The Causal Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Academic Burnout of University Students Mediated by Academic Buoyancy

Dorostkar Moghaddam, Hossein; Dortaj, Fariborz; Farrokhi, Nourali

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 51 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Dorostkar Moghaddam H, Dortaj F, Farrokhi N. The Causal Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Academic Burnout of University Students Mediated by Academic Buoyancy. MEJDS 2022; 12 :51-51
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2045-en.html

The Causal Relationship Between Attachment Styles and Academic Burnout of University Students Mediated by Academic Buoyancy

Hossein Dorostkar Moghaddam¹

, Fariborz Dortaj ^*²

, Nourali Farrokhi²

1- Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Faculty of Psychology and Education, Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract: (1003 Views)

Background & Objectives: One of the common problems in Iran's higher education is the low level of motivation and increased academic burnout among students. Academic burnout has adverse effects on students' health and learning process. It affects students' interest in continuing their education and is an essential factor in understanding students' different behaviors, such as their academic performance. Academic burnout is a feeling of tiredness due to the demands and requirements of education, having a pessimistic and uninterested feeling about the content and assignments, and a feeling of poor personal progress in academic matters. Given that academic burnout is a complex phenomenon and is affected by several factors, it seems necessary to develop a causal model to determine the role of the academic burnout factors. In addition, burnout in students leads to their inability to do academic and non-academic work. The present research aimed to find the causal relationship between attachment styles and academic burnout mediated by academic buoyancy in university students.
Methods: The research uses a structural equation modeling technique. The study’s statistical population included all the undergrauate students of Quchan Islamic Azad University in the 2016-2017 academic year. The study participants comprised 403 students and were selected by stratified sampling method. The inclusion criteria were satisfaction and interest in participating in the research and being an undergraduate student. The exclusion criterion was not completing all questionnaires. The research measuring instruments were the Revised Adult Attachment Scale (Collins, 1996), Maslach Academic Burnout Inventory (Schaufeli et al., 2002), and Academic Buoyancy Questionnaire (Dehghanizade & Hosseinchari, 2012). The collected data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. In the descriptive statistics, the mean indices and standard deviation of the research variables were calculated. In the inferential statistics, the obtained data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling in SPSS (Version 21) and LISREL (Version 8.8) software. The significance level of the tests was α =0.01.
Results: The results showed that among the attachment styles, only the secure attachment style had a significant positive direct effects on academic burnout (β=0.22, p<0.001) and on academic buoyancy (β =0.32, p<0.001). Also, anxious attachment style had a significant negative direct effect on academic buoyancy (β=-0.22, p<0.001). The results showed that academic buoyancy had no significant effect on academic burnout (β=0.08, p=0.098), and none of the attachment styles had an indirect effect on academic burnout mediated by academic buoyancy (p>0.01). To evaluate the goodness of the model fit, we examined the goodness indicators. The fit indices of the fitted conceptual model were CFI=0.90 and RMSEA=0.074, indicating that the model has a good fit.
Conclusion: Based on the research findings, secure attachment style control the students' academic burnout. Also, secure and anxious attachment styles affect academic buoyancy. Therefore, by being aware of the variables affecting academic burnout, preventive measures can be taken to reduce student academic burnout.

Keywords: Attachment styles, Academic burnout, Academic buoyancy, Structural equation modeling, Students

Full-Text [PDF 704 kb] (478 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Psychology

References

1. Salmela-Aro K, Savolainen H, Holopainen L. Depressive symptoms and school burnout during adolescence: evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal studies. J Youth Adolescence. 2009;38(10):1316–27. [DOI]

2. Sharifshad F, Arsang Jang S, Kheyrollahi F. Prevalence of academic burnout and its related factors among medical student in Qom, Iran. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2017;11(2):77–86. [Persian] [Article]

3. Neumann Y, Finaly-Neumann E, Reichel A. Determinants and consequences of students' burnout in universities. J Higher Educ. 1990;61(1):20. [DOI]

4. Salmela-Aro K, Kiuru N, Leskinen E, Nurmi JE. School Burnout Inventory (SBI): reliability and validity. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2009;25(1):48–57. [DOI]

5. IsHak W, Nikravesh R, Lederer S, Perry R, Ogunyemi D, Bernstein C. Burnout in medical students: a systematic review. Clin Teach. 2013;10(4):242–5. [DOI]

6. May RW, Seibert GS, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA, Fincham FD. Physiology of school burnout in medical students: Hemodynamic and autonomic functioning. Burnout Research. 2016;3(3):63–8. [DOI]

7. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: vol.3: loss: sadness and depression. Vintage/Ebury (A Division of Random House Group); 1980.

8. Goodwin I. The relevance of attachment theory to the philosophy, organization, and practice of adult mental health care. Clin Psychol Rev. 2003;23(1):35–56. [DOI]

9. Babakhani N. The relationship between the big-five model of personality, self- regulated learning strategies and academic Performance of Islamic Azad University students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;116:3542–7. [Persian] [DOI]

10. Pines AM. Adult attachment styles and their relationship to burnout: a preliminary, cross-cultural investigation. Work & Stress. 2004;18(1):66–80. [DOI]

11. Taylor RD. Demanding kin relations, adjustment problems and academic achievement and engagement among low-income, African American adolescents. J Child Fam Stud. 2018;27(3):707–16. [DOI]

12. Rahimi M, Zarei E. The role of adult attachment dimensions in academic buoyancy with the mediation of coping self-efficacy and perfectionism dimensions. Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2016;3(12):59–70. [Persian] [Article]

13. Shaikholeslami R, Taheri Zh. Causal explanation of academic buoyancy based on parental and peer attachment, and cognitive emotion regulation. Psychological Methods and Models. 2018;8(29):1–22. [Persian] [Article]

14. Picado L, Pinto AM, Da Silva AL. The functional content of the early maladaptive schemas in the explanation of burnout and engagement. Int Educ Res J. 2017;3(10):34–35.

15. Komaei A, Asgari P, Heidari A, Naderi F, Makvandi B. Causal relationship between achievement goals and academic performance through the mediation of academic buoyancy in female students. Journal of Research in Educational Systems. 2020;14(48):109–25. [Persian] [Article]

16. Yarahmadi Y, Ebrahimibakht H, Asadzadeh H, Ahmadian H. The effectiveness of academic buoyancy training program on students' academic performance, academic engagement, and academic buoyancy. Research in Teaching. 2018;6(2):163–82. [Persian] [Article]

17. Putwain DW, Connors L, Symes W, Douglas-Osborn E. Is academic buoyancy anything more than adaptive coping? Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012;25(3):349–58. [DOI]

18. Martin AJ, Marsh HW. Academic buoyancy: towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience. J Sch Psychol. 2008;46(1):53–83. [DOI]

19. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009.

20. Collins NL. Working models of attachment: implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(4):810–32. [DOI]

21. Zibakerdar M. Barrasiye vizhegi haye ravan sanjiye porseshnameye delbastegi bozorgsalan Collins va Reed va rabetey an ba panj amele shakhsiati NEO-FFI-R [Evaluation of psychometric properties of Collins and Reed Adult Attachment Questionnaire and its relationship with five personality factors NEO-FFI-R] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch; 2013. [Persian]

22. Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2002;33(5):464–81. [DOI]

23. Rostami Z, Abedi MR, Schuffli VB. Standardization of Maslash burnout inventory among female students at university of Isfahan. New Educational Approaches. 2011;6(1):21–38. [Persian] [Article]

24. Dehghanizade M, Hosseinchari M. Sarzendegi tahsili va edrak az olgouye ertebati khanevade; naghshe vasete'ei khod karamadi [Academic vitality and perception of family communication pattern; The mediating role of self-efficacy]. Journal of Education and Learning Studies. 2012;4(2):21–47. [Persian] [DOI]

25. Kline RB. Principles & practice of structural equation modeling. Third edition. New York: The Guilford Press; 2010.

26. Hajhosseini M, Hedayati E, Gholamali Lavasani M. The structural pattern of relationship between attachment styles and academic buoyancy: the mediating role of hope. Educational Psychology. 2021;17(59):1–22. [Persian] [Article]

27. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Boosting attachment security to promote mental health, prosocial values, and inter-group tolerance. Psychological Inquiry. 2007;18(3):139–56. [DOI]

28. Ainsworth, M, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall SN. Patterns of attachment: a psychological study of the strange situation. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis group Psychology Press; 2014.

29. Mikulincer M, Sheffi E. Adult attachment style and cognitive reactions to positive affect: a test of mental categorization and creative problem solving. Motiv Emot. 2000;24(3):149–74. [DOI]