Effects of Cognitive-Existential Therapy on Individual-Social Adjustment and Resilience in Women Exposed to Divorce

Eftekhari Afshar, Ramin; Heydari, Hassan; Davoodi, Hossein

doi:10.29252/mejds.0.0.161

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 14 | Back to browse issues page

‎ 10.29252/mejds.0.0.161

‎ 20.1001.1.23222840.1399.0.0.171.0

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Eftekhari Afshar R, Heydari H, Davoodi H. Effects of Cognitive-Existential Therapy on Individual-Social Adjustment and Resilience in Women Exposed to Divorce. MEJDS 2022; 12 :14-14
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1904-en.html

Effects of Cognitive-Existential Therapy on Individual-Social Adjustment and Resilience in Women Exposed to Divorce

Ramin Eftekhari Afshar¹

, Hassan Heydari ^*¹

, Hossein Davoodi¹

1- Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract: (1877 Views)

Background & Objectives: Divorce adversely affects women's mental health. Divorce disrupts the family system; some stressors associated with it lead to changes in individuals' personal and social structure (directly or indirectly). On the one hand, increased rates of divorce and marital dissatisfaction, and spouses' demand for fertility and improved marital relationships, on the other hand, indicate the need for spouses to receive specialized interventions and training. Accordingly, we intended to explore novel and effective patterns of cognitive–existential therapy for treating divorced women. This treatment is systematic and psychosocial based on the approach and background; thus, it focuses on marital relationships and is more related to personal, social, and resilience resulting from marital relationships. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of cognitive–existential therapy on socio–individual adjustment and resilience in women at risk of divorce.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with pretest–posttest and a control group design. The convenience sampling method selected all women at risk of divorce in districts 5 and 6 of Tehran, City, Iran (N=30). They were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Research instruments were demographic and social adjustment questionnaire (Clark et al., 1953) and resiliency questionnaire (Connor and Davidson, 2003). After the pretest phase, the experimental group administered the cognitive–existential treatment. Finally, both study groups received posttest. The study findings were analyzed by SPSS using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) at the significant level of 0.05.
Results: The present study results suggested that after eliminating the pretest effect, there was a significant difference between the study groups in the mean socio–adaptation and resiliency scores (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The current research data indicated that cognitive–existential therapy helps to facilitate healthy communication in families with conflict and leads to better marital satisfaction in couples, even if individuals have marital conflicts. Thus, the current treatment seems to be a promising strategy for couples in the process of separation and divorce. Psychotherapists and specialists need to be given treatment sessions according to the specific needs of couples and the extent of their problems. This helps couples become involved and improve their problems during treatment. Both individual and group therapy sessions can be tailored to the needs and desires of the couple. This treatment allows couples to solve their personal and private issues. In addition, cognitive–existential therapy uses a theoretical cognitive framework; thus, it can reduce other psychological problems.

Keywords: Cognitive –Existential therapy, Individual–Social adjustment, Resilience, Women

Full-Text [PDF 593 kb] (372 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Counseling

References

1. Hardesty JL, Ogolsky BG, Raffaelli M, Whittaker A. Relationship dynamics and divorcing mothers’ adjustment: Moderating role of marital violence, negative life events, and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2019;36(11–12):3651–72. [DOI]

2. Hezarjaribi J, Entezari A, Niyyati M. Divorce trends in Iran between 2004-2013. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2017;6(4):1108–22. [DOI]

3. Hawkins AJ, Fackrell TA. Should I keep trying to work it out? sacred and secular perspectives on the crossroads of divorce. Brigham Young University Studies. 2011;50(2):143–57.

4. Symoens S, Colman E, Bracke P. Divorce, conflict, and mental health: how the quality of intimate relationships is linked to post-divorce well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2014;44(3):220–33. [DOI]

5. Rahman MM, Giedraitis DVR, Akhtar MT. The social sanction of divorce: who ultimately pay the social costs of its adverse effects? Sociology and Anthropology. 2013;1(1):26–33. [DOI]

6. Umberson D, Williams K, Powers DA, Chen MD, Campbell AM. As good as it gets? a life course perspective on marital quality. Soc Forces. 2005;84(1):493–511. [DOI]

7. Olson D. FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study. J Marital Fam Ther. 2011;37(1):64–80. [DOI]

8. Lazaridès A, Bélanger C, Sabourin S. Personality as moderator of the relationship between communication and couple stability. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2010;6(2):11–31. [DOI]

9. Park J-H, Park J-H. The relationships among interpersonal relationship anxiety, college adjustment, self-control, and smartphone addiction in nursing students. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society. 2017;28(1):185–94. [Korean] [DOI]

10. Ye B, Lei X, Yang J, Byrne PJ, Jiang X, Liu M, et al. Family cohesion and social adjustment of chinese university students: the mediating effects of sense of security and personal relationships. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(4):1872–83. [DOI]

11. Cramm H, Norris D, Venedam S, Tam‐Seto L. Toward a model of military family resiliency: a narrative review. Journal of Family Theory & Review. 2018;10(3):620–40. [DOI]

12. Hoge EA, Austin ED, Pollack MH. Resilience: research evidence and conceptual considerations for posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(2):139–52. [DOI]

13. Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20–8. [DOI]

14. Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987;57(3):316–31. [DOI]

15. Kissane DW, Bloch S, Smith GC, Miach P, Clarke DM, Ikin J, et al. Cognitive-existential group psychotherapy for women with primary breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2003;12(6):532–46. [DOI]

16. Couper J, Collins A, Bloch S, Street A, Duchesne G, Jones T, et al. Cognitive Existential Couple Therapy (CECT) in men and partners facing localised prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2015;115 Suppl 5:35–45. [DOI]

17. Collins AL, Love AW, Bloch S, Street AF, Duchesne GM, Dunai J, et al. Cognitive Existential Couple Therapy for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and their partners: a descriptive pilot study. Psychooncology. 2013;22(2):465–9. [DOI]

18. Bahmani B, Najjar MM, Sayyah M, Shafi-Abadi A, Kashani HH. The effectiveness of cognitive-existential group therapy on increasing hope and decreasing depression in women-treated with Haemodialysis. Glob J Health Sci. 2016;8(6):219–25. [DOI]

19. Jalili Nikoo S, Karimi Z, Nejatinejad N, Bahmani B, Naghiaee M, Ghasemi Jobaneh R. Effectiveness of cognitive Existential Group therapy on quality of life of elderly people. Armaghane danesh. 2017;21(10):1013–21. [Persian] [Article]

20. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh Pub;2015. [Persian]

21. Thorpe LP, Clark WW, Tiegs EW. California test of personality, 1953 revision. Forms AA and BB, primary. elementary, intermediate, secondary, adult levels. Oxford, England: California Test Bureau; 1953.

22. Hashemian F, Shafiaabadi A, Soudanil M. Effect of anger control skills training onindividual-social adjustment of first-grade femal secondary education students in Mahshahr. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology. 2008;10(35):1–14. [Persian] [Article]

23. Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82. [DOI]

24. Shakerinia I, Mohammadpour M. Relationship between job stress and resiliency with occupational burnout among nurses. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2010;14(2):161–9. [Persian] [Article]