The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Emotion Regulation in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder

Dehghani Firoozabadi , Mahboobeh; Saeidmanesh , Mohsen

Volume 14 - Articles-1403 MEJDS (2024) 14: 81 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Dehghani Firoozabadi M, Saeidmanesh M. The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Emotion Regulation in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. MEJDS 2024; 14 :81-81
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3173-en.html

The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Emotion Regulation in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder

Mahboobeh Dehghani Firoozabadi¹

, Mohsen Saeidmanesh ^*²

1- MA in Clinical Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract: (729 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Borderline personality disorder is a complex mental disorder characterized by pervasive instability of self–concept, emotions, and behavior. The inability to regulate emotion in this disorder may be related to cognitive impairment because cognitive function modulates emotional reactions as a response to environmental stimuli. Studies that have been conducted to investigate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on borderline personality disorder have reported conflicting results on the impact of this type of stimulation. Studies that investigate the effect of tDCS on borderline personality disorder are rare. Of course, no study has been reported to investigate the effect of this type of treatment on emotion regulation in borderline personality disorder. So, the purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tDCS on emotion regulation in patients with borderline personality disorder.
Methods: This study method was a quasi–experimental intervention type with a pretest–posttest design and a control group. The statistical population included patients with borderline personality disorder aged 30 to 45 from Taft City, Iran, who were referred to psychiatric clinics in Yazd City, Iran. Among the community members, 30 available qualified volunteers entered the study, and 15 of them were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. The inclusion criteria were having a borderline personality disorder and psychiatrist's approval, an age range of 30 to 45 years, not using other treatment methods such as drug therapy and psychotherapy. The exclusion criteria included absence from a session of tDCS and failure to complete the questionnaire during the study. Each person completed the consent form to participate in the research. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) (Gratz & Romer, 2004) compared emotion regulation variable scores before and after tDCS. Data analysis was done using covariance analysis in SPSS version 17. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: The analysis of covariance by adjusting the effect of the pretest showed a significant difference in the average emotion regulation between the intervention group receiving tDCS and the control group without any intervention in the posttest (p<0.001). Also, the results related to the effect size indicated that 61% of the difference between the intervention and control groups in the emotion regulation variable was due to the implementation of tDCS.
Conclusion: According to the findings, tDCS has a significant effect on the improvement of emotion regulation of patients with borderline personality disorder. So, tDCS can be used as a complementary treatment to improve emotion regulation in patients with borderline personality disorder.

Keywords: Transcranial direct current stimulation, Emotion regulation, Borderline personality disorder

Full-Text [PDF 249 kb] (214 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Miller CE, Townsend ML, Day NJS, Grenyer BFS. Measuring the shadows: a systematic review of chronic emptiness in borderline personality disorder. Plos One. 2020;15(7):e0233970. [DOI]

2. Bozzatello P, Garbarini C, Rocca P, Bellino S. Borderline personality disorder: risk factors and early detection. Diagnostics. 2021;11(11):2142. [DOI]

3. Mirkovic B, Delvenne V, Robin M, Pham-Scottez A, Corcos M, Speranza M. Borderline personality disorder and adolescent suicide attempt: the mediating role of emotional dysregulation. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):393. [DOI]

4. Yi X, Fu Y, Zhang Z, Jiang F, Xiao Q, Chen BT. Altered regional homogeneity and its association with cognitive function in adolescents with borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2023;48(1):E1–10. [DOI]

5. Daros AR, Williams GE. A meta-analysis and systematic review of emotion-regulation strategies in borderline personality disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2019;27(4):217–32. [DOI]

6. Stiglmayr CE, Grathwol T, Linehan MM, Ihorst G, Fahrenberg J, Bohus M. Aversive tension in patients with borderline personality disorder: a computer‐based controlled field study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;111(5):372–9. [DOI]

7. Salgó E, Szeghalmi L, Bajzát B, Berán E, Unoka Z. Emotion regulation, mindfulness, and self-compassion among patients with borderline personality disorder, compared to healthy control subjects. Plos One. 2021;16(3):e0248409. [DOI]

8. Herr NR, Rosenthal MZ, Geiger PJ, Erikson K. Difficulties with emotion regulation mediate the relationship between borderline personality disorder symptom severity and interpersonal problems. Personal Ment Health. 2013;7(3):191–202. [DOI]

9. Gratz KL, Weiss NH, McDermott MJ, Dilillo D, Messman-Moore T, Tull MT. Emotion dysregulation mediates the relation between borderline personality disorder symptoms and later physical health symptoms. J Pers. 2017;31(4):433–48. [DOI]

10. Kells M, Joyce M, Flynn D, Spillane A, Hayes A. Dialectical behaviour therapy skills reconsidered: applying skills training to emotionally dysregulated individuals who do not engage in suicidal and self-harming behaviours. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020;7(1):3. [DOI]

11. Daros AR, Guevara MA, Uliaszek AA, McMain SF, Ruocco AC. Cognitive emotion regulation strategies in borderline personality disorder: diagnostic comparisons and associations with potentially harmful behaviors. Psychopathology. 2018;51(2):83–95. [DOI]

12. Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karaköse T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, et al. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97(4):3109–17. [DOI]

13. Hecht D, Walsh V, Lavidor M. Bi-frontal direct current stimulation affects delay discounting choices. Cognitive Neuroscience. 2013;4(1):7–11. [DOI]

14. Dockery CA, Hueckel-Weng R, Birbaumer N, Plewnia C. Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29(22):7271–7. [DOI]

15. Teti Mayer J, Nicolier M, Gabriel D, Masse C, Giustiniani J, Compagne C, et al. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in reducing impulsivity in borderline personality disorder (TIMBER): study protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):347. [DOI]

16. Schulze L, Grove M, Tamm S, Renneberg B, Roepke S. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cognitive control of negative stimuli in borderline personality disorder. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):332. [DOI]

17. Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41–54. [DOI]

18. Khanzadeh M, Saidian M, Hossein Chari M, Edrisi F. Factor structure and psychometric properties of Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2012;6(1):87–96. [Persian] [Article]

19. DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp. 2011;(51):2744. [DOI]

20. Van Dam WO, Chrysikou EG. Effects of unilateral tDCS over left prefrontal cortex on emotion regulation in depression: Evidence from concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021;21(1):14–34. [DOI]

21. Beblo T, Fernando S, Klocke S, Griepenstroh J, Aschenbrenner S, Driessen M. Increased suppression of negative and positive emotions in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2012;141(2–3):474–9. [DOI]

22. Raschle NM, Fehlbaum LV, Menks WM, Martinelli A, Prätzlich M, Bernhard A, et al. Atypical dorsolateral prefrontal activity in female adolescents with conduct disorder during effortful emotion regulation. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019;4(11):984–94. [DOI]