Volume 7 -                   MEJDS (2017) 7: 107 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nadertabar M, Sharifidaramadi P, Pezeshk S, Farrokhi N. Computer Games effects on Selective Attention and Visual Processing Speed in Deaf Students. MEJDS 2017; 7 :107-107
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-848-en.html
1- Allameh Tabataba’i University
Abstract:   (3173 Views)

Background & objective: Recently, there has been much interest in the relationship between audition and cognition. The new field of cognitive hearing science has highlighted the critical role of domain-general cognitive processes in supporting oral language comprehension and production. A lack of auditory stimulation negatively impacts the cognitive processes required to support spoken language. Two such methods that have been demonstrated to play a role in audio-visual speech comprehension are selective attention and visual processing speed. The studies show that deaf and hard of hearing children achieve lower results on the selective attention and visual processing speed tests when compared to children of normal development and early deafness can be reflected in the slower development of these skills. One of the methods for improving these skills is through the use of computer games. Here we consider the case of computer games as a tool to promote training-induced learning. Different computer games can enhance various aspects of cognition. The characteristics of the game itself are directly related to the types of processes that modified by playing the game (e.g., ability to effectively ignore distractors, speed of processing, monitoring of the periphery, tracking multiple moving objects, etc.). In this study, we used eye-hand coordination computer games to improve these skills. The child tries to use the mouse and keyboard to interact between the visual perception received from the screen and the motion of coordination. The children are initially uncertain and slow when using the mouse and keyboard; later, however, with repetition of these activities, they become faster and more dexterous. Although numerous studies have researched the effects of computers on the academic achievements of pupils, there are only a small number of studies examining the impact of computer game on visual processing speed and selective attention in deaf children. The study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of computer games on the visual processing speed and selective attention in deaf students.
Methods: This study was a quasi-experimental study with pretest-posttest design and with the control group. Thirty deaf children aged 7 to 10 years old were selected using convenient sampling method; these children selected among the clients of Loghman hospital and State Welfare Organization of Tehran. The criteria for those who entered the research were that they should all be the students of deaf schools, they have all received cochlear implants, and they should not have any other disability or incapability. The information related to their education level, physical health, and not having another disability and the amount of hearing loss extracted from the subjects rehabilitation files in the relevant center. The selected children divided randomly into two groups of experimental and control; every group included 15 children (7 girls and eight boys). All children in pretest and posttest evaluated via Continuous Performance Test. This test measures Visual processing speed and selective attention. The experimental group was taught by specialized computer games in 20 individual sessions of 50 minutes twice a week. Gathered data were analyzed using SPSS-21 software via ANCOVA. 
Results: The findings showed that training by the use of specialized computer games has a significant effect on the improving selective attention of deaf students (p<0.001) and also on the Visual processing speed (p=0.006).
Conclusion: These results confirm the positive effect of computer games, in carefully selected and applied doses, on the development of the Visual processing speed and selective attention in deaf students. This training method can be suggested to the scientific community of education and rehabilitation for deaf children.

Full-Text [PDF 515 kb]   (1522 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Prasad S, Cucci RA, Green GE, Smith RJ. Genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss: connexin 26 (GJB2) allele variants and two novel deafness-causing mutations (R32C and 645-648delTAGA). Human mutation. 2000 Dec 1;16(6):502-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-1004(200012)16:6<502::AID-HUMU7>3.0.CO;2-4 [DOI:10.1002/1098-1004(200012)16:63.0.CO;2-4]
2. Erden Z, Otman S, Tunay VB. Is visual perception of hearing-impaired children different from healthy children?. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2004 Mar 31;68(3):281-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.10.003]
3. Dye MW, Hauser PC. Sustained attention, selective attention and cognitive control in deaf and hearing children .Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct; 18(5): 275-279.
4. Douglas P. Sladen D.P.,Tharpe A. M., Ashmead D. H., Grantham D.W. Visual Attention in Deaf and Normal Hearing Adults: Effects of Stimulus Compatibility. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, December 2005, Vol. 48, 1529-1537. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/106)]
5. Siple, P. Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies,1978, 19, 95-110. [DOI:10.1353/sls.1978.0010]
6. Quittner AL, Smith LB, Osberger MJ, Mitchell TV, Katz DB. The impact of audition on the development of visual attention. Psychological Science. 1994;5(6):347-353. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00284.x]
7. Mitchell TV, Quittner AL. Multimethod study of attention and behavior problems in hearing-impaired children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1996;25(1):83-96. [DOI:10.1207/s15374424jccp2501_10]
8. Proksch J. and Bavelier D. Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Visual Attention after Early Deafness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2002, 14 (5):687-701. [DOI:10.1162/08989290260138591]
9. Marschark M, Pelz JB, Canvertino C. Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex. 2005 Jan,42(4):727-61. [DOI:10.3102/00028312042004727]
10. Hamilton, H. Memory skills of deaf learners: Implications and applications. American Annals of the Deaf.2011;156 (4),402-423 [DOI:10.1353/aad.2011.0034]
11. Fry A. F. ,Sandra H. Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 2000;54(1-3), 1-34. [DOI:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00051-X]
12. Abdi H., Kianzadeh A., Tayebi Sani S.M., Fahiminejad A.,Comparison of Simple Reaction Time and Selective Reaction Time in Sportsmen and Sportswomen. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.2010;7(4),294-300.[Persian]
13. Rothpletz, A., Ashmead, D. H., & Tharpe, A. M. Responses to targets in the visual periphery in deaf and normal hearing adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2003:46, 269-280. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/107)]
14. Leutzinger, M.R. Use of the WAIS -III performance scale with deaf adults.Dissertation abstracts international: the sciences and engineering,2002; 63 (2 - B), 1036.
15. Connolly T.M., Boyle E.A., MacArthur E., Hainey H, Boyle J.M. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education. 2012; 59(2). [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004]
16. Mitchell A, Savill-Smit C, The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. 1st ed, London, Learning and Skills Development Agency, 2004, (PP:30-58).
17. Achtman, R.L. | Green, C.S. | Bavelier, D. Video games as a tool to train visual skills. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2008 Oct;26(4):435-46.
18. Melonio A, Gennari R. How to design games for deaf children: Evidence-based guidelines.In: Evidence-Based Guidelines. In: Vittorini P., Gennari R., Marenzi I., Mascio T., Prieta F. (eds) 2nd International Workshop on Evidence-based Technology Enhanced Learning. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 218, Switzerland, Springer International Publishing..2013 (pp:83-92). [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-00554-6_11]
19. Mishra J, Zinni M, Bavelier D. , Hillyard S.A. Neural Basis of Superior Performance of Action Videogame Players in an Attention-Demanding Task. Journal of Neuroscience. 19 January 2011, 31 (3) 992-998. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4834-10.2011]
20. Hubert -Wallander B., Green CS, Bavelier D. Stretching the limits of visual attention: the case of action video games.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science.2011; 2(2): 222-230. [DOI:10.1002/wcs.116]
21. Green CS, Bavelier D, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Video Games. In: Messaris P, Humphreys L, Digital Media: Transformations in Human Communication,1st ed, New York, Peter Lang, 2006,( pp:211-24)
22. Dye M.W.G., Green S.C., Bavelier D. Increasing Speed of Processing With Action Video Games. Current Directions in Psychological Science.2009, 18 (6), page(s): 321-326. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01660.x]
23. CS Green, D Bavelier, Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 423, 2003, 534-537. [DOI:10.1038/nature01647]
24. 15 Leark A.,Greenberg, L. M., Kindschi, C. L., Dupuy, T. R., & Hughes, S. J.; T.O.V.A. Clinical Manual (test of variables of attention continuous performance test). Ed. No.844.CA. USA: TVOA Company.2008,(pp:1-2)
25. Hadianfard H., Najarian B., Shokrkon H., Mehrabizadeh Honarmand M. Construction and Validation of the Farsi Version of the Continuous Performance Test, Journal Of Psychology.2001,4(16),388-404.
26. Aliloo M., Hamidi S, Shirvani A. Comparison of executive function and sustained attention in students with obsessive-compulsive, high schizotypal and overlapping symptoms with the normal group. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2011;9(3),216-220.[Persian]
27. Hand-Eye Coordination Learning Games For Kids. [Internet]. [cited 2016 may 2].
28. Wu S., Cheng C.H., Feng J., D'Angelo L., Playing a First-person Shooter Video Game Induces Neuroplastic Change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.2012 June;24( 6):1286-1293. [DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_00192]
29. Radovanovic V. The influence of computer games on visual-motor integration in profoundly deaf children. British Journal of Special Education. 2013 Dec 1;40(4):182-8. [DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.12042]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb