Volume 14 - Articles-1403                   MEJDS (2024) 14: 70 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.SDJ.REC.1402.078

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Zandi N, Ahmadian H, Goudarzi M. Modeling the Structural Relationships Between the Original Family Health, Alexithymia, and Communication Beliefs with the Mental Wellbeing of Couples: The Mediating role of Forgiveness. MEJDS 2024; 14 :70-70
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3055-en.html
1- PhD Student, General Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Associate professor,Department of Family Counseling, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University,Sanandaj,Iran
Abstract:   (613 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Marriage is one of the basic foundations of human life. Relationships between husband and wife are increasingly crucial in promoting mental wellbeing. Various factors can affect mental wellbeing. One of these components is the health of the main family. Another factor that affects the mental wellbeing of couples is communication. One of the factors that married couples are dealing with is alexithymia. The factor of forgiveness is one of the variables that has drawn the attention of researchers in the field of couple conflicts. Despite the critical role of forgiveness in marital satisfaction and adjustment, little research has investigated the mediating role of this variable in the relationship between the communication patterns of the health of the main family and alexithymia with the mental wellbeing of couples. Therefore, the present study aims to model the structural relationships between the health of the original family and alexithymia, and communication beliefs with the mental wellbeing of couples were conducted with the mediating role of forgiveness.
Methods: The research method was correlational analysis with structural equation modeling. The statistical population included all married couples seeking counseling at counseling centers in the city of Javanrud, Iran. According to Kline's rule (2023) and considering the sample size criteria, 200 couples were initially considered, but 22 questionnaires were excluded due to incomplete responses. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age range of 20–55 years, minimum education of high school, at least one year of cohabitation, informed consent to participate in research, and completing questionnaires. The exclusion criterion was the failure to complete the questionnaires. The data collection tools consisted of the Subjective Wellbeing in Couple Relationship Scale (Urbano–Contreras et al., 2018), the Family–of–Origin Scale (Hovestadt et al., 1985), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (Bagby et al., 1994), the Relationship Beliefs Questionnaire (Romans & DeBord, 1995), and the Family Forgiveness Scale (Pollard & Anderson, 1998). To analyze the collected data, the statistical method of structural equation modeling by partial least square method was used in Smart PLS version 3 software.
Results: The effect coefficient of health in the main family on mental wellbeing in couples' relationships (β=0.41, p˂0.001), communicative beliefs on mental wellbeing in couples' relationships (β=0.213, p˂0.001), health in the family on the level of forgiveness (β=0.303, p˂0.001), communication beliefs on forgiveness (β=0.273, p˂0.001), and forgiveness on mental wellbeing in couples' relationships (β=0.252, p=0.002) was positive and significant and the effect coefficient of alexithymia on forgiveness was negative and significant (β=–0.481, p˂0.001). Also, the mediating effect of forgiveness in relation to health in the main family on mental wellbeing in couple relationships was positive and significant (β=0.076, p=0.018), the indirect effect of alexithymia through forgiveness on mental wellbeing in couple relationships was negative and significant (β=–0.121, p=0.002), and the mediating effect of forgiveness in relation to communicative beliefs on subjective wellbeing in couples' relationships was not confirmed (β=0.069, p=0.007).
Conclusion: According to the research findings, forgiveness plays a mediating role in the relationship between the health of the main family and alexithymia and communicative beliefs related to the mental wellbeing of couples.

Full-Text [PDF 514 kb]   (514 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Raley RK, Sweeney MM. Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: a decade in review. J Marriage Fam. 2020;82(1):81–99. [DOI]
2. Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective wellbeing. Collabra: Psychology. 2018;4(1):15. [DOI]
3. Khezri Z, Hassan SA, Nordin MHM. Factors affecting marital satisfaction and marital communication among marital women: literature of review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2020;10(16):220–36. [DOI]
4. Ebrahimi L, Mohamadlou M. Role of relationship beliefs and cognitive insight on the quality of marital relationship among divorced women. Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2019;9(2):28–35. [Persian] [DOI]
5. Wade NG, Hoyt WT, Kidwell JEM, Worthington EL. Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(1):154–70. [DOI]
6. Fahimdanesh F, Noferesti A, Tavakol K. Self-compassion and forgiveness: major predictors of marital satisfaction in young couples. Am J Fam Ther. 2020;48(3):221–34. [DOI]
7. Hooman H. structural equation modeling with LISREL application. Tehran: Samt Pub; 2018. [Persian]
8. Urbano-Contreras A, Martínez-González RA, Iglesias-Garcia MT. Validation of the Subjective Wellbeing in Couple Relationship Scale (SWCR). Marriage & Family Review. 2018;54(6):598–615. [DOI]
9. Zandi N. The Efficacy of a mindfulness-based educational program on marital relationships in reducing infidelity and marital instability [PhD dissertation]. Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch; 2023.
10. Hovestadt AJ, Anderson WT, Piercy FP, Cochran SW, Fine M. A Family‐of‐Origin Scale. J Marital Fam Ther. 1985;11(3):287–97. [DOI]
11. Karami A. Psychometric characteristics and standardization of health level of Family-of-Origin Scale. Journal of Counseling Research. 2011;10(38):103–18. [Persian]
12. Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):23–32. [DOI]
13. Besharat MA. Reliability and factorial validity of a Farsi version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale with a sample of Iranian students. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(1):209–20. [DOI]
14. Romans JSC, DeBord J. Development of the Relationship Beliefs Questionnaire. Psychol Rep. 1995;76(3_suppl):1248–50. [DOI]
15. Azkhosh M, Asgari A. Measuring irrational beliefs about marital relationships: standardization of Relationship Believes Questionnaire (RBQ). Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2015;4(14):137–53. [Article]
16. Pollard MW, Anderson RA, Anderson WT, Jennings G. The Development of a Family Forgiveness Scale. J Fam Ther. 1998;20(1):95–109. [DOI]
17. Seif S, Bahari F, Khosravi Z. Forgiveness Scale extended to the Iranian families. Journal of Women's Studies. 2006;6(3):97–112.
18. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Third edition. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage; 2022.
19. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2015;43(1):115–35. [DOI]
20. Stone M, Geisser F. Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1975;36(2):111–47. [Article]
21. Martin F, Dahmash D, Glover S, Duncan C, Turner A, Halligan SL. Needs of parents and carers of children and young people with mental health difficulties: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e071341. [DOI]
22. Crandall A, Miller JR, Cheung A, Novilla LK, Glade R, Novilla MLB, et al. ACEs and counter-ACEs: How positive and negative childhood experiences influence adult health. Child Abuse Neglect. 2019;96:104089. [DOI]
23. Fairbairn WR. An object-relations theory of the personality. Basic Books; 1954.
24. Hashemi Dezaki Z, Eyni S, Ebadi Kasbakhi M. Life satisfaction of veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder: The predictive role of cognitive flexibility and alexithymia. Medical-Psychological Annals, Psychiatric Journal. 2021;179(10):901–6. [DOI]
25. Karakuş S, Akbay SE. The mediating role of psychological flexibility in explaining authenticity and life satisfaction with alexithymia. Participatory Educational Research. 2022;9(1):285–302. [DOI]
26. Martino G, Caputo A, Vicario CM, Catalano A, Schwarz P, Quattropani MC. The relationship between alexithymia and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2020;11:2026. [DOI]
27. Sheldon P, Gilchrist-Petty E, Lessley JA. You did what? the relationship between forgiveness tendency, communication of forgiveness, and relationship satisfaction in married and dating couples. Communication Reports. 2014;27(2):78–90. [DOI]
28. Burnette JL, Franiuk R. Individual differences in implicit theories of relationships and partner fit: Predicting forgiveness in developing relationships. Pers Individ Dif. 2010;48(2):144–8. [DOI]
29. Schrodt P, Ledbetter AM, Ohrt JK. Parental confirmation and affection as mediators of family communication patterns and children's mental wellbeing. J Fam Commun. 2007;7(1):23–46. [DOI]
30. Rajgopal T. Mental wellbeing at the workplace. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2010;14(3):63. [DOI]
31. Akhtar S, Barlow J. Forgiveness therapy for the promotion of mental wellbeing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018;19(1):107–22. [DOI]
32. Abu-Raiya H, Ayten A. Religious involvement, interpersonal forgiveness and mental health and wellbeing among a multinational sample of Muslims. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(8):3051–67. [DOI]
33. Zagrean I, Russo C, Di Fabio M, Danioni F, Barni D. Forgiveness and family functioning among young adults from divorced and married families. J Divorce. 2020;61(8):543–55. [DOI]
34. Long KNG, Chen Y, Potts M, Hanson J, VanderWeele TJ. Spiritually motivated self-forgiveness and divine forgiveness, and subsequent health and wellbeing among middle-aged female nurses: an outcome-wide longitudinal approach. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1337. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb