Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 154 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Niusha B, Mohammadinia N, Momen Beitollahi S, Madani A. Determining the Relationship Between Spiritual Intelligence and Psychological Hardiness and Marital Adjustment of Mothers With Students With Special Learning Disabilities. MEJDS 2022; 12 :154-154
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2072-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch
2- Islamic Azad University, Saveh Branch
3- Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch
Abstract:   (1477 Views)

Background & Objectives: Specific learning disabilities are the most important cause of poor academic performance, and many affected students have difficulty learning curricula. In addition to interrupting educational activities, learning disabilities affect students’ psychological, developmental, and familial factors. Marital adjustment is one of the threatening factors in married life that may occur in the parents of children with special learning disabilities. Also, due to the importance of parents’ mental health, especially mothers with students with special learning disabilities, their resilience to psychological pressures is crucial and can make this burden lighter for them. On the other hand, spiritual factors are a determining factor in the dynamics of marital relations and family strength. In general, the study of family relationships and systemic factors affecting the health and dynamism of students with special learning disabilities is very important because parental involvement in children’s education can provide meaningful services and maximize educational potential. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between spiritual intelligence and hardiness with marital adjustment of mothers with students with special learning disabilities.
Methods: The method of the present study was descriptive–correlational. The statistical population comprised all mothers of students with special learning disabilities living in the city of Khosf, Iran, in the academic year of 2018–19. One hundred mothers from the statistical community were selected via the available sampling method. The inclusion criteria of mothers with students with specific learning disabilities included a definite diagnosis of their child’s learning disability by experts and trainers of the learning disability center, not having a mental illness based on the Rutter form and the student’s file, having at least reading and writing literacy, and having consent to complete the research questionnaires. The exclusion criteria were unwillingness to cooperate or being illiterate. Data collection tools included Spiritual Intelligence Scale (King, 2008), Ahwaz Psychological Hardiness Questionnaire (Kiamarsi et al., 1998), and Marital Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1987). To analyze the obtained data, the descriptive (mean, standard deviation) and inferential statistics (the Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression test) were performed at a significance level of α=0.05 in SPSS version 25.
Results: The linear regression coefficients showed the values of standardized regression coefficient (β) as follows: existential critical thinking, β=0.112 (p=0.034); production of personal meaning, β=0.245 (p<0.001); transcendent awareness, β=0.137 (p<0.001); development of consciousness, β=0.143 (p=0.017); struggle, β=0.118 (p<0.001); commitment, β=0.109 (p=0.041); and control, β=0.127 (p=0.025). So, spiritual intelligence and psychological hardiness could significantly predict marital adjustment.
Conclusion: Based on the study findings, by promoting spiritual intelligence and hardiness, it is possible to improve the marital adjustment of mothers with students with special learning disabilities.

Full-Text [PDF 919 kb]   (375 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [DOI]
2. Alipor A, Mahdavi Najmabadi Z. The comparison of central coherence between children with dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2014;3(4):80–98. [Persian] [Article]
3. Poletti M, Carretta E, Bonvicini L, Giorgi-Rossi P. Cognitive clusters in specific learning disorder. J Learn Disabil. 2018;51(1):32–42. [DOI]
4. Moradi M, Fathi D, Gharibzadeh R, Faeedfar Z. A comparison of academic burnout, academic procrastination and feelings comparison of academic burnout, academic negligence and feeling of loneliness in students with and without learning disabilities. Stud Med Sci. 2016;27(3):248–56. [Persian] [Article]
5. Sadri E, Ansari M, Esmaili Ghazivaloii F, Ghomi M. The comparison of the early maladaptive schemas and marital satisfaction in mothers with special learning disability children and mothers of normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2016;6(1):80–99. [Persian] [Article]
6. Manyam SB, Junior VY. Marital adjustment trend in Asian Indian families. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2014;13(2):114–32. [DOI]
7. Peterson-Post KM, Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Markman HJ. Perceived criticism and marital adjustment predict depressive symptoms in a community sample. Behav Ther. 2014;45(4):564–75. [DOI]
8. Durğut S, Kısa S. Predictors of marital adjustment among child brides. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;32(5):670–6. [DOI]
9. Dehle C, Weiss RL. Associations between anxiety and marital adjustment. J Psychol. 2002;136(3):328–38. [DOI]
10. Seyyed Noori SZ, Kafie SM, Hosseinkhanzadeh AA, Karimi R. A comparison of general health and marital satisfaction in mothers of children with learning disabilities and mothers of normal children. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2015;5:119–27 [Persian] [Article]
11. Meikaeilei N, Ganji M, Talebi Joybari M. A comparison of resiliency, marital satisfaction and mental health in parents of children with learning disabilities and normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2012;2(1):120–37. [Persian] [Article]
12. Kazemi N, Hosseinian S, Rasolzadeh V. Effectiveness of mindfulness education on psychological hardiness and mental rumination in mothers of students with learning disabilities. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2020;10(3):71–84. [Persian] [Article]
13. Asli Azad M, Rajaei R, Farhadi T, Aghasi A, Shahidi L. Investigating the relationship between hardiness as well as resiliency and burnout aspects in the care givers of the physically, mentally and multiple retarded patients at the welfare organization in 2015. J Community Health. 2016;10(2):24–32. [Persian] [Article]
14. Aghajani MJ. Effect of Hardiness training on self-esteem and adjustment of addicted male. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2016;26(4):1–9. [Persian] [Article]
15. Maddi SR. Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1(3):160–8. [Persian] [DOI]
16. De Freitas FMB, Vannuchi M, Haddad MC, Silva LGD, Rossaneis MA. Hardiness and occupational stress in nurses managers of hospital institutions. J Nurs FPE on Line. 2017;11(10):4199–205. [DOI]
17. Moein L, Ghiasi P, Masmoei R. Relationship between psychological hardiness and marital. Journal of Woman & Society. 2012;2(4):163–90. [Persian]
18. Roshannejhad N, Bayanfar F, Talepasand S. Predicting marital adjustment among young couples based on personality traits, differentiation of self and psychological hardiness. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2019;11(1):93–106. [Persian] [Article]
19. Zarei S. The mediating role of mindfulness in relation hardiness and forgiveness and marital adjustment married women in Tehran. Rooyesh. 2019;8(5):179–86. [Persian] [Article]
20. Civitci N, Civitci A. Social comparison orientation, hardiness and life satisfaction in undergraduate students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;205:516–23. [DOI]
21. Azarnik M, Aghaei A. Predicting the quality of the marital relationships between Isfahanian couples based on the components of spiritual intelligence (spiritual life and relying on the inner core). Journal of Excellence in Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2016;5(18):4–14. [Persian] [Article]
22. Yazdani N, Aghaei A. Effectiveness of positive psychology training in improving the quality of married women’s lives: spiritual intelligence as a moderator. International Journal of Psychology. 2019;13(1):206–29.
23. Kaur D, Sambasivan M, Kumar N. Impact of emotional intelligence and spiritual intelligence on the caring behavior of nurses: a dimension-level exploratory study among public hospitals in Malaysia. Appl Nurs Res. 2015;28(4):293–8. [DOI]
24. Amram JY. The contribution of emotional and spiritual intelligences to effective business leadership [PhD dissertation]. [Palo Alto, California]: Institute of Transpersonal Psychology; 2009.
25. Elkins M, Cavendish R. Developing a plan for pediatric spiritual care. Holist Nurs Pract. 2004;18(4):179–84.
26. Chehrehrvar M, Hojjatkhah SH, Parvaneh E, Naderi G, Hesar Sorkhi R, Parvaneh A. Predict marital adjustment based on spiritual intelligence and social support in couples. Rooyesh. 2018;7(7):63–78. [Persian] [Article]
27. Tavakolizadeh J, Soltani A, Panahi M. Marital adjustment: the predictive role of spiritual intelegence and coping strategeis. Horizon Med Sci. 2014;19(5):57–63 [Persian] [Article]
28. Dhote S. Marital adjustment as a function of spiritual intelligence. Andrean Research Journal. 2017;1:39–46.
29. Sharma S. A study of relationship between spiritual intelligence and adjustment in relation to their age and family system of working women. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. 2017;8(3):342–6.
30. Beygi A, Mohammadifar M, Najafi M, Rezayi A. Relationship of spirituality and forgiveness with family cohesion and adaptability in veterans. Iran J War Public Health. 2016;8(1):33–9. [Persian] [Article]
31. Haley K, Allsopp D. Advocating for students with learning and behavior challenges: Insights from teachers who are also parents. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2019;63(1):24–31. [DOI]
32. Delavar A. Educational and psychological research. Tehran: Virayesh; 2015. [Persian]
33. King DB. Rethinking claims of spiritual intelligence: a definition, model, and measure. Trent University: ProQuest; 2008.
34. Raghib MS, Ahmadi SJ, Siyadat A. Tahlil mizan hooshe manavi daneshjouyan daneshgah Isfahan va ertebat aan ba vizhegi haye jamiyat shenakhti [Analysis of spiritual intelligence of isfahan university students and its relation with demographic characteristics]. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. 2008;5(8):39–56. [Persian]
35. Kiamrsi A, Najarian B, Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. Sakht va etebar yabi meghyasi baraye sanjesh sarsakhti ravanshenakhti [Constructing and validing a scale to measure the psychological hardiness of the article]. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology. 1998;5(4–3):271–84. [Persian]
36. Spanier GB. Dyadic adjustment scale. In: Sherman R, Fredman N; editors. Handbook of measurement for marriage and family therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1987.
37. Mollazadeh J, Mansoor M, Ejehei J, Kiamanesh A. Sabk haye rooyaroo gari va sazegari zanashoo’i dar farzandan Shahed [Confrontational styles and marital adjustment in shahed children]. Journal of Psychology. 2002;6(3):255–75. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb