Volume 10 -
MEJDS (2020) 10: 155 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mousavi F S, Eskandari H, Bagheri F. Comparing the Effects of Glaser's Reality Therapy and Emotion-Focused Therapy on Relationship Quality and Marital Satisfaction in Betrayed Women. MEJDS 2020; 10 :155-155
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1339-en.html
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1339-en.html
1- Faculty of Human and Society Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2- Allameh Tabatabai University
3- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2- Allameh Tabatabai University
3- Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
Abstract: (2854 Views)
Background & Objectives: Family life is tied to numerous threats that could destroy it. One of these dangers is marital infidelity, which generates multiple problems and has diverse psychological effects on the affected individuals. One of the most significant impacts of marital infidelity is declined relationship quality and marital satisfaction; this condition could lead to the collapse of marital life and divorce if not intervened promptly. Therefore, it is required to design and select therapies to prevent the harmful effects of infidelity on families. Accordingly, this study aimed to compare the effects of Glasser's Reality Therapy (RT) and Emotion–Focused Therapy (EFT) on betrayed women.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all betrayed married women who referred to the counseling centers of the Welfare Organization of Tehran City, Iran, in 2017. The study sample included 45 individuals. In the first step, sampling was conducted by a multistage cluster sampling method. Then, the study subjects were randomly selected from 5 districts (2, 7, 11, 16, 21) out of the 22 districts of Tehran. Then, 2 counseling centers were randomly selected from each of the selected regions. Besides, 45 betrayed women were selected by random sampling method and were randomly assigned to either one of the experimental groups 1 and 2, or the control group (n=15/group). Each experimental group received 8 sessions of Glasser's RT or EFT. The research instruments included the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) (Busby et al., 1995), ENRICH Marriage Satisfaction Questionnaire (Olson et al., 1982), RT protocol (Abbasi et al., 2017), and EFT protocol (Bahrami et al., 2009). All study groups, before and after the end of the sessions and intervention, complemented the questionnaires. Finally, marital satisfaction and marital quality scores were compared. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The ANCOVA results indicated a significant difference in the scores of marital satisfaction and quality of marital relationships in both test groups, compared to the controls (p<0.001). The Eta squared value suggested that approximately 74% and 84% of the variance of the scores of quality of marital relations and marital satisfaction were respectively explained by the difference between the two provided interventions. Due to the significant difference between the posttest scores in the experimental and control groups, a two–way study of the significant difference between the three posttest scores of marital relationship quality and marital satisfaction was performed through pairwise comparisons (mean difference; primary–secondary) by Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) posthoc test. The LSD test data revealed no significant difference between the effects of Glaser's RT and EFT on the quality of marital relationships in the posttest phase (p=0.374). However, there was a significant difference between the efficacy of RT and EFT on marital satisfaction at the posttest (p<0.001).
Conclusion: EFT helps improve the damage of infidelity by alleviating attachment defects and regulating emotions. Moreover, RT provides such effects by emphasizing personal responsibility and recognizing the individual’s needs.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population of the study consisted of all betrayed married women who referred to the counseling centers of the Welfare Organization of Tehran City, Iran, in 2017. The study sample included 45 individuals. In the first step, sampling was conducted by a multistage cluster sampling method. Then, the study subjects were randomly selected from 5 districts (2, 7, 11, 16, 21) out of the 22 districts of Tehran. Then, 2 counseling centers were randomly selected from each of the selected regions. Besides, 45 betrayed women were selected by random sampling method and were randomly assigned to either one of the experimental groups 1 and 2, or the control group (n=15/group). Each experimental group received 8 sessions of Glasser's RT or EFT. The research instruments included the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) (Busby et al., 1995), ENRICH Marriage Satisfaction Questionnaire (Olson et al., 1982), RT protocol (Abbasi et al., 2017), and EFT protocol (Bahrami et al., 2009). All study groups, before and after the end of the sessions and intervention, complemented the questionnaires. Finally, marital satisfaction and marital quality scores were compared. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The ANCOVA results indicated a significant difference in the scores of marital satisfaction and quality of marital relationships in both test groups, compared to the controls (p<0.001). The Eta squared value suggested that approximately 74% and 84% of the variance of the scores of quality of marital relations and marital satisfaction were respectively explained by the difference between the two provided interventions. Due to the significant difference between the posttest scores in the experimental and control groups, a two–way study of the significant difference between the three posttest scores of marital relationship quality and marital satisfaction was performed through pairwise comparisons (mean difference; primary–secondary) by Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) posthoc test. The LSD test data revealed no significant difference between the effects of Glaser's RT and EFT on the quality of marital relationships in the posttest phase (p=0.374). However, there was a significant difference between the efficacy of RT and EFT on marital satisfaction at the posttest (p<0.001).
Conclusion: EFT helps improve the damage of infidelity by alleviating attachment defects and regulating emotions. Moreover, RT provides such effects by emphasizing personal responsibility and recognizing the individual’s needs.
Keywords: Family, Marital infidelity, Reality therapy, Emotion–Focused therapy, Marital quality, Marital satisfaction.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology
References
1. Shahyad A. The Relationship between Attachment Style, Quality of Life and Justify Extramarital Relations. Studies in Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2017;3(1/1):76–90. [Persian] [Article]
2. Tsapelas I, Fisher HE, Aron A. Infidelity: When, Where, Why. In: Cupach WR, Spitzberg BH. The Dark Side of Close Relationships II. New York : Routledge; 2011. pp: 175–96.
3. Fincham FD, May RW. Infidelity in romantic relationships. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:70–4. [DOI]
4. Ejtehadi M, Vahedi G. Barrasi Jame-shenakhti potansiel khianat dar ravabet zanashouie va avamel moaser bar an dar beyn karmandan edarat dolati va khosousi [Sociological study of the potential of betrayal in marital relations and its influential factors among public and private employees]. Iranian Sociological Association;2016;17(4):105–38. [Persian] [Article]
5. Behrad Far R, Jazayeri R, Bahrami F, Abedi MR, Etemadi O, Fatemi SM. A comparative scrutiny of the effectiveness of Emotionally-Focused Couple Therapy (EFCT) and Narrative Couple Therapy (NCT) in the marital quality and emotional, cognitive and behavioral impaired functioning of distressed couples. Journal of Family Psychology. 2016 ;3(1):3–16. [Persian] [Article]
6. Previti D, Amato PR. Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2004;21(2):217–30. [DOI]
7. Angusamy A, Kuppusamy J, Anantharaman RN, Syafiqah S. A study on marital satisfaction among Malaysian women. International Journal for Studies on Children, Women, Elderly And Disabled. 2017;1:85–89.
8. Dizjani F, Kharamin S. Reality therapy effect on marital satisfaction and women’s quality of life. Armaghane danesh. 2016;21(2):187–99. [Persian] [Article]
9. Abbasi H, Ahmadi SA, Fatehi Zadeh M, Bahrami F. The effect of Glaser’s reality therapy on personal commitment of couples. Family Pathology, Counseling and Enrichment Journal. 2016;2(1):39–53. [Persian] [Article]
10. Zarei E, Borumand R, Sadeghifard M, Najarpourian S, Askari M. Effectiveness of group counseling based on choice theory on increasing intimacy and marital satisfaction and reducing marital conflicts in married women. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2017;21(4):250–9. [Persian] [DOI]
11. Johnson SM, Greenberg LS. Differential effects of experiential and problem-solving interventions in resolving marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1985;53(2):175–84. [DOI]
12. Etemadi A, Ahmad Barabadi H. The effectiveness of emotionally focused group couple therapy on marital satisfaction in couples referred to counseling center education district 2 Mashhad. Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling. 2014;4(1):95–114. [Persian] [Article]
13. Glasser W. Fibromyalgia: Hope from a completely new perspective. Chatsworth, CA: William Glasser, Inc; 2001.
14. Greenberg L, Warwar S, Malcolm W. Emotion-focused couples therapy and the facilitation of forgiveness. J Marital Fam Ther. 2010;36(1):28–42. [DOI]
15. Babaei Gharmkhani M, Rasouli M, Davarniya R. The effect of Emotionally-Focused Couples Therapy (EFCT) on reducing marital stress of married couples. Zanko Journal of Medical Sciences. 2017;18(56):56–69. [Persian] [Article]
16. Dalgleish TL, Johnson SM, Burgess Moser M, Lafontaine M-F, Wiebe SA, Tasca GA. Predicting change in marital satisfaction throughout emotionally focused couple therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2015;41(3):276–91. [DOI]
17. Peluso PR. Infidelity: a practitioner’s guide to working with couples in crisis. New York: Routledge; 2007.
18. KeshavarzAfshar H, Etemadi A, Ahmadi K, Poor E. The comparison between effectiveness of personal constructs analysis model and emotionally-focused therapy on marital satisfaction. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014;3(4):613–41. [Persian] [Article]
19. Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct Hierechy and multimensional scale. Journal of Marital and Family therapy. 1995; 21: 289-308. [DOI]
20. Isanejad O, Ahmadi SA, Etemadi O. Effectiveness of relationship enhancement on marital quality of couples. Journal of Behavioral Science. 2010; 4(1): 9-16. [Article]
21. Olson DH, Fournier DG, Druckman JM. ENRICH: Enriching & nurturing the relationship issues, communication & happiness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1982; 15, 65- 79.
22. Johnson SM. The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy Creating Connection. Bahrami F, Azarian Z, Etemadi O, Samadi Sh. (Persian translator).Tehran: Danzheh Press; 2010, pp:257–9.
23. Akhavan Bitaghsir Z, Sanaie Zaker B, Navabinejad S, Farzad V. The effectiveness of emotional focused couple therapy on satisfaction and marital adjustment in couples. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2016;14(3):324–30. [Persian] [Article]
24. Feuerman M. Therapeutic presence in emotionally focused couples therapy. Journal of Experiential Psychotherapy. 2018;21(3):22–32.
25. Arianfar N, Etemadi O. Comparison of the Efficacy of Integrative Couple Therapy and Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy on marital intimacy injured by wife infidelity in Couples. Journal of Counseling Research. 2016;15(59):7–37. [Persian] [Article]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
