Volume 11 - Articles-1400                   MEJDS (2021) 11: 4 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Matin Khah F, Amiri S, Mazaheri M A, Ghanbari S. The Effects of Mother-Child Discourse in Externalizing Problems, the Negative Mental Representation of Mother and Child, and the Narrative Coherence of Children With Externalizing Problems. MEJDS 2021; 11 :4-4
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1793-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, University of Isfahan
2- Department of Psychology, Shaheed Beheshti University
Abstract:   (1949 Views)
Background & Objectives: Externalizing problems are associated with numerous unpleasant consequences, i.e., among the most frequent reasons for children’s referral to mental healthcare centers. Various factors were proposed respecting this issue’s etiology, ranging from genetic to environmental and familial features. However, mother-child interactions, and especially the mother-child discourse during preschool can impact the formation or reduction of numerous problems in such children. As per different theories, the components of the mother-child discourse are related to the child’s mental representations of attachment as well as the child’s narrative coherence ability. However, few interventions focusing on children’s behavioral problems have particularly addressed the significance of mother-child discourse. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of a formulated intervention based on the mother-child discourse model on reducing externalizing problems by reducing negative mental representations and increasing the narrative coherence of children with externalizing problems.
Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest-follow-up and a control group design. The statistical population of the study consisted of 4- to 6-year-old children with externalizing problems in the kindergartens of the Welfare Organization of Tehran City, Iran, and their mothers in 2018. Twenty-six mother-child couples whose children had externalizing problems were selected using the convenience sampling method. After homogenization based on demographic variables (children’s age & gender, and the educational level & occupation of the mothers), they were randomly divided into two groups; 15 couples were assigned per group. At the end of the study, 3 couples in the experimental group (n=12 couples( and 4 couples in the control group )n=11 couples( were excluded. The inclusion criteria of the research for the mothers included having a diploma and the lack of anxiety disorders and depression based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5); for children, the same was an age range of 4 to 6 years, receiving a score within the range of externalizing problems (65-69) according to the Child Behavior Checklist (CBC; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001), and not taking psychiatric drugs. Then, the children were assessed by the CBC concerning externalizing problems. Moreover, the MacArthur Story Stem Battery (Emde et al., 2003) was applied to examine the negative mental representations of attachment and narrative coherence in them. Furthermore, the intervention sessions were entitled "intervention based on mother-child discourse", i.e., a short-term approach to reduce externalizing problems in children. This package was prepared under the supervision of child psychologists; the content validity method was used to validate the package. The study was conducted in seven 2-hour weekly sessions with 4 sessions for mothers and 3 sessions for the mothers and children. Repeated-measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni posthoc test were used for data analysis in SPSS at the significance level of 0.05.
Results: The repeated-measures ANOVA data revealed that the main effect of time was significant on externalizing problems (p<0.001), the negative mental representation of attachment to the mother (p<0.001), and the child’s narrative coherence (p=0.020). Moreover, the main effect of intergroup was significant on externalizing problems (p=0.040) and the negative mental representation of attachment to the mother (p<0.001). Accordingly, the mean scores of the experimental and control groups were significantly different; however, children's narrative coherence was not significantly different between the two groups, suggesting that the change over time was the same for both study groups. Besides, the intervention for externalizing problems (F1.22=116.89, p<0.001, Ƞ=0.84), the negative mental representation of attachment to the mother (F1.22=165.00, p<0.001, Ƞ=0.82), and the child’s narrative coherence (F1.22=5.90, p<0.020, Ƞ=0.21) were significant. In terms of externalizing problems, the difference between pretest and posttest stages (p<0.001), and pretest and follow-up steps (p<0.001) was significant; however, there was no significant difference between the posttest and follow-up stages, indicating the persistence of the intervention (p=0.460). Respecting negative mental representation, the difference between pretest and posttest stages (p<0.001) and pretest and follow-up steps (p<0.001) was significant; however, there was no significant difference between the posttest and follow-up stages, reflecting the persistence of the intervention effects (p=0.170). There was a significant difference between pretest and posttest (p=0.010) and pretest and follow-up stages (p=0.040) in narrative coherence; however, there was no significant difference between the posttest and follow-up stages, demonstrating the persistence of the intervention effects (p=0.560).
Conclusion: According to the present research results, the intervention based on the mother-child discourse model was useful for reducing externalizing problems, reducing negative mental representations, and increasing the narrative coherence of children with externalizing problems.
Full-Text [PDF 517 kb]   (250 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References
1. 1. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Barkley R, Biederman J, Conners CK, Faraone SV, et al. Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder persistence into adulthood: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(11):1442–51. [DOI]
2. 2. Nock MK, Photos V. Parent motivation to participate in treatment: assessment and prediction of subsequent participation. J Child Fam Stud. 2006;15(3):333–46. [DOI]
3. 3. O’Dell SM, Marx JM, Parikh M. Externalizing disorders. In: Forman SG, Shahidullah JD, editors. Handbook of pediatric behavioral healthcare: an interdisciplinary collaborative approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp: 139–53. [DOI]
4. 4. Sharp C, Pane H, Ha C, Venta A, Patel AB, Sturek J, et al. Theory of mind and emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents with borderline traits. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(6):563–573. [DOI]
5. 5. Eisenbarth H, Godinez D, du Pont A, Corley RP, Stallings MC, Rhee SH. The influence of stressful life events, psychopathy, and their interaction on internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. Psychiatry Res. 2019;272:438–46. [DOI]
6. 6. Ponting C, Lee SS, Escovar EL, Rapp AM, Camacho A, Calderon I, et al. Family factors mediate discrimination related stress and externalizing symptoms in rural Latino adolescents. J Adolesc. 2018;69:11–21. [DOI]
7. 7. Ontai LL, Thompson RA. Attachment, parent-child discourse and theory-of-mind development. Social Development. 2008;17(1):47–60. [DOI]
8. 8. Etzion-Carasso A, Oppenheim D. Open mother-pre-schooler communication: relations with early secure attachment. Attach Hum Dev. 2000;2(3):347–70. [DOI]
9. 9. Oppenheim D, Koren-Karie N, Sagi-Schwartz A. Emotion dialogues between mothers and children at 4.5 and 7.5 years: relations with children’s attachment at 1 year. Child Dev. 2007;78(1):38–52. [DOI]
10. 10. Bretherton I, Munholland KA. Internal working models in attachment relationships: Elaborating a central construct in attachment theory. In: Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2008. pp: 102–27.
11. 11. MatinKhah F, Amiri S, Mazaheri MA, Ghanbari S. The mental representation of attachment and narrative coherence in children with and without externalizing disorders. Early Child Development and Care. 2020;190(16):2543–50. [DOI]
12. 12. Oppenheim D. Child, parent, and parent-child emotion narratives: implications for developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18(3):771–90. [DOI]
13. 13. Clyman, R. B. Portrayals in maltreated children’s play narratives: Representations or emotion regulation? In: Emde RN, Wolf DP, Oppenheim D. Revealing the inner worlds of young children: the macarthur story stem battery and parent-child narratives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003. pp:201–21.
14. 14. Minze LC, McDonald R, Rosentraub EL, Jouriles EN. Making sense of family conflict: intimate partner violence and preschoolers’ externalizing problems. J Fam Psychol. 2010;24(1):5–11. [DOI]
15. 15. Shields A, Ryan RM, Cicchetti D. Narrative representations of caregivers and emotion dysregulation as predictors of maltreated children’s rejection by peers. Dev Psychol. 2001;37(3):321–37. [DOI]
16. 16. Hill J, Fonagy P, Lancaster G, Broyden N. Aggression and intentionality in narrative responses to conflict and distress story stems: an investigation of boys with disruptive behaviour problems. Attach Hum Dev. 2007;9(3):223–37. [DOI]
17. 17. Williams KL. the effects of narrative coherence & mindfulness on parenting style & child behavior [Ph.D dissertations in Psychology]. [Knoxville, US]: University of Tennessee; 2010.
18. 18. Nawaz S, Lewis C. Mother–child conversation and social understanding in Pakistan. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2018;42(5):496–505. [DOI]
19. 19. Waters TEA, Camia C, Facompré CR, Fivush R. A meta-analytic examination of maternal reminiscing style: Elaboration, gender, and children’s cognitive development. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(11):1082–102. [DOI]
20. 20. Fivush R, Marin K, McWilliams K, Bohanek JG. Family reminiscing style: parent gender and emotional focus in relation to child well-being. J Cogn Dev. 2009;10(3):210–35. [DOI]
21. 21. Farrant BM, Maybery MT, Fletcher J. Maternal attachment status, mother-child emotion talk, emotion understanding, and child conduct problems. Child Development Research. 2013;2013:1–9. [DOI]
22. 22. Fivush R, Haden CA, Reese E. Elaborating on elaborations: role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Dev. 2006;77(6):1568–88. [DOI]
23. 23. Mason AE, Adler JM, Puterman E, Lakmazaheri A, Brucker M, Aschbacher K, et al. Stress resilience: Narrative identity may buffer the longitudinal effects of chronic caregiving stress on mental health and telomere shortening. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;77:101–9. [DOI]
24. 24. Krupa M, Boominathan P, Sebastian S, Venkat Ramanan P. Child-directed communication behaviours during mother-child interaction in children with autism spectrum disorder and typically developing children in south India. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2019;67:101423. [DOI]
25. 25. Van Bergen P, Salmon K, Dadds MR. Coaching mothers of typical and conduct problem children in elaborative parent-child reminiscing: Influences of a randomized controlled trial on reminiscing behaviour and everyday talk preferences. Behav Res Ther. 2018;111:9–18. [DOI]
26. 26. Salmon K, Dadds MR, Allen J, Hawes DJ. Can emotional language skills be taught during parent training for conduct problem children? Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2009;40(4):485–98. [DOI]
27. 27. Reese E, Newcombe R. Training mothers in elaborative reminiscing enhances children’s autobiographical memory and narrative. Child Dev. 2007;78(4):1153–70. [DOI]
28. 28. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT; Research Center for Children, Youth & Families; 2001.
29. 29. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. pp:133–7
30. 30. Seyed Mousavi PS, Nouri Moghadam S. Attachment and developmental outcomes: the role of mental representations in predicting internalizing and externalizing problems in preschool children. Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2015;12(47):251–263. [Persian] [Article]
31. 31. Emde RN, Wolf D, Oppenheim D. Revealing the inner worlds of young children: the MacArthur story stem battery and parent-child narratives. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
32. 32. Buchsbaum HK, Emde RN. Play narratives in 36-month-old children. Early moral development and family relationships. Psychoanal Study Child. 1990;45:129–55. [DOI]
33. 33. Oppenheim D, Goldsmith D, Koren-Karie N. Maternal insightfulness and preschoolers’ emotion and behavior problems: reciprocal influences in a therapeutic preschool program. Infant Ment Health J.2004; 25(4): 352–367. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb