Investigating the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Psychological Adjustment of Adolescents with Conduct Disorder

Saeidmanesh , Mohsen; Mayahi, Abdollah

Volume 15 - Articles-1404 MEJDS (2025) 15: 53 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Saeidmanesh M, Mayahi A. Investigating the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Psychological Adjustment of Adolescents with Conduct Disorder. MEJDS 2025; 15 (0) :53-53
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-3320-en.html

Investigating the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Psychological Adjustment of Adolescents with Conduct Disorder

Mohsen Saeidmanesh ^*¹

, Abdollah Mayahi²

1- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran
2- MSc in Child and Adolescent Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Science and Arts University, Yazd, Iran

Abstract: (855 Views)

Abstract
Background & Objectives: Conduct disorder is a psychiatric disorder in children and adolescents that is characterized by frequent and persistent norm–breaking behavior and violation of the rights of others. Adolescents with behavioral problems are more likely to commit crimes, be sexually abused, or use drugs, which may worsen their mental health. Poor academic achievement and career failure may negatively affect the health–related quality of life of these individuals in adulthood. Psychological problems in adolescents with behavioral disorders lead to many problems in their future, and it seems necessary to follow up on their issues and treat them. Cognitive–behavioral group therapy for adolescents with conduct disorder has been less studied, and in these studies, its effect on psychological adjustment has received less attention and investigation. Since no study has investigated the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy on the psychological adjustment of adolescents with conduct disorder, this study aims to examine the efficacy of this therapy.
Methods: This study employed a quasi–experimental design with a pretest–posttest control group. The statistical population consisted of adolescents with conduct disorder who were referred to psychological and psychiatric clinics in Ahvaz City, Iran, in 2023. Among the community members, 30 qualified volunteers were included in the study; 15 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 15 to the control group. The inclusion criteria were having a conduct disorder with the approval of a psychiatrist, an age range of 14 to 18 years, not using other psychotherapy methods, and drug therapy. The exclusion criteria included absence from a treatment session and failure to complete the questionnaire during the research. All samples completed the consent form to participate in the study. The scores of the Bill Adjustment Questionnaire (Bell, 1961) were compared before and after cognitive behavioral therapy. The initial patient assessment was conducted on the first day and lasted 90 minutes. The patient's file and information, including treatments performed so far, were also completed. The treatment protocol used in this study consisted of 8 sessions of group cognitive–behavioral therapy, developed based on the treatment protocol of Amirkhanloo et al. (2022) and approved by three professors from the Psychology Department of Yazd University of Science and Arts, specializing in cognitive–behavioral therapy.
Individuals in the intervention group received 8 cognitive behavioral therapy sessions twice a week in a group setting over four weeks. However, no therapy was provided to the control group. Data analysis was done using covariance analysis in SPSS version 17. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the psychological adjustment variable and all its subscales, including adjustment at home, adjustment in health, social adjustment, emotional adjustment, and occupational adjustment, decreased significantly in adolescents with conduct disorder in the intervention group after receiving treatment compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The results regarding the effect size also indicated that 68% of the difference between the intervention group and the control group in the psychological adjustment component was due to the implementation of group cognitive behavioral therapy.
Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, eight 90–minute group cognitive–behavioral therapy sessions lead to the improvement of the psychological adjustment of adolescents with conduct disorder living in Ahvaz city. So, group cognitive–behavioral therapy can be used as a complementary treatment along with other treatment methods to treat psychological problems of adolescents with conduct disorder.

Keywords: Cognitive behavioral therapy, Psychological adjustment, Adolescents with conduct disorder

Full-Text [PDF 222 kb] (35 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Osooli M, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Conduct disorder in immigrant children and adolescents: a nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10643. [DOI]

2. Fairchild G, Hawes DJ, Frick PJ, Copeland WE, Odgers CL, Franke B, et al. Conduct disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):43. [DOI]

3. Masroor A, Patel RS, Bhimanadham NN, Raveendran S, Ahmad N, Queeneth U, et al. Conduct disorder-related hospitalization and substance use disorders in American teens. Behavioral Sciences. 2019;9(7):73. [DOI]

4. Menks WM, Fehlbaum LV, Borbás R, Sterzer P, Stadler C, Raschle NM. Eye gaze patterns and functional brain responses during emotional face processing in adolescents with conduct disorder. NeuroImage Clin. 2021;29:102519. [DOI]

5. Goulter N, McMahon RJ, Pasalich DS, Dodge KA. Indirect effects of early parenting on adult antisocial outcomes via adolescent conduct disorder symptoms and callous-unemotional traits. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020;49(6):930–42. [DOI]

6. Frick PJ, Ray JV, Thornton LC, Kahn RE. Can callous-unemotional traits enhance the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of serious conduct problems in children and adolescents? a comprehensive review. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(1):1–57. [DOI]

7. Zou W, Ding X, Wang H. Exploration of college teachers' psychological adaptation to online teaching during the covid-19 pandemic using potential profile analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0278896. [DOI]

8. Walker JG, Jackson HJ, Littlejohn GO. Models of adjustment to chronic illness: Using the example of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004;24(4):461–88. [DOI]

9. Noguchi R, Sekizawa Y, So M, Yamaguchi S, Shimizu E. Effects of five-minute internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy and simplified emotion-focused mindfulness on depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–14. [DOI]

10. Stawarz K, Preist C, Tallon D, Wiles N, Coyle D. User experience of cognitive behavioral therapy apps for depression: an analysis of app functionality and user reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e10120. [DOI]

11. Amirkhanloo A, Dousti YA, Donyavi Reza. Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy with emotional intelligence training on reducing aggression in adolescents with conduct disorder. Community Health. 2022;9(1):25–35. [Persian] [Article]

12. Qaderi N, Asghari Moghadam MA, Shoairi MR. Investigating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral game therapy on the aggression of children with conduct disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality. 2006;4(2):75–84. [Persian] [Article]

13. Matthys W, Schutter DJLG. Increasing effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for conduct problems in children and adolescents: what can we learn from neuroimaging studies? Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2021;24(3):484–99. [DOI]

14. Bell HM. The Adjustment Inventory. Stanford University Press; 1979.

15. Fathi Ashtiani A, Dastani M. Psychological tests: personality and mental health evaluation. Tehran: Besat; 2013. [Persian]

16. Lochman JE, Boxmeyer CL, Kassing FL, Powell NP, Stromeyer SL. Cognitive behavioral intervention for youth at risk for conduct problems: future directions. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(5):799–810. [DOI]

17. Rivenbark JG, Odgers CL, Caspi A, Harrington H, Hogan S, Houts RM, et al. The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018;59(6):703–10. [DOI]