Volume 12 - Articles-1401                   MEJDS (2022) 12: 221 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Vahid R, Azemodeh M, Tabatabaei S M, Alivandi Vafa M. The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Training of Progressive Cognition on Audio-Visual Working Memory in Children Aged 8-12 Years With Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder. MEJDS 2022; 12 :221-221
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-1828-en.html
1- PhD Student in General Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3- Department of Physiology, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract:   (2552 Views)

Background & Objectives: Attention–deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by three main characteristics: attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder, and impulsivity. It is one of the most common neurobehavioral disorders in childhood, affecting a large part of the population. People with ADHD have problems with executive functions. Active memory is one of the most important executable functions. Nowadays active memory is considered one of the important subjects in neuroscience and has attracted the attention of many researchers. Therefore, recent research has focused more on working memory as one of the memory constructs. The aim of this study was the investigation of the effectiveness of computer–based training of progressive cognition on audio–visual working memory in children 8–12 years old with ADHD.

Methods: The present study is a pilot study with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The statistical population was all boys and girls 8 to 12 years old with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder living in Tabriz City, Iran, in 2019. To select the sample, one district multi–stage cluster random sampling was selected from the educational districts of Tabriz City, and then three schools were randomly selected from the primary schools of this area using the Child Symptom Inventory (CSI–4) (Gadow & Sprafkin, 1994) run by one of the researchers, children were screened for ADHD symptoms. These students were subsequently diagnosed according to the diagnosis of a child and adolescent psychiatrist. Thirty children with ADHD were screened and diagnosed according to the psychiatrist's choice (targeted or criterion–based) and were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. In addition, simple random sampling was used to select the research samples in both groups (experimental and control). The inclusion criteria for the experimental group included having ADHD, willingness to participate in the study, having moderate and higher intelligence, and lacking other disorders. The exclusion criteria included losing more than one intervention session, co–participation in other intervention programs, and no satisfaction with continuing study co–operation. The experimental group was trained in the computer–based Wechsler Working Memory Test– III (1997) using "working memory improvement software" and "my mind software" for ten 45–minute sessions, two sessions a week, individually. At the end of the intervention, two training sessions were held for the control group to observe ethics. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics indicators (graph, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (multivariate covariance analysis test) in SPSS version 22 software.
Results: The results showed that the computer–based training of progressive cognition on audio working memory (p<0.001) and visual working memory (p<0.001) in children with ADHD had a positive and significant effect on working memory. Based on the eta square, changes in each of the variables of auditory memory (0.856) and visual memory (0.660) are explained according to the intervention of computer–based progressive cognitive training.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, advanced computer–based cognitive training is an effective way to improve the performance of visual/ auditory active memory in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 

Full-Text [PDF 458 kb]   (320 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. Miller M, Hinshaw SP. Does childhood executive function predict adolescent functional outcomes in girls with ADHD? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38(3):315–26. [DOI]
3. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4(10):829–39. [DOI]
4. Brown TE. Executive functions and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: implications of two conflicting views. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2006;53(1):35–46. [DOI]
5. Goldstein S. The Effect of computer games on the sustained attention and active memory of elementary school students’ attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Medical Journal. 2002;311-21.
6. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA. 2006;296(23):2805–14. [DOI]
7. Olesen PJ, Westerberg H, Klingberg T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(1):75–9. [DOI]
8. Azami S, Moqaddas A, Sohrabi F. A comparison of the effect of computer-assisted cognitive remediation (CACR) and psycho-stimulant drugs on response inhibition and sustained attention of children with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychology of Exceptional Individuals. 2013;3(11):21–39. [Persian] [Article]
9. Asefi M, Nejati V, Sharifi M. The effect of cognitive rehabilitation on the improvement of language skills in 9-12 years old children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research. 2017;4(4):89–96. [Persian] [DOI]
10. Caplan B, Bogner J, Brenner L, Arciniegas D, Treble-Barna A, Sohlberg MM, et al. Cognitive intervention for attention and executive function impairments in children with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(6):407–18. [DOI]
11. Gadow KD, Sprafkin J. Child symptom inventory 4: screening and norms manual. Checkmate Plus; 1994.
12. Delavar A. Mabani nazari va elmi pazhoohesh dar oloum ensani va ejtemaie [Theoretical and practical foundations of research in the humanities and social sciences]: Tehran: Roshd Pub; 2017. [Persian]
13. Mohammad Esmaeel E. Adaptation and Standardization of Child Symptom Inventory-4 (CSI-4). Journal of Exceptional Children. 2007;7(1):79–96. [Persian] [Article]
14. Wechsler D. Psychological corporation. WAIS-III: Wechsler adult intelligence scale. San Antonio, Tex.: Psychological Corp; 1997.
15. Gathercole SE, Pickering SJ, Knight C, Stegmann Z. Working memory skills and educational attainment: evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2004;18(1):1–16. [DOI]
16. Elahi T, Azad-Fallah P, Fathi-Ashtiani A, Poorhosein R. Role of working memory in mental addition of preschool children. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2010;3(4):271–7. [Persian]
17. Asgharinejad Baluchi P. Asarbakhshi amoozesh shenakhti bar tavajoh paydar va hafezeh fa’al koodakan mobtala be naghse tavajoh [Effectiveness of cognitive training on sustained attention and working memory in children with attention deficit] [Thesis for M.A]. [Tabriz, Iran]: Faculty of Educational science and psychology, University of Tabriz; 2016. [Persian]
18. Sonuga-Barke E, Brandeis D, Holtmann M, Cortese S. Computer-based cognitive training for ADHD: a review of current evidence. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2014;23(4):807–24. [DOI]
19. Shalev L, Tsal Y, Mevorach C. Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: effective direct intervention for children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychol. 2007;13(4):382–8. [DOI]
20. Behrooz Sarcheshme S, Ashori M, Ansari Shahidi M. the effect of cognitive training on the attention rate and working memory in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2017;8(1):6–15. [Persian] [Article]
21. Isanejad Bushehri S, Dadashpur Ahangar M, Salmabadi H, Ashoori J, Dashtbozorgi Z. The effect of computer games on sustain attention and working memory in elementary boy students with attention deficit / hyperactivity disorders. Med J Mashhad Uni Med Sci. 2016;59(5):311–21. [Persian] [DOI]
22. Ke F. An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: a case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education. 2014;73:26–39. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb