Volume 10 -                   MEJDS (2020) 10: 93 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ashori M, Rashidi A, Mortezavi-Nezhad M, Banimin G. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies Training on Psychological Problems of Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Deaf Students. MEJDS 2020; 10 :93-93
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1422-en.html
1- Department of Psychology and Education of Children with Special Needs, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan
2- Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan
Abstract:   (2266 Views)

Background & Objectives: Hearing impairment is a prevalent neurosensory condition which leads to decreased life quality, withdrawal, social activities reduction, and rejection feelings. Additionally, decreased emotion regulation in hearing–impaired children and adolescents could sometimes increase their psychological problems. It is important to plan appropriate training programs for improving depression, anxiety, and stress in hearing–impaired children and adolescents. The cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program is one of such interventions. This program pays excellent attention to psychological problems, including depression, anxiety, and stress. The cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program could decrease psychological problems in hearing–impaired students. This is because hearing–impaired children and adolescents face numerous challenges in this respect. Undoubtedly, inappropriate emotional reactions lead to psychological issues, such as depression, anxiety, and stress in deaf children and adolescents. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategies training on depression, anxiety, and stress in hearing–impaired students.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest and a control group design. The study participants were 28 female hearing–impaired students aged 16–20 years from the hearing–impaired school of Mir in Isfahan City, Iran, in the 2018–2019 academic year. The study samples were selected by convenience sampling method. They were from the middle socioeconomic class. The study participants were randomly divided into the experimental and control groups, each group consisting of 14 students. The experimental group participated in cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program for 8 sessions (two 50–min sessions weekly); however, the control group received no intervention and remained in the waiting list. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) of Lobivand and Lobivand (1995) were used for data collection. The DASS was completed by hearing–impaired students in pretest and posttest phases. In other words, the required data were collected through this scale before and after conducting the training sessions. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) was used in SPSS to analyze the achieved data. (p<0.05).
Results: Initially, the normality of variables and contingency of variance and covariance assumptions were tested. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test results suggested that all variables were normally distributed. Furthermore, Box test results confirmed the contingency of variance–covariance assumption. Accordingly, the assumptions of MANCOVA were proved and this test could be used for data analysis. The MANCOVA data revealed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of depression, anxiety, and stress in the post–test stage (p<0.001). The MANCOVA results indicated that the cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program significantly impacted depression, anxiety, and stress in the investigated students (p<0.001). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program improved depression, anxiety, and stress in hearing–impaired students. According to the Eta squared, 62%, 57%, and 60% of variations of depression, anxiety, and stress could respectively be explained by the study subjects’ participation in the cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program.
Conclusion: The cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program improved depression, anxiety, and stress in the studied hearing–impaired students. In other words, applying this training program was associated with effective and positive outcomes. This conclusion is based on the depression, anxiety, and stress score of the control group, which remained without significant improvements. Therefore, paying attention to the cognitive emotion regulation strategies training program is essential, and planning for providing training of this type of program for the children and students with hearing impairments is of particular importance.

Full-Text [PDF 541 kb]   (707 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Zaidman-Zait A, Most T, Tarrasch R, Haddad-eid E, Brand D. The Impact of Childhood Hearing Loss on the Family: Mothers’ and Fathers’ Stress and Coping Resources. DEAFED. 2016;21(1):23–33. [DOI]
2. Ashori M, Ghasemzadeh S. The effectiveness of mental immunization training on alexithymia, self-determination and life orientation of adolescents with hearing impairment. Journal of Psychological Studies. 2018;14(2):7–23. [Persian] [DOI]
3. Hallahan DP, Kauffman JM, Pullen PC. Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson Education; 2012.
4. Mahmudi F, Ashori M, Ansari Shahidi M. Comparison of perceived social support, anxiety and stress in mothers of children with cochlear implants, hearing aids and normal hearing. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2017;8(2):15–25. [Persian] [Article]
5. Negovan V, Bagana E. A comparison of relationship between self-esteem and vulnerability to depression among high school and freshmen university students. Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;30:1324–30. [DOI]
6. Cooper CE, McLanahan SS, Meadows SO, Brooks-Gunn J. Family structure transitions and maternal parenting stress. J Marriage Fam. 2009;71(3):558–74. [DOI]
7. Nurizadeh Mirabadi N, Khastari S, Shirmardi S, Bamdad S, Khosravi Farsani A. The effectiveness of emotion regulation intervention on alexithymia and cognitive emotion regulation strategies with in patients with coronary heart disease. J New Advances in Behav Sci. 2017;2(10):1–13. [Persian] [Article]
8. Schoorl J, van Rijn S, de Wied M, van Goozen S, Swaab H. Emotion regulation difficulties in boys with oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder and the relation with comorbid autism traits and attention deficit traits. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0159323. [DOI]
9. Gross JJ, Thompson RA. Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations. In: Gross JJ. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York, US: The Guilford Press; 2007. p. 3–24.
10. Wilamowska ZA, Thompson-Hollands J, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. Conceptual background, development, and preliminary data from the unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(10):882–90. [DOI]
11. Hourani L, Tueller S, Kizakevich P, Strange L, Lewis G, Weimer B, et al. Effect of stress inoculation training with relaxation breathing on perceived stress and posttraumatic stress disorder in the military: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Stress Management. 2018;25(S1):124–36. [DOI]
12. Kaufman EA, Puzia ME, Mead HK, Crowell SE, McEachern A, Beauchaine TP. Children’s emotion regulation difficulties mediate the association between maternal borderline and antisocial symptoms and youth behavior problems over 1 year. J Pers Disord. 2017;31(2):170–92. [DOI]
13. Bahaodini H, Zandekarimi G. Stress inoculation training on cognitive emotional regulation: The effect on vulnerable married female adolescents. JBBS. 2018;8(6):329–38. [DOI]
14. Moynihan JA, Chapman BP, Klorman R, Krasner MS, Duberstein PR, Brown KW, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults: effects on executive function, frontal alpha asymmetry and immune function. Neuropsychobiology. 2013;68(1):34–43. [DOI]
15. Movahedi M, Khaleghipour S, Vahabi Homabadi J. The effectiveness of process management strategies of excitement on the cognitive emotion regulation of adolescent girls with oppositional defiant disorder. Scientific Research Quarterly of Woman and Culture. 2018;9(34):111–28. [Persian] [Article]
16. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003;42(Pt 2):111–31. [DOI]
17. Castiglione A, Benatti A, Velardita C, Favaro D, Padoan E, Severi D, et al. Aging, cognitive decline and hearing loss: effects of auditory rehabilitation and training with hearing aids and cochlear implants on cognitive function and depression among older adults. Audiol Neurootol. 2016;21 Suppl 1:21–8. [DOI]
18. Lin C-S, Lin Y-S, Liu C-F, Weng S-F, Lin C, Lin B-S. Increased risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with depressive disorders: population-based cohort study. J Laryngol Otol. 2016;130(1):42–9. [DOI]
19. Adigun OT. Depression and Individuals with Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review. Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2017;7(5):1–6. [DOI]
20. Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment. 1998;10(2):176–81. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb