnaire included 7 factors. Data analysis was conducted using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Bartlett's test of sphericity (KMO) in SPSS 25.
Results: After analyzing the qualitative data, 9 main themes were extracted: loneliness and isolation, choosing irreversible methods, reliable lethal tools, emotional detachment, lack of remorse for the decision, unwillingness to be saved, feelings of absolute despair, worthlessness and self–deprecation, and determination to end life. For factor analysis, the principal axis factoring (PAF) method and varimax rotation were used on the correlation matrix. The EFA revealed that the questionnaire, with 32 items and 7 main factors, achieves a simple structure. These 7 factors, after rotation, explained 67.37% of the total variance of the questionnaire (the first factor explained 14.13%, the second factor 13.265%, the third factor 12.007%, the fourth factor 8.538%, the fifth factor 6.789%, the sixth factor 6.66%, and the seventh factor 5.941% of the variance). Considering the 7 factors for the questionnaire, a simple structure can be achieved, with only 32.63% of the information lost. Therefore, the aforementioned factors explain a significant portion of the variance in suicidal intent, which indicates the validity of the questionnaire. The convergent validity of the questionnaire was 0.541 with the Beck Suicide Ideation Scale. Its reliability coefficient was 0.898 using Cronbach alpha, and 0.797 for test–retest reliability.
Conclusion: This study confirms that the Suicide with Death Intent Questionnaire (SDIQ) is a valid, accurate, and reliable tool for assessing suicidal tendencies in adolescents. The tool demonstrates high validity and reliability and can effectively measure various dimensions of suicidal ideation. This instrument can help counselors and parents gain a better understanding of the true intent of adolescents and young adults to attempt suicide.

Full-Text [PDF 362 kb]   (72 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Social Sciences

References
1. Poulin JM, Bigford GE, Lanctôt KL, Giacobbe P, Schaffer A, Sinyor M, et al. Engaging mood brain circuits with psilocybin (EMBRACE): a study protocol for a randomized, placebo–controlled and delayed–start, neuroimaging trial in depression. Trials. 2024;25(1):441. [DOI]
2. Lindh ÅU, Waern M, Beckman K, Renberg ES, Dahlin M, Runeson B. Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia–suicide severity rating scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self–harm. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):319. [DOI]
3. World Health Organization. Suicide worldwide in 2021: global health estimates [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2025 [cited 2025 May 10]. Available from: [Article]
4. Kanani J, Sheikh MI. Temporal patterns of suicide attempts in India: a comprehensive analysis by time of day, week, and hour, stratified by age, sex, and marital status, and examining suicidal methods distribution. Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative. 2024;7:100072. [DOI]
5. Jakobsen SG, Nielsen T, Larsen CP, Andersen PT, Lauritsen J, Stenager E, et al. Definitions and incidence rates of self–harm and suicide attempts in Europe: A scoping review. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;164:28–36. [DOI]
6. Mivehyan M. Investigating suicidal suicide factors in Kermanshah province. Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences. 2017;3(3):99–117. [Persian]
7. Arab A, Zaraatkar Makki M, Eftekhari Konzarki F, Afsharpour P. Prediction of suicidal thoughts based on the difficulty of emotion regulation and perceived social support in high school students. Journal of Psychology New Ideas. 2024;20(24):1–13. [Persian] [Article]
8. Asadiyun M, Daliri S. Suicide attempt and suicide death in Iran: a systematic review and meta–analysis study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2023;18(2):191–212. [DOI]
9. Bromand N, Naziryy G, Davodi A, Fath N. Comparison of the effectiveness of the suicide prevention training program (ASSIP) on cognitive reactivity, suicidal thoughts and social health in repeat suicide attempters. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2023;17(6):43–55. [Persian] [DOI]
10. Moradi R, Modabernezhad A. The effect of religiosity, socio–economic status change and social support on suicidal ideation among high school female students in Boyer–Ahmad city. Hakim Journal. 2020;23(3):332–43. [Persian] [Article]
11. Kusuma K, Larsen M, Quiroz JC, Torok M. Age–stratified predictions of suicide attempts using machine learning in middle and late adolescence. J Affect Disord. 2024;365:126–33. [DOI]
12. Salvi J. Calculated decisions: columbia–suicide severity rating scale (C–SSRS). Emerg Med Pract. 2019;21(5):CD3–4.
13. Riera–Serra P, Navarra–Ventura G, Castro A, Gili M, Salazar–Cedillo A, Ricci–Cabello I, et al. Clinical predictors of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide death in depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta–analysis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024;274(7):1543–63. [DOI]
14. Khodabandehlou S, Hashemi Golpayegani SA. How do abnormal trading behaviors diffuse in electronic markets? Soc Netw Anal Min. 2024;14(1):98. [DOI]
15. Joiner Jr. TE, Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Rudd MD. The interpersonal theory of suicide: guidance for working with suicidal clients. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2009. [DOI]
16. O'Connor RC, Nock MK. The psychology of suicidal behaviour. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(1):73–85. [DOI]
17. Lee J, Kim D, Lee WJ, Woo SH, Jeong S, Kim SH. Association of the COVID–19 pandemic and low–rescue suicide attempts in patients visiting the emergency department after attempting suicide. J Korean Med Sci. 2021;36(34):e243. [DOI]
18. Kang M, Kim H. Unique characteristics that distinguish suicide attempters from patients with nonsuicidal self–injury admitted to the emergency department following self–harm behavior: Psychological scales and biochemical markers. Turk J Emerg Med. 2021;21(2):62–8. [DOI]
19. Beck AT, Schuyler D, Herman I. Development of suicidal intent scales. In: The prediction of suicide. Oxford, England: Charles Press Publishers; 1974.
20. Posner K, Brown GK, Stanley B, Brent DA, Yershova KV, Oquendo MA, et al. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(12):1266–77. [DOI]
21. Ghasemi P, Shaghaghi A, Allahverdipour H. Measurement scales of suicidal ideation and attitudes: a systematic review article. Health Promot Perspect. 2015;5(3):156–68. [DOI]
22. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2002.
23. Beck AT, Kovacs M, Weissman A. Assessment of suicidal intention: the scale for suicide ideation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979;47(2):343–52. [DOI]
24. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Pearson; 1996. [DOI]
25. Anisi J, Fathi Ashtiani A, Salimi S, Ahmadi Noudeh K. Validity and reliability of Beck suicide scale ideation among soldiers. Journal of Military Medicine. 2005;7(1):33–7. [Persian]
26. D'Angelo M, Steardo L Jr. Understanding internalized stigma's role in sex-specific suicidal ideation among individuals with bipolar disorder. J Clin Med. 2024;13(14):4000. [DOI]
27. Hatkevich C, Penner F, Sharp C. Difficulties in emotion regulation and suicide ideation and attempt in adolescent inpatients. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:230–8. [DOI]
28. Kar N, Arun M, Mohanty MK, Bastia BK. Scale for assessment of lethality of suicide attempt. Indian J Psychiatry. 2014;56(4):337–43. [DOI]
29. Nobile B, Olié E, Dubois J, Benramdane M, Guillaume S, Courtet P. Characterization of suicidal depression: a one–year prospective study. Eur Psychiatry. 2022;65(1):1–40. [DOI]
30. Misson H, Mathieu F, Jollant F, Yon L, Guillaume S, Parmentier C, et al. Factor analyses of the suicidal intent scale (SIS) and the risk–rescue rating scale (RRRS): toward the identification of homogeneous subgroups of suicidal behaviors. J Affect Disord. 2010;121(1–2):80–7. [DOI]
31. Sheehan DV, Alphs LD, Mao L, Li Q, May RS, Bruer EH, et al. Comparative validation of the S–STS, the ISST–Plus, and the C–SSRS for assessing the suicidal thinking and behavior FDA 2012 suicidality categories. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014;11(9–10):32–46. 1.
32. Kim HJ, Lee DH. Predictive factors for the medical hospitalisation of patients who visited the emergency department with suicide attempt. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):79. [DOI]
33. Durkheim E. Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Paris: Félix Alcan; 1897.
34. Zivari–Rahman M, Ghanbari S, Shokouhi–Moghadam S. Psychometric properties of the youth pornography addiction screening tool. Addict Health. 2021;13(4):207–20. [DOI]
35. Giddens JM, Sheehan KH, Sheehan DV. The Columbia–suicide severity rating scale (C–SSRS): has the "gold standard" become a liability? Innov Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;11(9–10):66–80.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb