Volume 15 - Articles-1404                   MEJDS (2025) 15: 16 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.KHU.REC.1402.056

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gorji R, Kavousian J, Moradi A, Parhoon H. Comparing the Effectiveness of Executive Skills Coaching Program with Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program on the Executive Functions of Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :16-16
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3270-en.html
1- PhD Student in Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor of Educational Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3- Professor of Clinical Psychology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4- Assistant Professor of Health Psychology, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract:   (551 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Executive functions are a set of high–level cognitive abilities and excellent mental processes related to each other, which enable humans to filter disturbing and distracting factors, prioritize tasks, set goals, and control impulsiveness. These skills are the basis of children's cognitive, social–emotional, and psychological development. They can improve other cognitive abilities such as attention, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and planning to strengthen self–regulation, self–control, and cognitive, behavioral, and emotional regulation in people. Meanwhile, children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) show poor performance in relation to executive functions, and as a result, they face serious challenges in academic and social affairs. Therefore, improving this category of cognitive skills can have positive consequences for this group of children. Thus, the present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of executive skills coaching and mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation programs on the executive functions of children with ADHD.
Methods: This research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest and one–month follow–up design with a control group. The statistical population of this research included all children aged 9 to 12 years with ADHD who were referred to the clinics of District three of Tehran City, Iran, in 2023. Of them, 60 people were selected by a purposive sampling method and randomly and equally placed in two experimental groups and one control group, so there were 20 subjects in each group. The inclusion criteria for the subjects in the study were as follows: receiving a diagnosis of ADHD using a semi–structured clinical interview, a diagnostic questionnaire of ADHD, and a clinical diagnosis by a psychologist and psychiatrist; having an IQ above normal based on the records available in the centers (IQ score greater than 90); being in the age range of 9 to 12 years; not suffering from any other psychological disorder based on the opinions of a psychologist and psychiatrist; lacking any seizures, neurological diseases such as epilepsy, or medical conditions affecting cognitive function; not having any sensorimotor disability, brain injury, or other medical disease that better explains the subjects' cognitive problems; not participating in a similar treatment intervention with the present study design. The exclusion criteria for the subjects from the study were unwillingness to continue the treatment process and missing more than two sessions during the intervention. Then, the executive skills coaching program was implemented for the first experimental group during twelve 60–minute sessions. For the second experimental group, the mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation program was implemented during sixtheen 60–minute sessions. While the members of the control group did not participate in any of these interventions. Subject information was collected in the pretest, posttest, and follow–up stages using the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition: BRIEF2 (Gioia et al., 2015), which has favorable psychometric properties. To statistically analyze the collected data, indicators such as mean and standard deviation were used in the descriptive statistics section, and in the inferential section, the analysis of variance method with repeated measures and Bonferroni post hoc test were used using SPSS software version 26 at a significance level of 0.05.
Results: The findings indicated that the executive skills coaching program had a positive and lasting effect on the indicators of behavior regulation, cognitive regulation, and the total score of executive functions (p<0.001), but it was not effective on the emotion regulation index (p=0.071). Additionally, the mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation program has had a positive and lasting effect on the indicators of behavior regulation, cognitive regulation, and emotion regulation. It has been effective on the total score of executive functions (p<0.001). In addition, there has been a difference between the effectiveness of the executive skills coaching program and the mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation program in relation to the overall score of executive functions. In other words, the executive skills coaching program has been more effective than the mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation program (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The executive skills coaching program is more effective in improving the executive functions of children with ADHD than mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation. Moreover, executive skills coaching programs and mindfulness–based cognitive rehabilitation programs are effective interventions that psychologists and specialists can use to improve the executive functions of students with ADHD.

Full-Text [PDF 433 kb]   (52 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Leffa DT, Caye A, Rohde LA. ADHD in children and adults: diagnosis and prognosis. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2022;57:1–18. [DOI]
2. Erlandsson SI, Hornborg C, Sorbring E, Dauman N. Is ADHD a way of conceptualizing long–term emotional stress and social disadvantage? Front Public Health. 2022;10:966900. [DOI]
3. Ortega R, López V, Carrasco X, Escobar MJ, García AM, Parra MA, et al. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying working memory encoding and retrieval in attention–deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7771. [DOI]
4. Jacobson LA, Pritchard AE, Koriakin TA, Jones KE, Mahone EM. Initial examination of the BRIEF2 in clinically referred children with and without ADHD symptoms. J Atten Disord. 2020;24(12):1775–84. [DOI]
5. Neuhäußer AM, Bluschke A, Roessner V, Beste C. Distinct effects of different neurofeedback protocols on the neural mechanisms of response inhibition in ADHD. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;153:111–22. [DOI]
6. Anderson K, Marino M. Using technology as a compensatory technique for executive function skill deficits during the coaching process. Journal of Special Education Technology. 2022;38(4): 539–46. [DOI]
7. Marino MT, Vasquez E, Banerjee M, Parsons CA, Saliba YC, Gallegos B, et al. Coaching as a means to enhance performance and persistence in undergraduate STEM majors with executive function deficits. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2020:20(5);94–109. [DOI]
8. Castells N, Riccio J. Executive skills coaching plus incentives in a workforce program [Internet]. New York: MDRC; 2020 [cited 2025 Nov]. Available from: https://www.mdrc.org/work/publications/executive-skills-coaching-plus-incentives-workforce-program
9. Parker DR, Boutelle K. Executive function coaching for college students with learning disabilities and ADHD: a new approach for fostering self–determination. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 2009;24(4):204–15. [DOI]
10. Goudreau SB, Knight M. Executive function coaching: assisting with transitioning from secondary to postsecondary education. J Atten Disord. 2018;22(4):379–87. [DOI]
11. Ebrahimi B, Hasani Abharian P, Ramezani S, Bahrami S. Effectiveness of executive function coaching on improving sustained attention deficit and planning skills in adults with attention deficit– hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychology New Ideas. 2022;13(17):1–13. [Persian] [Article]
12. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805–20. [DOI]
13. Verhaeghen P. Mindfulness as attention training: meta–analyses on the links between attention performance and mindfulness interventions, long–term meditation practice, and trait mindfulness. Mindfulness. 2021;12(3):564–81. [DOI]
14. Law LM, Griffiths DR, Lifshitz J. Peg forest rehabilitation –a novel spatial navigation based cognitive rehabilitation paradigm for experimental neurotrauma. Behav Brain Res. 2023;443:114355. [DOI]
15. Najjari Alamooti B, Peymani J, Bahrami Hidaji M, Sodagar S, Havasi Soomar N. Investigating the efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation of inhibitory control on cold executive functions, working memory and cognitive flexibility in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023;22(123):613–25. [Persian] [Article]
16. Arshadi S, Nokani M, Asgari M, Sepahvand T. Comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation of inhibitory control, electrical stimulation of the brain and the combination of inhibitory control and electrical stimulation of the brain on executive functions (behavioral inhibition and cognitive flexibility) in children with ADHD. Journal of School Psychology. 2022;11(3):6–27. [Persian] [DOI]
17. Kiani Z, Moradi A, Kadivar P, Hasanabadi HR, Keramati H, Effatpanah M. Designing, developing and validating a psycho–educational program of mindfulness–based cognitive empowerment to executive functions in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2021;9(1):1–20. [Persian] [Article]
18. Salakari A, Virta M, Grönroos N, Chydenius E, Partinen M, Vataja R, et al. Cognitive–behaviorally–oriented group rehabilitation of adults with ADHD: results of a 6–month follow–up. J Atten Disord. 2010;13(5):516–23. [Persian] [DOI]
19. Gioia G, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. BRIEF2 – Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. 2nd ed. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2015.
20. Swanson JM, Schuck S, Porter MM, Carlson C, Hartman CA, Sergeant JA, et al. Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: hstory of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2012;10(1):51–70.
21. Sadrosadat SJ, Houshyari Z, Zamani R, Sadrosadat L. Determinatio of psychometrics index of SNAP–IV Rating Scale in Parents Execution. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2008;8(4):59–65. [Persian] [Article]
22. Parhoon K, Parhoon H, Moradi A, Hassanabadi H. Psychometric properties of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, second edition (BRIEF2) in students aged 13 to 18 years. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2021;12(45):165–86. [Persian] [DOI]
23. Dawson P, Guare R. Executive skills in children and adolescents: A practical guide to assessment and intervention. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.
24. Behnammoghadam Z, Hossiyninik S, Maredpour A, Behnammoghadam A. The effectiveness of abacus training on improving the working memory and response inhibition of primary school students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2023;10(1):40–9. [Persian] [Article]
25. Sanger KL, Dorjee D. Mindfulness training with adolescents enhances metacognition and the inhibition of irrelevant stimuli: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 2016;5(1):1–11. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb