Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 20 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Afaghi Y, Afrooz G A, Gholamali Lavasani M. Studying the Effectiveness of a Family-Centered Comprehensive Program of Enhancing Sensory-Motor Integrity on Motor Skills of Children with Down Syndrome. MEJDS 2022; 12 :20-20
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2711-en.html
Studying the Effectiveness of a Family-Centered Comprehensive Program of Enhancing Sensory-Motor Integrity on Motor Skills of Children with Down Syndrome
Yaser Afaghi1 , Gholam Ali Afrooz *2 , Masoud Gholamali Lavasani3
1- Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, University of Tehran
3- Department of Educational Psychology & Counseling, University of Tehran
Abstract:   (985 Views)

Background & Objectives: Children are a large part of the world's population. Every country pays special attention to the health of children and adolescents, and the emphasis on their mental health can help them play their social roles better. Children with Down syndrome have low cognitive ability, motor processing, sensory integrity, and limited motor skills that impair their everyday functions. Sensory and motor control problems can be normalized and improved. Given the high prevalence of Down syndrome and their well response to rehabilitation (due to their ability to grow appropriately), caring for these children and proper planning to improve their physical, mental, and social health is very important. Despite processing problems in motor–sensory functions of these children, its effect on motor development is appearent. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a family–centered comprehensive program to enhance sensory and motor functions and motor skills in children with Down syndrome.
Methods: The method of this study was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest design, a control group and a one–month follow–up. The study's statistical population comprised all children with Down syndrome and their registered parents referred to Saadat and Ava Rehabilitation Clinics in Kashmar City, Iran, in 2019–2018. According to the officials of these centers, they were 60 parents in total. The sample was selected in a multi–stage manner in which all children with Down syndrome were first assessed using Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS) (parent form) (Folio & Fewell, 1983). Then, from those whose children received low scores (Score ranging from 0 to 2), 20 parents were selected based on the research limit and the number of people referred to the centers. Based on the available sampling method, they voluntarily entered the study and were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups (experimental and control groups of 10 parents each). The inclusion criteria included having 4 to 7 years old children with Down Syndrome, not receiving any educational and psychological services by the parents and their children during the intervention period, parents having sufficient literacy to use educational services, and expressing written consent to participate in the research. The exclusion criteria were parents not regularly participating in the intervention program or using other centers for their children's rehabilitation services. The experimental group underwent intervention, but the control group did not receive any intervention. The experimental group (parents with a child with Down Syndrome) underwent family–centered sensory–motor function training sessions to strengthen the children's motor skills. Their children were examined in three stages of pretest, posttest, and follow–up using Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS) (Folio & Fewell, 1983). The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test) in SPSS software version 22. The significance level of statistical tests was 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the effect of time (p<0.001), group (p<0.001), and time * group (p<0.001) on gross and fine motor skills were significant. Also, in the experimental group, the mean scores of gross motor skills (p<0.001) and fine motor skills (p<0.001) in the posttest and follow–up stages were significantly different from the pretest. Besides, the effect of intervention persisted up to the follow–up stage for variables of gross motor skills (p=0.812) and fine motor skills (p=0.795).
Conclusion: According to findings, the comprehensive program to enhance sensory–motor functions significantly increases the level of gross and fine motor skills of children with Down syndrome. Therefore, it seems that the application of therapeutic methods such as family–centered enhancing motor–sensory training will positively improve motor skills.

Keywords: Family–centered enhancement of sensory–motor actions, Motor skills, Children with Down syndrome.
Full-Text [PDF 687 kb]   (372 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology
References
1. Narimani M, Soleymani E, Abolghasemi A. A comparison of internal and external dimensions of thinking styles in blind and sighted students. Journal of School Psychology. 2012;1(1):108–18. [Persian] [Article]
2. Malek M, Hasanzadeh R, Tirgari A. Effectiveness of group play therapy and cognitive behavioral techniques in reducing behavioral problems in children with reading disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2013;2(4):177–85. [Persian] [Article]
3. Lindsey MP. Dictionary of mental handicap. First edition. London: Routledge; 2002. [DOI]
4. Danielsson H, Henry L, Messer D, Carney DPJ, Rönnberg J. Developmental delays in phonological recoding among children and adolescents with Down syndrome and Williams syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;55:64–76. [DOI]
5. Bhatia MS, Kabra M, Sapra S. Behavioral problems in children with Down syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2005;42(7):675–80.
6. Fisher AG, Murray EA. Introduction to sensory integration theory. In: Fisher AG, Murray EA, Bundy AC; editors. Sensory integration: theory and practice. Philadelphia: F.A Davis; 1991.‌
7. Parham LD, Mailloux Z. Sensory integration. Occupational Therapy for Children. 2005;5:356–409.
8. Winders PC. Gross Motor Skills In children with down syndrome: a guide for parents and professionals. Slambolchi Moghaddam A, Fathi Nejad Sarabi F, Ahmadi Safa MK. (Persian translator). Tehran: Danjeh; 2001.
9. Soortiji H, Sazmand AH, Karbalaei Noori A, Jadidi H. Effect of sensory integration therapy on gross and fine motor skills of 5–7 years old children with Down syndrome. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2008;9(2):41. [Persian] [Article]
10. Sadeghian A, Bigdeli I, Alizade Zarei M. Effectiveness of sensory-motor integration training in improving autism symptoms among children with autism spectrum disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies. 2017;7:98. [Persian] [Article]
11. Uyanik M, Bumin G, Kayihan H. Comparison of different therapy approaches in children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics International. 2003;45(1):68–73. [DOI]
12. Vargas S, Camilli G. A meta-analysis of research on sensory integration treatment. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53(2):189–98. [DOI]
13. Parhoon K, Parhoon H, Movallali G. Effectiveness of training sensory stimulation on gross motor skills of 5–7 years old children with Down syndrome. International Journal of Academic Research in Psychology. 2014;1(1):18–27. [DOI]
14. Malek Pour M, Hadi S, Faramarzi S, Eshqi R, Keshavarz A. Comparison of the efficacy of family based, child based and family-child based interventions on the rate of ADHD's symptoms in children with ADHD. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2015;4(4):653–72. [Persian] [Article]
15. Pelham Jr WE, Wheeler T, Chronis A. Empirically supported psychosocial treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 1998;27(2):190–205. [DOI]
16. Amirinezhad A, Ghoreishi Rad F, Javanmard GH. A comparison of child rearing styles and mental health between the parents of individuals committed suicide and the parents of the common people. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2012;1(3):315–30. [Persian] [Article]
17. Hostler SL. Family-centered care: an approach to implementation. Virginia: The University of Virginia; 1994.
18. Bayati S, Afrooz G, Hosseinchari M. The effectiveness of family-centered training based on social competence on social skills of children with intellectual disability. J Except Educ. 2016;3(140):22–30. [Persian] [Article]
19. Ravaei F, Afrooz G, Hosseinian S, Khodayari Fard M, Farzad V. The effectiveness of a family-centered psychological program based on the Iranian Islamic model on marital satisfaction. Family Psychology. 2016;3(1):17–30. [Persian] [Article]
20. Faramarzi S, Afrooz G, Malekpour M. The impact of early family-centered psychological and educational interventions on adaptive behaviors in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Exceptional Children. 2008;8(3):257–70. [Persian] [Article]
21. Fadaei R, Firooz A. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for treatment: Vitiligo. Dermatology and Cosmetic. 2012;3(3):175-8. [Persian] [Article]
22. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody developmental motor scales: manual. Allen, Texas: DLM Teaching Resources; 1983.
23. Motamed N, Zamani F. Hajme nemoone dar tahghighate pezeshki rouykardi karbordi [Sample size in applied medical research]. Tehran: Asr–e–Roshanbini Publications; 2016. [Persian]
24. Merrick J, Kandel I, Vardi G. Adolescents with Down syndrome. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2004;16(1):13–9. [DOI]
25. Schoen SA, Lane SJ, Mailloux Z, May‐Benson T, Parham LD, Smith Roley S, et al. A systematic review of ayres sensory integration intervention for children with autism. Autism Res. 2019;12(1):6–19. [DOI]
26. Doumas M, McKenna R, Murphy B. Postural control deficits in autism spectrum disorder: the role of sensory integration. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(3):853–61. [DOI]
27. Schaaf RC, Miller LJ. Occupational therapy using a sensory integrative approach for children with developmental disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(2):143–8. [DOI]
28. Shakarami R, Nikravan A, Rezaee F. The effect of sensory-motor integration training with help of interested parent on balance in autism children. Development and Motor Learning. 2020;11(4):413–28. [Persian] [Article]
29. Bereyhi K, Pakdaman S, Afrooz G. Designing an educational application of parental-mediated intervention and its effectiveness to promote reading skills among slow-paced students with Down syndrome. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2017;8(1):e45548. [DOI]
30. Mostafavi M, Hejazi M, Afrouz G. Effectiveness of family–based sensory–motor games in decrease of clinical symptoms in ADHD children. Women and Study of Family. 2020;13(49):91–105. [Persian] [Article]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb