Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 142 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Najafi M T, Saffarinia M, Alipour A, Zare H, Khoshnevisan Z. Relationship Between Social Wellbeing and Social Comparison, and Symptom Severity in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. MEJDS 2020; 10 :142-142
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2172-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University
2- Department of Psychology, Khorasan Institute of Higher Education
Abstract:   (1633 Views)
Background & Objectives: Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is among the most critical psychosomatic disorders. Based on the biopsychosocial pattern, all biopsychosocial and behavioral factors that interact with each other should be examined to describe how this syndrome is developed. This is because none of these characteristics are individually sufficient to explain IBS in the affected patients. Social wellbeing was defined in 1948 by the World Health Organization as one of the several general variables of individual health. Social comparison processes also significantly impact psychological theories on how individuals interpret and perceive health risks, how and when to make decisions in search of physical symptom care, and how to cope with illnesses and serious disabilities. The current study aimed to examine the relationship between social wellbeing and social comparison, and the severity of symptoms in patients with IBS.
Methods: This was descriptive and correlational–predictive research in terms of design, and cross–sectional respecting time. The study statistical population included all patients with IBS who referred to a private hospital in the center of Tehran City, Iran, in the second half of 2019. The sample size was measured using G–power software, with the error rate of 0.01, the effect size of 0.15, and a power of 0.95 in regression equations equal to 180. Sampling was based on a non–probabilistic and convenience sampling method. Accordingly, after the expert’s approval through the Rome III evaluation, the sample group voluntarily completed the considered questionnaires. The study inclusion criteria included literacy, fluency in Persian, the age range of 18 to 55 years, no other serious biopsychological illnesses, not experiencing the early stages of diagnosis and treatment, being diagnosed with IBS by a colorectal specialist based on ROME III, the rule out of physical causes, and not receiving psychotherapy for IBS. The research exclusion criteria included unexplained weight loss, unexamined abnormal bleeding, and a family history of bowel cancer. Research instruments included the following: the Social Well–being Questionnaire (Keyes, 1998), the Social Comparison Questionnaire (Gibbons & Buunk, 1999), and the IBS–Symptom Severity Self–Report Scale (IBS–SSS) (Francis et al., 1997). Data analysis was performed in SPSS by Pearson Correlation and multiple linear regression analysis, as well as testing the prerequisite assumptions at the significance level of α=0.050.
Results: The current research findings suggested a significant indirect correlation between the severity of symptoms of patients with IBS and social wellbeing variables (r=–0.323, p<0.001), and a significant direct association with social comparison (r=0.170, p=0.022). Social wellbeing and social comparison were entered in the multiple regression equation models. The related results indicated that only the social wellbeing variable was significant at the 5% error level in the model (p<0.001). The independent variable of social comparison did not significantly affect the dependent variable, and was removed from the model; thus, social wellbeing could explain 10.5% of the variance in symptoms in the explored patients. Besides, a change in a unit in social wellbeing could reduce the severity of symptoms in the investigated patients with IBS by 0.3.
Conclusion: The obtained data signified that moderate social wellbeing levels, and to a smaller extent, social comparison were associated with alternations in the severity of symptoms in patients with IBS. When individuals’ perceptions of the environment and their beliefs about their living conditions are modified, the severity of their IBS symptoms could be reduced.
Full-Text [PDF 398 kb]   (506 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Bowers H, Gillanders D, Ferreira N. Moderating effect of IBS acceptance on psychosocial mediators of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020;16:30–6. [DOI]
2. Gaber OH. The relationship between irritable bowel syndrome, depression, anxiety, and stress among sample of irritable bowel patients - predictive study. J Psychol Clin Psychiatry. 2016;5(4):00290. [DOI]
3. Benno P, Norin E, Midtvedt T, Hellström PM. Therapeutic potential of an anaerobic cultured human intestinal microbiota, ACHIM, for treatment of IBS. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2019;40–41:101607. [DOI]
4. Otu-Nyarko CG, Gedalia A, Karpinski AC, Kolomensky A, Hyman PE. Disability in children and adolescents with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and/or Fibromyalgia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(5):558–60. [DOI]
5. Kumano H, Kaiya H, Yoshiuchi K, Yamanaka G, Sasaki T, Kuboki T. Comorbidity of irritable bowel syndrome, panic disorder, and agoraphobia in a Japanese representative sample. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(2):370–6. [DOI]
6. Walker EA, Roy-Byrne PP, Katon WJ, Li L, Amos D, Jiranek G. Psychiatric illness and irritable bowel syndrome: a comparison with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147(12):1656–61. [DOI]
7. Schönrich S, Brockow T, Franke T, Dembski R, Resch KL, Cieza A. Analyzing the content of outcome measures in clinical trials on irritable bowel syndrome using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2006;45(3):172–80. [DOI]
8. Keyes CLM. Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1998;61(2):121–4. [DOI]
9. Kelley-Gillespie N. Quality of Life for Older Adults, an Integrated Conceptual Model. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. pp: 5340–55. [DOI]
10. Hahn EA, Cella D, Bode RK, Hanrahan RT. Measuring Social Well-Being in People with Chronic Illness. Soc Indic Res. 2010;96(3):381–401. [DOI]
11. Jutagir DR, Blomberg BB, Carver CS, Lechner SC, Timpano KR, Bouchard LC, et al. Social well-being is associated with less pro-inflammatory and pro-metastatic leukocyte gene expression in women after surgery for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(1):169–80. [DOI]
12. Gerber JP. Social Comparison Theory. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp: 5004–11. [DOI]
13. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 1954;7:117–40. [DOI]
14. Tennen H, Mckee TE, Affleck G. Social Comparison Processes in Health and Illness. In: Suls J, Wheeler L, editors. Handbook of Social Comparison. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2000. pp: 443–83. [DOI]
15. Arigo D, Suls JM, Smyth JM. Social comparisons and chronic illness: research synthesis and clinical implications. Health Psychol Rev. 2014;8(2):154–214. [DOI]
16. Buunk AP, Dijkstra P. Social Comparisons and Well-Being. In: Robinson MD, Eid M, editors. The Happy Mind: Cognitive Contributions to Well-Being. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp: 311–30. [DOI]
17. Fitzsimmons-Craft EE. Eating disorder-related social comparison in college women’s everyday lives. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(8):893–905. [DOI]
18. Bäzner E, Brömer P, Hammelstein P, Meyer TD. Current and former depression and their relationship to the effects of social comparison processes. Results of an internet based study. J Affect Disord. 2006;93(1–3):97–103. [DOI]
19. Roohafza H, Keshteli AH, Daghaghzadeh H, Afshar H, Erfani Z, Adibi P. Life stressors, coping strategies, and social supports in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:158. [DOI]
20. Tayama J, Nakaya N, Hamaguchi T, Tomiie T, Shinozaki M, Saigo T, et al. Effects of personality traits on the manifestations of irritable bowel syndrome. Biopsychosoc Med. 2012;6(1):20. [DOI]
21. Robertson N, Gunn S, Piper R. psychological and social factors associated with pain in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review of the evidence in adult and pediatric studies. Crohn’s & Colitis 360. 2019;1(1):otz003. [DOI]
22. Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. The irritable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11(2):395–402. [DOI]
23. Gibbons FX, Buunk BP. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76(1):129–42. [DOI]
24. Phillips K, Wright BJ, Kent S. Psychosocial predictors of irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and symptom severity. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75(5):467–74. [DOI]
25. Gholamrezaei A, Zolfaghari B, Farajzadegan Z, Nemati K, Daghaghzadeh H, Tavakkoli H, et al. Linguistic validation of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life Questionnaire for Iranian patients. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(6):390–5.
26. Saffarinia M, Tadris Tabrizi M, Aliakbari M. Exploring the validity, relibility of social well-being questionnaire in men and women resident in Tehran city. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2014;5(18):115–32. [Persian] [DOI]
27. Cicognani E, Pirini C, Keyes C, Joshanloo M, Rostami R, Nosratabadi M. Social participation, sense of community and social well being: a study on American, Italian and Iranian university students. Soc Indic Res. 2008;89(1):97–112. [DOI]
28. Tajikesmaeili A, Hassanzadeh P. The study of psychometric elementary characteristics of iowa-netherlands comparison orientation measure in women and men of Tehran city. Social Psychology Research. 2014;4(15):73. [Persian]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb