Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 83 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hokmabadi M E, Zeraatkar M, Tabatabaee T S, Amirabadizadeh A, Bahmani F, Mohammadpour S. The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Based on Healthy Lifestyle on Self-Care Improvement in Patients With Heart Failure. MEJDS 2022; 12 :83-83
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1317-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Semnan University
3- birjand Azad University
4- Education Department Farhangian University
5- Department of Psychology, Torbat Jam Branch, Islamic Azad University
Abstract:   (2607 Views)

Background & Objectives: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and disability in most countries, including Iran. Reduced self–care skills in cardiac patients and their frequent hospitalizations is the main challenge. Lifestyle can refer to the interests, opinions, behaviors, and behavioral orientations of an individual, group, or culture. Self–care is a practice in which people use their knowledge, skills, and power as a source to take care of their health independently. Self–care is about self–determination and self–reliance. One of the treatment options for cardiovascular diseases is cognitive–behavioral therapy, which is provided in the form of appropriate training. Without such interventions, heart disease causes substantial economic costs and increases the duration of the disease. Accordingly, numerous side effects in various physical and psychological fields will be expected. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive–behavioral therapy based on a healthy lifestyle on self–care improvement in patients with heart failure.
Methods: The research method was quasi–experimental with a pretest–posttest and two–month follow–up design with a control group. The study population comprised patients with heart failure referred to Shafa Hospital in Kerman City, Iran, from summer 2013 to spring 2014. Considering the significance level of 0.05 and test power of 0.80, the required sample size for each experimental and control group was estimated to be 15, using G*Power software. Therefore, after coordination with Shafa Hospital authorities, 30 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were willing to cooperate were randomly selected as the final sample. They were the patients referred to that hospital after assessing the comorbidity of mental disorders using structured clinical interviews. They were then randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. The inclusion criteria for patients were as follows: having heart failure, not receiving psychotherapy from other centers at the same time, and not suffering from acute personality disorders, such as schizophrenia, obsessive–compulsive disorder, hospitalization, and treatment under the supervision of a physician. It is worth mentioning that during the treatment sessions in the experimental group, 4 patients refused to continue their study due to travel and working conditions. In the end, the sample size of the experimental group was reduced to 11 people. The experimental group underwent psychotherapy with cognitive–behavioral therapy. In contrast, the control group did not receive any treatment. The experimental group was under the administration of healthy lifestyle promotion intervention via cognitive–behavioral therapy of eight group sessions once a week. A demographic questionnaire was used to match the participants of the two groups. Variables such as age, gender, socioeconomic status, associated clinical disorders, dosage, and type of treatment were assessed using this questionnaire. Self–care was measured for all participants in three phases of pretest, posttest, and follow–up by the European Heart Failure Self–Caring Behaviors Scale (EHFScBs) (Jaarsma et al., 2009). Data analysis was performed with descriptive (mean, standard deviation, and graph) and inferential statistics (repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test) in SPSS version 19 software. The significance level of the tests was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the effects of time (p=0.001) and time *group (p=0.001) on the self–care variable were significant. Also, the cognitive–behavioral therapy based on a healthy lifestyle significantly affected the self–care of the experimental group compared to the control group (p=0.001). In addition, in the experimental group, a significant difference was observed between the average scores of the self–care variable in the pretest and posttest stages (p=0.025). However, there was no significant difference between the average scores of the mentioned variable in the posttest and follow–up stages (p=0.280), indicating the persistent effect of the intervention up to the follow–up stage.
Conclusion: According to the study findings, due to the importance of heart patients' lifestyles, the cognitive–behavioral based on a healthy lifestyle can improve the ability of self–care in heart patients.

Full-Text [PDF 722 kb]   (386 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Porth CM. Essentials of pathophysiology: concepts of altered health states. Third edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011, pp:245–6.
2. Bagheri Lankarani K, Alavian SM, Peymani P. Health in the Islamic Republic of Iran, challenges and progresses. Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran. 2013;27(1):42–9. [Persian] [Article]
3. Allahverdipour H, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Heshmati R, Hashemiparast M. Functional status, anxiety, cardiac self-efficacy, and health beliefs of patients with coronary heart disease. Health Promotion Perspectives. 2013;3(2):217–29. [Persian] [DOI]
4. Formiga F, Chivite D, Manito N, Osma V, Miravet S, Pujol R. One-year follow-up of heart failure patients after their first admission. QJM. 2004;97(2):81–6. [DOI]
5. Clark PC, Dunbar SB. Family partnership intervention: a guide for a family approach to care of patients with heart failure. AACN Clin Issues. 2003;14(4):467–76. [DOI]
6. Deaton C. Outcomes measurement. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1998;12(4):49-51. [DOI]
7. Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):239–43. [DOI]
8. Scheiner G, Boyer BA. Characteristics of basal insulin requirements by age and gender in Type-1 diabetes patients using insulin pump therapy. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2005;69(1):14–21. [DOI]
9. National Health Priority Action Council (NHPAC). National service framework for diabetes. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2006.
10. Oenema A, Brug J, Dijkstra A, de Weerdt I, de Vries H. Efficacy and use of an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention, targeting saturated fat intake, physical activity and smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2008,35(2):125–35. [DOI]
11. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action Control. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1985. pp: 11–39. [DOI]
12. Boyer BA, Paharia MI, editors. Comprehensive handbook of clinical health psychology. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons; 2008. 482 p.
13. Bennett S, Lane KA. Medication and dietary compliance beliefs in heart failure, West J NursRes, 2005;27(8):977–93. [DOI]
14. Jaarsma T, Arestedt KF, Mårtensson J, Dracup K, Strömberg A. The European heart failure self-care behavior scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009;11(1): 99–105. [DOI]
15. Barlow DH, Rapee RM, Reisner LC. Mastering stress: a lifestyle approach (A learn lifestyle program). American Health Publishing Company; 2001.
16. Mousavian L, Hassanpour Dehkordi A, Dereis F, Salehi Tali Sh. The effect of cognitive-behavioral intervention based on lifestyle modification on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients after coronary artery surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing and Midwifery. 2020;9(1):599-606. [Article]
17. Alipour A, Rezaei A, Hashemi A, Yousefpour N. The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy focused on lifestyle modification in improving vital signs and psychological well-being of coronary heart patients. Journal of Health Psychology. 2016;5(20):125-36. [Article]
18. Shojafard J, Nadrian H, Baghiani Moghadam M, Mazlumi Mahmudabad S, Sanati H, Asgar Shahi M. Effects of an educational program on self-care behaviors and its perceived benefits and barriers in patients with Heart Failure in Tehran. Journal of Payavard Salamat. 2009;2(4):43–55. [Persian] [Article]
19. Sol BGM, van der Bijl JJ, Banga JD, Visseren FLJ. Vascular risk management through nurse-led self-management programs. Journal of Vascular Nursing. 2005;23(1):20–4. [DOI]
20. Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561–87. [DOI]
21. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14. [DOI]
22. Razavi M, Fournier S, Shepard DS, Ritter G, Strickler GK, Stason WB. Effects of lifestyle modification programs on cardiac risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e114772. [DOI]
23. Holland R; Battersby j; Harvey I; Lenaghan E; Smith J; Hay L. Systematic review of multidisciplinary interventions in heart failure. Heart. 2005;91(7):899–906.‌ [DOI]
24. Riegel B, Driscoll A, Suwanno J, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Chung ML, et al. Heart failure self-care in developed and developing countries. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2009;15(6):508–16. [DOI]
25. Marks R, Allegrante JP, Lorig K. A review and synthesis of research evidence for self-efficacy-enhancing interventions for reducing chronic disability: implications for health education practice (part I). Health Promotion Practice. 2005;6(1):37–43. [DOI]
26. Stuifbergen AK, Seraphine A, Roberts G. An explanatory model of health promotion and quality of life in chronic disabling conditions. Nursing Research. 2000;49(3):122–9. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb