Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 61 | Back to browse issues page

Research code: 0
Ethics code: IR.UT.SPORT.REC.1400.015
Clinical trials code: 0

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kowsari R, Seidi F, Minoonejad H, Varmaziyar M. Comparing Electromyographic Activity of Selected Lower Extremity Muscles Using Virtual Reality in Feedforward and Feedback Phases in Male Badminton Players With and Without Functional Ankle Instability During Single Leg Landing. MEJDS 2024; 14 :61-61
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3044-en.html
1- MA in Sports Injury and Corrective Exercise, Department of Health and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Health and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1163 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Ankle injury is one of the most common sports and daily life injuries. Usually, in 15%–60% of cases, Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) occurs after the initial sprain of the ankle. People with FAI have different muscle recruitment patterns and neuromuscular firing rates than healthy people. The human body relies on three sensory systems to maintain balance: vision, somatosensory, and vestibular. Information obtained from weight can be united by all three systems in the central nervous system, and balance can be established. Virtual reality technology is a new way to create more visual impairment and instability. By providing unreal visual cues, virtual reality makes the central nervous system rely on somatosensory and vestibular to maintain balance. This study aims to investigate the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles in feedback and feedforward phases with and without using virtual reality in male badminton players with and without FAI.
Methods: The current research method was quasi–experimental. The statistical population of this research comprised Badminton athletes aged 15 to 18 who were playing at the professional level. Thirty Badminton players were divided into two groups with and without ankle instability, and each group included 15 subjects. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (Hiller et al., 2006) was used to diagnose FAI. The group with FAI received a Cumberland questionnaire score of 0 to 27, and the control group received a score of 27 to 30. The Anterior Drawer of the Ankle Test was performed to ensure the absence of mechanical instability, and if the participants showed mechanical instability, they were excluded from the research. Motion Lab System MA400 (DTU) device was used to measure the electrical activity of muscles, and the F–RG model electrode was made by Skintact. The electromyographic activity of the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and lateral gastrocnemius muscles in the feedforward and feedback phases was studied using virtual reality. After checking the normality of the data, the independent t test and Man–Whitney U test were used to analyze the data at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS 27.
Results: The independent t test and Man–Whitney U test results showed a significant difference in the feedforward and feedback phases between the groups with FAI and without FAI regarding the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus muscles activities (p<0.05). When using Virtual Reality in the feedforward phase, there is a significant difference between the tibialis anterior (p=0.003) and lateral gastrocnemius muscles (p<0.001) in the group with and without FAI when using virtual reality. It should be noted that the activity of the tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius muscle in the group without functional instability of the ankle in the feedforward phase was higher than the group with FAI. Also, a significant difference was observed in the feedback phase in the tibialis anterior (p=0.006) and the lateral gastrocnemius muscle (p<0.001) between the group with and without ankle functional instability. It should be noted that the activity of the tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius muscle in the group without ankle functional instability in the feedback phase was higher than in the group with ankle functional instability. Also, there is no significant difference between the FAI and non–FAI groups regarding peroneus longus.
 Conclusion: According to the results, virtual reality can change the electromyography activity of the ankle muscles. There are changes in the electromyographic activity of the tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius muscle when using virtual reality between athletes with and without FAI, indicating the effect of virtual reality on the electromyographic activity of ankle muscles in these people.

Full-Text [PDF 292 kb]   (366 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. Gribble PA, Robinson RHJJoat. Alterations in knee kinematics and dynamic stability associated with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2009;44(4):350. [DOI]
2. Diamond JE. Rehabilitation of ankle sprains. Clin Sports Med. 1989;8(4):877–91.
3. Hertel J. Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):364–75.
4. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):653–60. [DOI]
5. Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47(4):678–85.
6. Ross SE, Guskiewicz KM, Yu B. Single-leg jump-landing stabilization times in subjects with functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 2005;40(4):298–304.
7. Li Y, Ko J, Walker MA, Brown CN, Schmidt JD, Kim SH, et al. Does chronic ankle instability influence lower extremity muscle activation of females during landing? J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018;38:81–7. [DOI]
8. Hubbard TJ, Kaminski TW. Kinesthesia is not affected by functional ankle instability status. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):481–6.
9. Vaes P, Duquet W, Van Gheluwe B. Peroneal reaction times and eversion motor response in healthy and unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 2002;37(4):475–80.
10. Hoch MC, McKeon PO, Andreatta RDJM, sports si, exercise. Plantar vibrotactile detection deficits in adults with chronic ankle instability. 2012;44(4):666–72.
11. Feger MA, Donovan L, Hart JM, Hertel J. Lower extremity muscle activation in patients with or without chronic ankle instability during walking. J Athl Train. 2015;50(4):350–7. [DOI]
12. Palmieri-Smith RM, Ty Hopkins J, Brown TN. Peroneal activation deficits in persons with functional ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(5):982–8. [DOI]
13. Moisan G, Mainville C, Descarreaux M, Cantin V. Lower limb biomechanics during drop-jump landings on challenging surfaces in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2022;57(11–12):1039–47. [DOI]
14. Nessler T, Denney L, Sampley J. ACL Injury prevention: what does research tell us? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(3):281–8. [DOI]
15. Corbin DM, Hart JM, McKeon PO, Ingersoll CD, Hertel J. The effect of textured insoles on postural control in double and single limb stance. J Sport Rehabil. 2007;16(4):363–72. [DOI]
16. Mohebbi A, Amiri P, Kearney RE. Identification of human balance control responses to visual inputs using virtual reality. J Neurophysiol. 2022;127(4):1159–70. [DOI]
17. Burcal CJ, Wikstrom EA. Plantar cutaneous sensitivity with and without cognitive loading in people with chronic ankle instability, copers, and uninjured controls. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(4):270–6. [DOI]
18. Kim KM, Kim JS, Grooms DR. Stroboscopic vision to induce sensory reweighting during postural control. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26(5). [DOI]
19. Herbaut A, Delannoy J. Fatigue increases ankle sprain risk in badminton players: A biomechanical study. J Sports Sci. 2020;38(13):1560–5. [DOI]
20. Donovan L, Hetzel S, Laufenberg CR, McGuine TA. Prevalence and impact of chronic ankle instability in adolescent athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(2):232596711990096. [DOI]
21. Webster KA, Gribble PA. Functional rehabilitation interventions for chronic ankle instability: a systematic review. J Sport Rehabil. 2010;19(1):98–114. [DOI]
22. Mollà-Casanova S, Inglés M, Serra-Añó P. Effects of balance training on functionality, ankle instability, and dynamic balance outcomes in people with chronic ankle instability: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(12):1694–709. [DOI]
23. Stasinopoulos D. Comparison of three preventive methods in order to reduce the incidence of ankle inversion sprains among female volleyball players. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(2):182–5. [DOI]
24. Hale SA, Hertel J, Olmsted-Kramer LC. The effect of a 4-week comprehensive rehabilitation program on postural control and lower extremity function in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(6):303–11. [DOI]
25. Lin H, Han K, Ruan B. Effect of virtual reality on functional ankle instability rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:1–12. [DOI]
26. Gürerk Ö, Kasulke A. Does virtual reality increase charitable giving? an experimental study. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2021. [DOI]
27. Neumann DL. On the use of virtual reality in sport and exercise: applications and research findings. In: Hill Z; editor. Virtual reality: advances in research and applications. UK: Nova Science Pub Inc; 2016.
28. Chung S. Visual utilization after a single session of virtual reality-based training in patients with chronic ankle instability [Thesis for MSc]. University of Nebraska at Omaha; 2020.
29. Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, Herbert RD, Kilbreath SL. The cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1235–41. [DOI]
30. Haji-Maghsoudi M, Naseri N, Nouri-Zadeh S, Jalayi S. Evidence of reliability for Persian version of the “Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)” in Iranian athletes with lateral ankle sprain. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2016;16(4):304–11. [Persian] [Article]
31. Hertel J, Kaminski T. Second International Ankle Symposium, October 15–16, Newark, Delaware. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35((5 suppl)):A1–A28.
32. Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, Caulfield B, Docherty C, Fourchet F, et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the international ankle consortium. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(8):585–91. [DOI]
33. Herzog MM, Kerr ZY, Marshall SW, Wikstrom EA. Epidemiology of ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. J Athl Training. 2019;54(6):603–10. [DOI]
34. Nanbancha A, Tretriluxana J, Limroongreungrat W, Sinsurin K. Decreased supraspinal control and neuromuscular function controlling the ankle joint in athletes with chronic ankle instability. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(9):2041–52. [DOI]
35. Hertel J. Sensorimotor deficits with ankle sprains and chronic ankle instability. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27(3):353–70. [DOI]
36. Freeman MA, Dean MR, Hanham IW. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965;47(4):678–85.
37. Song K, Burcal CJ, Hertel J, Wikstrom EA. Increased visual use in chronic ankle instability: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(10):2046–56. [DOI]
38. Mao Y, Chen P, Li L, Huang D. Virtual reality training improves balance function. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9(17):1628. [DOI]
39. Cho KH, Lee KJ, Song CH. Virtual-reality balance training with a video-game system improves dynamic balance in chronic stroke patients. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;228(1):69–74. [DOI]
40. North MM, North SM, Coble JR. Virtual reality therapy: an effective treatment for psychological disorders. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;44:59–70.
41. Valori I, McKenna-Plumley PE, Bayramova R, Zandonella Callegher C, Altoè G, Farroni T. Proprioceptive accuracy in immersive virtual reality: a developmental perspective. Plos One. 2020;15(1):e0222253. [DOI]
42. Tretriluxana J, Nanbancha A, Sinsurin K, Limroongreungrat W, Wang HK. Neuromuscular control of the ankle during pre-landing in athletes with chronic ankle instability: Insights from statistical parametric mapping and muscle co-contraction analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;47:46–52. [DOI]
43. Dunning K, Levine P, Schmitt L, Israel S, Fulk G. An ankle to computer virtual reality system for improving gait and function in a person 9 months poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(6):602–10. [DOI]
44. Aiello E, Gates DH, Patritti BL, Cairns KD, Meister M, Clancy EA, et al. Visual EMG biofeedback to improve ankle function in hemiparetic gait. In: 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference [Internet]. Shanghai, China: IEEE; 2005. [DOI]
45. Baek JS, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, Park JH, Lee NR, Lee BR, et al. The effect of unstable supporting exercise in young adults with functional ankle instability when training with a virtual reality-head mounted display system. PNF and Movement. 2019;17(1):81–92. [DOI]
46. Feng J, Chen K, Zhang C, Li H. A virtual reality-based training system for ankle rehabilitation. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC) [Internet]. Suzhou, China: IEEE; 2018. [DOI]
47. Yazdani S, Mohammadalinezhad S, Eslami S, Sajedi H. The electromyographic activity of lower limb muscles in the elderly during walking on the treadmill: an emphasis on the effect of virtual reality. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences. 2020;16(1):135–41. [Persian] [Article]
48. Feger MA, Donovan L, Hart JM, Hertel J. Lower extremity muscle activation during functional exercises in patients with and without chronic ankle instability. PM R. 2014;6(7):602–11. [DOI]
49. Park J, Lee D, Lee S. Effect of virtual reality exercise using the nintendo wii fit on muscle activities of the trunk and lower extremities of normal adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(2):271–3. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb