تعطیلات نوروز ۱۴۰۴-ضمن آرزوی قبولی طاعات و عبادات و همچنین تبریک فرارسیدن بهار و شروع سال جدید، به اطلاع می‌رساند این نشریه از تاریخ ۲۸ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۳ لغایت ۱۵ فروردین ۱۴۰۴ تعطیل می باشد.

Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 62 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ali Mohammadi M, Sharifi Daramadi P, Noohi S. Effectiveness of Group Logotherapy Training on Sedentary Behavior Among Female Patients With Metabolic Syndrome. MEJDS 2022; 12 :62-62
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1656-en.html
1- Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch
Abstract:   (2440 Views)

Background & Objectives: Metabolic syndrome is characterized by high blood pressure, glucose intolerance, high triglycerides, and high–density lipoprotein. The syndrome is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Metabolic syndrome is associated with sedentary behaviors and is one of the most common diseases, especially among women. Overweight and obesity are the major determinants of metabolic syndrome. Treatment options include lifestyle modification, psychotherapy, and drug therapy. At present, no surgical intervention has been accepted for metabolic syndrome. Logotherapy, among other methods, is the one that provides an excellent philosophical and theoretical field for teamwork. This therapy can be used for intervention purposes in the best situation. Since logotherapy affects the quality of life and public health, we aimed to find whether logotherapy is effective in the reduction of sedentary behavior among female patients with metabolic syndrome.
Methods: This quasi–experimental study has a pretest–posttest and a two–month follow–up design with a control group. The study's statistical population included all women aged 25–60 years with metabolic syndrome referring to Semnan clinics, Semnan City, Iran. The study was conducted from March to September 2018. The study sample consisted of 30 women selected through the available sampling method. They were matched and randomly divided into the experimental and control groups (each group with 15 persons). The inclusion criteria were as follows: having a minimum diploma and maximum bachelor's degree, being 25 to 60 years old, having been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome based on tests and the doctor's opinion in the patient's medical file, being able to answer questions, not attending other educational and therapeutic classes. The exclusion criteria were as follows: having disabilities and diseases related to motor behaviors, having physiological problems of arthritic joints and obesity, attending physiotherapy, and participating in sports clubs. For the experimental group, logotherapy training was provided in ten 90–min sessions twice a week. The control group did not receive any intervention. The data collection tool in the pretest, posttest, and follow–up for two groups was the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (Rosenberg et al., 2010). The obtained data were analyzed with descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (repeated measures analysis of variance, Bonferroni post hoc test, two–sample independent t test, and the Chi–square test) in SPSS software version 22. The significance level of the tests was set at 0.05.
Results: Results showed a significant difference between the groups regarding the intra–group, inter–group, and time effect comparisons (p=0.001). The experimental and control groups, regardless of the test time (the cumulative mean scores of the posttest and follow–up), had a significant difference regarding the sedentary behavior at the beginning and the end of the week (p=0.001). Also, the mean posttest scores of the two groups were not significantly different from the mean follow–up test scores of both groups (the cumulative mean posttest scores of the two groups with their cumulative mean follow–up scores) in the sedentary behaviors at the beginning of the week (p=0.425) and the end of the week (p=0.302). There were significant differences between the two groups in the posttest (p=0.019) and follow–up (p=0.019) regarding the sedentary behavior at the beginning of the week. Also, a significant difference was observed between the two groups in the posttest (p=0.009) and follow–up (p=0.001) regarding the sedentary behavior at the end of the week. Besides, in the experimental group, comparing the posttest with the follow–up scores regarding the sedentary behavior at the beginning of the week (p=0.381) and the end of the week (p=0.476) showed that the follow–up scores were not significantly different from the posttest scores, indicating the sustained effect of the intervention up to the follow–up phase.
Conclusion: Based on the results, logotherapy can reduce sedentary behavior by creating a purpose and meaning for female patients with metabolic syndrome. Therefore, this intervention is recommended for people with sedentary behavior.

Full-Text [PDF 456 kb]   (316 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. Mahjoub S, Haji Ahmadi M, Faramarzi M, Ghorbani H, Moazezi Z. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the Iranian Committee of Obesity and ATP III criteria in Babol, North of Iran. Caspian J Intern Med. 2012;3(2):410–6.
2. Maleki F, Sayehmiri F, Kiani F, Sayehmiri K, Nasiri S. Metabolic syndrome prevalence in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2014;18(4):242–50. [Persian]
3. Sharghi S. Metabolic syndrome and obesity. Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism. 2013;12(5):399–412. [Persian] [Article]
4. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13. [DOI]
5. van der Ploeg HP, Hillsdon M. Is sedentary behaviour just physical inactivity by another name? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017;14(1):142. [DOI]
6. Jakes RW, Day NE, Khaw K-T, Luben R, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolk population-based study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(9):1089–96. [DOI]
7. Teychenne M, Costigan SA, Parker K. The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:513. [DOI]
8. Indelicato L, Dauriz M, Bacchi E, Donà S, Santi L, Negri C, et al. Sex differences in the association of psychological status with measures of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in adults with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(6):627–35. [DOI]
9. Salem Z, Shahabinejad M, Sadeghi T, Aghamohammad Hasani P, Sheikh Fathollahi M. Correlation between BMI (Body Mass Index) and psychiatric problems according to the demographic characteristics among nursing/midwifery students of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences in 2015. J Rafsanjan Uni Med Sci. 2016;15(3):223–34. [Persian] [Article]
10. Biddle S. Physical activity and mental health: evidence is growing. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(2):176–7. [DOI]
11. Saffarinia M, Dortaj A. Effect of group logotherapy on life expectancy and mental and social wellbeing of the female elderly residents of nursing homes in Dubai. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2018;12(4):482–93. [Persian] [DOI]
12. Esalati P, Arab A, Mehdinezhad V. Effectiveness of frankl's logotherapy on health (decreasing addiction potential and increasing psychological well-being) of students with depression. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2019;7(1):84–92. [Persian] [DOI]
13. Pelikánova T. Treatment of diabetes in metabolic syndrome. Vnitr Lek. 2009 Aug;55(7–8):637–45. [Czech]
14. Boylan JM, Ryff CD. Psychological well-being and metabolic syndrome: findings from the midlife in the United States national sample. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):548–58. [DOI]
15. Kang KA, Im JI, Kim HS, Kim SJ, Song MK, Sim S, et al. The effect of logotherapy on the suffering, finding meaning, and spiritual well-being of adolescents with terminal cancer. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing. 2009;15(2):136–44. [DOI]
16. Zanjiran S, Borjali A, Kraskian A. Effect of group Logotherapy education on quality of life and general health in women of sanatorium. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;21(127):39–51. [Persian] [Article]
17. Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Educational research: an introduction. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
18. Rosenberg DE, Norman GJ, Wagner N, Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF. Reliability and validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7(6):697–705. [DOI]
19. Hajiazizi AH, Bahmani B, Mahdi N, Manzari Tavakoli V, Barshan A. Effectiveness of group logotherapy on death anxiety and life expectancy of the elderly living in boarding houses in Kerman. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2017;12(2):220–31. [Persian] [DOI]
20. Breitbart W, editor. Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy in the Cancer Setting: finding meaning and hope in the face of suffering. New York, US: Oxford University Press; 2017.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb