Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 16 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kajbaf M B, Sepahpour S, Ahadi H, Abedi A. Preparing a Native Cognitive Enhancement Training Package, "33 Bridges", and Its Effectiveness on the Intelligence of 4- to 6-Year-Old Children. MEJDS 2022; 12 :16-16
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1820-en.html
1- Isfahan University
2- Islamic Azad University (Khorasgan Branch)
3- Department, Azad University (Science and Research Branch)
Abstract:   (1549 Views)

Background & Objectives: The most critical part of human communication develops during the growth of the human nervous system in the first five years of life. Previously, a good memory was considered the best and most influential factor that a child should have. However, the students' understanding and insight are being addressed because of the widespread changes in school curricula. Now, the child is asked to analyze, compare, and arrive at a conclusion. Thinking means manipulating and transferring information in memory. This process is designed for conceptualizing, reasoning, critical thinking, decision making, creative thinking, and problem–solving. "33 bridges" is a native curriculum that includes an interactive parent–child educational package. It has been designed to enhance deductive reasoning in preschoolers. This package targets proper conclusions and promotes school decision–making and success skills for preschoolers. So, this study aimed to edit and evaluate the effectiveness of the native cognitive enhancement training package of "33 bridges" on the intelligence of 4– to 6–year–old Iranian children.
Methods: This research is a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and follow–up design and a control group. The statistical population included all 4–6 years old children studying in preschools of the 22 districts of Tehran City, Iran. They were enrolled in the academic year 2015–2016. Next, 2 kindergartens and preschools were selected by multistage cluster sampling method, and 30 children were randomly selected and placed in one experimental (n=15) and one control group (n=15). The inclusion criteria for children were as follows: being 4 to 6 years old, living with both parents, lacking any mental disorders (by performing the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Third Edition; WPPSI–III) (Wechsler, 1967), not having any severe movement problems (based on medical records), not using any medicine (according to parents), lacking problems in the child's family relationships, not having certain diseases that disrupt the treatment process, lacking severe mental and motor problems, and obtaining parental consent to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were the absence of more than one session from treatment sessions and parents' dissatisfaction with continuing the study. The study data were gathered via the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence – Third Edition (WPPSI–III) (Wechsler, 1967). The intervention consisted of 12 sessions of the native "33 bridges" training program. However, no intervention was provided for the control group. For data analysis, descriptive statistics (including mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics, including repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test, were performed in SPSS. The significance level was considered 0.05 for all statistical tests.
Results: The result showed that the effect of the group on the variables of general intelligence (p=0.030), verbal intelligence (p<0.001), and practical intelligence (p<0.001) was significant. The effect of time on variables of general intelligence (p<0.001), verbal intelligence (p<0.001) and practical intelligence (p<0.001) was significant. The interaction of time and group on the general intelligence variable was not significant (p=0.177). However, the effect was significant on the variables of verbal intelligence (p<0.001) and practical intelligence (p=0.043). Also, the mean scores of variables of general intelligence (p<0.001), verbal intelligence (p<0.001), and practical intelligence (p<0.001) in the pretest were significantly different from the mean scores of these variables in the posttest and follow–up. The mean scores of general intelligence (p=0.048) and verbal intelligence (p<0.001) in the posttest with the follow–up showed a significant difference. Nevertheless, the mean scores of practical intelligence in the posttest with follow–up did not show a significant difference (p=0.279).
Conclusion: According to the research findings, the "33 bridges" native educational package can be used to increase the intelligence scores of children aged 4 to 6 years.

Full-Text [PDF 542 kb]   (500 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Perlmutted D, Colman C. Raise a Smarter Child by Kindergarten: Raise IQ by up to 30 points and turn on your child's smart genes. Amirimajd M. (Persian translator). Tehran: Shahre Ashoob Pub; 2011.
2. Dadsetan M. Piaget's standpoint essential texts developmental stages: tests and task, for assessment of intelligence from childhood to adulthood. Tehran: Be'sat Pub; 2000. [Persian]
3. Ahadi H, Banijamali Sh. The psychology of growth. Qom: Bakhshayesh Pub; 2019. [Persian]
4. Ellison S, Gray J. 365 days of creative play: for children two years and up. Angaji L. (Persian translator). Tehran: Javane Roshd Pub; 2013.
5. Beauchat KA, Blamey KL, Walpole S. The building blocks of preschool success. Imani A. (Persian translator). Tehran: Madrese Pub; 2013.
6. Sharp E. Thinking is child's play. Ghazi G, Kadivar N. (Persian translator). Qom: Ayande Derakhshan Pub; 2010.
7. Horn JL, Cattell RB. Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. J Educ Psychol. 1966;57(5):253–70. [DOI]
8. Biabangard I. Educational psychology. Tehran: Virayesh Pub; 2012. [Persian]
9. Zacks JM, Tversky B. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(1):3–21. [DOI]
10. Gentner D, Markman AB. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist. 1997;52(1):45–56. [DOI]
11. Al Husni NM, El Rouadi N. interdisciplinary curriculum empowers cognitive advancement to solve real life problems. Journal of Education and Learning. 2016;5(4):34–43. [DOI]
12. Hill O, Serpell Z, Faison O. The efficacy of the learningrx cognitive training program: modality and transfer effects. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2015;84(3):1–21. [DOI]
13. Klauer KJ. Teaching inductive thinking to highly able children. European Journal of High Ability. 1992;3(2):164–80. [DOI]
14. Mayoral-Rodríguez S, Timoneda-Gallart C, Pérez-Álvarez F, Das JP. Improving cognitive processes in preschool children: the COGEST programme. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. 2015;23(2):150–63. [DOI]
15. Moreau D. Brains and brawn: complex motor activities to maximize cognitive enhancement. Educ Psychol Rev. 2015;27(3):475–82. [DOI]
16. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Comprehensive meta-analysis Version 2.0. Delavar A, Ganji K. (Persian translator). Tehran: Allameh Tabataba'i University; 2012.
17. Wechsler D. WPPSI manual: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. The Psychological Corporation; 1967.
18. Razavieh A, Shahim S. Wechsler intelligence scale adaptation and standardization for preschool in Shiraz. Journal of Shiraz University Social Sciences and Humanities. 1990,5(2):49–74. [Persian]
19. Klauer KJ, Phye GD. Inductive reasoning: a training approach. Review of Educational Research. 2008;78(1):85–123. [DOI]
20. Klauer KJ. Intellectual training in preschool and elementary school children. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht. 1987;34:205–13. [German]
21. Klauer KJ. Teaching for analogical transfer as a means of improving problem-solving, thinking and learning. Instr Sci. 1989;18(3):179–92. [DOI]
22. Klauer KJ. A process theory of inductive reasoning tested by the teaching of domain-specific thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 1990;5(2):191–206. [DOI]
23. Woumans E, Surmont J, Struys E, Duyck W. The longitudinal effect of bilingual immersion schooling on cognitive control and intelligence. Language Learning. 2016;66:76–91.
24. Barkl S, Porter A, Ginns P. Cognitive training for children: Effects on inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning, and mathematics achievement in an Australian school setting: Cognitive Training for Children. Psychol Schs. 2012;49(9):828–42. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb