The Effectiveness of the Unified Protocol for Trans Diagnostic Treatment on Anhedonia and Emotional Expression in Children of Divorce of Bandar Abbas City, Iran

Soleymani, Saeid; Amirfakhraei, Azita; Keramati, Keramat; Samavi, Abdolvahab

Volume 12 - Articles-1401 MEJDS (2022) 12: 38 | Back to browse issues page

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Soleymani S, Amirfakhraei A, Keramati K, Samavi A. The Effectiveness of the Unified Protocol for Trans Diagnostic Treatment on Anhedonia and Emotional Expression in Children of Divorce of Bandar Abbas City, Iran. MEJDS 2022; 12 :38-38
URL: http://jdisabilstud.org/article-1-2096-en.html

The Effectiveness of the Unified Protocol for Trans Diagnostic Treatment on Anhedonia and Emotional Expression in Children of Divorce of Bandar Abbas City, Iran

Saeid Soleymani¹

, Azita Amirfakhraei ^*¹

, Keramat Keramati²

, Abdolvahab Samavi³

1- Department of Psychology, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University
2- Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti Pardis, Farhangian University
3- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities Sciences, Hormozgan University

Abstract: (1532 Views)

Background & Objectives: Divorce causes many problems for children and increases anhedonia and decreases emotional expression in them. Anhedonia means a decrease in the desire to experience a pleasure. It is one of the main components of depression disorder and reduces the ability or desire of people to participate in enjoyable and lovable activities. Emotional experience means expressing emotion regardless of its value (positive or negative) and method (verbal, physical or facial). The unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment is one of the effective treatment methods for emotional disorders that occur due to the limitation of cognitive behavioral therapies in the treatment of some disorders. Unified trans diagnostic treatment emphasizes the role of emotional regulation as the main cognitive and behavioral processes in emotional disorders and has an effective role in improving psychological characteristics, especially emotion–related characteristics. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the effectiveness of a unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment of anhedonia and emotional expression in the children of divorce living in Bandar Abbas City, Iran.
Methods: This research is a quasi–experimental study with a pretest–posttest design with a control group. The research population was children of divorce referring to the psychological service clinics of Bandar Abbas City in 2019. The sample size was calculated at 34 children, which were selected by the available sampling method and randomly divided into two equal groups of experimental and control. The inclusion criteria of divorced children in the study included being 13 to 18 years of age, at least six and at most twelve months passed after formal parental divorce, living with one parent, no history of receiving psychological treatment, absence of other psychological disorders at the same time and not taking psychiatric medication. The exclusion criteria were cancellation of study continuation and absence of more than one session from the intervention. The experimental group underwent the unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment for ten 70–min sessions (one session per week), and the control group did not receive any training. The research instruments in the pretest and posttest for two groups were Anhedonia Scale (Snaith et al., 1995) and the Emotional Expression Questionnaire (King & Emmons, 1990). To analyze the data, we used descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage) and inferential statistics (the Chi–square test to compare variables of gender, age, length of time since parental divorce and living status with the parent, and multivariate analysis of covariance) in software SPSS version 19. The significance level of the tests was considered 0.05.
Results: The results showed that after eliminating the effect of pretest scores, the unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment significantly changed both variables of anhedonia (p<0.001) and emotional expression (p<0.001) in the posttest in the children of divorce in the experimental group compared to the control group. In addition, based on the effect size, 64% of the changes in anhedonia and 69% of the changes in emotional expression were due to the trans diagnostic treatment.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the unified protocol for trans diagnostic treatment is effective in reducing anhedonia and increasing emotional expression in children of divorce. As a result, therapists and health professionals can use the trans diagnostic treatment to improve emotional characteristics, especially to reduce anhedonia and increase emotional expression.

Keywords: Emotional expression, Unified trans diagnostic treatment, Divorce, Anhedonia

Full-Text [PDF 444 kb] (435 Downloads)

Type of Study: Original Research Article | Subject: Rehabilitation

References

1. Raley RK, Sweeney MM. Divorce, repartnering, and stepfamilies: a decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2020;82(1):81–99. [DOI]

2. Poursardar F, Sadeghi M, Goodarzi C, Roozbehani M. Integrative treatments and couple therapy: comparison of the effectiveness of integrative approaches, therapy emotionally focused couple therapy and therapy integrative behavioral couple therapy on forgiveness in couples with marital conflict. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2019;8(2):69–96. [Persian] [Article]

3. D'Onofrio B, Emery R. Parental divorce or separation and children's mental health. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):100–1. [DOI]

4. Wu C, Lu J, Lu S, Huang M, Xu Y. Increased ratio of mature BDNF to precursor-BDNF in patients with major depressive disorder with severe anhedonia. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;126:92–7. [DOI]

5. Bodenschatz CM, Skopinceva M, Rub T, Kersting A, Suslow T. Face perception without subjective awareness-emotional expressions guide early gaze behavior in clinically depressed and healthy individuals. J Affect Disord. 2020;265:91–8. [DOI]

6. Cheng F, Wang Y, Zhao J, Wu X. Mothers' negative emotional expression and preschoolers' negative emotional regulation strategies in Beijing, China: the moderating effect of maternal educational attainment. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;84:74–81. [DOI]

7. Sakiris N, Berle D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the unified protocol as a transdiagnostic emotion regulation based intervention. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019;72:101751. [DOI]

8. García-Escalera J, Valiente RM, Sandín B, Ehrenreich-May J, Prieto A, Chorot P. The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders in adolescents (UP-A) adapted as a school-based anxiety and depression prevention program: an initial cluster randomized wait-list-controlled trial. Behavior Therapy. 2020;51(3):461–73. [DOI]

9. Steele SJ, Farchione TJ, Cassiello-Robbins C, Ametaj A, Sbi S, Sauer-Zavala S, et al. Efficacy of the Unified Protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of comorbid psychopathology accompanying emotional disorders compared to treatments targeting single disorders. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;104:211–6. [DOI]

10. Ghamarani A, Mohseni-Ezhiyeh A. The effectiveness of transdiagnostic treatment on anhedonia and gelotophobia in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder. J Res Behav Sci. 2017;15(1):13–20. [Persian] [Article]

11. Otared N, Mikaeili N, Mohajeri N, Vojoudi B. The effect of unified transdiagnostic treatment on anxiety disorders and comorbid depression: single-case design. J Health Chimes. 2017;4(4):54–62. [Persian] [Article]

12. Osmani H, Shokri L. Effectiveness of unified trans-diagnostic treatment on emotion’s cognitive regulation and cognitive empathy of students with externalized behavior disorder. Empowering Exceptional Children. 2019;10(1):125–36. [Persian] [Article]

13. Firoozi M, Biranvandi M. Integrate metacognition for cognitive emotional regulation in patients with cardiovascular. Yafte. 2018;20(2):93–102. [Persian] [Article]

14. Farchione TJ, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Boisseau CL, Thompson-Hollands J, Carl JR, et al. Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: a randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy. 2012;43(3):666–78. [DOI]

15. Solgi Z. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on insecure attachment, fear of intimacy, and addiction to social networks in teenagers with suicidal history. J Applied Psychology. 2018;11(4):535–55. [Persian] [Article]

16. Khalatbari J, Hashemi Golpayegani F. The effectiveness of integrated model of emotional focused approach and Gottman model on fear of intimacy and anxiety in infertile women. Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2018;13(48):27–36. [Persian] [Article]

17. Snaith RP, Hamilton M, Morley S, Humayan A, Hargreaves D, Trigwell P. A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;167(1):99–103. [DOI]

18. Siadatian S, Ghamarani A. The investigation of validity and reliability of Snaith–Hamilton Anhedonia Scale (Shaps) in the students of Isfahan university. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2013;12(10):807–18. [Persian] [Article]

19. King LA, Emmons RA. Conflict over emotional expression: psychological and physical correlates. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(5):864–77. [DOI]

20. Rafiinia P. Rabeteye sabk haye ebraz hayajan ba salamat omoumi dar daneshjouyan [the relationship between emotional expression styles and general health in students] [Thesis for MSc]. [Tehran, Iran]: Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University; 2002. [Persian]